Gadi Mokotov makes cars bulletproof. Living in Mexico City, he sees all sorts of demands for armored vehicles – from military trucks and secretive government vehicles to the Cadillacs of the capital’s high rollers and even 10-year-old Hondas. As criminal violence ticks up across the country, the lines for his services have grown longer – and more of his customized cars are coming back for repairs with bullet pocks and shattered windows. “We are living in a war,” he told CNN. “A war with the cartels.” Despite the efforts of successive governments to combat Mexico’s deeply entrenched cartels, tens of thousands of people are killed each year in crime-related deaths, according to government figures. Recently, Mokotov says one of his private clients in Guadalajara brought their Ford pick-up truck back to his shop with over 100 bullet marks, breaking down into tears, thankful to have survived an ambush. In years past, Mexico City was seen as a relatively peaceful oasis in the country. But even here, violence is spiking, with murders up over 150% compared to the same period last year, according to reporting by El Pais. Some attacks appear to be designed to send a message to Mexico’s political class. Last week, two aides to the mayor of Mexico City were gunned down on their way to work, in what authorities concluded was a “direct and highly planned attack.” A few days earlier, a mayoral candidate in the state of Veracruz had been shot and killed alongside three other people during a festive campaign march. As controversial national judicial elections approach on Sunday, some Mexicans across the country are preparing for the worst. According to Mexican think tank Laboratorio Electoral, last year’s legislative elections were the most violent on record, with over 40 candidates assassinated and hundreds more violent incidents, including attacks and kidnappings, largely attributed to cartels aiming to sway the vote and intimidate candidates. While the run-up to this year’s judicial vote has not been quite as bloody, a climate of fear persists. Across the country, at least four candidates have already abandoned their campaigns after receiving threats, per the international conflict research organization Crisis Group, and several judges have refused to campaign at all in areas controlled by cartels. Since 2012, at least 17 judges and six clerks have been killed in connection to their work, the group notes. A controversial vote One of the last acts of former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador in 2024 was to pass a constitutional reform mandating that all judges in the country be elected by direct vote – a radical shift from the system of internal appointments that had populated most of Mexico’s judiciary until then. The vote – seen by supporters as an effort to guarantee judges’ autonomy and impartiality – has been embraced by Lopez Obrador’s successor and protege, President Claudia Sheinbaum. On Sunday, June 1, thousands of candidates will be competing for the 881 seats up for grabs. César Gutiérrez Priego, a criminal lawyer in Mexico City running for a seat on the country’s Supreme Court, told CNN he’s been campaigning this spring with a bulletproof vest under his suit. “It doesn’t smell very good. But it’s something that I needed to do because I have to protect myself. I have two kids and I don’t want to just be another number,” he says of the vest, which he’s been wearing for two months on the campaign trail. Priego is no stranger to the potential for violence and corruption in Mexican politics – he decided to study law when he was in his 20s, after seeing his high-ranking military father, Mexico’s then-drug czar, imprisoned on what he says were false charges. Across the country, trust in the justice system has been broken over and over. Judges are widely perceived as among the most corrupt officials in the country, and many high-profile cases have never been concluded. In 2022, just 16 percent of criminal investigations overall were resolved, according to Human Rights Watch. Critics argue that addressing these issues requires far more profound change – including repressing organized crime and addressing corruption at the prosecutorial level and in government – than this week’s judicial vote can address. Both the Biden and Trump administrations in the US have warned against the judicial vote, voicing concern that making judges run for election could further expose them to political interests and to potential corruption or intimidation by organized crime groups. Still, Priego says he’s willing to try the new system – and to face the personal risk to his own life – for a shot at a seat on the highest bench in the country. “In Mexico, we have a big trouble here in our country. And what is that trouble? It’s that criminals take control of some places, some institutions, and one of those institutions is the justice system. And I believe if we change that, we can make the change that really helps people, because if you make the criminals go to jail, you can end impunity,” Priego tells CNN. Ending impunity, everyone agrees, is long overdue in the country – though not everyone agrees on how to get there. In his Mexico City garage, Mokotov sees daily evidence of the crisis, including a fast-growing number of first-time clients asking for his services: women looking to add bulletproof armor to humble commuter cars. It’s a request that leaves even him a bit disturbed, he says. “It’s not nice to see moms coming here saying ‘I need to protect my kids to go to school.’ They’re afraid for the lives of their kids.”
‘We are living in a war’: Mexicans brace for violence ahead of judicial elections
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Mexicans Prepare for Increased Violence Ahead of Judicial Elections Amid Escalating Crime"
TruthLens AI Summary
As violence escalates across Mexico, Gadi Mokotov, a bulletproof car manufacturer in Mexico City, has witnessed a significant increase in demand for armored vehicles. The rising threat from drug cartels has transformed the landscape of security in the country, prompting civilians and government officials alike to seek protection. Mokotov recounts harrowing stories, such as a client who returned with a truck riddled with over 100 bullet holes, expressing gratitude for surviving an assassination attempt. Once considered a relatively safe haven, Mexico City is now experiencing a spike in crime, with murder rates surging by over 150% compared to the previous year. Recent targeted attacks on political figures, including the assassination of mayoral candidates and aides, have further intensified fears ahead of the upcoming judicial elections. These elections are particularly crucial, as they follow a period marked by unprecedented violence against politicians, with over 40 candidates killed during last year’s legislative elections. The looming threat of cartel violence has led to a pervasive climate of fear, causing several candidates to abandon their campaigns and judges to refuse to run in cartel-controlled areas.
The upcoming judicial elections, scheduled for June 1, are underpinned by a controversial constitutional reform that mandates judges be elected rather than appointed. This significant shift aims to enhance judicial autonomy and integrity, a move supported by both former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador and his successor, President Claudia Sheinbaum. However, critics warn that the electoral process may expose judges to increased political pressure and corruption from organized crime. César Gutiérrez Priego, a Supreme Court candidate, highlights the personal risk involved, noting he has been campaigning in a bulletproof vest for safety. The justice system in Mexico is widely viewed as corrupt, with a dismal resolution rate for criminal cases. Many believe that deeper reforms are necessary to combat organized crime and restore public trust. As the country grapples with these profound challenges, Mokotov's experience reflects a troubling reality where ordinary citizens, including mothers seeking safety for their children, are forced to navigate an environment rife with fear and insecurity. This situation underscores the urgent need for effective solutions to curb violence and restore faith in the justice system.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article highlights the escalating violence in Mexico as the country braces for judicial elections, painting a grim picture of the security situation. It emphasizes the increased demand for armored vehicles due to the growing threat posed by drug cartels. This situation is not only a personal concern for citizens but also reflects a broader societal issue that is intertwined with political stability and public safety.
Societal Perception and Emotional Impact
The narrative aims to create a sense of urgency and fear among the public regarding the current state of safety in Mexico. By presenting personal testimonies, such as that of Gadi Mokotov, the article elicits emotional responses from readers and highlights the everyday realities of violence. This portrayal may lead to heightened anxiety and a call for more robust governmental action against organized crime.
Potential Concealments
While the article focuses on the violence and its implications for the upcoming elections, it may downplay the complexities of Mexico's political landscape, including the government's responses and the socio-economic factors that contribute to this violence. By focusing primarily on the violence itself, there is a risk of simplifying the broader context, such as the role of poverty and corruption.
Manipulative Aspects
The piece exhibits a moderate level of manipulativeness through its choice of language and focus. Phrases like "We are living in a war" create a dramatic tone that could sway public opinion towards viewing the government as ineffective. While the article is grounded in truth, the emotional framing could be interpreted as an attempt to incite fear or urgency.
Truthfulness and Reliability
The information appears to be reliable, as it references credible sources and statistics from government figures and reports from reputable publications. However, the emotional framing and selective focus may influence the perceived reliability of the narrative. It offers a truthful account of the violence but does so in a way that emphasizes fear.
Comparative Context
When compared to other reports on violence in Mexico, this article aligns with ongoing narratives about the influence of cartels on elections. There is a consistent theme across various news outlets regarding the threats faced by political candidates and the general public, suggesting a broader pattern of instability.
Industry Image
The publication of this article contributes to a broader image of Mexico as a nation grappling with violence and insecurity, which can affect tourism and foreign investment. It reinforces perceptions of Mexico as a dangerous location, potentially influencing economic decisions.
Impact on Society, Economy, and Politics
The portrayal of violence could lead to increased calls for security reforms and changes in policy, as citizens demand more protection ahead of elections. Economically, fear of violence might deter investment and tourism, impacting growth. Politically, the article could influence voter behavior, swaying public opinion against current leaders.
Community Reception
The article resonates more with communities directly affected by violence, such as those in urban centers. It targets readers who are likely feeling the repercussions of insecurity and may be looking for solutions or accountability from their leaders.
Market Influence
In terms of market impact, this news could affect sectors related to security, such as armored vehicle manufacturing. Companies involved in protective services or security technology may see increased interest following heightened awareness of violence.
Geopolitical Relevance
This article reflects broader issues of governance and security in Mexico, which could have implications for international relations, particularly with neighboring countries and the United States. As drug trafficking and violence cross borders, the article situates itself within ongoing discussions about border security and drug policy.
Use of Artificial Intelligence
It’s plausible that AI tools were utilized in gathering and analyzing data for this report, particularly in compiling statistics and trends related to violence. However, the writing style suggests human authorship, focusing on personal stories to engage readers emotionally.
The overall analysis indicates that while the article is rooted in factual reporting, its emotional framing and focus on violence may be designed to evoke fear and urgency, ultimately aiming for increased awareness and potential action regarding public safety. The reliability of the article is affirmed through its credible sources, though its narrative style may lead to manipulation of public sentiment.