Two activists fled Iran for the US. They disagree on the strikes against their home country

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Iranian Activists in U.S. Split Over U.S. Strikes Against Iran"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Roozbeh Farahanipour and Elham Yaghoubian are two Iranian activists who fled their home country nearly 30 years ago due to threats against their lives for opposing the Islamic Republic. Farahanipour, who experienced imprisonment and torture for his activism, left Iran in 2000, while Yaghoubian, a student activist, escaped following the arrests of her friends in 1999. Both have since established lives in Los Angeles, which is home to a significant Iranian American community. Despite their shared history, they hold opposing views regarding recent U.S. military strikes against Iran, which have heightened tensions in the region. Farahanipour, who owns a restaurant in a vibrant area known as 'Persian Square,' is against further military involvement, fearing it could lead to another protracted conflict similar to those in Afghanistan or Iraq. In contrast, Yaghoubian supports the strikes, believing they could potentially benefit Iran and the broader Middle East by undermining the current regime's power.

The recent U.S. strikes, which targeted key Iranian nuclear sites, have sparked a divide within the Iranian American community in Los Angeles. Demonstrators gathered to protest U.S. involvement, holding signs that expressed a desire for peace rather than war. Yaghoubian argues that the strikes are justified as they target the infrastructure of the Islamic Republic, which she believes has caused immense suffering to the Iranian people. She sees the possibility of regime change as a hopeful outcome from the conflict. On the other hand, Farahanipour insists that military action is not the solution and advocates for an internal revolution led by Iranians themselves. He emphasizes that civilian casualties, regardless of nationality, are unacceptable and that the focus should be on achieving a secular and democratic Iran without foreign military intervention. This ideological rift between the two activists highlights the complexities and differing perspectives within the Iranian diaspora regarding the future of their homeland amidst ongoing geopolitical tensions.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Roozbeh Farahanipour saw his name published in an Iranian newspaper — along with a reward for his body, and he knew he was no longer safe, he said.

Elham Yaghoubian, a student activist in Iran who co-founded an underground party against the Islamic Republic with Farahanipour had that same feeling when her friends and fellow activists were arrested in 1999.

Both fled Iran nearly 30 years ago, fearful for their safety. Both built new lives in Los Angeles, where nearly 141,000 Iranian Americans, according to theUS Census, have forged a tight-knit community.

But the two activists, who have had such similar paths to the United States, are split on the country’s strikes in Iran.

Farahanipour, a restaurant owner, had been jailed and tortured for his work as an opposition leader by the time he fled Iran in 2000. He opposes war in the region because he doesn’t want to see another “Afghanistan or Iraq.”

Yaghoubian, who works at a language and translation company, supports the attacks, saying they are “beneficial” for Iran, the Middle East and the world.

The US attack Saturday night led to Iran retaliating with a targeted missile attack on the US Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar.

The strikes, which are part of an escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, have divided Los Angeles’ tight-knit Iranian American community, Farahanipour said.

One of Farahanipour’s restaurants is located on a strip of Westwood Boulevard near UCLA known asPersian Square.

Home to many Iranian businesses, the restaurants, bakeries and bookstores are adorned with signs in both English and Farsi.

On Sunday, nearly three decades after he saw his name on an execution list and a day after the US strikes on Tehran, Farahanipour stood outside the restaurant with his young son.

The pair wore jeans and matching blue polos as they waved the flag of the Iranian diaspora.

Immigration from Iran to the US began in the early 20th century and spiked around the time of the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Over 50 percent of immigrants — including Farahanipour and Yaghoubian — arrived in the US after 1994, according to the UCLA Center for Near Eastern Studies

Many Persian residents refer to the Los Angeles area as “Tehrangeles,” — a mix of Tehran and Los Angeles — according to Bruin Life, a UCLA student website.

On Sunday, demonstraters gathered at the federal building in Westwood to rally against the United State’s involvement in the conflict.

People held signs reading “No War on Iran,” and “We won’t let you drag us into global war.” Others chanted “hands off Iran,” and “Money for jobs and education. Not for wars and occupation.”

The recent strikes, Yaghoubian argued, targeted infrastructure belonging to the Islamic Republic. The US attack hit three nuclear sites in Iran: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.

“These infrastructures, roads, factories, buildings, they can rise again, but what we can never recover are the lives of all young men and women we’ve lost to the brutal regime every time they rise for their basic rights,” Yaghoubian said.

War isn’t something people wanted, but Yaghoubian believes something good could come out of it — the end of the Iranian regime. The attacks represent hope for a better future, she said.

“No negotiation, no appeasement will bring an end this war. Only with removing this regime from Iran will bring peace and prosperity, she said.”

But Farahanipour doesn’t think the attacks will free Iran. He has advocated for a secular Iran, and the “internal toppling” of the Islamic Republic by Iranians. The activist believes the US should not have thrust itself into the conflict.

“Killing the people, regardless in Iran, in Israel, American people, anyone, any civilian or people, they just died, is not an answer,” he said.

Back to Home
Source: CNN