President Donald Trump has asked aides and advisers if they believe Elon Musk’s behavior over the past 48 hours could be related to his alleged drug use, privately seeking to understand the tech billionaire’s broadsides against him while signaling publicly he doesn’t care, a source familiar with the conversations told CNN. In his own telling, Trump is not wasting any time thinking about the man who, one week ago, was receiving a giant golden key in the Oval Office and has since lobbed insults toward its occupant. The president told CNN’s Dana Bash in a brief phone call Friday morning he was “not even thinking about Elon” and wouldn’t be speaking to Musk “for a while.” But questions about the spectacularly public break-up have come nonetheless. Talking to reporters on Air Force One Friday night, Trump said he would “take a look at” canceling some of Musk’s government contracts, a possibility he had floated on Truth Social in the height of their feud, and asserted the country would be fine without them. “The US can survive without almost anybody – except me,” he said, adding that he was joking on the latter point. Though the source said Trump had privately inquired about Musk’s alleged drug use, the president declined to weigh in on the matter publicly. “I don’t want to comment on his drug use. I don’t know - I don’t know what his status is,” he said on Air Force One, adding that New York Times reporting on the matter “sounded very unfair.” CNN has reached out to a Musk representative. When Musk was asked about the report during his Oval Office farewell with Trump a week ago, he declined to answer and attacked the newspaper instead. The Times reported that Musk was “using drugs far more intensely than previously known,” as he rose to prominence in Trump’s inner circle in 2024, including “using ketamine often, sometimes daily, and mixing it with other drugs,” according to people familiar. In a 2024 interview with Don Lemon, Musk acknowledged he took “a small amount” of ketamine to treat negative moods, under a prescription, but that a heavy workload prevented him from using too much. Neither Musk nor his lawyer responded to the Times’ request for comment about his drug use. CNN also reached out to his representative about the allegations at the time. Last week, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, whose wife Katie Miller left a job with the Department of Government Efficiency to work for Musk, told CNN he had no concerns over the New York Times report that Musk used drugs more extensively than previously known. In the day since the Trump-Musk feud erupted on their respective social media platforms, Trump’s aides said the president has been focused on advancing that supersized bill that started the whole thing, and has directed his team to follow suit. His online presence Friday morning was limited to posts about the economy, without any mention of the tech billionaire. He spent the morning on the phone — not with Musk, but with the new president of South Korea, whom he invited to the US for talks. He chatted with the president of Poland about the upcoming NATO summit. And before traveling to Bedminster, New Jersey, in the evening, he stopped to tour a golf course. Whether the president is successful in turning attention away from the ugly spat remains to be seen. The Justice Department’s announcement late Friday afternoon that Kilmar Abrego Garcia has returned to the US to face criminal counts began to shift the narrative. Nor was it precisely clear what effect the wreckage of the Trump-Musk alliance would have on the president’s agenda bill being considered by Congress, on Musk’s businesses or on the direction of the Republican Party. All seemed potentially caught in the undertow after the two men spent Thursday afternoon and evening lashing out at each other online. A tipping point for Trump and his advisers, people familiar with what was happening behind the scenes said, was Musk’s linkage of the president to Jeffrey Epstein. Musk suggested the administration wasn’t releasing information about the convicted pedophile because it invokes Trump. (Musk cited no evidence and gave no detail how he would have gained access to unreleased files.) White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt called his claims an “unfortunate episode” in a Thursday evening statement. After that, any chance of reconciliation appeared to be scuttled. For Trump, Musk’s criticism of the major legislative package could only embolden Republicans who share the tech CEO’s concerns the bill would explode the US deficit. Rep. Thomas Massie, who voted against the bill, told CNN that he thinks Musk’s opposition could fuel buyer’s remorse. And Rep. Michael McCaul, who supported it, said he worries that a prolonged fight between Musk and Trump could become a distraction for getting Trump’s agenda passed, before going on to cite “very good intelligence” that the two men would soon settle their spat. But Musk – who less than a month ago had said he’d spend “a lot less” on politics – has also threatened to put his substantial spending power behind efforts to remove from office Republicans who vote for the bill. After spending more than $290 million to help elect Trump and Republicans last year, the future of Musk’s political spending now appears unknown. Funds Musk privately promised to groups associated with Trump are now in doubt. One powerful Trump ally, Steve Bannon, suggested Trump use his power to go after Musk in multiple ways. He said on his “War Room Live” show Thursday that Trump should begin deportation proceedings for Musk, saying he is “illegal” and has “got to go.” Musk was born in South Africa but became an American citizen in 2002. Bannon also suggested the Trump administration investigate Musk’s alleged drug use, and potentially suspend his security clearance. Still, allies of both seemed to hold out hope the rupture would not be permanent, and that the two most dominant figures in current Republican politics might be able to patch things up. “I’m not going to speak for either of them. I was with the president in the Oval Office yesterday afternoon as some of this unfolded. And I can just say he was disappointed. I mean, he said that himself. And I was, as well,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said Friday. “I believe in redemption,” Johnson went on. “I hope we can resolve it, get everybody together again. That’s really important for all of us.” CNN’s Hadas Gold, Molly English, Lauren Fox and Betsy Klein contributed to this report.
Trump asks aides if they think Musk’s behavior could be related to alleged drug use, source says
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Trump Questions Musk's Behavior Amid Allegations of Drug Use"
TruthLens AI Summary
In a recent turn of events, President Donald Trump has privately inquired with aides about whether Elon Musk's recent erratic behavior could be linked to his alleged drug use. This inquiry follows a series of public insults exchanged between the two, marking a significant fallout from their previous camaraderie. Trump, who had recently honored Musk with a golden key in the Oval Office, now claims to be unfazed by Musk's provocations, stating he is not currently focused on the tech billionaire. Despite his dismissive public stance, Trump has hinted at the possibility of canceling some of Musk’s government contracts, suggesting that the U.S. could thrive without Musk’s contributions. The President's comments come in the context of a heated dispute that has escalated dramatically over social media, with Musk suggesting a connection between Trump and the infamous Jeffrey Epstein, a claim Trump’s administration has vehemently denied.
The tensions between Trump and Musk have not only raised questions about their future relationship but also about the potential impact on Trump's legislative agenda. Musk's criticism of a major bill has emboldened Republican dissenters who share his concerns about fiscal responsibility. Meanwhile, Trump's allies, including Steve Bannon, have suggested aggressive strategies against Musk, including calls for an investigation into his alleged drug use. Despite the discord, some insiders express hope for reconciliation, emphasizing the importance of unity among leading figures in the Republican Party. As the situation unfolds, both Trump and Musk’s political futures and their influence on party dynamics remain uncertain, suggesting that this public spat could have far-reaching implications for their respective agendas and the Republican landscape as a whole.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The news article presents an intriguing glimpse into the dynamic between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, highlighting Trump's speculation regarding Musk's behavior and alleged drug use. This relationship, once seemingly cordial, has taken a tumultuous turn, prompting questions about the motivations and implications of such public exchanges.
Intended Purpose of the Article
The article likely aims to draw attention to the evolving relationship between two influential figures in American culture and politics. By focusing on Trump's inquiries about Musk's alleged drug use, it seeks to create a narrative around the instability of their alliance and possibly frame Musk as less credible or rational in his comments against Trump.
Public Perception
The narrative constructed in the article may aim to sway public opinion against Musk by introducing the idea of drug use, which can stigmatize him in the eyes of his supporters or the general public. This could serve to reinforce a perception of Musk as erratic or untrustworthy, potentially influencing how people view his statements and actions.
Hidden Agendas
While the article primarily discusses Musk's behavior, it could also be diverting attention from other significant issues, such as the political climate surrounding Trump's administration or Musk's business dealings and controversies. The focus on personal behavior may lead audiences to overlook broader implications of their respective actions in the political and business arenas.
Manipulative Elements
The article does contain manipulative aspects, particularly in how it frames Musk's drug use and Trump's reactions. The suggestion that Trump's aides are concerned about Musk's behavior implies a deeper issue, potentially aiming to create a sense of drama and intrigue that captivates the audience. This framing can lead to speculation and assumptions that may not be fully substantiated.
Authenticity of the News
While the article cites sources and presents quotes, it is essential to recognize that the information is presented in a way that may not provide a complete picture. The reliance on unnamed sources raises questions about the reliability of the claims made regarding Musk’s alleged drug use.
Societal Impact
The ongoing feud between Trump and Musk could have repercussions in various sectors, including politics and technology. As public figures, their conflicts can influence their respective follower bases, potentially affecting political support and market perceptions of companies associated with Musk, such as Tesla and SpaceX.
Support Base Dynamics
This article might resonate more with audiences critical of Musk, potentially those who align with Trump or who are skeptical of the tech industry. Conversely, it may alienate Musk's supporters, who may view the article as an unfair attack on a prominent figure in innovation.
Market Implications
The narrative around Musk's behavior and potential repercussions on his business dealings could impact stock prices in companies like Tesla. Investors may react to news that suggests instability or controversy surrounding a leading figure, leading to fluctuations in market confidence.
Geopolitical Context
While the article primarily focuses on a domestic issue, the influence of both Trump and Musk extends internationally, particularly in technology and space exploration. Their interactions may reflect broader trends in how leadership dynamics are perceived globally.
Potential AI Influence
It is plausible that AI tools were used in crafting the article, particularly in determining the structure and flow of information. AI models could analyze public sentiment and trending topics, influencing how the article was framed to maximize engagement and discussion.
The article's manipulation of the narrative, particularly through its focus on personal issues rather than substantive policy discussions, raises concerns about its overall reliability. The framing techniques employed suggest a clear intention to provoke a reaction rather than to inform comprehensively.