For people with chronic gynecological pain conditions, pain can be constant, making everyday activities like sitting, riding a bicycle and even wearing underwear extremely uncomfortable. For many of these people — most of whom identify as women — sexual intercourse and routine pelvic exams are unbearable. Endometriosis and vulvodynia, or chronic genital pain, are common gynecological conditions that can cause severe pain. They each affect about 1 in 10 American women. Yet many women face skepticism and gaslighting in health care settings when they seek care for this type of pain. READ MORE: Ovarian cysts can be painful when they burst. When do you need to see a doctor? We know this well through our research on social cognition and on how people with misunderstood health conditions manage difficult conversations with their doctors and family, as well as through volunteer work alongside people living with these conditions. We’ve consistently found that medical gaslighting around chronic gynecological pain is a complex societal problem, fueled by holes in medical research and training. ‘It’s all in your head’ A 2024 study of patients who went to a clinic for vulvovaginal pain — pain experienced in the external female genitals and vagina –- found that 45% of these patients had been told that they “just needed to relax more” and 39% were made to feel that they were “crazy.” A staggering 55% had considered giving up on seeking care. These results echo what one of us — Elizabeth Hintz — found in her 2023 meta-synthesis: Female patients with chronic pain conditions frequently hear this “it’s all in your head” response from doctors. Another study followed patients in two different major US cities who were seeking care for vulvovaginal pain. The researchers found that most patients saw multiple clinicians but never received a diagnosis. Given the challenges of seeking medical care, many patients turn to social media sources like Reddit for support and information. These studies, among others, illustrate how people with these conditions often spend years going to clinician after clinician seeking care and being told their pain is psychological or perhaps not even real. Given these experiences, why do patients keep seeking care? “Let me describe the pain that would drive me to try so many different doctors, tests and treatments,” a patient with vulvovaginal pain said to her doctor. For her, sex “is like taking your most sensitive area and trying to rip it apart.” “I can now wear any pants or underwear that I want with no pain,” said another patient after successful treatment. “I never realized how much of a toll the pain took on my body every day until it was gone.” Medical gaslighting Many patients worldwide experience medical gaslighting — a social phenomenon where a patient’s health concerns are not given appropriate medical evaluation and are instead downplayed, misattributed or dismissed outright. Medical gaslighting is rooted in centuries of gender bias in medicine. Women’s reproductive health issues have long been dismissed as psychological or “hysterical.” Genital and pelvic pain especially has been misattributed to psychological rather than biological causes: A century ago, Freudian psychoanalysts incorrectly believed that female sexual pain came from psychological complexes like penis envy. These historical views help shed light on why these symptoms are still not taken seriously today. Consequences of medical gaslighting In addition to the physical toll of untreated pain, medical gaslighting can take a psychological toll. Women may become isolated when other people do not believe their pain. Some internalize this disbelief and can begin to doubt their own perceptions of pain and even their sanity. This cycle of gaslighting compounds the burden of the pain and might lead to long-term psychological effects like anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress symptoms. For some, the repeated experience of being dismissed by clinicians erodes their sense of trust in the health care system. They might hesitate to seek medical attention in the future, fearing they will once again be dismissed. Although some chronic gynecological pain conditions like endometriosis are gaining public attention and becoming better understood, these dynamics persist. A funding crisis Part of the reason for the misunderstanding surrounding chronic gynecological pain conditions is the lack of research on them. A January report from the National Academies found that research on diseases disproportionately affecting women were underfunded compared with diseases disproportionately affecting men. This problem has gotten worse over time. The proportion of funding from the National Institutes of Health spent on women’s health has actually declined over the past decade. Despite these known disparities, in April the Trump administration threatened to end funding for the Women’s Health Initiative, a long-running women’s health research program, further worsening the problem. READ MORE: The Women’s Health Initiative has shaped women’s health for over 30 years, but its future is uncertain Without sustained federal funding for women’s health research, conditions like endometriosis and vulvodynia will remain poorly understood, leaving clinicians in the dark and patients stranded. Disparities in care As hard as it is for any female patient to have their pain believed and treated, gaining recognition for chronic pain is even harder for those who face discrimination based on class or race. One 2016 study found that half of the white medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences between Black and white patients, such as that Black people have physically thicker skin or less sensitive nerve endings than white people. The medical students and residents who endorsed these false beliefs also underestimated Black patients’ pain and offered them less accurate treatment recommendations. Studies show that women are more likely to develop chronic pain conditions and report more frequent and severe pain than men. But women are perceived as more emotional and thus less reliable in describing their pain than men. Consequently, female patients who describe the same symptoms as male patients are judged to be in less pain and are less likely to be offered pain relief, even in emergency settings and with female clinicians. Compared to male patients, female patients are more likely to be prescribed psychological care instead of pain medicine. These lingering erroneous beliefs about gender and race are key reasons patients’ pain is dismissed, misunderstood and ignored. The very real-life consequences for patients include delayed diagnosis, treatment and even death. Practical steps to disrupt medical gaslighting Correcting these problems will require a shift in clinical training, so as to challenge biased views about pain in women and racial minorities and to educate clinicians about common pain conditions like vulvodynia. Research suggests that medical training needs to teach students to better listen to patients’ lived experiences and admit when an answer isn’t known. In the meantime, people navigating the health care system can take practical steps when encountering dismissive care. They can educate themselves about chronic gynecological pain conditions by reading books like “When Sex Hurts: Understanding and Healing Pelvic Pain” or educational information from trusted sources like the International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health, the International Pelvic Pain Society and the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease. Although these steps do not address the roots of medical gaslighting, they can empower patients to better understand the medical conditions that could cause their symptoms, helping to counteract the effects of gaslighting. READ MORE: Endometriosis pain leads to missed school and work in two-thirds of women with the condition, new study finds If someone you know has experienced medical gaslighting and would like support, there are resources available. Organizations like The Endometriosis Association and the National Vulvodynia Association offer support networks and information — like how to find knowledgeable providers. Additionally, connecting with patient advocacy groups like Tight Lipped can provide opportunities for patients to engage in changing the health care system.
Women often face medical gaslighting for chronic gynecological pain, experts say
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Chronic Gynecological Pain in Women Often Dismissed in Healthcare Settings"
TruthLens AI Summary
Chronic gynecological pain conditions, such as endometriosis and vulvodynia, significantly affect the quality of life for many women, making everyday activities extremely uncomfortable. These conditions, which impact about 1 in 10 American women, can render sexual intercourse and routine pelvic exams unbearable. Unfortunately, when these women seek medical help, they often encounter skepticism and gaslighting from healthcare professionals. A 2024 study highlighted that a substantial number of patients reported being told to 'just relax' or feeling dismissed as 'crazy.' This dismissive attitude contributes to a staggering 55% of patients contemplating giving up on seeking care altogether. Research indicates that many women endure years of consultations with various clinicians without receiving a proper diagnosis, largely due to the prevailing notion that their pain is psychological. This phenomenon is exacerbated by societal biases that have historically marginalized women's reproductive health issues, leading to a lack of understanding and proper medical evaluation for chronic gynecological pain conditions.
The psychological consequences of medical gaslighting can be severe, resulting in feelings of isolation, self-doubt, and a loss of trust in the healthcare system. This cycle of disbelief can lead to long-term mental health issues like anxiety and depression. Furthermore, disparities in medical care are evident, particularly for women of color and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, who may face additional discrimination and bias. Research shows that women are often perceived as less credible when describing pain compared to men, leading to inadequate treatment options. The funding crisis for women's health research compounds these issues, as many chronic conditions affecting women remain underfunded and poorly understood. To combat medical gaslighting, experts suggest improvements in clinical training to address biases and promote better patient-provider communication. Empowering patients with knowledge about their conditions and connecting them with advocacy groups can also help mitigate the impact of gaslighting in healthcare settings.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article sheds light on the pressing issue of medical gaslighting faced by women suffering from chronic gynecological pain. It highlights the deep-seated societal and medical biases that often lead to women’s pain being dismissed or minimized by healthcare providers. This lack of recognition can have detrimental effects on the lives of those affected, as they often struggle to find proper diagnoses and treatments.
Purpose of the Article
The primary aim of this article is to raise awareness about the phenomenon of medical gaslighting, particularly in the context of gynecological pain conditions like endometriosis and vulvodynia. By presenting statistics and personal anecdotes, it seeks to inform readers about the challenges women face in obtaining appropriate care. This effort is likely intended to advocate for better education and training among healthcare providers regarding women's health issues.
Societal Perception
The article aims to create empathy and understanding within the community regarding the experiences of women suffering from chronic pain. By sharing statistics and personal experiences, it seeks to challenge the stigma and skepticism that often surrounds women's health issues, thus promoting a more supportive environment for those affected.
Potential Omissions
There is a possibility that the article does not address alternative perspectives or solutions that could be considered to improve the situation. For example, it may not provide insights into effective advocacy efforts or highlight successful patient-provider communication strategies, which could empower readers further.
Manipulative Aspects
The article does employ emotionally charged language such as "gaslighting" and "it's all in your head," which can evoke strong reactions from readers. While the intention appears to be to highlight an important issue, the use of such terminology may also be seen as manipulative, aiming to provoke outrage and concern among the audience.
Reliability and Truthfulness
The article presents data from studies and expert opinions, which lends it a degree of credibility. However, the focus on negative experiences without offering a balanced view may lead some readers to question the overall reliability. The statistics cited are alarming and suggest a significant problem exists, but they could also portray the healthcare system as entirely flawed without acknowledging any positive developments.
Comparative Context
When compared to other reports on women's health, this article aligns with broader discussions around gender bias in medicine. It reflects a growing recognition of the need for systemic change, similar to other articles addressing disparities in healthcare treatment based on gender.
Impact on Society
The potential societal impact of this article could include increased advocacy for better healthcare practices, policies aimed at addressing gender bias, and more funding for research into women's health conditions. In the long term, this may lead to improved healthcare outcomes for women, but it could also provoke backlash from those who deny the existence of gender bias in medicine.
Community Support
The article is likely to resonate with feminist groups, women's health advocates, and individuals who have experienced similar challenges. It aims to engage those who are already aware of or affected by women's health issues while encouraging broader societal support.
Market Implications
While the article may not directly influence stock markets or specific companies, it could create a ripple effect in the healthcare sector, potentially impacting companies focused on women's health products and services. Increased awareness may lead to higher demand for innovative treatments and solutions.
Global Relevance
The issues discussed are relevant in the context of global conversations about healthcare equity and gender bias. The article connects to ongoing debates about women's rights and health access, making it pertinent to current discussions in many parts of the world.
AI Involvement
It is plausible that AI tools were employed in drafting or editing the article to refine its structure or language. Such tools could assist in ensuring clarity or enhancing engagement. However, the article's emotional tone suggests a human touch in conveying urgency and empathy.
In conclusion, while the article effectively highlights a critical issue affecting many women, its reliance on emotionally charged language and focus on negative experiences could be viewed as manipulating public sentiment. Nevertheless, the data presented lends it credibility, raising important questions about the treatment of chronic pain conditions in women. The overall reliability is moderate, but the emotional resonance is significant, calling for action and awareness in women's healthcare.