US judge says layoffs at Department of Health and Human Services were likely unlawful and must be halted

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Federal Judge Rules Against HHS Layoffs, Citing Likely Unlawfulness"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.1
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

A federal judge has issued a ruling indicating that the recent mass layoffs at the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) were likely unlawful, effectively ordering the Trump administration to cease its plans for downsizing and reorganizing the nation’s health workforce. US District Judge Melissa DuBose granted a preliminary injunction in response to a lawsuit filed in early May by a coalition of attorneys general from 19 states and the District of Columbia. In her 58-page order, Judge DuBose highlighted that the states had demonstrated 'irreparable harm' resulting from the layoffs and were likely to succeed in their claims that HHS's actions were both arbitrary and capricious, as well as contrary to law. The ruling specifically blocks the administration from finalizing layoffs initially announced in March and mandates HHS to provide a status report regarding the situation by July 11.

The layoffs affected employees across multiple divisions of HHS, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Center for Tobacco Products within the Food and Drug Administration, and the Office of Head Start. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had previously announced the elimination of over 10,000 positions and the consolidation of 28 agencies into 15, citing the need to address chaos and disorganization within HHS. However, these drastic cuts have raised significant concerns, as they dismantled essential programs critical to public health and safety, such as those regulating food safety, drugs, and programs for HIV prevention and maternal health. The lawsuit asserts that the restructuring was arbitrary and exceeded the agency's authority, thereby imposing additional burdens on states. The plaintiffs, consisting of states with Democratic governors, had also previously initiated legal action against the administration over substantial cuts to public health funding, which had similarly resulted in a preliminary injunction.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

A federal judge hasruledthat recent mass layoffs at theUS Department of Health and Human Serviceswere likely unlawful and ordered the Trump administration to halt plans to downsize and reorganize the nation’s health workforce.

US District Judge Melissa DuBose granted the preliminary injunction sought by a coalition of attorneys general from 19 states and the District of Columbia in a lawsuit filed in early May.

DuBose said the states had shown “irreparable harm,” from the cuts and were likely to prevail in their claims that “HHS’s action was both arbitrary and capricious as well as contrary to law.”

“The executive branch does not have the authority to order, organize, or implement wholesale changes to the structure and function of the agencies created by Congress,” DuBose wrote in a58-page orderhanded down in US District Court in Providence, Rhode Island, on Tuesday.

Her order blocks the Trump administration from finalizing layoffs announced in March or issuing any further firings. HHS is directed to file a status report by July 11.

The ruling applies to terminated employees in four divisions of HHS: the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; the Center for Tobacco Products within the Food and Drug Administration; the Office of Head Start within the Administration for Children and Families and employees of regional offices who work on Head Start matters; and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.eliminated more than 10,000 employees in late March and consolidated 28 agencies to 15. Since then, agencies including the CDC have repeatedly rescinded layoffs affecting hundreds of employees, including in branches that monitor HIV, hepatitis and other diseases.

The attorneys general argued that the massive restructuring was arbitrary and outside of the scope of the agency’s authority. The lawsuit also says that the action decimated essential programs and pushed burdensome costs onto states.

“The intended effect … was the wholesale elimination of many HHS programs that are critical to public health and safety,” the lawsuit argued.

The cuts are part of afederal “Make America Healthy Again” directiveto streamline costly agencies and reduce redundancies.Kennedy told senators at a May 14 hearingthat there is “so much chaos and disorganization” at HHS.

But the restructuring had eliminatedkey teams that regulate food safety and drugs, as well as support a wide range of programs for tobacco, HIV prevention and maternal and infant health. Kennedy has since said that because of mistakes, 20% of people fired might be reinstated.

The states who joined the lawsuit have Democratic governors, and many of the same states — plus a few others — also sued the Trump administration over$11 billion in cuts to public health funding. A preliminary injunction was granted in that case in mid-May.

Back to Home
Source: CNN