Kashmir has been a source of conflict between India and Pakistan for decades Nuclear-armed neighbours India and Pakistan have fought two wars and a limited conflict over Kashmir. But why do they dispute the territory - and how did it start? Kashmir is an ethnically diverse Himalayan region famed for the beauty of its lakes, meadows and snow-capped mountains. Even before India and Pakistan won their independence from Britain in August 1947, the area was hotly contested. Under the partition plan provided by the Indian Independence Act, Muslim-majority Kashmir was free to accede to either India or Pakistan. The maharaja (local ruler), Hari Singh, initially wanted Kashmir to become independent - but in October 1947 chose to join India, in return for its help against an invasion of tribesmen from Pakistan. Kashmir profile - Timeline A war erupted and India asked the United Nations to intervene. The UN recommended holding a plebiscite to settle the question of whether the state would join India or Pakistan. However, the two countries could not agree to a deal to demilitarise the region before the referendum could be held. In July 1949, India and Pakistan signed an agreement to establish a ceasefire line as recommended by the UN and the region became divided. Kashmir is known by some as India's Switzerland, due to its verdant fields and sweeping mountainscapes A second war followed in 1965. Then in 1999, India fought a brief but bitter conflict with Pakistani-backed forces. By that time, India and Pakistan were declared nuclear powers. Today, Delhi and Islamabad both claim Kashmir in full, but control only parts of it. Within Kashmir, opinions about the territory's rightful allegiance are diverse and strongly held. Many do not want it to be governed by India, preferring either independence or union with Pakistan instead. Religion is one factor: Jammu and Kashmir is more than 60% Muslim, making it the only part of India where Muslims are in the majority. An armed revolt has been waged against Indian rule in the region since 1989, claiming tens of thousands of lives. India accuses Pakistan of backing militants in Kashmir - a charge its neighbour denies. In 2019, Indian-administered Kashmir was stripped of its semi-autonomous status by the government in Delhi amid a huge security crackdown. For several years after, the revocation of the region's special status, militancy waned and tourist visits soared. What happened after previous Kashmir militant attacks? In 2016, after 19 Indian soldiers were killed in Uri, India launched "surgical strikes" across the Line of Control - the de facto border between India and Pakistan - targeting alleged militant bases. In 2019, the Pulwama bombing, which left more than 40 Indian paramilitary personnel dead, prompted Indian airstrikes deep into Balakot - the first such action inside Pakistan since 1971 - sparking retaliatory raids and an aerial dogfight. Tensions rose again in April 2025 after years of relative calm when militants killed 26 people in an attack on tourists near the resort town of Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir. It was the deadliest attack on civilians in two decades. India responded two weeks later with missile strikes on targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, once again raising fears of further escalation and calls for restraint. Kashmir remains one of the most militarised zones in the world. India and Pakistan did agree a ceasefire in 2003. In 2014, India's current Prime Minister Narendra Modi came to power promising a tough line on Pakistan, but also showed interest in holding peace talks. Pakistan and India's prime ministers promised peace in 2014 Nawaz Sharif, then prime minister of Pakistan, attended Modi's swearing-in ceremony in Delhi. But a year later, India blamed Pakistan-based groups for an attack on its airbase in Pathankot in the northern state of Punjab. Modi also cancelled a scheduled visit to the Pakistani capital, Islamabad, for a regional summit in 2017. Since then, there hasn't been any progress in talks between the neighbours.
Why India and Pakistan fight over Kashmir
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Understanding the Longstanding Conflict Over Kashmir Between India and Pakistan"
Bbc News
7.8
TruthLens AI Summary
Kashmir has long been a flashpoint of conflict between India and Pakistan, a dispute rooted in historical, political, and religious complexities. The region, known for its stunning landscapes and ethnic diversity, became contested territory even before the partition of British India in 1947. Under the partition plan, the Muslim-majority state of Kashmir had the option to join either India or Pakistan. Initially, the local ruler, Maharaja Hari Singh, sought to maintain independence, but in October 1947, he chose to accede to India in exchange for military assistance against an invasion by Pakistani tribesmen. This decision led to the first war between the two nations, prompting India to seek United Nations intervention. The UN proposed a plebiscite to determine Kashmir's future, but the lack of agreement on demilitarization stalled any progress. By July 1949, a ceasefire line was established, effectively dividing Kashmir into parts controlled by India and Pakistan. Over the years, further conflicts ensued, including a second war in 1965 and a brief conflict in 1999, as both countries emerged as nuclear powers. Presently, both nations claim Kashmir in its entirety while controlling only segments of it, and opinions within Kashmir regarding its allegiance remain deeply polarized.
The situation in Kashmir has been exacerbated by an armed insurgency against Indian governance that has persisted since 1989, resulting in significant loss of life. India accuses Pakistan of supporting militant groups in the region, a claim that Pakistan denies. The status of Kashmir was further complicated in 2019 when the Indian government revoked its semi-autonomous status, leading to increased military presence and security measures. Despite a ceasefire agreement in 2003, tensions have remained high, with sporadic violence and military confrontations continuing to erupt. Recent incidents, such as a deadly attack on tourists in April 2025, have reignited fears of escalation between the two nuclear-armed countries. While there have been attempts at dialogue, particularly during the early years of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration, relations have soured, and no significant progress towards peace has been achieved since a 2017 attack on an Indian airbase. The Kashmir conflict remains one of the most militarized and contentious issues in contemporary geopolitics, with no clear resolution in sight.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The news article presents a historical overview of the ongoing conflict over Kashmir between India and Pakistan, touching on key events that have shaped the territorial dispute. It highlights the complex interplay of political, ethnic, and religious factors contributing to the region's unrest.
Underlying Intent of the Article
The article aims to inform readers about the historical context of the Kashmir conflict, potentially fostering a better understanding of its complexities. The detailed recounting of events from 1947 to the present indicates an effort to shed light on the reasons behind the continued strife between the two nuclear-armed neighbors. The choice to mention the diversity of opinions within Kashmir suggests a desire to present a nuanced view rather than a one-sided narrative.
Public Perception and Narrative Framing
By emphasizing the diverse demographics and opinions within Kashmir, the article may seek to cultivate empathy towards the region's inhabitants and their struggles. It subtly encourages readers to consider the implications of governance and identity in a territory marked by division. The narrative could influence public perception by framing the issue as one that requires a deeper understanding rather than merely a geopolitical conflict.
Potential Omissions and Hidden Agendas
While the article provides a substantial amount of historical detail, it may downplay the recent developments and current humanitarian crises in Kashmir. By focusing heavily on the historical context, there is a risk of overlooking the immediate challenges faced by the local population, such as human rights violations and political repression. This could indicate a desire to avoid discussing these sensitive issues in greater depth, thus shaping a less critical view of the situation.
Manipulative Aspects and Credibility
The article appears to be largely factual, relying on historical events and established timelines to support its claims. However, its framing can be perceived as somewhat manipulative, particularly in how it delineates the narrative of Kashmir's rightful allegiance. By not fully addressing the contemporary implications of the conflict, it may unintentionally serve specific political narratives. The manipulative aspect is moderate, primarily stemming from selective emphasis rather than outright misinformation.
Comparative Context with Other Reports
When compared to other reports on Kashmir, this article aligns with a broader tendency to focus on historical grievances while often neglecting recent developments. Many sources cover Kashmir in a similar historical context; however, some prioritize the human rights aspects more heavily. The underlying connection here could indicate a media trend that favors a historical narrative over current events.
Impact on Society and Economy
The ongoing conflict over Kashmir has significant implications for regional stability, which in turn affects economic prospects and foreign relations. As tensions escalate, there could be repercussions on trade and investment in both India and Pakistan, affecting markets and potentially leading to increased military expenditure.
Support from Specific Communities
This article is likely to resonate more with audiences interested in international relations, history, and South Asian politics. It may attract readers who are sympathetic to the plight of Kashmiris or those seeking a deeper understanding of the complexities of regional disputes.
Market and Global Implications
In terms of financial markets, heightened tensions over Kashmir could lead to volatility in stock prices, particularly for companies with interests in defense or energy sectors. The geopolitical nature of the conflict makes it relevant for investors monitoring risk factors in South Asia.
Geopolitical Relevance
The article has significant relevance to the current global power dynamics, especially in the context of rising tensions in South Asia. The Kashmir issue remains a focal point in discussions about nuclear stability and regional security, making it pertinent to contemporary geopolitical considerations.
AI Involvement in Article Composition
There is no clear indication that artificial intelligence played a role in the article's composition. However, if AI were to be involved, it might have influenced the structure and delivery of information, focusing on clarity and engagement. The overall approach seems human-generated, emphasizing historical narrative without overtly digital characteristics.
Trustworthiness of the Article
The article is generally credible, relying on well-documented historical events and established timelines. While it may possess some biases in its framing, the factual basis appears sound, making it a reliable source for understanding the Kashmir conflict's historical context.