Trump administration scrambles to rehire key federal workers after DOGE firings

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Trump Administration Rehires Federal Workers Following Layoffs Amid Service Gaps"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a surprising turn of events, the Trump administration is actively rehiring federal employees who were laid off or opted for early retirement as part of its effort to reduce the size of the federal workforce. This decision comes in response to the noticeable gaps in essential services that arose following the Department of Government Efficiency's aggressive workforce reduction initiatives. Agencies are beginning to realize the detrimental impact of these firings, as they struggle to maintain operations and fulfill their mandates. Experts like Elaine Kamarck from the Brookings Institution have raised alarms about the long-term consequences of these cuts, suggesting that the administration's actions have created 'time bombs' across various agencies, risking the loss of critical institutional knowledge and expertise necessary for effective governance in the future. The rehirings, though a step back from previous policy, reflect mounting pressure from lawmakers and advocacy groups concerned about the ramifications of a diminished federal workforce on public services.

The reinstatement of employees has been particularly pronounced in agencies like the Department of Health and Human Services, which has brought back hundreds of workers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) after significant layoffs aimed at reorganizing the agency. These reinstated positions are crucial, especially in the context of ongoing public health challenges, including childhood lead exposure and HIV prevention efforts. Other agencies, such as the National Weather Service and the Food and Drug Administration, have also begun rehiring staff to restore critical functions impacted by earlier cuts. The chaotic nature of these personnel decisions has raised concerns about the federal government's ability to respond effectively to immediate and future challenges, with some experts arguing that the administration's approach reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the importance of sustained government expertise. The situation underscores the complexities and potential dangers of hastily implemented workforce reductions, as the federal government grapples with the implications of its staffing decisions on public safety and service delivery.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Federal agencies are rehiring and ordering back from leave some of the employees who were laid off in the weeks after PresidentDonald Trumptook office as they scramble to fill critical gaps in services left by theDepartment of Government Efficiency-led effortto shrink the federal workforce.

The Trump administration’s quiet backtracking from the firings and voluntary retirements — which are also paired with new hires to fill vacancies those departures created — come as federal agencies are still implementing their“reduction-in-force” plansas part of a push for spending cuts.

Experts warned that even though the Trump administration has backtracked on some of its efforts to shrink the federal workforce, the rapid rehirings are a warning sign that it has lost more capacities and expertise that could prove critical — and difficult to replace — in the months and years ahead.

“There are time bombs all over the place in the federal government because of this,” said Elaine Kamarck, the director of the Center for Effective Public Management at the Brookings Institution. “They’ve wreaked havoc across nearly every agency.”

Some government employees’ firings were halted by courts. But other moves to reinstate federal workers come as the Trump administration faces pressure from lawmakers, industries and groups they serve.

“President Trump pledged to make our bloated government more efficient by slashing waste, fraud, and abuse. The administration is committed to delivering on this mandate while rectifying any oversights to minimize disruptions to critical government services,” White House spokesman Kush Desai said.

Earlier this month, as Israel’s conflict with Iran escalated,Voice of America called backdozens of Farsi speakers who had been on paid administrative leave since March. Those staffers at its Persian-language service were among hundreds who were then laid off again the next week, as the Trump administrationgutted the network.

With hurricane season looming, the National Weather Service — which lost more than 560 employees to layoffs and early retirement incentives earlier this year — received permission tohire about 125 new meteorologistsand specialists for its forecast offices around the country, despite a federal hiring freeze. Those hires will help staff offices that had to cut back on their hours or stop staffing the overnight shift.

The Department of Health and Human Servicesreinstated 450 employeesat the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who were fired as part of a massive reorganization in April, including workers focused on HIV and childhood lead exposure.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in May that the department had also reinstated 328 workers at the CDC’s National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health focused on mine safety.

Those employees combined represent about one-third of the 2,400 workers whose jobs HHS eliminated as part of its “reduction-in-force” plan as the Trump administration slashed the size of the federal workforce.

More than 200 employees had their firings rescinded at the CDC’s National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and Tuberculosis Prevention, along with 158 at the National Center for Environmental Health, an HHS spokesperson confirmed. Another 71 were brought back in the Office of the Director and two dozen more at the Global Health Center.

The cuts had wiped out the CDC’s Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention and Surveillance Branch as it was in the midst of helping Milwaukee address a lead exposure crisis in its public schools. The firings meant the CDC had to deny a request from the city for specialists to help. The entire lead team was rehired, along with its parent group, the Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, according to its newly reinstated director, Dr. Erik Svendsen.

Other rehires are similarly driven by specific government services that were gutted by the initial layoffs. The Food and Drug Administration rehired more than a dozen scientists at a food safety lab in Illinois. The Department of Agriculture halted plans to lay off 25% of its staff at 58 facilities responsible for responding to bird flu, which had driven up theprice of eggs.

Federal agency heads are also blocking some plans to lay off their employees. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who was concerned about plans to slash 10% of the Indian Health Service’s staff, said in a New York Times interview that Kennedy called her to say he was personally blocking those cuts.

“He called me up to say, ‘They told me that I was supposed to find 10% cuts across the board for IHS, and I told them I wouldn’t do it, that IHS has chronically been underfunded, we cannot go backward, and I’m not going to do that,’” the Alaska Republican said.

In February, theTrump administration fired— and then the next day rehired — more than 300 probationary employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration, the agency within the Department of Energy tasked with managing the nation’s nuclear stockpile. Sources told CNN at the time the Trump administration officials responsible for the decision did not seem to know this agency oversees America’s nuclear weapons.

After HHS let go of the entire team that handles the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, or LIHEAP, in early April, the agency had to rehire one longtime employee for 2½ weeks to run a critical formula needed to distribute more than $400 million to states, said Mark Wolfe, executive director of the National Energy Assistance Directors Association.

The dismissal of the more than a dozen LIHEAP staffers raised concerns among state officials and lawmakers, who feared HHS would not send out this final tranche of fiscal year 2025 funding. Some states were depending on receiving this money to help residents cool their homes this summer since the states had already exhausted their prior appropriations on the heating season.

The agency announced at the end of April that it was releasing the remaining LIHEAP money. Wolfe, however, remains concerned about how HHS will handle the distribution of any fiscal year 2026 funds that Congress may appropriate since the agency will not have any experienced LIHEAP staffers. Doing so “requires skills, requires knowledge about the program,” he said.

Scott Laney, a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health epidemiologist who’d received notice he was being placed on administrative leave but was then called back, told CNN there is “still a lot of chaos, sort of throughout the federal workforce.”

But he said he is more concerned about coal miners’ safety.

If protections in place for decades are cut, Laney said, it’s certain “that people will die earlier — that people will die in mining accidents and roof collapses, all sorts of the work that we do to prevent injury and illness and mining more broadly across the United States.”

Max Stier, CEO of the Partnership for Public Service, said the moves to eliminate, and then reinstate, many federal workers “shows the mosaic of incompetence and a failure on the part of this administration to understand the critical value that the breadth of government expertise provides.”

“This is not about a single incident. It’s about a pattern that has implications for our government’s ability to meet not just the challenges of today but the critical challenges of tomorrow,” Stier said.

CNN’s Tami Luhby, Annie Grayer, Camila DeChalus, Andrew Freedman, Meg Tirrell and Brenda Goodman contributed to this report.

Back to Home
Source: CNN