Calley Means has built a following within the “Make America Healthy Again” movement by railing against the failings of the U.S. health system, often pinning the blame on one issue: corruption. Means, a top aide to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., was hired as a White House adviser in March. He has used that perch to attack the nation’s leading physician groups, federal agencies and government scientists, claiming they only protect their own interests in the nation’s $4.9 trillion-a-year industry. In recent interviews, speeches and podcasts he has called the American Medical Association “a pharma lobbying group,” labeled the Food and Drug Administration “a sock puppet of industry,” and said federal health scientists have “overseen a record of utter failure.” Means, however, has his own financial stake in the sprawling health system. He’s the co-founder of an online platform, Truemed, that offers dietary supplements, herbal remedies and other wellness products. Some of the vendors featured on Truemed’s website are supporters of Kennedy’s MAHA movement, which downplays the benefits of prescription drugs, vaccines and other rigorously tested medical products. Kennedy has pledged to run the Department of Health and Human Services with “radical transparency,” but Means has never had to publicly disclose his own financial details or where exactly they intersect with the policies he’s advancing. “It reeks of hypocrisy,” said Dr. Reshma Ramachandran, a health researcher at Yale University. “In effect, he is representing another industry that is touting nonregulated products and using his platform within the government to financially benefit himself.” In a written statement, Means said his government work has not dealt with matters affecting Truemed and has focused on issues like reforming nutrition programs and pressuring companies to phase out food dyes. “Pursuing these large-scale MAHA goals to make America healthy has been the sole focus in my government work,” Means said. Truemed helps users take tax-free money out of their health savings accounts, or HSAs, to spend on things that wouldn’t normally qualify as medical expenses, such as exercise equipment, meal delivery services and homeopathic remedies — mixtures of plants and minerals based on a centuries-old theory of medicine that’s not supported by modern science. The business model caught the attention of the IRS last year, which issued an alert: “Beware of companies misrepresenting nutrition, wellness and general health expenses as medical care.” Truemed co-founder and CEO, Justin Mares, said in a statement the company is “in full alignment” with IRS guidelines. “Truemed enables patients to work with providers to use medical funds for root cause interventions like exercise and vitamin D to reverse disease under current law,” Mares said. The full extent of Means’ potential conflicts — including his personal investments— are unclear because of his status as a special government employee. Unlike presidential appointees and other senior officials, special government employees are temporary staffers who do not have to leave companies or sell investments that could be impacted by their work. Also, their financial disclosure forms are shielded from public release. “It’s a big problem,” says Richard Painter, a former White House ethics lawyer under George W. Bush now at the University of Minnesota. Painter and other experts have raised alarms over a whirlwind of Trump administration actions to dismantle the government’s public integrity guardrails. Still, part-time government employees are subject to the same law that bars all federal staffers from working on issues that could directly benefit their finances. When such cases arise, they must recuse themselves or risk criminal penalties. Means regularly opines on matters before HHS, including rethinking the use of drugs for depression, weight loss, diabetes and other conditions. Recently he’s been promoting a new government report that calls for scaling back prescription medications in favor of exercise, dietary changes and other alternatives. “If we rely less on our medical system, less on drugs, it necessitates the spiritual, cultural conversation about what we’re doing to our children’s bodies,” Means said in a recent podcast appearance. Experts note that government ethics rules are intended to both prevent financial conflict violations, but also the appearance of such conflicts that might undermine public trust in government. “If I were running the ethics office over at HHS, I sure as heck wouldn’t want anybody going around giving interviews and speeches about government matters that could have an effect on their own financial interests,” Painter said. A rising star in the MAHA movement Means’ rapid rise reflects the seeming contradictions within the MAHA movement itself, which urges followers to distrust both big corporations and the government agencies which regulate them. Means rails against big pharma and food conglomerates, two industries that he says he spent years working for as a consultant in Washington. Means has no medical training. A graduate of Harvard Business School, he previously ran a bridal gown startup with his wife. On Wednesday, he’s scheduled to be the keynote speaker at FDA’s annual science forum, according to a copy of the program shared with The Associated Press. He traces his passion for health care reform to the death of his mother from pancreatic cancer in 2021. Shortly thereafter, Means and his sister, Dr. Casey Means, took psychedelics together and had “a mind-blowing, life-changing experience,” which led them to co-author a wellness book, launch separate health startups and begin appearing on podcasts. Casey Means was recently nominated to be surgeon general and has faced scrutiny over her qualifications, including an unfinished medical residency. Asked about her nomination, President Donald Trump said: “Bobby thought she was fantastic,” adding that he did not know her. Meanwhile, her brother has stepped up his rhetoric for the MAHA agenda, recently declaring that Kennedy has “a spiritual mandate to reform our broken system.” While promoting the administration’s accomplishments, Means does not shy away from plugging his own brand or those of his business partners. When asked to offer health advice to listeners of a sports podcast, Outkick The Show, in April, Means said: “Read our book, ‘Good Energy.’” He also recommended blood tests sold by Function Health, which provides subscription-based testing for $500 annually. The company was cofounded by Dr. Mark Hyman, a friend of Kennedy and an investor in Truemed, which also offers Hyman’s supplements through its platform. Casey Means is also an investor in Hyman’s company. “If you’re sick, most likely you have some kind of nutrient deficiency, some kind of biomarker that you can actually then target with your diet and your supplements,” Calley Means said. Like dietary supplements, the marketing claims on laboratory tests sold by Hyman are not approved by the FDA. The agency has warned for years about the accuracy of such tests and tried to start regulating them under President Joe Biden. Experts say MAHA entrepreneurs like Hyman are following a playbook common to the wellness industry: Identify a health concern, market a test to diagnose it and then sell supplements or other remedies to treat it. “It ends up favoring these products and services that rest on flimsy grounds, at the expense of products that have actually survived a rigorous FDA approval process,” said Dr. Peter Lurie, a former FDA official who is now president of the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Many of the items sold via Truemed, including sweat tents, cold plunge tanks and light therapy lamps, wouldn’t typically qualify as medical expenses under rules for HSAs, tax-free accounts created by Congress to manage medical costs. The IRS generally states that HSA purchases must help diagnose, cure, treat, mitigate or prevent disease. Truemed allows users to request a “letter of medical necessity” from a doctor, stating that the product in question could have medical value for them. Like other telehealth services, there’s usually no real-time communication with the patient. The physician reviews a “simple survey solution,” filled out by the Truemed user, according to the company’s website. Industry representatives say customers should be careful. “You need to be prepared to defend your spending habits under audit,” said Kevin McKechnie, head of the American Bankers Association’s HSA council. “Companies are popping up suggesting they can help you manage that process and maybe they can — so the debate continues.” Americans have an estimated $147 billion in HSA accounts, a potential windfall for companies like Truemed that collects fees for transactions made using their platforms. Means sees an even bigger opportunity — routing federal funds out of government programs and into more HSAs. “The point of our company is to steer medical dollars into flexible spending,” Means told fitness celebrity Jillian Michaels, on her podcast last year. “I want to get that $4.5 trillion of Medicare, Medicaid, everything into a flexible account.” Who benefits most from HSAs? Means’ pitch for expanding HSAs echoes two decades of Republican talking points on the accounts, which were created in 2003 to encourage Americans in high-deductible plans to be judicious with their health dollars. But HSAs have not brought down spending, economists say. They are disproportionately used by the wealthiest Americans, who have more income to fund them and a bigger incentive to lower their tax rate. Americans who earn more than $1 million annually are the group most likely to make regular HSA contributions, according to an analysis by the nonprofit Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. More than half Americans with HSAs have balances less than $500. Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” would further expand HSA purchases, making gym memberships and other fitness expenses eligible for tax-free spending. That provision alone is expected to cost the government $10 billion in revenue. “These are really just tax breaks in the guise of health policy that overwhelmingly benefit people with high incomes,” said Gideon Lukens, a former White House budget official during the Obama and Trump administrations, now with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Expanding HSA eligibility was listed as a goal for a coalition of MAHA entrepreneurs and Truemed partners, founded by Means, which lobbied Congress last year, according to the group’s website. Means said in a statement that the group focused only on broad topics like “health care incentives and patient choice — but did not lobby for specific bills.” In total, the HSA expansions in Trump’s bill are projected to cost the federal government $180 billion over the next 10 years. As HSAs expand to include more disparate products and services, Lukens says the U.S. government will have fewer dollars to expand medical coverage through programs like Medicaid. “We have a limited amount of federal resources and the question is whether we want to spend that on health and wellness products that may or may not be helpful for wealthy people,” Lukens said.
Top RFK Jr. aide attacks US health system while running company that promotes wellness alternatives
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Top Advisor to RFK Jr. Critiques U.S. Health System Amid Wellness Business Ties"
TruthLens AI Summary
Calley Means, a prominent aide to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has garnered attention within the 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement by vocally criticizing the U.S. health system, which he attributes largely to corruption. Since being appointed as a White House adviser in March, Means has targeted major physician organizations, federal health agencies, and government scientists, accusing them of prioritizing their own interests over public health in a system worth nearly $5 trillion annually. He has made sweeping statements, labeling the American Medical Association as a 'pharma lobbying group' and condemning the Food and Drug Administration as a 'sock puppet of industry.' While Means advocates for significant changes in health policies, he simultaneously co-founded Truemed, an online platform that promotes dietary supplements and wellness products, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest and hypocrisy in his critiques of the established health system. Critics, including health researcher Dr. Reshma Ramachandran, have pointed out that Means' financial involvement in the wellness industry could undermine the credibility of his public health advocacy.
Means maintains that his work with the government has not influenced his business interests, focusing instead on reforming nutrition programs and addressing food safety issues. However, his company, Truemed, allows users to spend health savings account (HSA) funds on non-traditional medical expenses, which has attracted scrutiny from the IRS. The platform's business model, which includes using tax-free dollars for wellness products, has raised concerns about its alignment with IRS regulations and the broader implications for healthcare spending. Experts have voiced concerns about the ethics of Means' dual roles, emphasizing the importance of maintaining public trust in government institutions. As Means continues to promote the MAHA agenda, his background and financial ties to the wellness industry have sparked a debate about the integrity of health policy discussions in the U.S. and the potential consequences for healthcare access and spending, particularly for lower-income Americans who may not benefit from such wellness alternatives.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article highlights a significant contradiction in the actions of Calley Means, a prominent aide to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is vocal about the flaws in the U.S. health system while also operating a business that promotes wellness alternatives. This juxtaposition raises questions about the integrity of his stance and the potential motivations behind his public criticisms.
Motivation Behind the Article
The piece aims to expose perceived hypocrisy in Means's public health advocacy versus his business interests. By emphasizing his position as a government adviser while promoting alternative health products, the article suggests a conflict of interest that could undermine the legitimacy of his attacks on established health organizations. The intention appears to be to hold Means accountable and to question the credibility of the "Make America Healthy Again" movement he supports.
Public Perception
This reporting seeks to shape public opinion by portraying Means as a self-serving figure within the health narrative, suggesting that his critiques of the medical establishment are not genuinely aimed at reform but rather serve his business agenda. The language used, such as calling the American Medical Association a "pharma lobbying group," is designed to resonate with skepticism toward traditional medicine, potentially mobilizing support from those disillusioned with the established health system.
Possible Concealments
The article may aim to divert attention from broader systemic issues within the healthcare industry by focusing on Means as an individual. While it critiques Means, it does not delve deeply into the larger problems of healthcare access, affordability, and efficacy that contribute to public dissatisfaction. This focus might obscure the complexities of healthcare reform, redirecting the conversation toward personal accountability.
Manipulative Aspects
The article demonstrates a medium level of manipulability through its selective emphasis on the contradictions in Means's role. By framing the narrative around personal hypocrisy rather than systemic issues, it potentially oversimplifies the challenges facing the American health system. This approach might invoke emotional responses from readers, fostering distrust in both Means and the broader health establishment without offering comprehensive solutions.
Credibility Assessment
While the article presents factual information about Means's dual roles, the framing suggests a bias against him and the wellness movement he represents. The use of strong language and a focus on personal contradictions could diminish its perceived objectivity. Nonetheless, the core facts regarding his government position and business involvement are verifiable, lending a degree of credibility to the overall narrative.
Impact on Society and Economy
Should this critique gain traction, it might affect public trust in both alternative health products and government officials advocating for health reform. It could lead to a broader skepticism towards wellness trends and a push for more stringent regulations on health-related businesses. Economically, companies in the wellness sector could face challenges if perceived as lacking credibility, especially if there's a public backlash against non-regulated health products.
Target Audience
The article likely resonates with audiences that are already critical of the established healthcare system, including those who support alternative medicine or are frustrated with conventional healthcare practices. It may also appeal to individuals concerned about government transparency and accountability.
Market Influence
News of this nature can have ripple effects on stock prices, particularly for companies in the pharmaceutical and wellness industries. If it sways public opinion against alternative health products, companies within that sector could see a decline in consumer trust and sales, while traditional pharmaceutical companies might benefit from a renewed focus on regulated medical solutions.
Geopolitical Considerations
While this article does not directly address global power dynamics, it reflects a broader trend of skepticism towards government and established institutions which can have indirect implications for public health policies worldwide. The discourse around health reform resonates with current global conversations about healthcare access and regulation.
AI Involvement
There is no direct indication that AI was used in crafting this article, yet it is possible that standard writing assistance tools influenced the style or clarity of the writing. If AI were involved, it might have contributed to the framing of the narrative, subtly guiding the tone and emphasis to align with prevailing sentiments about health and wellness.
In summary, the article presents an intriguing case of conflict between personal interests and public advocacy, shaping perceptions around health reform while potentially neglecting broader systemic issues. The credibility is moderate, supported by factual bases but colored by a critical lens that may reflect a particular bias.