An acrid smell hangs over the town of Rodynske. A couple of minutes after we drive into the city we see where it's coming from. A 250kg glide bomb has ripped through the town's main administrative building, and taken down three residential blocks. We're visiting a day after the bomb struck, but parts of the wreckage are still smoking. From the edges of the town we hear the sound of artillery fire, and of gunshots – Ukrainian soldiers shooting down drones. Rodynske is about 15km (9 miles) north of the embattled city of Pokrovsk. Russia has been trying to capture it from the south since the autumn of last year, but Ukrainian forces have so far managed to stop Russian soldiers from marching in. So Russia has changed tactics, moving instead to encircle the city, cutting off supply routes. In the past two weeks, as hectic diplomatic efforts to bring about a ceasefire in Ukraine have failed, Russia has intensified its push, making its most significant advances since January. We find proof of that in Rodynske. Within minutes of us arriving in town, we hear a Russian drone above us. Our team runs to the closest cover available – a tree. We press up against it so the drone won't see us. Then there's the sound of a loud explosion – it's a second drone making impact nearby. The drone above us is still hovering. For a few more minutes, we hear the terrifying whirring sound of what's become the deadliest weapon of this war. When we can't hear it any more we take the chance to run to hard cover in an abandoned building 100ft away. From the shelter, we hear the drone again. It's possible it returned after seeing our movement. That Rodynske is being swarmed by Russian drones is evidence that the attacks are coming from positions much closer than known Russian positions to the south of Pokrovsk. They were most likely coming from newly captured territory on a key road running from the east of Pokrovsk to Kostyantynivka. After half an hour of waiting in the shelter, when we can't hear the drone anymore, we move quickly to our car parked under tree cover, and speed out of Rodynske. By the side of the highway we see smoke billowing and something burning – it's most likely a downed drone. We drive to Bilytske, further away from the frontline. We see a row of houses destroyed by a missile strike overnight. One of them was Svitlana's home. "It's getting worse and worse. Earlier, we could hear distant explosions, they were far away. But now our town is getting targeted – we're experiencing it ourselves," says the 61-year-old, as she picks up a few belongings from the wreckage of her home. Luckily Svitlana wasn't at home when the attack occurred. "Go into the centre of the town, you'll see so much that is destroyed there. And the bakery and zoo have been destroyed too," she says. At a safehouse just out of reach of drones, we meet soldiers of the artillery unit of the 5th Assault Brigade. "You can feel the intensity of Russian assaults increasing. Rockets, mortars, drones, they're using everything they have to cut off supply routes going into the city," says Serhii. His unit has been waiting for three days to deploy to their positions, waiting for cloud cover or high-speed winds to give them protection from drones. In an ever-evolving conflict, soldiers have had to rapidly adapt to new threats posed by changing technology. And the latest threat comes from fibre optic drones. A spool of tens of kilometres of cable is fitted to the bottom of a drone and the physical fibre optic cord is attached to the controller held by the pilot. "The video and control signal is transmitted to and from the drone through the cable, not through radio frequencies. This means it can't be jammed by electronic interceptors," says a soldier with the call sign Moderator, a drone engineer with the 68th Jaeger Brigade. When drones began to be used in this war in a big way, both militaries fitted their vehicles with electronic warfare systems, which could neutralise drones. That protection has evaporated with the arrival of fibre optic drones, and in the deployment of these devices, Russia currently has the edge. Ukraine is trying to ramp up production. "Russia started using fibre optic drones much before us, while we were still testing them. These drones can be used in places where we have to go lower than usual drones. We can even enter houses and look for targets inside," says Venia, a drone pilot with the 68th Jaeger Brigade. "We've started joking that maybe we should carry scissors to cut the cord," says Serhii, the artillery man. Fibre optic drones do have drawbacks – they are slower and the cable could get entangled in trees. But at the moment, their widespread use by Russia means that transporting soldiers to and from their positions can often be deadlier than the battlefield itself. "When you enter a position, you don't know whether you've been spotted or not. And if you have been spotted, then you may already be living the last hours of your life," says Oles, Chief Sergeant of the reconnaissance unit of the 5th Assault Brigade. This threat means that soldiers are spending longer and longer in their positions. Oles and his men are in the infantry, serving in the trenches right at the very front of Ukraine's defence. It's rare for journalists these days to speak to infantrymen, as it's become too risky to go to these trenches. We meet Oles and Maksym in a rural home converted into a makeshift base, where the soldiers come to rest when they're not on deployment. "The longest I spent at the position was 31 days, but I do know guys who have spent 90 and even 120 days there. Back before the drones arrived, the rotations could have been between 3 or 7 days at the position," says Maksym. "War is blood, death, wet mud and a chill that spreads from head to toe. And this is how you spend every day. I remember one instance when we didn't sleep for three days, alert every minute. The Russians kept coming at us wave after wave. Even a minor lapse would have meant we were dead." Oles says Russia's infantry has changed its tactics. "Earlier they attacked in groups. Now they only send one or two people at times. They also use motorcycles and in a few instances, quad bikes. Sometimes they slip through." What this means is that the front lines in some parts are no longer conventional lines with the Ukrainians on one side and the Russians on the other, but more like pieces on a chessboard during play, where positions can be intertwined. This also makes it harder to see advances made by either side. Despite Russia's recent gains, it will not be quick or easy for it to take the whole of the Donetsk region, where Pokrovsk lies. Ukraine has pushed back hard, but it needs a steady supply of weapons and ammunition to sustain the fight. And as the war enters a fourth summer, Ukraine's manpower issues against a much bigger Russian army are also evident. Most of the soldiers we meet joined the military after the war began. They've had a few months of training, but have had to learn a lot on the job in the middle of a raging war. Maksym worked for a drinks company before he joined the military. I asked how his family copes with his job. "It's hard, it's really hard. My family really supports me. But I have a two-year-old son, and I don't get to see him much. I do video call him though, so everything is as fine as it could be under the circumstances," he trails off, eyes welling up with tears. Maksym is a soldier fighting for his country, but he's also just a father missing his two-year-old boy. Additional reporting by Imogen Anderson, Sanjay Ganguly, Volodymyr Lozhko and Anastasiia Levchenko
The terrifying new weapon changing the war in Ukraine
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Escalating Drone Warfare Alters Dynamics of Ukraine Conflict"
TruthLens AI Summary
The small town of Rodynske, located just north of the frontline city of Pokrovsk, has recently become a focal point in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia. A devastating 250kg glide bomb struck the town, demolishing the main administrative building and three residential blocks, leaving behind a scene of destruction and chaos. The aftermath of the bombing is palpable, with smoke still rising from the wreckage and the sounds of artillery fire echoing in the distance. As Russian forces adjust their tactics to encircle Pokrovsk and cut off supply routes, the intensity of the conflict has escalated significantly in recent weeks. Reports indicate that Russian drones have become a prominent threat, with Ukrainian soldiers frequently having to shoot them down to protect their positions. The use of these drones, particularly the new fibre optic models, has shifted the dynamics of warfare, making the battlefield more dangerous for Ukrainian forces as they adapt to this new challenge.
Ukrainian soldiers are reporting an increase in the frequency and ferocity of Russian assaults, utilizing rockets, mortars, and drones to undermine Ukrainian defenses. The introduction of fibre optic drones has proven particularly challenging, as they operate on a cable that cannot be jammed by electronic warfare systems, giving Russian forces an edge in drone warfare. Soldiers describe the psychological toll of the conflict, with prolonged deployments in the trenches becoming the norm due to the persistent threat posed by these drones. The changing tactics of Russian infantry, including smaller, more discreet attacks, have made the front lines less predictable and more treacherous. Despite the ongoing challenges, Ukrainian forces continue to resist, emphasizing the need for a steady supply of weapons and support to sustain their defense. As the war drags on, the personal sacrifices of the soldiers, many of whom left civilian lives to join the military, highlight the human cost of this protracted conflict.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article portrays a vivid and alarming picture of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, focusing on the use of advanced weaponry, particularly Russian drones, which have become a significant threat in the war. It illustrates the immediate aftermath of a drone strike in Rodynske, highlighting the destruction and the psychological impact on the local population.
Intended Message and Public Perception
The narrative aims to evoke a sense of urgency and fear regarding the evolving nature of warfare in Ukraine. By detailing the destruction caused by drone strikes and the precarious situation for Ukrainian forces, the article seeks to rally international support for Ukraine while simultaneously portraying Russia as aggressive and relentless in its military strategy. This aligns with broader Western narratives that emphasize the need for continued military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine.
Potential Omissions
While the article focuses on the immediate impact of drone warfare, it may downplay the broader context of the conflict, including the geopolitical dynamics at play, the role of international allies, and the humanitarian crisis resulting from the ongoing war. This selective emphasis could be seen as an attempt to shape public perception in favor of military engagement without fully addressing the complex realities on the ground.
Manipulative Elements
The article exhibits some manipulative characteristics, particularly through its emotive language and vivid imagery of destruction, which may amplify fear and urgency. Describing the drones as the "deadliest weapon of this war" intends to instill a sense of dread, potentially skewing perceptions of the conflict's dynamics. This kind of framing can influence public opinion by portraying the situation in stark, dramatic terms.
Credibility Assessment
The article appears credible, as it includes specific details about the events in Rodynske and provides a first-hand account of the situation. However, given the potential for bias in reporting on military conflicts, readers should consider multiple sources for a more balanced understanding. The language used, while compelling, suggests a need for cautious interpretation.
Connections to Other News
Comparing this article to other reports on the Ukraine conflict reveals a trend toward emphasizing the technological advancements in warfare, particularly concerning drone usage. This focus is likely part of a larger narrative around modern warfare and its implications for international security.
Impact on Society and Politics
The portrayal of escalating drone warfare could galvanize public opinion in favor of increased military support for Ukraine, influencing political responses from Western governments. This may lead to further military aid packages and diplomatic efforts aimed at countering Russian aggression.
Audience Engagement
This article likely resonates more with communities advocating for military support and humanitarian aid to Ukraine. It appeals to those concerned about global security and the implications of the conflict on international relations.
Market Influence
The article could potentially affect stock markets, particularly companies involved in defense and technology sectors that produce drones and military equipment. As public interest in the conflict heightens, there may be fluctuations in stock prices related to defense contractors.
Geopolitical Relevance
The article is significant in the context of global power dynamics, as it reflects ongoing tensions between Russia and Western nations. The focus on drone warfare indicates a shift in military strategies that could have broader implications for international security.
AI Involvement
There is no clear indication that AI was used in the writing of this article; however, advancements in AI technologies could influence how news is reported and disseminated. If AI tools were involved, they might have contributed to the framing and stylistic choices aimed at engaging readers emotionally.
Conclusion
Overall, the article provides a gripping account of the evolving warfare in Ukraine, focusing on the implications of drone technology. While it is credible, its emotive language and selective focus warrant a critical reading to understand the broader context of the conflict.