Blind content creator and TikTok star Lucy Edwards says she's "so excited" to be on a health kick to undergo IVF for gene editing purposes, but reveals the dilemma she faced in deciding to screen out the very gene that made her blind. "I'm so broody," the 29-year-old tells theBBC Access All podcast. Lucy and her husband Ollie married at Kew Gardens two years ago and are now ready to start a family - but there are complications to consider. Lucy has the rare genetic condition Incontinentia Pigmenti (IP) and lost her sight due to this aged 17, just months after meeting Ollie. The condition runs through the female line - Lucy's mum has IP although isn't blind, her Grandma did too and her great-aunt was blind in one eye. Lucy is totally blind, but, if she had been a boy, she may not have survived. The abnormal IP gene is located on the X chromosome. Women have two X chromosomes, while males have X and Y, meaning the appearance of the gene can be more catastrophic in male pregnancies. "My grandma actually had nine miscarriages," Lucy says. This is one of the facts that played into the complicated decision Lucy and Ollie made to opt for pre-implantation genetic testing, a special type of IVF where embryos are created outside of the body and screened for the genetic condition. Only those embryos which are not affected by the condition are placed back into the womb. Without medical intervention, Lucy says there would be four potential outcomes to any pregnancy she carried: A healthy and unaffected boy or girl, an affected boy she would likely miscarry or who would be born with severe brain damage or an affected girl. She pauses, then laughs: "That sounds horrible, doesn't it? That's me." And that's the quandary. IVF will edit out the very thing that has made Lucy who she is today - a journalist, advocate, author and broadcaster. It is an emotive topic of debate. The most well-known conversation is around Down's syndrome and the number of women who choose to abort a pregnancy once their baby is tested and diagnosed as having the condition. The question is around the value people place on other peoples' lives which may not look like our own. In 2021 campaigner Heidi Crowter, who herself has Down's syndrome, challenged legislation allowing foetuses with the condition to be aborted up until birth. She took her case to the High Court arguing the rules were discriminatory to disabled people who could live a good life. She lost the case and the subsequent argument she made at the Court of Appeal. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) later rejected it as well, but Heidi continues to campaign to have the law overturned. It is something Lucy is very aware of and she and her husband have spent a long time considering. "It's understanding that it is removing that part of me that makes me, me," Lucy says. "It's such a personal decision and I know that I'm opening myself up for possible designer baby discussions, but I know I'm doing it for the right reasons." Lucy says first being diagnosed with IP and then losing her sight as a teenager were both traumatic events and she wants to minimise the likelihood of miscarriage to limit any future traumatic load. She says she found it impossible to "knowingly" consider having a baby naturally once she knew the science was available to give a baby the healthiest start possible. "If I had a baby and, unknowingly, I had a gorgeous, gorgeous baby with disabilities, I would be so thankful, so happy and amazed but knowingly having this gene? That's why we're having IVF." IP doesn't just cause blindness, it can also cause severe epilepsy and more difficult outcomes. Lucy says having the option to ensure complications were not passed on felt like both a responsibility and a privilege previous generations did not have. "Whether we like it or not, we have to be responsible here. Maybe a responsible issue for you, if you have IP or another genetic disorder, is to have a child naturally and we are not judging you in any shape or form, this is just our decision." In response to their openness around this decision comments were overwhelmingly positive from Lucy's fans which she thinks might be because she is so "disability positive" in her everyday life - "I love being blind," she frequently states. But Lucy says responses have been different around the world. When she was working in Japan and her content was reaching audiences unfamiliar with her story, she faced a lot more trolling. "I got a lot of abusive comments that go into my spam filter questioning why I would be a mother," she says. "I know that I'm going to get a lot of abuse, but I'm just going to block them. "I'm going to be OK. All I think about is the other mothers that have come before me who are competent, capable and resilient." Lucy, who is known for her How Does A Blind Girl... series of videos, is overjoyed by the prospect of IVF but she has also been frank about the fact she currently does not qualify, owing to her current weight, a sensitive element of IVF treatment that many keep to themselves. NHS guidelines specify your Body Mass Index (BMI) must be 30 or under to qualify - a healthy BMI is considered to be between 18.5 and 24.9. "I need to be a BMI of 30 and I'm very open that I need to lose 9kg," Lucy says. "I've already lost 15kg." Her health journey has involved swimming, lifting weights and many runs with Ollie tethered to her as her sighted guide. She has also found a love for batch cooking nutritious meals which she posts about on all of her channels on Instagram, TikTok and YouTube and the workarounds she has developed as a blind cook. "I wanted a positive representation of losing weight online because it's all about this blinking jab," she says, referring to weight loss injections. "I just wanted to lose it healthily, have lots of nice food, talk about meal prep and just smile and run." Once she hits the required BMI, Lucy will qualify for three rounds of IVF on the NHS. She will contact her consultant, after which she has to "spit in a cup" and offer up her DNA for genetic testing and analysis. Over a period of about three months, a genetics team will "make a bespoke test to find the gene within my eggs," Lucy explains. Meanwhile Lucy will inject herself with trigger shots to stimulate the follicles within her ovaries to increase the number of eggs produced which will be retrieved, and then made into embryos with Ollie's sperm. The embryos will then be tested so only ones without the IP gene will be possible candidates. Those embryos will be "shuffled about" so Lucy and Ollie don't know which will be selected in terms of gender or other genetic qualities, and implanted into Lucy, who will carry the baby to term. Lucy can't wait for the moment she holds her baby in her arms. "It will never stop being a thing within my mind that this gene is being eradicated," she admits. "But I am very happy in my decision." A few days ago Lucy posted on Instagram, her cardigan tightened at the back with a hairband to make it smaller and fit. "I've lost so much [weight] that my clothes are too loose now so we had to tie it up with a bobble," she tells her followers. "Fingers crossed [we're] only a few weeks away from ringing the clinic." You can listen to Lucy Edwards onBBC Access Allon BBC Sounds. Subscribe and email your thoughts to accessall@bbc.co.uk
Why I want an IVF baby to screen out gene that made me go blind
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Blind Content Creator Lucy Edwards Discusses IVF Plans to Screen Genetic Condition"
TruthLens AI Summary
Lucy Edwards, a 29-year-old blind content creator and TikTok star, is embarking on a health journey to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF) with the intention of screening out the genetic condition Incontinentia Pigmenti (IP), which caused her blindness at the age of 17. Lucy, who is married to Ollie, has a family history of IP that has resulted in severe outcomes, including her grandmother's nine miscarriages. The couple has decided to pursue pre-implantation genetic testing as part of their IVF process, allowing them to create embryos outside the body and only implant those free of the condition. This decision is emotionally complex for Lucy, as she grapples with the idea of eliminating the very gene that has shaped her identity as a journalist and advocate for disability awareness. She acknowledges the broader ethical debates surrounding genetic selection and the value of lives affected by disabilities, reflecting on campaigners who challenge the societal perceptions of disabilities like Down's syndrome.
In addition to her IVF plans, Lucy is focused on achieving a healthy body mass index (BMI) to qualify for NHS-funded IVF treatment, as current guidelines require a BMI of 30 or under. She has already lost 15kg through swimming, weightlifting, and healthy meal prep, documenting her journey on social media. Lucy is determined to reach her target weight to proceed with the IVF process, which involves genetic testing of her eggs to ensure that any embryos implanted do not carry the IP gene. While she is excited about the prospect of motherhood, she is also aware of the emotional weight of her decision and the potential backlash she may face regarding her choices. Nevertheless, she expresses optimism about the future and the possibility of holding her healthy baby in her arms, emphasizing her commitment to making informed choices for her family's well-being.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article presents a deeply personal story of Lucy Edwards, a blind content creator, who is contemplating in vitro fertilization (IVF) to screen out the genetic condition that caused her blindness. This narrative raises significant ethical, social, and medical questions surrounding genetic screening and the implications of selecting embryos based on genetic criteria.
Purpose Behind the Publication
The intent behind sharing Lucy's story seems to be to highlight the complexities of genetic diseases and the emotional struggles involved in making decisions about potential parenthood when faced with hereditary conditions. By focusing on Lucy's experience, the article aims to evoke compassion and understanding for those with genetic conditions, while also sparking discussions about the broader implications of genetic testing and the choices parents face.
Public Perception Goals
This story may aim to foster a sense of empathy towards individuals with disabilities and genetic conditions, while also engaging the audience in a conversation regarding the ethics of genetic selection. By detailing Lucy’s dilemma, the article can stir public interest in both the emotional aspects of IVF and the scientific advancements in genetic engineering.
Information Omitted or Concealed
While the article provides a rich narrative, it may gloss over the potential societal implications of normalizing genetic screening and the ethical questions surrounding the "design" of children. The focus remains primarily on Lucy's emotional journey without delving into the potential consequences of widespread genetic selection, which could lead to societal divisions based on genetic traits.
Manipulative Aspects
The article does contain elements that could be viewed as manipulative, particularly in the way it frames Lucy’s identity and achievements in relation to her genetic condition. By portraying her blindness as a significant part of her identity, the narrative may unintentionally persuade readers to feel that eradicating the gene would diminish who she is as a person.
Trustworthiness of the Information
The article appears to be credible, as it presents a personal account supported by factual information about the genetic condition and the IVF process. However, the emotional framing could influence readers' perceptions, making them more likely to sympathize with Lucy's situation while potentially overlooking the broader ethical implications.
Societal Implications
Should genetic screening become more commonplace, it could lead to a shift in societal attitudes toward disabilities and genetic conditions. This may result in increased stigma against those with genetic conditions or disabilities, as well as pressure on individuals to conform to societal expectations regarding health and genetic "normalcy."
Target Audience
The article is likely aimed at a broad audience that includes individuals interested in health, genetics, and social issues, as well as those who may relate to or empathize with Lucy's experiences. It resonates particularly with communities advocating for disability rights and genetic awareness.
Impact on Financial Markets
While the immediate impact on stock markets or specific companies may be minimal, advancements in genetic testing and IVF technologies could influence biotech stocks in the long term. Companies involved in genetic research or reproductive technologies might see increased interest or investment stemming from discussions like those presented in the article.
Global Power Dynamics
The narrative touches on themes relevant to ongoing debates about genetic engineering and bioethics. As genetic technologies evolve, they may influence global power dynamics, especially in healthcare and ethical standards. The conversation about genetic selection is particularly pertinent given current discussions in various countries about genetic modification and reproductive rights.
Use of Artificial Intelligence in Article Composition
It is possible that AI tools could have been employed in drafting or editing the article, particularly in structuring the narrative or ensuring clarity of explanation. While AI may assist in generating content, the emotional depth and personal anecdotes suggest significant human involvement in the writing process.
Conclusion
The article serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges faced by individuals with genetic conditions and the ethical dilemmas involved in genetic selection. While it offers valuable insights into personal experiences, the broader implications of such decisions warrant further discussion.