As servicemen aboard the US Navy aircraft carrier dumped millions of dollars of military hardware into the South China Sea, the commander chose not to watch. Capt. Larry Chambers knew his order to push helicopters off the flight deck of the USS Midway could cost him his military career, but it was a chance he was willing to take. Above his head, a South Vietnamese air force major, Buang-Ly, was circling the carrier in a tiny airplane with his wife and five children aboard and needed space to land. It was April 29, 1975. To the west of where the Midway was operating, communist North Vietnamese forces were closing in for the capture of Saigon, the capital of South Vietnam, which the US had supported for more than a decade. Buang feared his family would pay a terrible price if captured by the communists. So, he jammed his family aboard the single-engine Cessna Bird Dog he found on minor airstrip near Saigon, headed out to sea – and hoped. And luckily Buang ran into another “idiot,” as Chambers puts it. “I figured, well, if he’s brave enough or dumb enough to come out and think some other idiot is going to clear the deck (of a US Navy aircraft carrier) of a whole bunch of helicopters to give him a personal runway to land on …” Chambers told CNN, with a chuckle and a scratch of his head as if still not believing the crazy episode. The Midway’s deck was crowded with helicopters that Tuesday because it was assisting in Operation Frequent Wind, the helicopter evacuation of Saigon. Some 7,000 South Vietnamese and Americans would make their way onto US Navy ships on April 29 and 30 in frenzied escapes from Saigon. Some 2,000 of them found their way onto Midway. But few could rival the drama of the family of seven in that two-seat Cessna. Buang had no radio and so the only way to let the captain of the Midway know he needed help was to drop a handwritten note onto its deck as he flew overhead. Several attempts failed before finally one found its mark. “Can you mouve [sic] these Helicopter to the other side, I can land on your runway, I can fly 1 hour more, we have enough time to mouve. Please rescue me, Major Buang wife and 5 child,” it read. Capt. Chambers had a choice to make: clear the deck as Buang requested; or let him ditch in the ocean. He knew the aircraft, with its fixed landing gear, would flip over once it hit the water. Even if it held together, flipping would doom the family to drowning. He couldn’t let that happen, he said, even though his superiors did not want the small aircraft to land on the carrier. Neither did the Midway’s air boss, who ran flight deck operations. “When I told the air boss we’re going to make a ready deck (for the small plane), the words he had to say to me I wouldn’t want to print,” Chambers said. Chambers said he ordered all of the ship’s 2,000-person air wing up to the deck to prepare to receive the small plane and turned his ship into the wind to make a landing possible. Crewmen pushed helicopters – worth $30 million by some accounts – off the deck. American, South Vietnamese, even CIA choppers splashed into the waves. Chambers still doesn’t know exactly how many. “In the middle of chaos, nobody was counting,” he said. And he wasn’t looking. Because he was disobeying the orders of his superiors in the US fleet, he knew his decision could land him a punishment that included being kicked out of the Navy. “I knew that I was going to have to face a (court martial) board. And I wanted to be able to say, even with the lie detector, that I didn’t know how many we actually pushed over the side,” Chambers told CNN, explaining his decision not watch as his orders were executed. “So that was my defense. It was kind of a stupid idea at the time, but at least it gave me the confidence to go ahead and do it.” With enough space cleared, Buang touched down on the Midway. Crewman grabbed onto the light plane with their bare hands to make sure it wasn’t blown off the deck in the strong winds coming across it. The rest of the crew cheered. “He’s probably the bravest son of a bitch I’ve run into in my whole life,” said of Buang, adding that the South Vietnamese pilot was trying save his family by landing on an aircraft carrier – something he’d never done before – in a plane not designed for that. “I was just clearing the runway for him … that’s all you can do.” And life came before hardware, he said. “We do the best we can saving human lives. That’s the only thing you can do.” The final days of the Vietnam War The fall of Saigon brought the final curtain down on a grinding conflict that unleashed devastation across the region, cost more than 58,000 American and millions of Vietnamese lives, saw the might of US military power fought to a bloody stalemate and triggered huge social unrest at home. The 50th anniversary on Wednesday will trigger complex and mixed emotions for those who lived through it. For Vietnam’s government, still run by the same Communist Party that swept to victory, it will be a week of huge parades and celebrations, officially known as “Liberation of the South and National Reunification Day.” For those South Vietnamese who had to flee, many of whom settled in the US, the anniversary has long been dubbed “Black April.” For US veterans, it will once again raise the age-old question – what was it all for? Chaos ruled Saigon in the last week of April 1975. Though more than a decade of US military involvement in the Vietnam War had officially ended with the signing of the Paris Peace Accords with North Vietnam in January 1973, the deal didn’t guarantee an independent state in the South. The administration of US President Richard Nixon had pledged to keep up military aid for the government in Saigon, but it was a hollow promise that would not last into the era of his successor Gerald Ford. Americans, tired of a divisive war that had cost so many lives and hundreds of billions in taxpayer dollars, were broadly unsupportive of the South Vietnamese regime. In early March 1975, North Vietnam launched an offensive into the South that its leaders expected would lead to the capture of Saigon in about two years. Victory would come in two months. On April 28, North Vietnamese forces attacked Tan Son Nhut Air Base in Saigon, making an evacuation by airplane impossible. There was no other place in the city that could handle large aircraft. With helicopter evacuation the only option, Washington launched Operation Frequent Wind. When Bing Crosby’s seasonal classic “White Christmas” played over the radio, that was the signal for Americans and select Vietnamese civilians to go to designated pickup spots to be airlifted out of the city. More than 100 helicopters, operated by the US Marine Corps, the US Air Force and the CIA, would deliver evacuees to US Navy ships waiting offshore. By command of the president (not really) While Capt. Chambers was making command decisions at sea, American helicopter pilots were doing so above Saigon. Marine Corps Maj. Gerry Berry flew from a US ship offshore to Saigon 14 times during the evacuation, the last of those flights marking the official end of the US presence in South Vietnam. But getting to that point wasn’t straightforward. Berry, the pilot of a twin-rotor CH-46 Sea Knight helicopter, got orders on the afternoon of April 29 to fly to the US Embassy in Saigon and get Ambassador Graham Martin out. But nobody seemed to have told Martin or the US Marines guarding the embassy. Upon touchdown, when he told the guards he was there to pick up the ambassador, they ushered about 70 Vietnamese evacuees aboard the aircraft instead, he said. Subsequent flights from an offshore US Navy ship were greeted with more and more evacuees – and no US envoy. With each flight to and from the embassy, Berry could see the crowds outside the it growing – and North Vietnamese forces drawing closer. “I remember thinking at the time, ‘Well, we can’t finish this,’” he told CNN. But he knew someone had to take charge, to at least get the ambassador out. Around 4 a.m., he could see the North Vietnamese forces closing on the embassy. “The tanks were coming down the road. We could see them. The ambassador was still in there,” he said. Landing on the roof, the Sea Knight took on another stream of evacuees – and no Ambassador Martin. Berry called a Marine guard sergeant over to the cockpit – and told him he had direct orders from President Ford for the ambassador to get on the helicopter. “I had no authorization to do that,” Berry said. But he knew time was short, and his frustration at making this trip more than a dozen times was boiling over. “I basically ordered him out, when I said in my best aviator voice, ‘The president sends. You have got to go now,’” using military terminology for how an order is handed down. He said Martin seemed happy to finally get a direct order, even if it came from a Marine pilot. “It looked like an Olympic sprint team getting on that (aircraft). So you know, I’ve always said that all he wanted to do was be ordered out by somebody,” Berry said. With the envoy aboard, the Sea Knight headed out to the USS Blue Ridge, ending Berry’s 14th flight of Operation Frequent Wind, some 18 hours after he started. Hours later North Vietnamese tanks would break through the gates of the South Vietnamese presidential palace, not far from the US Embassy. The Vietnam War was over. Legacies of Vietnam Berry and Chambers were both officers who had to make decisions – outside or against the chain of command – that saved lives during the fall of Saigon, which was soon renamed Ho Chi Minh City by the victorious North Vietnamese. And Chambers says it is a quality that sets the US military apart from its adversaries to this day. “We have young kids … taught initiative to do things and to take responsibility, unlike some of the other militaries where the commissar, or whoever it is,” looms over every decision, Chambers said. “We want everybody to think, and everybody to act,” said Chambers, who as a Black man was the first person of color to command a US Navy aircraft carrier. “You’ve got to be the guy in charge. You can’t run things all the way up through the Pentagon every time you have to do something,” Berry said. Chambers never faced any disciplinary action for his decisions aboard the Midway off Saigon. He’s not sure if that’s because the Midway wasn’t the only ship dumping helicopters overboard that day or because he was quickly dispatched on another rescue mission. And it certainly didn’t hurt his naval career. Two years after dumping those helicopters into the sea, he was promoted to rear admiral. Pilot Berry, who also served a combat tour in Vietnam in 1969 and ’70, is also left with sadness at the war’s futility. “I hate to think all those deaths were for naught, the 58,400,” he said. “What did we gain by all that, you know? And we killed more than a million Vietnamese.” “Those people not only lost that life, but they lost the life where they would have had families and all those things,” Berry said. As the 50th anniversary of his evacuation flights neared, Berry, now 80, was asked how long Americans would remember the Fall of Saigon, which brought to a close one of the US military’s greatest failures. “With the number of lives we lost… it can’t be called a victory. It just can’t be,” Berry said. But Vietnam also provides lessons 50 years later about keeping your trust with allies and friends, like NATO and Ukraine, he said. “We had all that promised aid for South Vietnam that never came after the final assault” began in March 1975, he said. “We never, never delivered. “You promise something, you should follow through.”
US officers who broke rank to save lives recall the fall of Saigon 50 years ago
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Veterans Reflect on Heroic Actions During the Fall of Saigon's Evacuation"
TruthLens AI Summary
In the chaotic final days of the Vietnam War, Capt. Larry Chambers of the USS Midway faced a critical decision that would put his career on the line. As North Vietnamese forces advanced towards Saigon, Chambers received a desperate request for help from South Vietnamese pilot Major Buang-Ly, who was circling the carrier in a small Cessna with his wife and five children. The Midway was already crowded with helicopters involved in Operation Frequent Wind, the evacuation of Saigon, and Chambers was under orders to clear the deck of military hardware. Despite the risks of disobeying his superiors and the potential for punishment, including court martial, Chambers chose to prioritize the safety of Buang's family. He ordered his crew to push helicopters—worth millions—overboard to create a landing space, demonstrating a commitment to saving lives over material assets. The successful landing of Buang's plane on the Midway became a dramatic highlight of the chaotic evacuation, which saw thousands of South Vietnamese and Americans escaping the impending takeover by the North Vietnamese forces.
The fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975, marked the end of a devastating conflict that had claimed countless lives and left a deep scar on both American and Vietnamese societies. As the 50th anniversary of this pivotal moment approaches, reflections from veterans like Chambers and Marine Corps Maj. Gerry Berry underscore the complex emotions tied to the event. Berry, who undertook multiple evacuation flights, recalls the urgency of rescuing Ambassador Graham Martin amidst the chaos. Both men express a sense of loss regarding the war's outcome, questioning the sacrifices made and the promises unfulfilled by the U.S. government to its allies in South Vietnam. The anniversary serves as a reminder of the lessons learned about trust and commitment in international relations, while also highlighting the human cost of a war that many view as a failure. For those who lived through it, the fall of Saigon remains a poignant memory of bravery, loss, and the moral dilemmas faced in times of crisis.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article presents a compelling narrative surrounding the fall of Saigon and the actions of U.S. Navy officers during a critical moment in history. This recollection serves as both a tribute to individual bravery and a reflection on the broader implications of U.S. involvement in Vietnam.
Purpose of the Article
The recounting of Capt. Larry Chambers’ decision to clear the deck of the USS Midway for an emergency landing highlights themes of heroism, moral duty, and the complexities of military orders during wartime. By sharing personal stories from the past, the article aims to evoke emotions and provoke reflection on the decisions made during the Vietnam War. It seeks to remind readers of the human element behind military actions, particularly the desperate circumstances faced by those fleeing Saigon.
Perception Creation
This narrative is crafted to elicit sympathy and admiration for those who acted against orders to save lives. It frames the U.S. military personnel as not just soldiers but as individuals capable of compassion and moral courage, potentially shifting public perception of the Vietnam War from purely political to deeply human. By emphasizing personal sacrifice and bravery, the article fosters a sense of nostalgia and reflection on American values.
Underlying Issues
While the article focuses on heroism, it could be argued that it glosses over the larger implications of the war, including the consequences of U.S. foreign policy in Vietnam and the subsequent fallout for both American and Vietnamese citizens. By celebrating individual acts of bravery, there may be an attempt to distract from the broader criticisms of the war and its outcomes.
Manipulative Aspects
The article’s storytelling approach, filled with emotional anecdotes, could be seen as a manipulation of public sentiment. By focusing on individual heroism, it may unintentionally downplay the complexities and failings of the war, potentially shaping a more favorable view of U.S. military actions during a controversial period.
Authenticity
The narrative appears to be accurate in recounting historical events, supported by firsthand accounts. However, the selection of details and emotional framing may influence how the audience perceives the overall context of the Vietnam War.
Social Implications
There could be a resurgence of discussions regarding U.S. foreign policy and military ethics as a result of this article. It may encourage renewed interest in historical events and their lessons for contemporary military and diplomatic strategies.
Target Audience
The article likely resonates with audiences interested in military history, veterans, and those who reflect on moral dilemmas in warfare. It appeals to individuals who value personal stories of courage and sacrifice, potentially fostering a sense of national pride.
Market Impact
While this article may not have a direct impact on financial markets, it could influence public sentiment regarding defense spending or military engagements, which in turn could affect stock prices of defense contractors. Companies involved in military and defense sectors may see varying reactions based on public perception of military actions.
Geopolitical Relevance
The discussion around the fall of Saigon has ongoing relevance in understanding U.S. foreign relations and military strategies today. It may prompt reflections on current geopolitical tensions and the importance of historical context in shaping present-day policies.
Use of AI in Writing
It is plausible that AI tools were employed in structuring the narrative or enhancing the clarity of the storytelling. The flow and structure suggest a level of refinement that could benefit from AI assistance, particularly in ensuring readability and engagement. However, without specific indicators, it is difficult to determine the extent of AI involvement.
Conclusion on Manipulation
The emotional framing of the story might serve to manipulate public sentiment, as it emphasizes individual heroism while potentially downplaying the broader implications of the Vietnam War. This can shape the narrative in a way that supports a more favorable view of military actions, obscuring critical discussions about the war's legacy.
The overall reliability of the article is bolstered by its historical context and firsthand accounts, but the narrative's emotional appeal and focus on individual acts of bravery may lead to a skewed interpretation of the Vietnam War.