The first editions of this morning's papers were published before President Trump's ceasefire announcement - but many of the American news websites have been following developments. President Trumphas told NBCthat he expects the ceasefire to "go forever", saying that he doesn't believe Iran and Israel "will ever be shooting at each other again". He says he has "got the job done" with a truce, which the New York Times reports even caughtsome senior members of his own administration by surprise. An official tells the outlet that the US bombings of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend "set the conditions" for ceasefire talks. A source quoted on the website Axios says that once Iran had responded with an attack on an American air base, officials in Tehran notified the White House -through Qatar - that theywould not carry out any further strikes. The unnamed insider says the Trump administration then agreed not to retaliate and said it was ready to negotiate. An American official tells the Washington Post that the Iranians "made it clear" to the US that they would be willing to re-enter talks on their nuclear programme. The Financial Times casts doubt on the White House's claims that the programme has been "obliterated" - reporting that it may have been "pushed into smaller, secret facilities which are harder to find". An Iranian insider tells the paper that "the enriched uranium is untouched" despite the US attacks. The Guardian publishes satellite images of Iran's main nuclear facility in the days before the strikes, which it says appear to confirm that some material had been "preemptively removed". The i Paper focuses on the UK's response to the situation in the Middle East - pointing out that the government has "hardened" its language against Iran. But the Sun highlights calls for the prime minister to get off the "moral fence". The Daily Mail says his failure to publicly back the US strikes at the weekend puts him at risk of being "marginalised on the world stage". "So whose side are you on, Sir Keir?" asks its headline. The Times reports that the Home Office believes that Iran could be funding - through proxies - the campaign group, Palestine Action. The paper says government officials are investigating the source of its donations, because of concerns about where the group is raising "the significant sums it requires for its legal costs". Palestine Action did not respond to a request for comment. Sign up for our morning newsletterand get BBC News in your inbox.
The Papers: 'Ceasefire agreed with Iran' and 'war games'
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Trump Announces Ceasefire Between Iran and Israel Amid Nuclear Negotiations"
Bbc News
7.0
TruthLens AI Summary
President Trump's recent announcement of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel has generated significant attention across various American news platforms. In an interview with NBC, Trump expressed optimism about the longevity of the ceasefire, stating that he believes the two nations will not engage in conflict again. This announcement reportedly took some senior officials within his administration by surprise, as the U.S. had conducted bombings on Iranian nuclear sites prior to the ceasefire talks. An official source indicated that these bombings played a crucial role in setting the stage for negotiations. Following an Iranian missile attack on an American air base, Tehran communicated through intermediaries in Qatar that it would refrain from further strikes, paving the way for the U.S. to agree to negotiate terms for peace. An official also noted that Iran has shown a willingness to re-enter discussions regarding its nuclear program, although skepticism remains about the state of that program, with reports suggesting that it may have been relocated to smaller, more clandestine facilities.
The coverage of the ceasefire and its implications has varied among different publications. The Financial Times expressed doubts about claims from the White House that Iran's nuclear capabilities have been significantly diminished, while The Guardian provided satellite imagery suggesting that materials at Iran's nuclear facility had been preemptively removed prior to the U.S. strikes. In the UK, the government's stance towards Iran has become more aggressive, with calls for clearer support for U.S. actions in the region. The Daily Mail criticized Prime Minister Boris Johnson for not publicly endorsing the U.S. military strikes, suggesting this could lead to his marginalization on the international stage. Additionally, The Times reported concerns from the Home Office regarding potential Iranian funding of the activist group, Palestine Action, raising questions about the sources of its financial support. Overall, the ceasefire and the surrounding geopolitical developments have sparked a complex dialogue on international relations and military strategy in the Middle East.
TruthLens AI Analysis
You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.
Log In to Generate AnalysisNot a member yet? Register for free.