Walmart and Target have resumed business with some of their Chinese suppliers, after pausing orders for a few weeks due to uncertainties over the imposition of steep US tariffs, two Chinese factories have told CNN. The resumption came days after a meeting last week between US President Donald Trump and the heads of retail giants Walmart, Target, Lowe’s and Home Depot — who warned the president that store shelves across America could soon be empty. The resumption of business, even if partial, suggests retailers are attempting to ensure their stores remain stocked as tariffs threaten to disrupt their supply chains, which are crucial to their own bottom lines as well as to the survival of thousands of factories in China. Trump’s 145% levies on Chinese goods have led many American retailers, both large and small, to suspend or cancel outright previous agreements with their suppliers in the country. The two that spoke to CNN said they supplied to Walmart and Target, respectively, and that previous orders had been in limbo for weeks. The scope of the suspension, as well as the level of resumption, is unclear. CNN has reached out to Walmart and Target for comment. China and the United States, the world’s two largest economies, remain locked in a trade war with no clear off-ramp. Both are refusing to back down from the sky-high tariffs they have imposed on each other, with no sign of trade talks on the horizon. Vivi Tong, whose factory in China’s central Anhui province makes toy cars, told CNN that orders from Walmart resumed last week, after Trump indicated that levies may come down. “American supermarkets don’t have much inventory left, and we’re also waiting to see how the situation develops. Our toys are low value-added products – if tariffs drop to around 30%, it will be easier for our customers to accept,” she said. Tong said her clients would normally have placed preliminary orders during this time of the year. The period from May to October is usually the peak time for toy production and shipment, ahead of the year-end holiday season. Hong Kong newspaper Ming Pao reported on Saturday that Walmart had resumed ordering from some Chinese exporters, citing two ceramics suppliers attending a major trade fair in the city of Guangzhou. One of them told the newspaper that the orders were only “partially resumed.” Last month, even before Trump massively escalated tariffs on China from the initial 20% to the current triple-digit level, Walmart pressured its Chinese suppliers for discounts, which upset Beijing. It even prompted China’s Commerce Ministry to summon Walmart executives for talks. Resuming trade Michael Hart, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, declined to comment specifically about Walmart but said a resumption in shipments was not a surprise. “This fits the trend that we’re hearing about here in China, where companies are in discussions with the government about getting certain items and products on the tariff exemption lists, especially where these products are deemed critical to the country or cannot be supplied by anyone else,” he said. Tong said her customers were still very cautious, and she barely shipped anything to the US this month. However, American retailers are asking for discounts, which she has agreed to. “This year, many of our customers are demanding price reductions – there’s really nothing we can do about it,” she added. Allen Yan, who runs factories in the eastern province of Zhejiang making swimming pool supplies, said he got word on Monday to send out a batch of products for Target, which had suspended that shipment for two weeks. Business with other clients, Costco and Sam’s Club, has not resumed. “In two months, the shelves in the US will probably be empty,” Yan said, adding that he had refused to give discounts. On Monday, an editorial published by Chinese state-run tabloid Global Times urged Washington to reflect on the Walmart news “carefully,” as it demonstrated “reckless tariff policies pose a severe test to their (companies) product pricing and supply chain systems.” “It is hoped that the US side will learn a lesson from this incident, promptly correct its misguided tariff policies, and return to the right path of engaging in dialogue with China,” it said. Jobs affected While official Chinese media is talking tough, it’s not just American retailers and consumers that could be affected. China’s export industry accounts for about 18 million domestic jobs, the Ministry of Commerce has said, and the interconnected business relationships forged over decades between the US and China make both sides vulnerable. Rachel Zhang, whose textile factory sells blankets and cushions to multiple retailers including Walmart, Costco and Target, told CNN that orders had been halted in early April. Zhang said she could only count on smaller orders from European countries and Japan, so she’s trying to sell her products to domestic market in the meantime. But the uncertainties pose a huge challenge for her prospects. “The key question is: How many months into the future are we talking about? Six months? Nine months? Businesses simply can’t wait that long,” she said. “In the end, it’s the small and medium-sized enterprises … that will end up paying the price,” she added. Beijing sought to put a brave face on the situation at a government press conference on Monday. Sheng Qiuping, deputy minister of commerce, said Beijing would enhance financial and policy support for the country’s exporters in the face of US tariffs. The government will also “actively assist exporters to respond to external risks and challenges” by facilitating their transition to domestic markets and diversification into other markets. China will “continuously enrich the toolbox of policies to stabilize foreign trade and introduce new incremental policy measures as needed,” he said.
Walmart, Target resume business with some Chinese factories after tariff-related halt, suppliers say
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Walmart and Target Restart Orders with Chinese Suppliers Amid Tariff Uncertainties"
TruthLens AI Summary
Walmart and Target have recently resumed orders from some Chinese suppliers after a temporary halt due to uncertainties regarding the imposition of high tariffs by the U.S. government. This decision follows a meeting between President Donald Trump and executives from major retailers, where concerns were raised about potential shortages on American store shelves. The two Chinese factories that spoke to CNN reported that their orders had been in limbo for weeks but resumed shortly after the meeting, indicating that retailers are eager to maintain inventory levels despite ongoing tariff disputes. Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods, which have escalated to 145%, have pressured American retailers to reconsider their supply agreements with Chinese manufacturers. The extent of the resumed business remains unclear, and CNN has sought comments from Walmart and Target to clarify the situation further.
The trade war between the U.S. and China continues to pose significant challenges for both countries, with no resolution in sight as both sides uphold their respective tariffs. Chinese suppliers are feeling the pinch, with many reporting that orders have been significantly reduced or halted altogether. For instance, a factory in Anhui province that produces toy cars noted that its orders had resumed only after Trump hinted at potentially lowering tariffs. The peak production season for toys is fast approaching, and suppliers are anxious about their clients' inventory levels. Additionally, the impact of these trade tensions extends beyond American retailers; China's export industry, which supports millions of jobs, is also at risk. As suppliers adapt to changing market conditions, some are seeking to diversify their customer base while navigating the uncertainties posed by U.S. tariff policies. The Chinese government has pledged to support its exporters through financial and policy assistance as they face these external challenges.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The news article reports on Walmart and Target resuming orders with some Chinese suppliers after a brief halt due to uncertainties surrounding U.S. tariffs. This resumption comes after a meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and retail executives who expressed concerns about potential shortages in American stores. The implications of this development are significant, given the ongoing trade tensions between the United States and China.
Intent of the Article
The article appears to highlight the fragility of supply chains amid ongoing trade tensions. By reporting on the resumption of business, it aims to reassure the public and stakeholders about the stability of retail supply chains. The mention of retail executives warning about empty store shelves underscores the urgency of the situation, suggesting that retailers are actively working to mitigate risks. This is likely intended to convey that Walmart and Target are responsive to market pressures, thus positioning them favorably in the eyes of consumers and investors.
Public Perception
The article seeks to foster a sense of caution regarding the broader economic implications of trade tariffs. By focusing on the challenges these tariffs pose to supply chains, it raises awareness of how global trade issues can directly impact everyday consumers. This can create a narrative of vulnerability within the economy, suggesting that consumers may face shortages or increased prices if tariffs remain high.
Omissions or Hidden Agendas
While the article addresses the resumption of orders, it does not delve into the potential long-term consequences of these tariffs, such as the impact on prices for consumers or the broader economic landscape. By not exploring these aspects, the article may downplay the severity of the trade war and its implications for both U.S. retailers and Chinese manufacturers.
Reliability of the News
The reliability of the article appears reasonable, given that it cites specific sources (Chinese factories) and touches on verifiable facts regarding trade discussions and tariffs. However, the lack of direct quotes or detailed responses from Walmart and Target limits its comprehensiveness. Overall, it provides a snapshot of a developing situation but lacks depth in exploring potential ramifications.
Comparison with Other News
In the context of other reports on the U.S.-China trade war, this article fits into a larger narrative of instability and uncertainty. Similar articles might focus on the economic repercussions of tariffs or the political dimensions of the trade war, creating a complex web of information that reinforces the idea of a deteriorating trade relationship.
Impact on Various Sectors
The resumption of business between these major retailers and Chinese suppliers could have varied effects on the economy, including influencing stock prices of Walmart and Target. This news may be particularly significant for investors, as it suggests that these companies are attempting to maintain product availability, which could impact their sales performance.
Community Support
The news is likely to resonate with business communities, particularly those involved in retail and international trade. It may also attract attention from consumers who are concerned about product availability and pricing. Conversely, it may be less relevant to communities focused solely on domestic issues or those critical of corporate practices.
Market Influence
The article could lead to fluctuations in stock prices for Walmart and Target as investors respond to the perceived stability of their supply chains. The news may also affect broader market sentiment regarding retail stocks, particularly in the context of ongoing trade discussions.
Geopolitical Context
In the grand scheme of global power dynamics, this article reflects the ongoing tensions between the U.S. and China. The resumption of orders suggests a tactical move by retailers to navigate these complex relationships while still fulfilling consumer demand. Given the current political climate, this issue is likely to remain relevant in discussions about trade policy.
Use of Artificial Intelligence
It’s possible that AI tools were utilized to generate aspects of the article, particularly in summarizing the factual elements of the trade situation. However, the narrative tone and framing indicate human editorial input, likely steering the focus toward the implications of the trade war for both retailers and consumers.
In conclusion, the article provides a valuable but limited perspective on the ongoing trade tensions and their immediate effects on supply chains. While it successfully highlights the urgency of the situation for retailers, it may also obscure the broader consequences of sustained tariff policies.