Venezuela is demanding that a 2-year-old girl be returned to her family after the United States deported her parents and kept the toddler in government custody. The Venezuelan foreign ministry on Monday accused the US of “kidnapping” Maikelys Antonella Espinoza Bernal, saying she was separated from her mother as she was boarding a deportation flight back to Venezuela. It also said the girl’s father, Maiker Espinoza-Escalona, had been deported earlier by the US to a notorious prison in El Salvador. “(The US) once again committed the extremely serious offense of separating families and removing a minor from her emotional environment and, in particular, from her biological mother,” read a statement from the Venezuelan government on Monday. The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) denied it kidnapped the girl, arguing it was trying to protect her from her parents, whom it accused without evidence of being part of Tren de Aragua (TDA), a Venezuelan gang the US has designated a terror organization. The father believes he was accused of being a gang member because he has tattoos, but he denies they have anything to do with gangs, according to his sworn declaration filed in court in early March. CNN has asked Maikelys’ mother, Yorely Escarleth Bernal Inciarte, about the allegation. In a Saturday statement, DHS said the toddler was removed from a deportation flight list “for her safety and welfare.” She remains in the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) and has been placed with a foster family, it added. The toddler is one of several children to have been affected by the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown. Last week, three US citizen children — including a 4-year-old with metastatic cancer — were taken to Honduras with their undocumented mothers as the women were deported by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. White House border czar Tom Homan said the US removed the children because their mothers “requested” they stay with them rather than remain in the country. It’s unclear if Maikelys’ mother was given the choice to be deported with her daughter. When asked for more information, DHS referred CNN to the statement it released on Saturday. CNN has also reached out to ORR for details on Maikelys’ case. A family separated The toddler and her parents entered the US in May 2024 to seek asylum, according to a court document filed by legal advocacy groups. Maiker – who received a deportation order last July under the Biden administration – said in his declaration that he and his partner were put in immigration detention while their daughter was placed in the custody of ORR. Between October and March, the couple had weekly, in-person visits with their daughter, Maiker stated. CNN has reached out to his attorneys for details about his detention and deportation order. On March 29, Maiker was sent to a naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where DHS has transferred migrants, according to court documents filed by his lawyers. They said he was flown the following day to El Salvador’s notorious Cecot mega-prison, which the US is using to detain hundreds of Venezuelan migrants it accuses of being violent gang members, though it hasn’t provided strong evidence to back that claim. CNN has reached out to the Salvadoran government for more information on this case but has not yet received a response. The toddler’s mother was deported soon after Maiker was sent to El Salvador. She was forced to return to her country on a flight without her 2-year-old child, Venezuela said. The girl was kept in ORR custody, with DHS saying, “We will not allow this child to be abused and continue to be exposed to criminal activity that endangers her safety.” Without providing evidence, it alleged in Saturday’s statement that the father was a TDA lieutenant who oversaw various crimes including homicides and trafficking, and that the mother oversaw the recruitment of young women for drug smuggling and prostitution. Rising anger in Venezuela Venezuela accused the US of violating international law and said it would take all legal and diplomatic measures to secure the girl’s return. Its government demanded the “immediate release” of the child and “that the rule of law and the basic rights of our little girl be restored.” It cited the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which states in part that children should not be separated from their parents against their will unless such separation is necessary for the best interests of the child. The US has signed the convention but has not ratified it. CNN has reached out to DHS for comment on Venezuela’s accusations. Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro insists the US is unjustly holding the child. He announced that a march intended for International Workers’ Day on May 1 would become a rally to demand her release. “I ask for the full support of the Venezuelan people in the effort we are going to make to rescue this kidnapped girl and to bring back safe and sound — sooner rather than later — the 252 Venezuelans kidnapped in El Salvador,” he said in Caracas Monday, referring to the Venezuelan migrants the US has deported to the Salvadoran prison. CNN’s Caroll Alvarado, Mounira Elsamra and Ivonne Valdés contributed to this report
Venezuela accuses US of ‘kidnapping’ toddler who was separated from deported parents
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Venezuela Demands Return of Toddler Separated from Parents During US Deportation"
CNN
4.9
TruthLens AI Summary
Venezuela has demanded the return of a 2-year-old girl, Maikelys Antonella Espinoza Bernal, who was separated from her parents during a deportation process by the United States. The Venezuelan foreign ministry accused the US of 'kidnapping' the child after her mother was forcibly removed from a deportation flight while attempting to return to Venezuela. The girl's father, Maiker Espinoza-Escalona, had been deported earlier to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Venezuelan officials criticized the US for committing what they described as a grave violation of family rights, stating that the separation of families and the removal of minors from their parents' care is an egregious act. They asserted that the US actions not only breach international law but also disregard the emotional well-being of the child by separating her from her biological mother.
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has denied the kidnapping accusation, asserting that the child's removal was a protective measure. DHS claimed that the parents were suspected of being involved with Tren de Aragua (TDA), a Venezuelan gang designated as a terrorist organization by the US, though evidence to support these allegations has not been publicly provided. The agency stated that the toddler was placed in the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) for her safety and welfare. This incident has drawn international attention, especially as it highlights the broader implications of the US immigration policies, which have led to family separations. Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has expressed outrage over the situation, promising to mobilize public support to demand the child's return and to address the larger issue of Venezuelan migrants being deported to dangerous conditions in El Salvador. The Venezuelan government has vowed to pursue all legal and diplomatic avenues to secure Maikelys' release and restore her rights as outlined in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which emphasizes the importance of keeping children with their families unless it is in their best interest to separate them.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The news article highlights a complex and emotionally charged incident involving a Venezuelan toddler who was separated from her parents during a deportation process led by US authorities. The Venezuelan government has accused the United States of “kidnapping” the child, which raises significant questions about immigration policy, human rights, and international relations. This situation not only affects the family involved but also serves to shape public perceptions about immigration practices in the US and its treatment of vulnerable populations.
Underlying Intentions of the Article
This news piece appears to aim at highlighting perceived injustices in US immigration policies, particularly regarding family separation. By framing the incident as a "kidnapping," the Venezuelan government seeks to garner sympathy for the child and her family, portraying the US as an oppressor. This could be part of a broader strategy to rally domestic and international support against US immigration practices.
Public Perception and Emotional Appeal
The article plays on strong emotions, particularly concerning family unity and the well-being of children. By emphasizing the term "kidnapping," it seeks to provoke outrage among readers, potentially influencing public opinion against the US government's actions. This framing may resonate especially with communities that prioritize family integrity and child welfare, thus mobilizing support for the Venezuelan government's stance.
Possible Concealments and Omissions
While the article focuses on the emotional aspects and accusations, it does not delve deeply into the context behind the US government's actions, such as their rationale for believing the parents might be linked to criminal activities. This omission could suggest an attempt to simplify a complex issue and divert attention from the justifications for the US policies that some may view as necessary for national security.
Manipulative Elements
The use of emotionally charged language and the framing of the United States' actions as "kidnapping" indicate a potential manipulative intent. This language choice aims to vilify the US while garnering sympathy for the Venezuelan family. By focusing on emotional appeal rather than providing a balanced view of the situation, the article may be attempting to sway public opinion without fully presenting all sides of the story.
Comparative Context
When compared to other news stories regarding immigration, this article highlights a recurring theme of family separation that has gained attention, particularly during the Trump administration. Such narratives often intersect with broader discussions about human rights and immigration reform, creating a pattern of reporting that might serve to reinforce certain ideological divides.
Impact on Society, Economy, and Politics
The fallout from this incident could influence public discourse around immigration policies in the US, potentially leading to increased scrutiny and calls for reform. Moreover, the narrative may exacerbate tensions between the US and Venezuela, affecting diplomatic relations and potentially influencing policy decisions related to immigration and foreign aid.
Target Audience
This article likely appeals to communities concerned with human rights and immigrant welfare, including activists, human rights organizations, and those with personal ties to immigration issues. It seeks to resonate with individuals who value family unity and may be critical of current US immigration policies.
Market Implications
While this news piece may not have immediate implications for stock markets, it could indirectly affect companies involved in immigration services or those reliant on immigrant labor. Broader discussions around immigration reform may influence market sentiments regarding affected sectors.
Global Power Dynamics
This incident underscores ongoing tensions between the US and Venezuela, reflecting broader geopolitical struggles. The narrative feeds into existing narratives of US interventionism and the humanitarian crises that arise from such policies, making it relevant in discussions about global governance and human rights.
Use of Artificial Intelligence
There is no clear indication that artificial intelligence directly influenced the writing of this news article. However, if AI were employed in crafting the article, it could have affected the choice of language and framing, potentially steering the narrative toward a more sensationalized portrayal of the events.
In conclusion, the article serves to highlight significant issues surrounding immigration policy, human rights, and international relations while employing emotionally charged language to influence public perception. The reliability of the article is somewhat compromised by its lack of balance and potential omissions, leading to a perception of bias in its presentation of the events.