“How can you talk to those crazy people?” I get asked that question a lot. Over the last few years, I’ve spoken to hundreds — possibly thousands — of Americans whose lives have become consumed by conspiracy theories. It’s easy, perhaps natural, for us to want to label them all as “crazy.” But it’s not true. The overwhelming majority of people I have spoken to are highly productive members of society. They are moms, dads, business owners — they’re your next-door neighbor, your son, your daughter. They are disillusioned, disaffected, and in some cases they are desperate. But they are not crazy. They include the many Americans who don’t believe Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, as well as a group of people I once met who don’t even believe JFK is dead. In fact, most of us hold some form of conspiracy theory or superstitious belief that others might consider absurd. This kind of thinking can give us a sense of security by providing easy answers to difficult questions — certainty in uncertain times. It can provide a sense of purpose and community, a kinship among those who understand the “truth” or at least are on our side. An apparent antidote for an era of declining trust in institutions for an age when we are spending less time with each other and more time alone with our phones. Fear and isolation: It’s why conspiracy theories flourished during the Covid-19 pandemic lockdowns. But for many families, the rabbit holes of 2020 are not a distant memory, they’re an ongoing reality. A loved one coming to the kitchen table every night repeating bizarre claims about vaccines and cabals, becoming increasingly frustrated as their families fail to embrace their newfound “truth.” Every time I do a story about these kinds of beliefs I receive emails, messages, and hear from people on the street about their brother, their mom, their friend who’s stuck down the rabbit hole. Their question for me is always the same: “How can I help them?” I never really had an answer. As a journalist on the misinformation beat, I viewed my job more as covering the phenomena of conspiracy theories, how they spread and how they affect people. Occasionally my editor at CNN, perhaps distraught by the seemingly infiniteness of the subject matter, would ask if there were any solutions we could include at the end of a story to make it “less depressing.” There weren’t. But in Persuadable, a new limited series podcast from CNN Audio, we try to start a productive conversation about solutions. Step One is empathy. After years of talking to people with irrational beliefs, I began to think about some of my own. I don’t believe in QAnon or the cabal. But I’ve had no shortage of irrational thoughts and obsessions. I’ve long grappled with mental health issues — anxiety, depression, and a particular form of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) that prompts distressing intrusive thoughts. In my case, irrational beliefs pop up during times of personal uncertainty, stress, or change, and are normally rooted in a false sense of guilt and reasons why I ought to hate myself — thought patterns that are familiar to many who suffer from depression. If a family member gets sick, I can ruminate and convince myself that it is somehow my fault. It’s clearly irrational but at times I can spend days or weeks obsessing about this and telling myself that it is true. It’s important to point out here you needn’t have mental health issues to hold irrational beliefs. I’m sure you can think of a time where you fell into a cycle of over-thinking something — maybe about a partner or an ex, or a situation at work, or something about your kid. You couldn’t stop thinking about it and the more you thought about it the more stressed you became. Then it turned out to be nothing. Looking back, you can see the thought was irrational in the first place — but it was probably fueled by a genuine fear or insecurity. Indeed, psychologists I spoke to for this podcast explained how humans are wired to have irrational beliefs and that believing in conspiracy theories doesn’t mean someone has a mental illness. I bring up my mental health experience because for me it is a way to unlock my own empathy for people who are mired in a world of conspiracy theories. I’ve spoken through the years to a few people who’ve gone down the QAnon rabbit hole and come back out. They describe the fear, uncertainty, and struggles in their own lives that drove them to seek meaning and purpose in the first place. The brief relief they felt when they first thought they’d found a truth that made sense to them — before eventually realizing they’d need to go deeper and deeper into the lies to maintain that false sense of security, spiraling to a point where they thought they could never come back. Most of us have hit similar lows in our lives — they just aren’t framed by QAnon and the belief our country is ruled by an evil cabal. The people who’ve been able to get back out of the pit of despair and disinformation have all described one thing that was critical to allowing them to do so: a friend. Having someone in their life who was willing to give them the space to come back with dignity and not be treated as a fool for the views they once espoused. That can be extremely difficult because oftentimes that someone is the person who had to sit and listen to the former believer’s nonsensical QAnon talking points for months or years on end. Without creating that space, however, we risk giving our loved ones nowhere else to go but further into the conspiracy theory — where there is a community, albeit one built around a lie. There are so many things that make it difficult or impossible to reach empathy here. Not least, many rabbit holes are lined with hate, racism, antisemitism, and homophobia. How can you have empathy for someone who buys into a conspiracy theory that threatens a community of which you are a member? There are no straightforward answers — but this is my attempt to try to at least start a solution-oriented conversation about an issue that affects an untold number of families in the United States and all around the world. I am not a perfect messenger. There are plenty of times through the years I wish I had approached a believer in a conspiracy theory differently. Television news is not necessarily the best medium to unpack the sometimes-complicated reasons someone has arrived at their belief in a lie. Trust in the so-called “mainstream media,” of which I am a part, is at an all-time low. Some of that is due to relentless attacks on the press, often from people acting in bad faith. But some of it is also rooted in fair criticism about how we cover and how we talk about people who believe things that are wrong. I hope you listen to our podcast where we can talk about this a lot more.
Why it’s time we change how we talk about conspiracy theories
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"A Call for Empathy in Conversations About Conspiracy Theories"
TruthLens AI Summary
In recent years, the conversation surrounding conspiracy theories has gained significant traction, prompting a need for a more empathetic approach to understanding those who subscribe to them. Many individuals who fall into the realm of conspiracy theorizing are not the stereotypical 'crazy' people; rather, they are ordinary, productive members of society who are often disillusioned or desperate. This includes parents, business owners, and everyday individuals who may hold beliefs that range from questioning historical events like the assassination of JFK to more contemporary theories surrounding COVID-19. The rise of conspiracy theories can be attributed to a combination of factors, including a decline in trust towards institutions and a growing sense of isolation, particularly exacerbated during the pandemic lockdowns. Families often find themselves grappling with loved ones who have become entrenched in these beliefs, leading to frustration and confusion about how to engage with them productively.
The podcast "Persuadable" attempts to address this issue by initiating a dialogue on the importance of empathy when discussing conspiracy theories. The host reflects on their own experiences with irrational beliefs stemming from mental health challenges, highlighting that such thoughts can emerge during times of personal turmoil. It is crucial to recognize that believing in conspiracy theories does not inherently indicate mental illness; rather, it is a part of the human condition to seek explanations for life's uncertainties. The podcast includes insights from individuals who have managed to extricate themselves from conspiracy theories, emphasizing the role of supportive friends who provide a safe space for dialogue without ridicule. The challenge lies in fostering this empathy, especially when conspiracy theories can often be intertwined with harmful ideologies. Ultimately, the goal is to shift the narrative from judgment to understanding, thereby opening pathways for more constructive conversations about misinformation and belief systems that affect countless families worldwide.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article delves into the complex and often troubling world of conspiracy theories, emphasizing the need for a more compassionate and understanding approach when discussing individuals who hold such beliefs. The author highlights that many of these individuals are not "crazy" but are instead disillusioned and searching for meaning in a chaotic world. This framing suggests a desire to shift the narrative surrounding conspiracy theories from one of ridicule to one of empathy and understanding.
Understanding Conspiracy Theories and Their Hold on Individuals
The piece argues that conspiracy theories can provide a sense of security and community, especially during uncertain times. This is particularly relevant in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where fear and isolation led many to delve deeper into these beliefs. The author’s observations indicate that these theories can be a coping mechanism, fulfilling emotional needs that are often unmet in modern society.
Public Perception and Stigma
The author aims to challenge the stigma associated with those who believe in conspiracy theories. By presenting them as productive members of society, the narrative seeks to foster a more inclusive dialogue. This approach could help reduce the alienation felt by those who subscribe to such beliefs, promoting understanding over division.
Hidden Agendas or Information
While the article itself does not overtly conceal information, its empathetic framing raises questions about broader societal narratives. There is an implication that mainstream media often dismisses or ridicules those with conspiracy beliefs, potentially obscuring underlying issues of mistrust in institutions. This could suggest that there are larger systemic problems at play that need addressing, rather than merely labeling individuals as irrational.
Evaluating Manipulative Elements
The article's manipulative aspect lies in its language and framing. While it advocates for understanding, it also subtly suggests that the audience should reconsider their preconceived notions about conspiracy theorists. This can lead to a form of cognitive dissonance where readers may be challenged to confront their biases, potentially leading to a shift in public perception.
Trustworthiness of the Content
The insights presented are grounded in the author's personal experiences and observations, which lends credibility. However, the subjective nature of the narrative can introduce bias. While the article is thought-provoking and offers a fresh perspective, it is essential to approach it with a critical mindset, considering the potential for confirmation bias in the portrayal of conspiracy theorists.
Societal Implications
The discussion around conspiracy theories has profound implications for society, especially in terms of trust in institutions and communal relationships. As isolation increases in modern life, the need for community and belonging drives many towards these theories. This could lead to further fragmentation in society if not addressed through open dialogue and understanding.
Target Audience and Community Support
The article resonates particularly with those who may have loved ones affected by conspiracy theories or those who are involved in social and psychological support communities. It aims to engage a broader audience by appealing to shared values of empathy and understanding, rather than division.
Influence on Markets or Global Dynamics
While the article does not directly address financial implications, the growing belief in conspiracy theories can have indirect effects on markets, particularly in sectors like pharmaceuticals and technology. Companies that are perceived as part of the "establishment" may face backlash or shifts in consumer behavior influenced by conspiracy beliefs.
Contextual Relevance
In today's climate of misinformation and increasing polarization, the article's themes are highly relevant. The conversation around trust, community, and shared truth is crucial in navigating contemporary issues, including public health and political discourse.
Potential Use of AI in Content Creation
It is possible that AI tools were utilized in crafting the article, especially in generating structured arguments and synthesizing various perspectives. Such models might have enhanced the clarity and flow of the narrative, emphasizing emotional resonance while maintaining a logical framework.
Ultimately, this article presents a nuanced perspective on a challenging topic, advocating for understanding and empathy rather than judgment. The approach encourages readers to reflect on their biases and consider the broader societal implications of conspiracy theories.