The government’s May jobs report, slated for release at 8:30 a.m. ET Friday, could reveal the first signs of the impact on American workers of President Donald Trump’s harsh on-again, off-again tariff policy. The consensus forecast is for the US economy to have added 130,000 jobs, slowing from a stronger-than-expected 177,000 gain in April, and for the unemployment rate to hold at 4.2% for the third consecutive month, according to FactSet estimates. “The labor market is good, but it’s not exceptional, and we’re in the process of putting some real strain on the economy,” Claudia Sahm, New Century Advisors chief economist, told CNN in an interview. A case in point: Last June, after almost a full year on the job hunt, Jordan Williams landed a role at a high-growth, United Kingdom-based outdoor apparel brand that was looking to build out its US operations. Passenger Clothing was well positioned for expansion: The company landed orders with REI, Scheels and others; and Williams, a Portland, Oregon-based outdoor industry veteran, was excited for the ride. Until April. “Upon ‘Liberation Day,’” Williams said, nodding to the moniker Trump assigned to his blowout tariff announcement on April 2, “I was liberated from employment.” Overnight, the US went from being Passenger’s biggest potential growth driver to its biggest existential threat. For every $1 million of recycled fabrics, organic clothing and other products that landed in the US from countries such as India and China, Passenger was responsible for an additional $500,000 of duties, the company said in a mid-April statement announcing the pause of its US operations. Williams officially lost his job on April 11. Economists have warned that early layoffs like Williams’ could be the first signs of labor market fallout from Trump’s steep (and shifting) tariffs, which have ramped up uncertainty testing the nimbleness of businesses of all sizes. Hesitation on the hiring front The Labor Department’s weekly jobless claims report has shown higher numbers of first-time claims last month as well as people who have remained on unemployment for multiple weeks. Last week, first-time claims rose more than expected and totaled an estimated 247,000 filings, marking the highest weekly tally since October 2024, according to Department of Labor data released Thursday. Continuing claims, which are filed by people who have received unemployment insurance for at least a week or more, continue to bump up against a three-and-a-half-year high. “This is a market where there are stops and starts, and there are pullbacks in hiring,” Nela Richardson, chief economist at payroll giant ADP, said Wednesday. “With establishments, especially small establishments, when there’s a lot of uncertainty — it doesn’t mean that the demand isn’t there but the timing may be off — firms would rather wait and see than hire aggressively.” The hiring rate, the number of hires as a percentage of total employment, ticked higher in April to 3.5%, but remains below pre-pandemic levels, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data released earlier this week. And by ADP’s count (which doesn’t always correlate with the official jobs report) hiring dropped off precipitously in April and May, when the private sector gained 60,000 and 37,000 jobs, respectively. “The weak numbers we’re seeing now does not point to a labor market that’s collapsing, but there is hiring hesitancy,” Richardson said Wednesday. “It’s like driving through fog for some of our firms here,” she added. Federal workforce hit the hardest by job cuts Though the ripple effects from various Trump policies could take longer to show up in the data, the federal workforce reductions have already started appearing. The federal government posted job losses for three consecutive months, dropping 13,000 jobs in February, 4,000 in March and 9,000 in April, BLS data shows. More losses could be spread over many months to come: Not all federal workers were laid off immediately, and other actions are being challenged in court. Through May, announced job cuts are running significantly higher than in recent years; however, the lion’s share of the cutbacks have come from the federal government. Department of Government Efficiency-related cost-cutting and its downstream effects have led to more than 294,000 announced job cuts, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas data released Thursday. Another 131,257 announced cuts have been attributed to “market/economic conditions,” while 2,097 have been directly tied to tariffs. “Tariffs, funding cuts, consumer spending, and overall economic pessimism are putting intense pressure on companies’ workforces,” Andrew Challenger, senior vice president of the outplacement and coaching firm, said in a statement. “Companies are spending less, slowing hiring, and sending layoff notices.” DOGE’s actions and economic uncertainty have driven job cut announcements significantly higher than last year: Through the first five months of the year, employers have announced 696,309 job cuts, an 80% increase from the comparable year-ago period, according to the Challenger report. It’s also the third-highest total for a January-through-May period (behind the pandemic in 2020 and the Great Recession fallout in 2009) since Challenger started tracking employers’ layoff intentions in 1993. In May, employers announced 93,816 job cuts, a decrease of 12% from April. The recent surge in layoff announcements could indicate that the labor market may see a further softening in the months to come (given the timing of the actions, severance and other effects); however, as it stands now, layoffs aren’t mounting. Also, jobless claims (a proxy for layoffs) and the rate of layoffs and discharges remain below pre-pandemic levels, Labor Department data shows. Still, the impacts from tariffs might very well by a slow burn, Sahm said. “We are still early days,” she said.
What to expect from Friday’s jobs report
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"May Jobs Report Expected to Reflect Impact of Tariff Policies on Employment"
TruthLens AI Summary
The upcoming May jobs report, scheduled for release at 8:30 a.m. ET on Friday, is anticipated to provide insights into the effects of President Donald Trump's fluctuating tariff policies on the American workforce. Analysts predict that the U.S. economy added approximately 130,000 jobs in May, a notable decrease from the unexpectedly strong gain of 177,000 jobs reported in April. The unemployment rate is expected to remain steady at 4.2% for the third month in a row. Claudia Sahm, chief economist at New Century Advisors, emphasized that while the labor market remains robust, it is not exceptional and is facing increasing strain. This sentiment is echoed in the experiences of individuals like Jordan Williams, who lost his job at the outdoor apparel company Passenger Clothing due to the adverse impact of tariffs on their operations, highlighting the tangible consequences of economic policy on employment. Williams's situation illustrates the broader trend of companies reevaluating their growth strategies amid tariff-related uncertainties.
Moreover, recent data from the Labor Department indicates a rise in initial jobless claims, reaching approximately 247,000 filings, marking the highest weekly total since October 2024. This increase reflects growing caution among businesses, particularly small establishments, which are hesitant to hire aggressively during uncertain economic times. Despite a slight uptick in the hiring rate, it remains below pre-pandemic levels, suggesting a cautious labor market. The federal workforce has already experienced job losses, with significant cuts attributed to government policy changes, leading to over 294,000 announced job cuts in the current year. While layoffs are not yet at pre-pandemic levels, the significant increase in job cut announcements signals potential further softening in the labor market. Economists warn that the impacts of tariffs may unfold gradually, suggesting that the current labor market dynamics may be indicative of deeper issues yet to fully materialize.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article provides insights into the anticipated U.S. jobs report and its implications for the labor market amid President Trump’s fluctuating tariff policies. It highlights concerns regarding job growth and the potential fallout from tariffs that could affect various industries. The narrative is built around personal experiences and expert opinions, aiming to paint a picture of a labor market that, while still functional, is under strain.
Implications of Tariff Policies
The article discusses how Trump's tariff policies are projected to begin impacting American workers, particularly in industries reliant on international trade. It presents a case study of an individual who lost their job due to the economic shifts triggered by these policies. This personal story serves to illustrate the broader consequences of political decisions on the workforce.
Labor Market Analysis
The forecast of job growth slowing from April's figures suggests that while the labor market is stable, it may not be resilient in the face of economic pressures. Economists quoted in the article express concerns about job security as tariffs introduce uncertainty, which could hinder business operations and hiring practices across various sectors.
Public Sentiment
By highlighting the struggles of workers like Jordan Williams, the article seeks to evoke empathy and concern among readers. It suggests that the government policies may have real-life consequences, fostering a narrative that warns against the potential pitfalls of aggressive trade strategies.
Potential Omissions
While the article focuses on the negative impacts of tariffs, it does not delve deeply into potential benefits or alternative viewpoints regarding trade policies. This could give a skewed perception of the overall economic situation, possibly omitting a balanced discussion of how different sectors may respond differently to such policies.
Manipulative Elements
The use of personal stories combined with expert analysis may lead to a sense of urgency or fear about the economic future, which could be viewed as a manipulative tactic to shape public opinion against the current administration's policies. The language used, particularly terms that evoke strong emotional responses, could be seen as a means to sway readers' perspectives.
Headline Comparisons
When compared to other recent articles discussing economic forecasts, this one emphasizes personal narratives more heavily, potentially linking individual stories to broader economic trends. This approach fosters a connection between personal experiences and national economic policies, suggesting a deliberate strategy to humanize the impacts of political decisions.
Market Reactions
This analysis could influence stock market behavior, particularly in sectors vulnerable to tariff impacts, such as retail and manufacturing. Investors may react to the anticipated slowdown in job growth as a sign of economic instability, prompting adjustments in stock strategies.
Broader Political Context
The article touches on significant themes in the current political landscape, reflecting ongoing debates about trade, employment, and economic policy. The framing of the narrative aligns with broader criticisms of the current administration's approach to international trade relations.
AI Involvement
While it is unclear if AI was used in crafting this article, it is conceivable that AI models could assist in analyzing data trends or generating insights based on existing economic conditions. If AI were involved, it might have influenced the article's tone or focus, steering it toward highlighting the challenges faced by workers.
In conclusion, the article serves as a warning regarding the potential ramifications of tariff policies on American jobs while fostering a sense of urgency among readers. Its reliability is bolstered by the use of expert opinions and real-life examples, though it may lack a comprehensive view of the economic landscape. Overall, the article presents a significant narrative that suggests caution in the face of economic changes.