The UK government has hit back at suggestions the tariff agreement it reached with the US last week could be damaging to China. It said there was "no such thing as a veto on Chinese investment" in the deal. The UK-US agreement rowed back on big hikes in tariffs on metals and cars imposed by President Donald Trump, but it also included conditions requiring the UK to "promptly meet" US demands on the "security of the supply chains" of steel and aluminium products exported to America. Beijing fears this could see it being excluded from supplying US-bound goods to the UK, tellingthe Financial Timesit was a "basic principle" that bilateral trade deals should not target other countries. At a regular press conference on Tuesday China's foreign ministry spokesperson was asked about the UK's trade agreements with the US and India. Lin Jian said: "As for the trade agreement... between the UK and relevant countries, I would like to point out that cooperation between countries should not target or harm the interests of third parties." China is the world's second biggest economy and the UK's fifth biggest trading partner. In 2024 total bilateral trade hit £98.4bn. In response to the latest comments from China, the UK government said the agreement with the US was "in the national interest to secure thousands of jobs across key sectors, protect British businesses and lay the groundwork for greater trade in the future". Any "external provisions" in the agreement were "not designed to undermine mutually beneficial economic relations with any third country", it said. "As the Chief Secretary to the Treasury clearly stated, there is no such thing as a veto on Chinese investment in this trade deal." It added that "trade and investment with China remain important to the UK." Under the UK-US deal Trump's blanket 10% tariffs on imports from countries around the world still applies to most UK goods entering the US. But the deal has reduced or removed tariffs on some of the UK's exports, including steel and aluminium. The terms of the agreement say the UK will "work to promptly meet US requirements on the security of the supply chains of steel and aluminium products intended for export to the United States and on the nature of ownership of relevant production facilities". The US and China have been engaged in a tariffs war since the beginning of this year. The US buys much more from China ($440bn) than it sells to it ($145bn), which is something Trump has long been unhappy with. His reasoning in part for introducing tariffs, and higher ones on countries which sell more to the US than they buy, is to encourage US consumers to buy more American-made goods, increase the amount of tax raised and boost manufacturing jobs. However, on Monday, Trump said talks over the weekend between the US and China had resulted in a "total reset" in terms of trade between the two countries, with tariffs either being cut or suspended on both sides. The result is that additional US tariffs on Chinese imports - that's the extra tariffs imposed in this recent stand-off - will fall from 145% to 30%, while recently-hiked Chinese tariffs on some US imports will fall from 125% to 10%. The move is seen as helping to defuse the trade war between the world's two biggest economies.
UK hits back at claims US tariff deal bad for China
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"UK Government Defends US Tariff Agreement Amid Chinese Concerns"
Bbc News
8.0
TruthLens AI Summary
The UK government has responded to criticisms regarding its recent tariff agreement with the United States, which some claim could adversely affect China. Officials emphasized that the deal does not impose any restrictions on Chinese investment, asserting that there is 'no such thing as a veto on Chinese investment' in the context of the agreement. While the UK-US deal has rolled back significant tariff increases on metals and vehicles that were initially implemented by former President Donald Trump, it also includes stipulations mandating the UK to 'promptly meet' US expectations regarding the security of supply chains for steel and aluminum products destined for the US market. China has expressed concerns that this arrangement may lead to its exclusion from supplying goods to the US via the UK, reiterating its stance that bilateral trade agreements should not negatively impact third-party nations. During a press conference, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson highlighted the importance of cooperation among countries without targeting others' interests.
In light of China's remarks, the UK government reiterated that the agreement with the US serves the national interest by safeguarding jobs across vital sectors and protecting British businesses while paving the way for enhanced future trade. The UK clarified that any provisions in the agreement were not intended to undermine beneficial economic relations with China, which remains a crucial trading partner. Despite the UK-US deal reducing or eliminating tariffs on certain UK exports, the broader context of US tariffs remains unchanged, with a 10% blanket tariff still in effect for most UK goods entering the US. Recent developments in the US-China trade relationship have indicated a potential thaw, as both countries have engaged in negotiations leading to a reduction of tariffs from both sides. This evolving landscape highlights the complex interplay of international trade dynamics and the ongoing efforts to mitigate tensions between the world's largest economies.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article addresses the UK government's response to concerns raised regarding its recent tariff agreement with the US and its implications for China. This situation illustrates the complexities of international trade relations, particularly in the context of geopolitical tensions. The UK aims to reassure both domestic and international audiences about the intentions behind the agreement and its impact on China's investment opportunities.
UK's Position on Trade Agreements
The UK government has firmly rejected the idea that its tariff deal with the US would harm China's interests. By emphasizing that there is "no such thing as a veto on Chinese investment," the UK seeks to convey a message of openness and inclusivity in its trade relations. This stance appears designed to mitigate any potential backlash from China, which is a significant trading partner for the UK.
China's Concerns
China's response highlights its apprehensions about being indirectly targeted by trade agreements between other nations. The comments from China's foreign ministry spokesperson reflect a broader concern about trade practices that could undermine its economic interests. This underscores the delicate balance countries must maintain when navigating trade partnerships that could affect third parties.
Implications for Bilateral Relations
The UK’s assertion that the agreement is in its national interest suggests a strategic focus on job security and business protection. The UK is keen to promote the idea that its trade policies will not compromise its relations with other nations, including China. This is crucial for maintaining strong economic ties, especially given the significant volume of bilateral trade.
Potential Economic and Political Consequences
The article hints at potential repercussions for the global economy, particularly if nations perceive trade deals as exclusionary. The UK’s efforts to present the agreement as beneficial for all parties involved may be aimed at preventing any escalations in trade tensions. The ongoing dynamics between the US, UK, and China will continue to shape the global economic landscape, particularly as geopolitical alliances evolve.
Target Audience
This news likely resonates more with policymakers, business leaders, and analysts who are monitoring the implications of international trade agreements. The article serves to inform these stakeholders about the UK's strategic positioning in the global market while addressing any fears regarding China's role in international trade.
Market Impact
In the financial markets, this news could influence investor sentiment regarding stocks related to trade-sensitive industries, particularly in the metal and automotive sectors. Investors will be watching how these trade agreements affect supply chains and market access.
Geopolitical Context
The article situates itself within the broader context of global power dynamics, especially as the US and UK seek to strengthen their economic alliance amid rising competition from China. This is relevant to discussions about how countries navigate their economic relationships in an increasingly multipolar world.
Reliability of the Information
The article appears to provide a balanced view of the situation, presenting both the UK and China's perspectives. However, the UK government's assurances may be seen as somewhat optimistic, potentially downplaying the complexities of international trade relations. Thus, while the information is credible, it is essential to consider the broader context and motivations behind such statements.