Ahmad has been hiding in Afghanistan for years. The former Afghan military employee is living in fear of being found by the Taliban, which seized power in 2021 as US forces withdrew from the Central Asian nation. As a result, Ahmad is unable to get a job or access medical care, relying on donations from friends outside the country to survive. His son, 12, is unable to go to school. If they are found, Ahmad says, the Taliban "will remove" him. His hope had been refugee resettlement in the US, but - with just a medical check to complete - the process was put on pause by the Trump administration. Still, he hoped. Then, on Thursday he woke to the news that US President Donald Trump had issued a new order banning the entry of Afghan passport holders to the US, citing national security threats. "I am not a threat to the United States," Ahmad told the BBC. The BBC is not using his real name because of concerns about his safety. "We were friends of the United States," he added. Trump's sweeping travel ban came into force on Monday, blocking people from Afghanistan and 11 other countries, including seven from Africa, as well as countries like Haiti and Yemen, from entering the US. There are partial bans on seven other countries. According to the ban, Afghanistan was included because the Taliban are considered by the US government to be a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) group, and the country does not have "a competent or co-operative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents", or "appropriate screening and vetting measures". It also notes a relatively high rate of people overstaying their visas. The Trump administration has, however, recently dropped temporary protected status for more than 9,000 Afghans living in the US, arguing its assessments showed the security and economic situation in Afghanistan had improved. But those living in Afghanistan are faced with a series of restrictions brought in by the Taliban government in line with its strict interpretation of Sharia law. The ones affecting women - including the enforcement of head coverings, restrictions on travel and education over the age of 12 - amount to a "gender apartheid", according to the United Nations. The Taliban says it respects the rights of women in line with Sharia and Afghan culture. A different UN report from 2023 found there were credible reports that hundreds of former government officials and armed forces members had been killed since the group returned to power in 2021, despite a general amnesty. The Taliban has previously said all Afghans could "live in the country without any fear" - and those abroad should come back and help rebuild the country. "There is a general amnesty," Mohammad Suhail Shaheen, Taliban ambassador to Qatar, told the BBC earlier this year. "Countrywide security is prevalent in Afghanistan. Every citizen and traveller can travel to any corner of the country without any obstacles or any difficulties." There are exceptions to Trump's ban - including for Afghans who worked directly with the US military before the Taliban back took control of the country in 2021. But Ahmad, whose application for resettlement was backed by a former US service member, does not qualify for a Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) because he did not work directly for the US. And he is far from the only one. Some 200,000 Afghans have been resettled since the US military's chaotic withdrawal, but there are still tens of thousands more waiting for a decision. Many have fled across the border to neighbouring Pakistan to wait for a decision to be made on their application. Samira, who spoke to the BBC's Afghan Service, is currently in Pakistan - which has been expelling tens of thousands of Afghans in recent months. If the path to the US is closed to her, she is not sure what to do next. "Returning to Afghanistan is not an option for us - it would be incredibly challenging," she said. "Our children have already lost years of education, and we have no hope of safely going back." More than 8,300 family members of US citizens are ready for an interview in Afghanistan, with more than 11,400 others awaiting family reunification, according to US Department of State data shared by AfghanEvac. Mojo, who asked to be identified by his nickname, is one of the 200,000 Afghans who have already reached the US, because he worked directly for the US military. He is now a US citizen. His sister, however, remains in Afghanistan where she and her husband are "living in a hide and seek game", he says. They change their address and city every couple months in order to stay safe. They passed the background and medical checks for refugee resettlement, but like the others who spoke to the BBC, they became trapped when the process was paused in January. This latest order has made Mojo, who lives in Houston, Texas, and the rest of his family lose "all our hope completely" . "I wish that he would change his mind, make some exception, change the rules or take his order back and let people have a peaceful life," he said. The ban also affects Afghans who are not trying to reach the US for resettlement. Zarifa Ghafari is studying at Cornell University in New York state, but is currently in Germany for the summer with her young child. She said she began a "frantic" race back to the US on Thursday in order to continue her studies, before the start of the travel ban on Monday. The ban has put her under "immense pressure" and has made her feel "very vulnerable", the the 30-year-old former politician told the BBC. What makes it worse, she said, was that she regularly had to return to Germany every few months to maintain her residency status there too. Describing her situation as "precarious", she said she worried about how she could make her regular trips to Germany when the travel ban began. Shawn VanDiver, of AfghanEvac, said the ban broke a promise Americans had made to Afghans over the 20 years they were in the country. "This policy punishes people who escaped the Taliban, risked everything to support democracy, are already vetted, were told by the US government to wait," he wrote on social media platform X. "They're not threats. They're our allies - and they're being left behind." Meanwhile, many of those still in Afghanistan have other problems to contend with. As one Afghan man in Kabul told AFP news agency: "We don't even have bread, why are you asking me about travelling to America?" Additional reporting by Azadeh Moshiri and Gabriela Pomeroy
'We were friends of the US': Fearful Afghans face Trump travel ban
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"New Trump Travel Ban Leaves Afghan Allies in Limbo and Fear"
Bbc News
6.8
TruthLens AI Summary
Ahmad, a former Afghan military employee, has been living in hiding in Afghanistan since the Taliban regained control in 2021. He fears for his life and that of his family, particularly as the Taliban has been known for targeting individuals associated with the previous Afghan government. Ahmad's hopes for a safe future in the United States were dashed when he learned that President Donald Trump had issued a travel ban that includes Afghan passport holders, citing national security concerns. This ban has left Ahmad and many others in a precarious situation, unable to secure jobs or medical care, and relying on external support. His son, who is 12, cannot attend school, further complicating their already dire circumstances. Ahmad's application for refugee resettlement was nearly complete but has been stalled due to the new restrictions, leaving him feeling hopeless and trapped. He expressed his frustration, stating, "I am not a threat to the United States. We were friends of the United States."
The travel ban affects not only Ahmad but also tens of thousands of Afghans who have worked with the US military and those awaiting resettlement. Despite some exceptions for individuals who worked directly with the US military, many like Ahmad do not qualify for Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs). The Taliban's strict governance has led to severe restrictions on freedoms, particularly for women, further complicating the lives of those remaining in Afghanistan. Reports indicate that many former government officials and military personnel have been killed despite claims of a general amnesty. Meanwhile, Afghans residing outside the country, such as Samira and Zarifa Ghafari, face uncertainty about their futures as they navigate travel restrictions and the threat of deportation. Activists like Shawn VanDiver have criticized the ban for breaking promises made to those who aided US efforts in Afghanistan, emphasizing that these individuals are allies and should not be left behind in perilous conditions. The situation remains dire for many, as they grapple with the implications of the ban and the ongoing instability in Afghanistan.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article highlights the plight of Afghans like Ahmad, who are facing severe challenges after the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan in 2021. It emphasizes the impact of the Trump administration's travel ban on Afghan passport holders, showcasing the fear and desperation of individuals who previously assisted the US military and government. This narrative serves to evoke sympathy and raise awareness about the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan.
Purpose of the Article
The primary intent behind this article appears to be to shed light on the struggles faced by Afghans, particularly those who allied with the US, in the wake of the Taliban's resurgence and subsequent travel restrictions. By sharing personal stories, the article seeks to evoke empathy from the audience and foster a sense of urgency regarding the need for refugee resettlement and support.
Public Perception
The narrative likely aims to shape public perception by portraying the affected individuals as innocent victims of geopolitical decisions. This approach may lead readers to sympathize with those who feel abandoned by the US government despite their contributions.
Omitted Information
There may be a tendency to omit the broader context of the US-Taliban relationship and the complexities involved in the travel ban. Discussions around national security concerns, visa overstays, and the challenges of screening individuals from conflict zones are not deeply explored, which could provide a more nuanced understanding of the situation.
Manipulative Aspects
While the article presents a compelling narrative, its emotional appeal may oversimplify the issues at play. The use of personal anecdotes can be seen as manipulative if it leads to one-sided conclusions without considering the government's perspective on national security.
Truthfulness of the Article
The factual basis of the article appears strong, with specific references to government policies and personal testimonies. However, the emotional framing may lead to questions about the completeness of the narrative being presented.
Shaping Public Sentiment
The article is likely designed to resonate with humanitarian organizations, advocates for refugee rights, and individuals concerned about US foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize support for Afghan refugees and critique the current administration's stance on immigration.
Potential Societal Impact
In the wake of this article, there could be an increase in advocacy for Afghan refugees and pressure on the US government to revise its immigration policies. This could lead to a broader discussion on how the US handles asylum seekers from conflict zones.
Market and Economic Implications
The article does not directly address market implications, but heightened awareness and advocacy for Afghan refugees could influence policies affecting immigration services and humanitarian aid organizations.
Geopolitical Relevance
In the context of global power dynamics, the article reflects ongoing concerns about the US's role in Afghanistan and its responsibilities towards those who supported its efforts. It connects with current discussions about human rights and security challenges in the region.
AI Usage in the Article
There is no clear indication that AI was used in crafting this article. However, if AI tools were employed, it might have influenced the framing of the story to enhance emotional engagement or streamline data presentation.
Overall Reliability
The article provides a largely accurate account of the challenges faced by Afghans under the Taliban and the implications of the travel ban. However, its emotional framing and selective presentation of facts suggest a potential bias in how the story is told.