Spain beat England in the 2023 final to win their first Women's World Cup "Fifa was right." That's how president Gianni Infantino described his organisation's decision to expand the Women's World Cup from 16 teams to 32 for the 2023 tournament. Less than two years later Fifa has announced plans for further expansion. The women's tournament will follow the lead of the men's World Cup andbecome a 48-team competition from 2031. But is Fifa right this time? BBC Sport looks at the pros and cons of an expanded Women's World Cup. The 2023 World Cup in Australia and New Zealand, which featured eight new teams, threw up plenty of surprises. It was a successful tournament for African nations, with underdogs Morocco, South Africa and Nigeria - ranked 72, 54 and 40 in the world respectively - reaching the last 16. Morocco's progression came at the expense of two-time champions Germany, who went out at the group stages a year after reaching the Euro 2022 final. Zambia, ranked 81st, were the lowest-ranked team to qualify. While they suffered 5-0 losses to Japan and Spain, they finished third in their group thanks to a 3-1 win over Costa Rica, who were ranked 44 places higher. Nigeria, 40th in the rankings, lost to eventual runners-up England in a penalty shootout in the last 16. Of the 32 teams, only three failed to earn a single point - Costa Rica, Haiti and Vietnam - and only Vietnam failed to score. There were some one-sided scorelines, though, including the Netherlands firing seven past Vietnam and Norway thrashing the Philippines 6-0. Only 44 nations have played in a Women's World Cup. With the tournament expanding by 16 teams, there will be more qualifying places allocated to each of the six Fifa continental zones. That could provide an extra incentive for governments and national football associations - particularly from smaller nations who have not competed on the world stage - to invest in the women's game. US Soccer chief executive JT Batson said the expansion of the 2031 tournament - set to be held in the US - would be "incredible for growing the women's game". "One of the things we hear from folks who lead federations around the world is they view the Women's World Cup as an opportunity for them to, one, make a World Cup and, two, really go compete in a way that conceivably they wouldn't be able to on the men's side,"Batson said.,external "So what this would lead to in terms of spurring investment all around the world in women's and girls' soccer, we think would be incredible." England manager Sarina Wiegman said she had reservations about expanding from 24 teams to 32 for the 2023 edition. However, she changed her mind after the tournament, saying more teams "made it more competitive". "It will grow the game again in different countries because they have other opportunities to come and still have challenges to overcome," Wiegman said. "Some countries are at different stages of their development, so it will empower women in sport, women in football and women in society." From a UK perspective, more qualifying places would give the home nations a better chance of reaching a tournament on home soil in 2035. While England have established themselves as one of the world's best teams, Scotland and the Republic of Ireland have played in only one World Cup, and Wales and Northern Ireland have never qualified. Wales and Scotland lost in the play-off finals for the 2023 tournament. Wales missed out on a first major tournament when Switzerland scored a late extra-time winner in the play-off finals for the 2023 World Cup When it was announced that the men's World Cup would expand to 48 teams, the immediate concerns were that the competition would be diluted. The same questions have been asked of an expanded Women's World Cup and there are worries that one-sided scorelines and a gulf in quality would devalue the women's game and turn off television audiences. "There is the fear it might dilute some of the competition," said former England goalkeeper Karen Bardsley. She also highlighted player welfare and adding to an already busy football calendar as possible downsides to an expanded tournament. "There's probably also an element of will the tournament be longer? You're going to see a massive increase in games," she said. "Will there be an increase in rest periods? How is that going to affect the domestic calendar? How is that going to affect the player loading and recovery?" Qualifying for a World Cup does not guarantee that federations will fully support their women's teams, with the 2023 edition featuring a number of teams, such as Jamaica, who faced battles off the pitch andpublicly criticised their federationover facilities and preparation. Bardsley said there must be a "real emphasis on developing the game" if the tournament expands to 48 teams. "There is time but it's going to have to really be prioritised and accelerated," she said. Fifa launched its Women's Football Strategy in 2018 and set a goal of having 60 million girls and women playing football across the globe by 2027. Within its objectives, Fifa aims to ensure all 211 of its members have comprehensive women's football strategies. Through its Women's Development Programme, Fifa also offers its members the opportunity to apply for and access additional resources and specialist expertise to develop women's football. "It's going to be a tall order, but if Fifa serious about this investing in the women's game now, you'll see a massive benefit by 2035," Bardsley said. For the teams who do qualify, Fifa has previously promised tomatch the prize moneyon offer at the men's World Cup for the 2027 tournament. The first time we will see a 48-team tournament is next year's men's World Cup in Canada, Mexico and the US. At first, Fifa suggested a group-stage format that included 16 groups of three teams, with the top two from each group going through. But that caused controversy because the sides playing in the final group game could play out a result that enabled both to go through at the expense of the other team. After widespread criticism and a thrilling four-team group stage in Qatar at the 2022 men's World Cup, Fifa revised its plans. The 48 teams will be drawn into 12 groups of four with the top two from each - along with the eight best third-placed nations - advancing to a 32-team knockout stage. There has been no indication yet as to whether a women's tournament would follow the same format. The number of games will rise from 64 in a 32-team competition to 104 with 48 teams, which is likely to mean a longer tournament. The 2026 men's World Cup is set to last 10 days longer than in 2022. This article was first published on 10 April 2025.
Will 48-team Women's World Cup be good for the game?
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"FIFA Plans to Expand Women's World Cup to 48 Teams by 2031"
TruthLens AI Summary
The expansion of the Women's World Cup from 32 to 48 teams, set to begin in 2031, has sparked a significant debate about its potential impact on women's football. FIFA President Gianni Infantino hailed the previous expansion as a success after Spain won their first title in 2023, which featured a diverse lineup of teams that included several underdogs from Africa reaching the knockout stages. Notable performances came from Morocco, South Africa, and Nigeria, indicating an increase in competitiveness among teams traditionally considered underrepresented in global tournaments. The expansion aims to provide more opportunities for countries to participate and invest in women's football, a sentiment echoed by officials and coaches alike. US Soccer's chief executive, JT Batson, emphasized the importance of this growth for smaller nations and the overall development of the women's game, suggesting it could lead to increased investment and interest worldwide.
However, the move to expand raises concerns about maintaining the quality of competition. Critics, including former England goalkeeper Karen Bardsley, worry that the influx of teams might dilute the tournament's competitive edge, potentially leading to one-sided matches that could deter viewers. There are also logistical challenges to consider, such as player welfare and the impact on domestic football calendars due to the increased number of games. The need for comprehensive support and development strategies for women's teams is crucial, as highlighted by instances where teams like Jamaica faced significant off-field difficulties despite qualifying for the tournament. FIFA's ongoing initiatives, including its Women's Football Strategy, aim to enhance the sport's infrastructure and ensure sustainable growth. As the anticipation builds for the 2031 tournament, the focus will be on how FIFA manages this expansion while fostering a competitive and inclusive environment for women's football worldwide.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The expansion of the Women's World Cup to 48 teams is a significant development that raises various questions about the future of women's football. This article delves into this topic, exploring the implications of such a change following the recent success of the tournament in Australia and New Zealand.
Potential Benefits of Expansion
The article emphasizes several positive aspects of expanding the Women's World Cup. One main benefit is the increased representation of nations, particularly from regions that have historically been underrepresented in international football. The success of African teams in the 2023 tournament, especially Morocco reaching the last 16, demonstrates the potential for growth and competitiveness in women's football across diverse countries. The expansion offers opportunities for national football associations, particularly from smaller nations, to invest in women's programs and enhance their competitiveness on the global stage.
Concerns and Drawbacks
However, the article also highlights some concerns regarding the expansion. There is a fear that increasing the number of teams may dilute the quality of competition, leading to more one-sided matches, as seen with some scorelines in the recent tournament. Critics may argue that while more teams participating is beneficial for inclusivity, it could also result in a less compelling viewing experience for fans. The balance between expanding the tournament and maintaining high standards of play is a delicate one.
Public Perception and Impact on Women's Football
The narrative around this expansion effort may shape public perception of women's football. There’s a potential for it to be seen as a "growth initiative," aiming to elevate the sport globally. However, it could also add pressure on underperforming teams to meet expectations. This article seeks to portray a balanced view, acknowledging both the optimistic and cautious perspectives from various stakeholders in the football community.
Connection to Broader Trends in Sports
The decision to expand the Women's World Cup mirrors trends seen in men's football and other sports where inclusivity and representation are increasingly prioritized. It is indicative of a broader movement in sports to promote gender equity, encouraging investments in women's sports. This could lead to significant changes in how women’s football is perceived and funded in the coming years.
Economic and Political Implications
The expansion could have far-reaching effects on local economies and political landscapes, particularly in nations that may gain qualification. Increased visibility and success in women's football can lead to greater support for women in sports, potentially influencing policy and funding. This could also shift the dynamics of international football, with smaller nations gaining more prominence.
Target Audiences
This article likely appeals to a diverse audience, including sports enthusiasts, policymakers, and advocates for women's rights in sports. It aims to engage those who support the growth of women’s sports and those who are skeptical about the implications of such expansions.
Trustworthiness of the Reporting
The article is presented with a factual basis, citing specific outcomes from the 2023 Women's World Cup and expert opinions. However, the emphasis on potential benefits may lean towards a more optimistic perspective, which can influence the reader's understanding of the complexities involved in such a decision.