Étoile review – a ballet show that’s absolutely not on pointe

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Étoile: A Ballet Series Struggles with Tone and Character Development"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The new series Étoile, created by Amy Sherman-Palladino and Daniel Palladino, attempts to explore the world of ballet through a narrative that combines elements of comedy and drama. The story revolves around two struggling ballet companies: Le Ballet National in Paris and the Metropolitan Ballet Theater in New York City. Both institutions are facing significant challenges in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic, compounded by contemporary issues such as anti-elitism and dwindling attention spans. To revitalize interest in ballet, the companies decide to swap their lead dancers and choreographers, launching a publicity campaign in hopes of reigniting public enthusiasm. However, the series struggles with its identity, often veering into whimsical territory without a clear direction or cohesive tone. The lead character, Geneviève, played by Charlotte Gainsbourg, is tasked with securing a deal with her former lover Jack, the head of the New York company, despite his distaste for the funding source. The plot thickens with the introduction of Cheyenne Toussaint, a passionate ballerina and environmental activist, and the neurotic choreographer Tobias Bell, who adds a comedic element to the narrative.

Despite its potential, Étoile suffers from tonal inconsistencies, with characters appearing to act in disparate shows rather than a unified production. The humor fails to land effectively, leaving the series in a limbo between comedy and drama. Instances of attempted satire fall flat, as the barbs are blunt and lack the finesse needed to resonate with viewers. While the show showcases the challenges dancers face, including the sacrifices they make, it fails to develop its characters sufficiently for the audience to invest in their journeys. The whimsical elements, such as a bull that cannot face the principal dancer due to her costume, detract from the genuine charm needed to captivate viewers, leaving Étoile feeling more like a collection of vignettes than a cohesive narrative. Ultimately, while the series offers glimpses of charm and humor, it is in desperate need of a stronger footing to truly engage with its audience, making it a lackluster addition to the Palladino's repertoire.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of "Étoile" paints a rather critical picture of the ballet show, indicating that it struggles to find its identity and purpose. The juxtaposition of a ballet narrative with contemporary issues, such as the difficulties faced by dance companies post-COVID, suggests an ambitious attempt to address modern challenges within the arts. However, the execution appears to falter, leaving audiences questioning the show's direction.

Purpose of the Article

The article aims to provide a critical evaluation of the ballet show "Étoile," highlighting its shortcomings in storytelling and character development. By drawing parallels to popular culture, such as the 80s series "Fame," the reviewer emphasizes the expectations that come with such comparisons and ultimately critiques the show for not delivering on them.

Perception Creation

The review seeks to shape the audience's perception of "Étoile" as a misguided attempt at blending high art with contemporary themes. The negative portrayal of key characters, like Geneviève and Jack, along with the cringe-worthy villain Crispin Shamblee, suggests that the production may lack depth and authenticity.

Potential Omissions

While the article highlights the flaws of "Étoile," it may downplay any positive aspects or potential merits of the show. By focusing primarily on the negative elements, it risks creating an unbalanced view that could overshadow any redeeming qualities present in the narrative.

Manipulative Elements

There is a degree of manipulation present in the article, primarily through its starkly negative tone and the emphasis on specific character flaws. This could lead readers to form a biased opinion about the show without considering it in a broader context or recognizing differing perspectives on its themes.

Truthfulness of the Review

The review appears to present genuine critiques of the show, based on the reviewer's observations. However, the subjective nature of reviews means that the truthfulness can vary depending on individual perspectives and tastes in performance art.

Societal Messaging

The article conveys a message that contemporary ballet struggles to resonate with modern audiences, potentially reflecting broader societal attitudes towards traditional art forms. It hints at the need for ballet to adapt in order to survive, which could provoke discussions about the future of the arts.

Comparative Connections

When comparing this review with others in the arts sector, there may be a trend of critical evaluations focusing on the intersection of traditional art and modern societal issues. This suggests a collective concern within the arts community about staying relevant.

Impacts on Society and Economy

Should the review influence public perception negatively, it could impact ticket sales and funding for similar productions. If audiences are dissuaded from attending, this may have broader implications for the arts economy, particularly in the wake of the pandemic.

Target Audience

The review seems to resonate more with audiences who have a critical view of contemporary adaptations of classical art forms. It may appeal to those who value authenticity and depth in performance, aligning itself with more traditional ballet aficionados.

Market Effects

While the review itself may not directly influence stock markets, the performance and reception of "Étoile" could impact the financial health of the ballet companies involved. Investors in arts-related ventures may take notice of public sentiment as reflected in reviews.

Geopolitical Relevance

The themes of funding from morally questionable sources, as represented by the character Crispin Shamblee, could speak to larger conversations about ethics in the arts and funding. However, the review's immediate relevance seems more aligned with cultural commentary than geopolitical dynamics.

Use of AI in the Review

It is unlikely that AI was used in crafting this review, as it reads with a distinctly human tone and critical perspective. The nuanced opinions and emotional language suggest a personal touch that is characteristic of human reviewers rather than AI-generated content.

Conclusion on Trustworthiness

This review, while critical and potentially biased, contains valid observations that could serve as a guide for audiences considering "Étoile." However, readers should approach it with an understanding that reviews are subjective and may not capture the full experience of the show.

Unanalyzed Article Content

At first, Étoile looks as if it’s shaping up to be Fame in pointe shoes. One character even knowingly quotes the “This is where you start paying, in sweat” speech. This would be fine – great, even, because who didn’t love the quintessential 80s series about the high-energy kids from New York City’s High School of the Performing Legwarmers? The problem is that, as the new venture from Gilmore Girls and The Marvelous Mrs Maisel creators Amy Sherman-Palladino and Daniel Palladino progresses, it doesn’t seem to be sure what it is. Apart from Whimsical with a capital W, an attitude that rarely works out well for anyone.

The setup is simple. Two dance companies – Le Ballet National in Paris and the Metropolitan Ballet Theater in New York City – are struggling after Covid and assorted other modern pressures such as anti-elitist attitudes and everybody’s terrible attention spans. So what if they swapped their top dancers and choreographers and launched a huge publicity campaign about it so everyone abandoned YouTube and became interested in ballet instead?

The head of the French company, Geneviève (Charlotte Gainsbourg, jarringly unconvincing in her first television role) has already secured funding for the project. All she needs is for her former lover and head of the New York company, Jack (Luke Kirby), to agree, even though the money is coming from a man he despises – arms and chemicals manufacturer Crispin Shamblee (Simon Callow, giving his Four Weddings and a Funeral turn an evil billionaire twist. He’s not quite twirling a moustache but it’s cringe-inducing nonetheless). But what are peacenik principles when you are a ballet company director who has just had to order ordinary champagne flutes (instead of the preferred etched) for the bar for cost reasons? Jack reluctantly agrees to the swap and they hammer out a deal. “It must happen! For ballet’s sake!”

The big draw is star ballerina Cheyenne Toussaint (Lou de Laâge). She is feisty, of course, and an ecowarrior in her spare time. Sofurieuseabout the swap is she that she turns up at Geneviève’s office straight from a protest on a fishing boat to tell her so, even though she is in a trawler’s jacket and stinks ofle poisson! But there is ballet’s sake to be considered, so off she must go. In her stead comes Mishi Duplessis (Taïs Vinolo), returning to her native France and the keep of her neglectful parents, one of whom is the minister for culture and delighted to have her back as a ballerina if not as a daughter.

Added to the mix is hapless neurotic and choreographer Tobias Bell (Gideon Glick, who provides much of the comedy that works on screen). He is sent from New York to Paris and is paralysed by the lack of Crest toothpaste there, and an unnamed cleaner’s unnamed child who practises alone at the Metropolitan at night using videos of classes her mother secretly records during the day. Cheyenne discovers her and a bond is formed, revealing the golden heart under the feisty exterior.

Étoile is … fine. It passes the time. But every person seems to be acting in a slightly different show from everyone else, and tonally it falls between any and every possible stool. There is a scattering of jokes per episode but it is not funny enough to be a comedy, not dramatic enough to be a drama (nor, on the basis of a seriously terrible speech Crispin gives to Cheyenne about the need for artists to prevent their humanity “floating out into the ether”, should it go further down this road), or frothy enough to be a soap.

Occasionally (see the etched champagne flutes), it seems to be aiming for satire but – perhaps because Sherman-Palladino is a former ballet dancer herself and loves the form – the barbs are blunt. We are clearly meant to root for various characters – especially Cheyenne – but they remain ciphers it is impossible to invest in. De Laâge does a wonderful line in apoplectic fury, but when this is all you do – and when lesser dancers literally cower from you as you march through a studio – it becomes a bit much.

And then there are all the bits of bolt-on whimsy, like the bull that is to be used in a production but must not face the principal dancer because of her red costume, which the designer refuses to change. These things strip the show of the easy charm it needs if it is to ape the Palladinos’ previous hits. Étoile may be a show about dancers, but it urgently needs to find its feet.

Étoile is on Prime Video now

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian