People aren’t friending each other as much on Facebook these days. The iPhone might not feel necessary in a decade. And Google searches on one of the world’s most popular smartphones are declining. Those were some of the unusually frank admissions from two separate antitrust trials against Meta and Google. It was a rare acknowledgement from tech leaders that the once-cutting edge products their companies were founded on could someday lose their relevance. Silicon Valley prides itself on innovation, change and a constant quest to find “the next big thing.” The race for relevance is a constant one. Still, the admissions underscore the mounting pressure tech giants face amid new threats from artificial intelligence and new social media apps – and how quickly any product can get left behind. Apple did not respond to CNN’s request for comment. A Google spokesperson pointed to the company’s public statements, while a Meta spokesperson directed CNN to specific responses from CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s courtroom testimony. The three tech giants helped shape the modern web over the last two decades. Google’s search engine triumphed in the late 1990s and early 2000s due to its system of ranking results by relevance and importance rather than sorting them by topic. And Meta, Facebook’s parent company, is largely responsible for turning social platforms into an addictive feed of likes, comments and other interactions. Fueling both of those trends was the smartphone, allowing users to access these services from almost anywhere, which Apple set the stage for with the first iPhone in 2007. The success of those products catapulted Apple, Google and Meta to mega-valuations. But during courtroom testimony, executives indicated consumers are losing interest in some of the very tasks Facebook and Google were initially built for. Eddy Cue, Apple’s senior vice president of services, revealed last week that Google search queries on its devices decreased for the first time last month, according to Bloomberg. The comments came during his testimony in the Justice Department’s antitrust trial against Google. (Google pays Apple to be the default search engine in the iPhone maker’s Safari browser.) It’s another sign that consumers may be shifting to AI chatbots to fulfill some of the duties of a traditional search engine. Market research firm Gartner estimated last year that search engine volume would drop 25% by 2026 as consumers gravitate toward AI tools. Google said in a statement on Wednesday that it continues “to see overall query growth in search,” and that includes “an increase in total queries coming from Apple’s devices and platforms.” Meta, too, is seeing consumers shift away from its original use case: adding friends and sharing content. “The amount that people are sharing with friends on Facebook, especially, has been declining,” Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said during an April trial for an antitrust lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission. “Even the amount of new friends that people add … I think has been declining. But I don’t know the exact numbers.” Instead, Zuckerberg said the company has seen a big boost in direct messages. Zuckerberg’s comments come as research shows Facebook is falling behind other online platforms with younger crowds. A Pew Research Center report from December found that Facebook usage has dropped off over the last 10 years, with just 32% of teens saying they use what was previously Meta’s namesake social network. That compares to 71% in 2014 and 2015, although teens still use Instagram frequently. Meta has aggressively shaped its apps to keep up with new trends. In 2013, Facebook failed to buy Snapchat, but about three years later it introduced its own alternative in Instagram Stories. Instagram’s short-form video feed, known as Reels, came to take on TikTok in 2020, and Zuckerberg said in his testimony that video content is where people are spending most of their time on Facebook these days. Even the iPhone may be at risk of losing favor over the next decade, an Apple executive said. “You may not need an iPhone 10 years from now, as crazy as it sounds,” Apple’s Cue said during his courtroom testimony in the Google trial, according to Bloomberg. With 19% of global smartphone shipments in the first quarter of 2025, according to the International Data Corporation, Apple’s iPhone is the world’s second most popular smartphone brand. But Apple, along with other tech behemoths, is determined to figure out what comes next. And the answer could be smart glasses that use AI to analyze the world around you to execute tasks without reaching for your phone — a vision that Meta, Samsung and Google are already betting on. Zuckerberg said in his testimony that he believes consumers will eventually interact with content through “smart glasses and holograms,” removing the need to use a “glowing rectangle” to access digital platforms. Amazon’s head of devices and services Panos Panay also didn’t rule out the possibility of camera-equipped Alexa glasses similar to those offered by Meta in a February CNN interview. Apple, too, believes the next step in computing will involve devices worn on the face, as evidenced by the $3,500 Vision Pro. That device, while niche, could be a precursor to the types of smart glasses Apple’s rivals are working on or currently selling. At the same time, consumers aren’t upgrading their phones as frequently now that mobile devices no longer dramatically change each year. For now, consumers will continue scrolling through Instagram and typing Google Search queries on their iPhones. And change is a good thing for corporate giants like these; it lets them show Wall Street there’s still room to grow while boosting their arguments to lawmakers that they face stiff competition. What’s changing, though, is that the tech companies that ruled the early 2000s and 2010s may have to fight a bit harder to stay ahead of the curve.
The tech that defined the modern internet is changing, and Silicon Valley is finally admitting it
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Tech Giants Acknowledge Shifts in Consumer Behavior Amid Antitrust Trials"
TruthLens AI Summary
Recent antitrust trials against tech giants Meta and Google have revealed a startling admission: the foundational technologies that once defined the modern internet may be losing their relevance. Facebook, once a leader in social networking, is seeing a decline in user engagement, particularly in how users interact with friends and share content. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg noted that the number of new friends added on Facebook is decreasing, as is the overall sharing activity. This shift in user behavior aligns with research indicating that younger audiences are increasingly turning to alternative platforms, with only 32% of teens reporting active use of Facebook, down from 71% a decade ago. Furthermore, as users gravitate towards direct messaging and video content, traditional social interactions on platforms like Facebook appear to be diminishing. In contrast, Meta is adapting by focusing on features that align with emerging trends, such as Instagram's Reels, which directly competes with TikTok's popularity.
Similarly, Google's dominance as a search engine is being challenged, with a notable decrease in search queries from Apple devices reported for the first time. Eddy Cue, Apple’s senior vice president, indicated that consumers may be shifting towards AI chatbots, which could serve the same functions as traditional search engines. Market projections suggest that search engine volume could decline by 25% by 2026 as AI tools gain traction. The executives' candid remarks during the trials signal a broader recognition within Silicon Valley that innovation is essential for survival, as the technological landscape evolves rapidly. Both Apple and Meta are exploring new frontiers, such as smart glasses and AI-driven devices, to maintain their competitive edge. This acknowledgment of shifting consumer preferences highlights the challenges these tech giants face in an environment where their once-unstoppable innovations may no longer guarantee success.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article highlights a significant shift in the tech landscape, particularly regarding the relevance of foundational products from major companies like Meta, Google, and Apple. The acknowledgment of declining interest in platforms such as Facebook and Google Search signifies a potential turning point in consumer behavior and technology adoption.
Implications of Declining Engagement
The admissions from executives during antitrust trials indicate a broader concern within Silicon Valley about the sustainability of their business models. As consumer interest wanes, these companies may face challenges in maintaining their current market dominance. The article suggests that the rise of artificial intelligence and new social media platforms could further disrupt the status quo, emphasizing the need for continual innovation.
Public Perception and Sentiment
This article aims to shape public perception by highlighting the vulnerabilities of once-dominant tech giants. By openly discussing these challenges, it may foster a sense of skepticism among consumers regarding the long-term viability of these platforms. There is an underlying message that the tech industry, once perceived as infallible, is now facing real competition and existential threats.
Potential Concealments
While the article sheds light on the struggles of major tech companies, it may divert attention from other significant issues within the industry, such as regulatory scrutiny, privacy concerns, and ethical implications of AI technology. By focusing on the decline in engagement, deeper systemic problems could be overshadowed.
Manipulative Nature of the Article
The article has a moderate level of manipulative potential. While it presents factual information about declining user engagement, the framing may lead readers to draw more negative conclusions about the future of these companies than warranted. The language used emphasizes uncertainty and decline, which could influence investor sentiment and public opinion.
Truthfulness and Reliability
The reliability of the article is bolstered by its basis in court testimonies and public statements from executives. However, the selective focus on negative aspects may skew the overall narrative. The information provided is factual, but the interpretation leans towards alarmism regarding the future of social media and search engines.
Broader Context and Connections
Comparing this article with other recent tech news reveals a pattern of increasing scrutiny on large tech firms, particularly regarding their market power and ethical practices. This trend indicates a growing concern about monopolistic behaviors, which may resonate with a socially conscious audience advocating for regulatory reforms.
Impact on Society and Markets
The potential repercussions of this article could extend to both the economy and politics. Heightened scrutiny of tech companies may lead to stricter regulations, impacting their operations and profitability. Investor confidence could be shaken, leading to stock market volatility, particularly for companies like Meta and Google, which are heavily reliant on user engagement.
Target Audience
The article seems to resonate more with tech-savvy individuals and those critical of the influence of major corporations in society. It appeals to audiences who are concerned about privacy, the ethical implications of technology, and the changing landscape of digital communication.
Market Implications
The insights presented could influence stock prices of major tech firms. Companies that rely heavily on user engagement for revenue, such as Meta and Google, might see fluctuations in their stock values as investor sentiment shifts in response to perceived threats to their business models.
Geopolitical Considerations
The article touches on the broader implications of tech's evolution in the context of global power dynamics. As the dominance of U.S. tech giants is questioned, it raises concerns about the competitive landscape, especially with emerging players from other countries leveraging new technologies.
The article itself does not specifically indicate the use of AI in its composition, but it is possible that AI-driven analytics could inform the discussion, particularly in identifying trends in user engagement. If AI techniques were employed, they may have contributed to highlighting the urgency of the situation without providing a balanced view of potential solutions or positive developments.
In conclusion, while the article presents credible information, its framing suggests a more negative outlook on the future of major tech firms. It serves to highlight the shifting dynamics in the industry and the pressures these companies face, but may also inadvertently distract from broader issues that require attention.