Donald Trump spent his first 100 days back in the Oval Office driving an economy that the world envied to the brink of crisis, risking America’s reputation as a financial safe haven and fostering fear among voters who’ve lost confidence in his leadership. Americans were desperate for relief from high grocery prices and bought into Trump’s promise to make America affordable again in November 2024, partly out of nostalgia for the pre-pandemic economy of his first term. But the president deliberately and singlehandedly adopted policies that are almost certain to spike prices even more; that could lead to shortages; and that have CEOs and small businesses dealing with chaos and the possibility of a recession. Trump is attempting the most fundamental overhaul of the US and global economies in generations, adamant that he can recreate a mythical late 19th-century golden age using “beautiful” tariffs to exert US economic might to crush trade rivals. But a president who has played golf while workers’ 401(k)s tanked has often looked indifferent to the growing concerns of Americans, from business titans to ordinary shoppers who are seeing the impact of his policies in real time over his first 100 days in office, which he will mark on Tuesday. Trillions of dollars have been wiped off stock markets. Airlines are cutting flights; top firms are trashing their own annual forecasts; some retailers have given up selling China-made goods in the US because of the tariffs. The International Monetary Fund cut US growth forecasts; the Federal Reserve says some businesses have stopped hiring; the CEO of Walmart told Trump his policies will seize up the supply chain by summer. In a warning sign of a possible slide to a recession, consumer sentiment has plummeted and was in April at its fourth-lowest level since 1952. CNN’s Fear and Greed Index, a snapshot of emotion on the markets, has been registering “fear” or “extreme fear” for the last month. Relentlessly applying American power Like much that Trump has done since returning to the Oval Office, his trade policy is legally and constitutionally questionable since he unilaterally declared a national emergency to unlock powers to wage tariff warfare. He’s now wielding vast and unaccountable authority to test his lifelong theory that the United States, the world’s richest nation, has long been ripped off by every other country. His aim is to force foreign markets wide open for US products and to make manufacturers bring back factories and jobs to revive industrialized regions that have paid a heavy price for the globalization of trade. He insists that scores of nations are lining up to do US-friendly deals that will make Americans rich. Millions of American jobs may depend on the outcome of his gamble. Trump is putting into practice a core belief that is also at the center of his effort to dismantle the US-led Western political system that has prevailed and kept global peace for 80 years: That the United States — the mightiest world power — should not lead the world but should use its strength in one-on-one negotiations to coerce smaller nations into policies that benefit America and no one else. This principle, embedded in his “America first” approach, has already alienated many American allies — although that’s a feature rather than a bug for a president who sees life as a win-lose proposition. The president’s brittle temper and belief that he possesses a sharper economic mind than those whose job it is to protect employment and to fight inflation are also contributing to pushing the US economy to the brink. His attacks on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, for instance, have tarnished America’s brand as the rock of stability in the global economy. Trump has been demanding big interest-rate cuts even though many experts warn that this could hike inflation, which is already expected to rise because of his tariffs. Markets hated his interference — perhaps one reason why he’s toned down, at least for now, his threats to fire the central bank chief. Trump is also escalating a dangerous showdown with China, launching full-on economic warfare with America’s 21st-century superpower rival, which has enormous geopolitical implications far beyond trading conditions. “If you look at all of the years that I’ve been doing this, I’ve been right on things,” Trump told Time Magazine in an interview last week marking his first 100 days. “You’re going to have the wealthiest country we’ve ever had, and you’re going to have an explosion upward in the not-too-distant future.” What is so remarkable about the gathering storm is that it’s not the product of business cycles, an outside economic shock, a terrorist attack, or an act of God like a pandemic or natural disaster. It’s all authored by an American president knowingly adopting tariff policies that almost all informed economic observers predict will lead to higher prices and slowed economic activity. It’s not just what Trump is doing, but how he’s doing it. He has imposed, paused and adjusted arbitrary tariffs erratically, creating the kind of uncertainty that can cause recessions. He claimed in his Time interview he’d already done 200 trade deals and that his team is talking with China, which is facing a 145% tariff that has effectively halted trade between the rivals. Beijing denies it’s in contact with the US and is showing no sign of backing down to his intimidation. Americans don’t believe in Trump’s economic mastery anymore Trump is making an extraordinary hazardous bet. “This is one of the most important days, in my opinion, in American history. It’s our declaration of economic independence,” the president said, declaring “Liberation Day” in the White House Rose Garden on April 2. He gleefully ran down the list of tariff rates for dozens of nations on big poster. “We’re going to be wealthy as a country because they’ve taken so much of our wealth away from us.” But within hours of reciprocal tariffs coming into force, Trump suddenly paused them for 90 days, apparently brought back to reality by alarming activity in the bond markets that suggested investors were abandoning their faith in the US economy. His officials, steeped in Trump’s personality cult, nevertheless hailed his sudden reversal as proof of his genius and predicted a torrent of deals that would boost the economy. None of them have materialized so far. The confusion and reversals have been traumatic for millions of Americans who hoped he’d bring economic relief, not a new round of pain for family budgets. After winning a plurality of the popular vote in November, Trump’s approval rating has plummeted to 41%, the worst of any president in his first 100 days in 70 years, according to a new CNN/SSRS poll. His approval on the economy — a key to his longtime political viability — is at its lowest-ever level at 39%. Only 35% approve of his approach to inflation, the same number who back Trump on tariffs. Where are the deals from the ‘ultimate dealmaker?’ The president’s deteriorating political position is escalating pressure to produce outcomes that justify the massive shock and damage he’s caused to the economy. The administration, however, insists that an economic policy that seems to emerge from the president’s personal whims is a well-thought-out plan primed to deliver. “I mean, he is the ultimate dealmaker,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins told CNN’s Dana Bash on “State of the Union” Sunday. “It is going to be a new era of market expansion around the world … Countries are knocking on our door right now.” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent portrayed Trump’s capricious leadership as an example of a president outwitting US trade rivals. “In game theory, it’s called strategic uncertainty. So, you’re not going to tell the person on the other side of the negotiation where you’re going to end up. And nobody’s better at creating this leverage than President Trump,” Bessent said on ABC News’ “This Week” Sunday. “You know, he’s shown the high tariffs, and here’s the stick. This is where the tariffs can go. And the carrot is, come to us, take off your tariffs, take off your non-tariff trade barriers, stop manipulating your currency, stop subsidizing labor and capital and then we can talk.” If Trump’s tariff strategy succeeds and he markedly improves trading conditions for the United States, he will defy the conventional wisdom of almost every leading economic analyst and decades of US economic policy. But if he tips the country — and the rest of the world — into recession, there will be no political escape since he’s made himself the personification of the tariff policy. This is why it will be important to watch what happens next. The administration is predicting that a flurry of trade deals from the likes of Japan, South Korea and the European Union will soon begin rolling out. Given that such agreements usually take years to negotiate and require ratification by foreign legislatures in democratic states, it’s likely that what emerges will fall far short of the revolution in global trade that the administration is predicting. But Trump is likely to hail any deals as extraordinary breakthroughs. If they don’t satisfy his goal of transforming global trade, they might calm markets and stabilize the president’s political standing and restore his dealmaker’s mythology. Higher prices are coming Even if Trump succeeds, his approach almost certainly means higher prices for Americans across the board — in defiance of the message voters sent last November. Trump said in the Time interview, for instance, that he would regard it as a “total victory” if tariffs are at 20% or 30% or 50% on foreign imports next year. Such a scenario would mean American consumers would face far higher prices, effectively a massive tax increase. Trump insists that this will be offset by a massive tax reduction bill — but progress has been slow as GOP leaders try to work the plan through Congress. And while he insists he has lowered prices for basic goods since taking office, that’s mostly untrue. Trump’s vision of himself as a master impresario conducting the economy suggests that even rockier times will be ahead. He has suggested, for instance, that he would have sole responsibility for setting the prices of goods. “We are a department store, and we set the price,” Trump told Time. “Now, some countries may come back and ask for an adjustment, and I’ll consider that, but I’ll basically be, with great knowledge, setting.” Such an arbitrary system, in which one person sets prices — let alone someone with as rudimentary grasp of economics as Trump — would be a recipe for mayhem and corruption, and would shatter the rules-based economic system that has made the US the world’s greatest power. “The United States was more than just a nation. It’s a brand,” billionaire investor Ken Griffin warned at the Semafor World Economy Summit last week. “It was like an aspiration for most the world. And we’re eroding that brand right now.”
Trump took the US economy to the brink of a crisis in just 100 days
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Trump's First 100 Days Mark Economic Turmoil and Rising Inflation Concerns"
TruthLens AI Summary
In the first 100 days of Donald Trump's return to the Oval Office, his economic policies have driven the U.S. economy to the brink of crisis, undermining America’s status as a financial safe haven. His administration's approach has led to rising fears among voters as they grapple with soaring grocery prices and diminished confidence in his leadership. Trump’s promise to restore affordability has not materialized, as his actions, particularly the imposition of tariffs, are expected to exacerbate inflation and create supply shortages. The International Monetary Fund has downgraded U.S. growth forecasts, while consumer sentiment has plummeted, indicating a potential recession. Major corporations are adjusting their forecasts, and the Federal Reserve has noted a slowdown in hiring, underscoring the immediate negative impact of Trump's policies on the economy. His unilateral trade decisions, enacted under a declared national emergency, reflect a controversial and aggressive strategy aimed at reshaping both U.S. and global economic landscapes, but they have also alienated key allies and raised concerns about the stability of the financial markets.
Trump's self-proclaimed economic mastery is being tested as his administration grapples with the fallout from erratic tariff policies and a confrontational stance towards China. Despite his assertions that he is negotiating favorable deals, the reality is that markets are responding negatively, with stock values declining and uncertainty prevailing. His approval ratings have dropped significantly, particularly regarding his handling of the economy and inflation, raising questions about his political viability. The administration's optimistic forecasts for new trade deals contrast sharply with the skepticism of economic experts who warn that any agreements will take time to materialize. If Trump's tariff strategy fails, it could lead to severe repercussions for both the economy and his presidency, as he has positioned himself as the architect of these policies. The potential for higher consumer prices looms as a significant concern, challenging the very promises that brought him back to power. As the situation develops, it remains to be seen whether Trump can navigate the economic turmoil he has sparked and restore confidence among Americans.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article reflects on the first 100 days of Donald Trump's return to the Oval Office, emphasizing the negative impact of his economic policies. It portrays a narrative of decline in consumer confidence and a looming financial crisis, highlighting various statistics and personal anecdotes to substantiate its claims.
Intent Behind the Article
The purpose of this piece appears to be to cast doubt on Trump's economic leadership and to raise alarm about the potential for a financial crisis. By showcasing the adverse effects of his policies, the article aims to influence public perception, particularly among voters who may be considering their options for the upcoming election.
Public Sentiment and Perception
The article seeks to generate a sense of anxiety among the public regarding Trump's economic decisions. It suggests that many individuals, from everyday consumers to corporate leaders, are feeling the pressure of rising prices and economic instability. This narrative is likely intended to sway voters who may have doubts about Trump's capability to handle the economy effectively.
Omissions and Hidden Agendas
There may be elements of the economic landscape that are downplayed or ignored in this report, such as positive impacts of certain policies or broader economic trends that could counterbalance the negative portrayal. The focus on fear and crisis could serve to obscure more complex realities in the economy and the political motivations behind such coverage.
Manipulative Elements
The article exhibits a manipulative quality through its sensationalist language and selective reporting on economic indicators. By emphasizing the dire consequences of Trump's policies while minimizing any potential benefits, it creates a biased narrative that may lead readers to an emotional response rather than a balanced view.
Truthfulness of the Report
The accuracy of the claims made in the article largely depends on the context and interpretation of the data presented. While it cites legitimate concerns regarding economic indicators, the framing and emphasis suggest a particular bias that may distort the overall truth.
Implied Messages
The narrative conveys that Trump's approach is fundamentally flawed and that he is out of touch with the average American's struggles. This could resonate particularly with communities that are feeling the direct effects of inflation and economic uncertainty.
Impact on Markets and Economy
The concerns raised in the article could have significant implications for market behavior and investor confidence. Stocks, particularly in sectors directly affected by tariffs and consumer sentiment, may experience volatility as a result of this type of reporting. Companies reliant on imports or those in consumer goods might be particularly vulnerable.
Global Power Dynamics
From a geopolitical standpoint, the article hints at the risks of America's economic policies on its standing as a financial safe haven. This could influence international perceptions and relationships, particularly with trade partners affected by Trump's tariffs.
Potential AI Involvement
It's plausible that AI tools were used in generating or editing the article, particularly in data analysis or language processing. Models like GPT or similar could assist in crafting narratives based on economic data, potentially influencing the tone or direction of the piece.
Conclusion on Reliability
While the article raises legitimate concerns regarding Trump's economic policies, its framing and selective emphasis suggest a degree of manipulation aimed at shaping public opinion. The portrayal of an impending crisis may resonate with those already skeptical of Trump's leadership.