Tammy Faye Bakker. Thierry Mugler. Leigh Bowery. These three figures come from extremely different worlds — televangelism, couture fashion and drag performance art, respectively — and yet all of them inform the singularly bizarre and flamboyant style on “The Righteous Gemstones,” a raucous satire of Southern megachurch bigwigs that ends its four-season run on Sunday. (The show is a property of HBO, which shares parent company Warner Bros. Discovery with CNN.) The titular Gemstones, three wealthy adult siblings who’ve inherited their parents’ booming megachurch and TV operation in South Carolina, are “always on stage,” said costume designer Christina Flannery in a phone call with CNN. Perpetually playing dress-up, they wear sequins, silks and shoulder pads — and sometimes capes, to leave a room with a flourish. Even their more casual moments at home are opportunities to flaunt their flashy wardrobes. Take the image above. On their family property, eldest son Jesse (Danny McBride) is wearing a full leather suit in the Southern heat. Kelvin (Adam DeVine), the youngest, is bedazzled from head to toe. And eccentric middle child Judy (Edi Patterson) is wearing a power-clashing skirt suit straight out of the 1980s. Their gaudy getups are the manifestations of what children imagine fancy adults wear (and the Gemstone siblings are exceptionally juvenile). With deep pockets and thousands of eager worshippers hanging on their every word each Sunday, what does their church garb look like? “Absolutely more and more sequins,” Flannery said. Putting on a show Though it reserves affection for its (very) flawed characters, “The Righteous Gemstones” giddily skewers the Southern megachurch. With packed rows of congregants, an evangelical bent and technology that wouldn’t feel out of place at a stadium concert, the Gemstones’ megachurch isn’t far off from the real thing. See: The pastors and performers who have flown above parishioners for special events, much like the Gemstone siblings using jet packs to propel themselves across their audience during the finale of a telethon. Before the siblings’ takeover, Gemstone patriarch Eli (played by John Goodman) and wife Aimee Lee (Jennifer Nettles) anchored the family’s church until her death. It’s a nod to real husband-wife duos like Jim Bakker and Tammy Faye and televangelist Joel Osteen and his wife Laura, the latter of whom still lead around 45,000 congregants per week at Lakewood Church in Texas. Some of the most well-known US megachurches, though, are in the country’s most liberal cities. Zoe Church and the scandal-plagued Hillsong have marketed Christianity to a younger, hipper set of parishioners (including celebrities like Justin Bieber), partly through the charisma of the “hypepriest,” the term coined by GQ in 2017 that describes the clergymen who don streetwear in the pulpit and encourage a more casual churchgoing environment. “Gemstones” pokes fun at hypepriests, too, Flannery said, especially through Kelvin and his bestie-turned-boyfriend Keefe (Tony Cavalero). The pair also takes style notes from Siegfried and Roy, the magician duo who performed alongside tigers in Vegas for years, Flannery notes, through the emerald-green co-ords they wear to Prism, their LGBTQ-friendly ministry. Similarly, nearly all of Flannery’s inspirations for the Gemstones’ style are known for their flamboyant dress. Bakker (who went by Messner after remarrying in 1993) was a televangelist who favored exaggerated silhouettes and voluminous hair like Judy. And in the third season, the Gemstones’ showman uncle, “Baby” Billy Freeman (Walton Goggins), wears an oyster-shell ensemble that emulates Mugler’s theatrical pink silk-lined “Birth of Venus” clamshell dress, a nod to Botticelli’s 15th-century painting of the same name. Mugler’s work has become a sartorial touchstone for drag performers, too, for its open-armed embrace of camp. Performances of gender The world of drag, especially, has provided ample if unlikely inspiration for Flannery’s work on “Gemstones,” she said. Drag-inspired performance artist Leigh Bowery, whose surrealist gender-bending styles challenged conventional standards of beauty, and Yvie Oddly of “RuPaul’s Drag Race” made outfits that Flannery considers “walking piece(s) of art.” Drag and the world of Southern televangelism share little overlap in practice, but aesthetically, both are predicated on the exaggerated performance of gender. “They’re so influenced by each other,” Flannery said of the crossover. Bakker, in particular, was emulated by drag queens in the South during her ‘80s heyday for her heavy makeup and gaudy dress. Her appearance “reinforced the concept of gender as performance, thereby unintentionally intersecting with the crux of drag,” wrote religion scholar Denis Bekkering in 2015. Though their politics are somewhat opaque, the Gemstone women operate within highly conservative evangelical networks. They also wear what could be considered “Republican makeup,” the TikTok moniker for the heavy cosmetics preferred by high-profile conservative women like Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Trump campaign adviser Kimberly Ann Guilfoyle and former RNC co-chair Lara Trump. Inae Oh, a senior editor at Mother Jones, called the phenomenon “perceived hotness as a power play” in the Vox podcast “Today, Explained” in April. The beauty ideals favored by some Republican women helps reinforce traditional gender norms while asserting their power in a way that feels palatable to a conservative institution, she explained. “’You don’t have to be threatened by this woman of power because she is also what a ‘real’ woman looks like,’” Oh said. Amber Gemstone (Cassidy Freeman), Jesse’s wife, fits that mold. She’s rarely seen onscreen without a full face of makeup and styled hair and typically dons dresses that are form-fitting yet demure, and almost always with heels. Her style telegraphs her position of power in the family, as her husband’s supportive (and sharper) half. Judy is also rarely seen dressed down, but her skirt suits and perm lend her a more awkward air. Her style is stuck in the 1980s, inspired by her late mother’s church ensembles. There’s power in her last name — she was born a Gemstone; Amber married into it, a point of contention since they met — but she lacks the traditional beauty expected of a powerful Southern woman, and for that, she’s regularly discounted by others in her orbit. “It’s like pageantry,” Flannery said of her interpretation of what Judy’s idea of femininity looks like, adding that “Toddlers & Tiaras” inspired some of her more juvenile looks. There may never be another series that lets her take as wild swings as she has on “Gemstones,” Flannery reflected — the opportunity to dress Goggins as an old man in gold and purple lamé, or Patterson in a nautical skirt-suit with matching sailor hat. But she’ll carry that “crazy, sparkly, weird sh*t” with her in future projects, she said, letting the zany miracles of the Gemstones live on.
What ‘The Righteous Gemstones’ got right about megachurch fashion
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"The Fashion Influence Behind "The Righteous Gemstones" and Its Reflection of Megachurch Culture"
TruthLens AI Summary
The HBO series "The Righteous Gemstones" has concluded its four-season run, showcasing a unique blend of influences from televangelism, high fashion, and drag performance art. The show's costume designer, Christina Flannery, draws inspiration from iconic figures like Tammy Faye Bakker, Thierry Mugler, and Leigh Bowery to create a visually striking wardrobe for the Gemstone siblings, who embody the excess and flamboyance of Southern megachurch culture. The characters, led by eldest son Jesse, portrayed by Danny McBride, don outfits that are as extravagant as their personalities, featuring sequins, silks, and shoulder pads. Even in seemingly casual settings, their attire is a spectacle, emphasizing their perpetual performance for their congregation and viewers alike. Flannery notes that the Gemstones' fashion choices reflect a childlike imagination of what 'fancy adults' wear, further emphasizing their juvenile behavior despite their wealth and power.
Beyond the aesthetics, "The Righteous Gemstones" critiques the Southern megachurch phenomenon, drawing parallels to real-life figures like Jim Bakker and Joel Osteen. The show highlights the theatricality of megachurch services, where pastors often use elaborate technology and dramatic presentations to engage their congregants. Flannery's design work also incorporates elements from drag culture, illustrating the shared emphasis on performance and exaggerated gender expressions in both realms. Characters like Judy Gemstone, who exhibits a quirky 1980s style, and Amber Gemstone, who embodies a more traditional view of femininity, showcase the complexities of power dynamics within the family. The series ultimately serves as a satirical yet affectionate commentary on the intersection of faith, fashion, and performance, leaving a lasting impact through its vibrant and outlandish visual storytelling.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article explores the intersection of fashion, culture, and religion as portrayed in the HBO series "The Righteous Gemstones." By analyzing the flamboyant styles of the characters, the piece highlights how various cultural influences, including televangelism and high fashion, converge in the show's aesthetic. This analysis serves to illustrate the absurdity and excesses often associated with megachurches, especially in the Southern United States.
Cultural Commentary
The piece offers a critique of the megachurch phenomenon, illuminating the ways in which it reflects broader societal issues regarding wealth, power, and spectacle. The characters' extravagant wardrobes symbolize their superficiality and the performative nature of their roles as both religious leaders and entertainers. By showcasing their ostentatious clothing choices, the article implies a commentary on the commercialization of faith and the theatricality of modern religious practices. This portrayal resonates with viewers who may feel skeptical about the sincerity of such institutions.
Public Perception
This article appears to aim at fostering a critical view of megachurches and their leaders, potentially swaying public opinion against the excesses of these organizations. It seeks to underscore the disconnect between the lavish lifestyles of the Gemstone siblings and the more humble lives of their congregants. By doing so, it encourages readers to question the authenticity of religious figures who prioritize appearance over substance.
Underlying Issues
There may be broader issues that the article subtly hints at but does not directly address. For instance, it does not delve deeply into the ethical implications of wealth accumulation in religious contexts or the impact of such institutions on local communities. This omission could suggest a desire to keep the focus on the more entertaining aspects of the show while glossing over potentially more contentious debates surrounding faith and finance.
Manipulative Elements
While the article presents itself as a lighthearted cultural analysis, there are elements that may be seen as manipulative. The use of vivid descriptions and the emphasis on the outrageous fashion choices of the characters could evoke strong emotional reactions from readers, nudging them towards a particular interpretation of the show. This technique can create a sense of disdain for the characters and, by extension, for real-life counterparts in megachurch settings.
Reliability Assessment
The article's reliability is moderate; while it accurately reflects the show's themes and aesthetic choices, it relies heavily on subjective interpretations of the characters and their motivations. Readers should approach the piece as a commentary rather than an objective analysis of religious institutions.
Cultural Resonance
This article aligns itself with a contemporary critique of wealth in religious movements, appealing to audiences who may already be skeptical of megachurches. It resonates particularly with younger, more progressive viewers who value authenticity and may feel alienated by the excesses depicted.
Economic Implications
In terms of economic impact, this article may influence public sentiment towards religious organizations, potentially impacting their donations and attendance. As viewers reflect on the themes presented, there could be a ripple effect on how such institutions are perceived in the marketplace.
Current Global Context
The themes discussed in the article are relevant to ongoing discussions about the intersection of faith, capitalism, and celebrity culture. As society grapples with inequality and the role of religious institutions in public life, this piece contributes to a larger dialogue about the relevance and integrity of modern megachurches.
Artificial Intelligence Consideration
It is possible that AI tools may have been employed in the drafting of this article, particularly in generating engaging language and structuring the narrative. However, the nuances of cultural critique suggest human oversight in the analysis, as the commentary reflects a deeper understanding of societal issues that AI may not fully capture.
In summary, the article serves as a satirical lens through which to view the complexities of megachurch culture, using fashion as a metaphor for deeper societal critiques. Its engagement with contemporary issues makes it a relevant read, despite some potential biases in interpretation.