What we learned from Ted Cruz vs. Tucker Carlson

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson Clash Over Foreign Policy and GOP Dynamics"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a striking shift from their previous interactions, Senator Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson engaged in a heated debate on foreign policy during a recent segment on Carlson's network. This conversation marked a departure from Cruz's earlier appearance on Carlson's show in 2022, where he had sought to appease the host after facing backlash for labeling the January 6 Capitol attack a 'violent terrorist attack.' Over time, the dynamics have shifted significantly, with Cruz now attempting to marginalize Carlson, who has emerged as a controversial figure within the Republican Party due to his opposition to Trump-backed Israeli strikes on Iran. Cruz's strategy involved framing Carlson as isolationist and critical of Trump, which culminated in accusations of antisemitism against Carlson, who vehemently denied these claims and accused Cruz of playing the 'antisemitism card' to deflect from the conversation. This exchange highlighted the growing tensions within the GOP regarding foreign policy and the influence of various factions within the party.

Throughout their two-hour discussion, Cruz sought to align himself with pro-Israel sentiments and counter Carlson's questioning of U.S. foreign policy towards Iran. He pointed to allegations that Iran had targeted Trump for assassination, trying to assert a narrative of loyalty to Trump while Carlson challenged Cruz's assertions. The conversation took on an increasingly combative tone, with Cruz dismissively comparing Carlson's views to those of former President Jimmy Carter and questioning his understanding of international relations. Carlson, in turn, ridiculed Cruz's inability to provide specific details and defended his stance on Russia, emphasizing a desire for diplomatic relations rather than enmity. The interview concluded with Cruz actively promoting clips of their exchange, suggesting a concerted effort within the GOP to address the challenges posed by Carlson's controversial positions, indicating a significant realignment in the party's approach to both domestic and foreign policy debates in the context of Trump's influence.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

When Sen. Ted Cruz went on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show in 2022, he was there to make amends.

The Texas Republican’s offense was having called the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol a “violent terrorist attack.” This kind of view was quickly falling out of favor as Donald Trump moved to sanitize January 6. So Cruzdisowned what he had saidthe day before to a cable host who had just savaged him for it.

It was a stunning scene: a US senator feeling compelled to grovel to a cable TV host who had targeted him for saying January 6 was very bad. But it epitomized the MAGA zeitgeist and shifting power dynamics, in which extreme enforcers like Carlson had to be appeased.

Three years later, Cruz this week joined Carlson on Carlson’s own network for a very different purpose – but also one that recognized the former Fox anchor’s heft on the right.

This time, Cruz was there to try and marginalize a man who is suddenly a big problem for the Trump administration. Carlson has criticized the Trump-backedIsraeli strikes on Iranand strongly opposes the US joining in those strikes, which Trump is increasingly considering.

Carlson’s opposition had already earned a sharp comment from the president, who called him “kooky Tucker Carlson.” Cruz was there to argue that maybe this guy that he and other Republicans have been so solicitous of is indeed a crank.

Aftertwo hours of joustingover foreign policy, it became clear Cruz was trying to paint Carlson as isolationist, amoral, anti-Trump and soft on Russian President Vladimir Putin. He also quite strongly suggested Carlson might be an antisemite – a charge Carlson rejected.

After Carlson spent much of the first 40 minutes pressing Cruz on his support for Israel and the support he had received from members of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee – which Carlson sought to cast as a “foreign lobby” – Cruz finally went there.

“By the way, Tucker, it’s a very weird thing, the obsession with Israel,” Cruz said, noting Carlson hadn’t inquired about foreign lobbying from other countries.

“Oh, I’m an antisemite now?” Carlson shot back.

“You’re asking the questions Tucker,” Cruz said. “You’re asking, why are the Jews controlling our foreign policy. That’s what you just asked.”

Carlson accused Cruz of trying to derail his questions by playing the antisemitism card.

“That does not make me an antisemite, and shame on you for suggesting otherwise,” Carlson said.

The exchange evoked growing concerns in some corners of the right over Carlson’s commentary and programming on Israel and Jewish people. Last year, for example, even some Republicans criticized Carlson for hosting aconversation with a Holocaust revisionist. Carlson said the man “may be the best and most honest popular historian in the United States.”

This week’s interview got no less heated from there.

Cruz repeatedly pointed to allegations from the US government that Iran has targeted Trump for assassination, a case in which the Justice Department under then-President Joe Bidenbrought charges last year. Cruz was trying to tie going after Iran to loyalty to Trump.

This led Carlson to question that narrative about Iran targeting Trump, and Cruz again pounced.

“Did we land on the moon? What other conspiracies to you believe? Was 9/11 an inside job?” Cruz said. He added that “even the looniest Democrat doesn’t dispute that.”

Cruz accused Carlson of having more or less the foreign policy of Jimmy Carter.

“Oh absolutely, I’m a big leftist,” Carlson responded sarcastically. “This is so silly.”

Cruz went on to ask Carlson if Putin was the United States’ enemy. Carlson said Russia was technically our enemy by virtue of the US government’s support for Ukraine, but he resisted making a moral judgment.

“I don’t want to be enemies with Russia. It doesn’t help us at all,” Carlson said. “It may help some people in the United States, but in general, I don’t want to be.”

Cruz pointed to another infamous episode involving Carlson and Russia, when Carlson filmeda video in a Russian grocery storein which he fawned over the facility and its offerings. (Even a participant in an alleged Russian influence operation apparentlyregarded Carlson’s video as “overt shilling.”)

“It was just weird,” Cruz said. “It was like a promo video for Russia.”

Carlson got his licks in too. In addition to painting Cruz as too focused on supporting Israel, he ridiculed the senator for not being able to quantify the population of Iran and provide a citation for a specific verse of the Bible he referenced.

But after the interview posted, Cruz was quite happy to post a multitude of clips. He said Carlson was “running interference” for Trump’s would-be assassins. He said Carlson was “obsessed with defending Russia and the KGB thug that runs it.” He promoted someone who praised him for calling out Carlson’s “thinly veiled antisemitism.”

And perhaps most tellingly, the Senate Republican Conferenceon its own feedpromoted a bunch of the same content intended to ding Carlson. That would seem to signal this is a concerted GOP effort to deal with a perceived problem.

It remains to be seen whether it works. But it’s a remarkable turnabout from where things were three years ago.

Carlson has been saying these kinds of things for years, but they – and his commentary on Iran – are increasingly political problems for Trump’s party that apparently must be dealt with.

Back to Home
Source: CNN