The Trump administration is suing Minnesota over breaks in higher education for immigrant students

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Trump Administration Sues Minnesota Over Tuition Breaks for Undocumented Students"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Trump administration has initiated a lawsuit against the state of Minnesota, seeking to challenge its policies that allow immigrant students who entered the U.S. illegally to access in-state tuition rates and scholarships. The U.S. Department of Justice, filing the suit in federal district court, named Minnesota's Democratic Governor Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison as defendants. The lawsuit claims that Minnesota is in violation of federal law by providing financial benefits to undocumented students that are not available to U.S. citizens. The Justice Department argues that this constitutes discrimination against American citizens, as the law prohibits states from offering such benefits to undocumented residents unless comparable benefits are provided to citizens. This legal action is part of a broader strategy by the Trump administration to enforce federal immigration laws and limit public benefits for immigrants living in the U.S. illegally.

The lawsuit follows similar actions taken against Kentucky and Texas, where the Justice Department has also sought to dismantle policies favoring undocumented students. In Texas, a federal judge recently blocked a law that provided tuition breaks to such students, highlighting the contentious nature of this issue across states. Supporters of Minnesota's policies argue that they do not violate federal law, as they extend benefits to U.S. citizens under the same conditions, specifically for state residents who graduated from local high schools. Advocates for these tuition breaks emphasize that many of these students were brought to the U.S. as children and are integral members of their communities, often demonstrating high academic achievement. The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for immigrant education policies nationwide, as at least 21 states currently offer similar tuition breaks or scholarships to undocumented students, despite the ongoing legal challenges from the federal government.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Minnesota becamethe latest stateWednesday to face a lawsuit from the Trump administration seeking to force it to give its high school graduates who entered the U.S. illegally as immigrants the same lower tuition rates reserved for in-state citizens.

The U.S. Department of Justice’s lawsuit also seeks to strike down a law that allows the same immigrant students to receive scholarships covering part or all of their tuition under the state’s North Star Promise program. The department filed its case in federal district court in Minnesota, naming Democratic Gov. Tim Walz and Democratic state Attorney General Keith Ellison as defendants, along with the state’s Office of Higher Education.

The Justice Department has filed similar lawsuits this month against policiesin Kentuckyand Texas. Last week, a federal judgein Texasblocked that state’s law giving a tuition break to students living in the U.S. illegally after the state’s Republican attorney general, Ken Paxton, said he supported the legal challenge.

Walz’s office said it is reviewing the lawsuit “to better understand what this means for the state.”

The lawsuit argued that Minnesota is “flagrantly violating” a federal law that prevents states from providing a benefit in higher education to resident students living in the U.S. illegally if U.S. citizens cannot receive the same benefits. States generally set higher tuition rates for out-of-state students.

Also, President Donald Trump issued executive orders in February directing federal agencies to see thatpublic benefits do not goto immigrants living in the U.S. illegally and to challenge state and local policies seen as favoring those immigrants over some citizens. The lawsuit argues that the Republican president’s orders enforce federal immigration laws.

The lawsuit also argues that Minnesota’s policies discriminate against U.S. citizens.

“No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens,” U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement.

The Justice Department’s lawsuit in Minnesota noted the cases filed earlier this month in Kentucky and Texas but did not mention any other states as potential targets of litigation. However, in discussing the Texas case, Bondi has suggested more lawsuits might be coming.

Last year, Florida ended its tuition break for students living there illegally, but at least 21 states have laws or policies granting them, in addition to the University of Michigan system, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones like Kansas and Nebraska.

According to the center, at least 16 states allow the immigrant students to receive scholarships or other aid to go to college.

Supporters of the state tuition breaks argue that they don’t violate federal law if they provide the same rates to U.S. citizens in the same circumstances — meaning they are residents of the state and graduates of one of its high schools.

Generally states have imposed other requirements. For example, Minnesota requires male students to have registered with the U.S. Selective Service System and all students to be seeking legal resident status if that’s possible.

Backers of the laws also argue that the students generally were brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents, often when they were far younger, and are as much a part of their local communities as U.S.-born students. Also, they contend that such immigrants tend to be motivated high achievers.

Back to Home
Source: CNN