Listen to this article on BBC Sounds We are driving at speed through the green hills of rural Hertfordshire. Through the passenger seat window, large elegant houses flash by. Each front lawn is neat, each hedgerow well-kept. It looks like England from a storybook - but this part of the country is actually on the frontline of a relatively new (and some might say divisive) approach to crime prevention. In the driver's seat is Robert, a guard employed by Blueline Security. His car is painted with blue and yellow stripes, meaning it looks a lot like a police car. Inside there's a walkie-talkie, a first-aid kit, and a Belgian Malinois dog called Bella (given similar training to a police dog, I'm told). But Robert - who wears a bullet-proof vest and carries a pair of handcuffs - is careful to point out that he is not a real policeman. "The more keen eye will realise that this isn't a police car," he says as he flicks his indicator. He points out that they follow the regulations on vehicle markings designed to distinguish police cars from other cars. "But it looks similar enough where criminality will see it at a distance and think, 'Let's maybe not go there'." Blueline is one of a handful of "private policing" firms that have emerged in recent years. It has operated mostly in wealthy enclaves of southern England since 2019 and, for a fee, its team of ex-police or ex-army guards can patrol villages, looking for burglars and car thieves. Robert, in fact, spent 14 years working in the police force. Various similar businesses have sprung up around the UK in recent years, including My Local Bobby, which was founded in 2016 and now has almost 150 security guards, as well as a fleet of cars. According to some customers who spoke to the BBC, this fills a gap left by the real police, who they claim they no longer trust to turn up promptly to a 999 call in their villages. To residents who can afford these firms, they are a "lifeline", as one customer tells me. But to others, they represent an affront to the values on which British policing was founded; a step towards a country in which the wealthy get better access to law enforcement than the poor. One former senior figure in the Metropolitan Police says she fears the emergence of a "two-tier society". So, with pressures on real police growing, is there room for private firms to help ease the load - or do so-called "private bobbies" blur the lines between police and profit? The firms offering "private policing" that I've spoken to say that demand for their services has risen. According to a paper published last year by criminologists from the universities of Sheffield and Brunel, the UK's private security industry grew substantially between 2008 and 2021, with an increase in revenue and in the number of licensed security guards. And, according to the Home Office, the number of real police officers in England and Wales fell most years from 2009 onwards, reaching a low of about 122,000 in 2017 - before ticking back up, to about 147,000 last year. The study's co-author, Dr Matteo Pazzona, a Senior Lecturer in Economics at Brunel University, describes a shift in policing from the "public to the private" realm. Whilst most UK security guards work in shops and other businesses, his data does also signal a rise in the sort of residential work carried out by private firms, he says. There are lots of reasons why the security industry might have grown over this period. But David Spencer, a former Detective Chief Inspector at the Metropolitan Police, thinks that private firms could be filling the gaps left by police. "If you've got money and you don't feel that the police are effective, then it's no surprise if you decide to use your resources to keep your family safe," he says. Until the 19th Century, protection from crime was largely a privilege enjoyed by the rich. Wealthy people employed "thief takers" to guard their property, whilst ordinary folk had to make do with volunteer watchmen, who focused on the more basic task of keeping order. That changed when Sir Robert Peel, a Tory prime minister, started London's Metropolitan Police - Britain's first modern, professional force funded from general taxation. He instilled in the force several principles that can still be reeled off from memory by many constables today: being visible in the community; treating members of the public equally, regardless of wealth or social standing - and perhaps more important than all: policing with trust. Now, some worry that trust is being undermined. Most burglaries and car thefts go unsolved. A YouGov survey from last month found that 50% of adults in Great Britain held "not very much confidence" or "no confidence at all" in their local force - up from 42% in 2019. The government's police inspector, Andy Cooke, said in a report in 2023 that confidence in police "hangs by a thread" (although his report last year noted some improvements). Mr Spencer, who is now head of crime and justice for the centre-right Policy Exchange think tank, says demands on police time have risen dramatically. Online fraud has shot up in recent decades, and police have recognised the need to tackle issues that were once considered "private" (like domestic abuse and sexual violence). And police resources are failing to keep up pace, he says. This, he thinks, helps explain the interest in so-called private police. Laura (who didn't want to share her full name) signed up for private security to patrol her road a few weeks ago, after a spate of burglaries in the area. She lives in rural Hertfordshire with her husband and one of her three children. She already had CCTV installed and, on the night that her neighbour was burgled, it showed a gang of masked men sitting on her garden chairs. "You can see them looking at the camera, and they've seen it's zoomed in on them. And then they went." Her neighbours held a meeting; about 40 households decided to subscribe to a private firm. Each pays £1,500 per year. In return, guards patrol the area daily. Laura says she can call a guard at any time. "I don't think we can afford to be confident that [the police] would get here in good time," she says. However, private guards have no more power than a member of the public. The aim for many is not to catch or restrain criminals but to act as a deterrent. Jamie Strickland, a former soldier who founded Blueline, stresses that he does not regard his business as a replacement for the police and argues that even a perfectly-resourced force would struggle to reach remote areas of the countryside. "The police can't be everywhere all the time," he adds. But a spokesperson for the National Police Chiefs' Council says they remain "resolutely committed" to attending the scene of crimes, and that all English and Welsh police forces now aim to attend a property following every burglary report. They added that private firms "should not replace or supplement police and it is for properly trained officers to intervene when a crime has been committed". The question, though, is whether so-called private police firms signal the emergence of an unfair two-tier system, in which the wealthiest can pay to be better protected from crime. This is a concern for Parm Sandhu, a former chief superintendent at the Metropolitan Police who left the force in 2019 and has since written a book about her experiences of prejudice. "If you're living on a council estate, you cannot afford to pay for policing," she says. "Does that mean you deserve to be burgled, sexually assaulted, or mugged? No you don't." She argues that the correlation between falling police numbers and an expanding private security industry signals something "totally wrong". Andy, who also lives in rural Hertfordshire, near Laura, and employs a private security firm, has his own feelings on this. "I look at it and say, 'It's £1,500 a year, I'm lucky I can find that,'" he says. But he argues that not everyone who uses the service is wealthy. "You watch the CCTV [of burglaries], you feel worried for your family." The expense, he adds, is worth it for that reason. Still, doubts remain. Ms Sandhu points out that the police-like appearance of some of these security firms could be confusing. "If you've got somebody who's under the influence [of] drugs or alcohol, they will look up quickly and think, 'Oh, this is a police officer'," she says. "It's really important to have that differential between police officers and security guards. "Members of the public [could] go to them thinking they're talking to police officers, and take their advice." Which raises the question of what, exactly, private guards can do. The companies I speak to are clear that their staff can restrain somebody they suspect to be a criminal, only in the same way that any member of the public can, a power commonly known as a "citizen's arrest". And it comes with risk. Under English and Welsh law, a citizen's arrest can only be used for an "indictable" offence - a serious crime tried at the Crown Court. You cannot use a citizen's arrest for a lesser "summary" offence (tried at the magistrates' court). In the heat of the moment, it may be difficult for a guard to judge the difference - and if they get it wrong, they could be guilty of a crime themselves. There are also questions about accountability. Police forces are inspected by the Government's Inspectorate of Constabulary; if a serious complaint is made against a constable, it will be investigated by an independent regulator. Few such tools of accountability exist for private firms - other than having their licence revoked by the Security Industry Authority. But Martin Gill, a criminology professor and the director of Perpetuity Research, a security consultancy, points out that in shopping centres and hospitals, the "majority of policing is undertaken by private police forces" (in other words, security guards). Most of them, he argues, do a "very good job". In his view, when a private firm starts operating in a residential area, the local police force should engage. The founder of My Local Bobby, David McKelvey, says he now has a "good relationship" with police forces, after a rocky start. "There was a lot of reticence [from the police] in the first place, but now they're starting to see the benefit of [our service]," he claims. He would like police to work closer with firms. "At the moment, there's a reticence still within policing to sharing information [and] intelligence. Often that information is absolutely vital for us to do our job." The College of Policing has said police forces should only share intelligence under strict circumstances. Ultimately, the sort of work carried out by 'private bobbies' is a tiny fraction of the real police work carried out across the country. But whether more residential communities will in future opt for the private model depends largely on whether the police are able to restore public confidence, says Mr Spencer of Policy Exchange. "If it doesn't, then I think it's inevitable we will see more people […] turning to private providers," he says. Back on the road with Robert, midway through his patrol, his radio buzzes. A customer has called: a horse is loose and wandering in a country lane. Within minutes, he has driven there and helped return it to its field. It's not quite Starsky & Hutch, Robert concedes, but it's an insight into the sort of work they do. And yet, he admits, there are limits. He recalls one shift, on an April night this year, when he drove along a country road in his patch and saw a car that looked like it was being used for drug dealing. "If they've had drugs and they're behind a wheel, that's a summary offence - I have no power to deal with it," he says. Instead, he sat in his car and called the real police. Top image credit: Getty Images BBC InDepthis the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.
The families paying £1,500 for 'private bobbies' to police their homes
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"The Rise of Private Security Firms Amidst Declining Trust in Police"
TruthLens AI Summary
In rural Hertfordshire, the emergence of private security firms has sparked a debate on crime prevention strategies and public trust in traditional policing. Companies like Blueline Security and My Local Bobby offer services to affluent neighborhoods, providing ex-police or ex-army personnel to patrol areas for a fee, typically around £1,500 annually. These services aim to fill perceived gaps left by the police, as many residents express dissatisfaction with police response times and effectiveness. The rise of these private firms reflects growing concerns over safety, particularly in light of unsolved burglaries and diminishing confidence in local law enforcement. A recent YouGov survey indicated that a significant portion of the British public lacks faith in their police, highlighting a potential crisis in policing that these private entities are stepping in to address. However, critics argue that this trend fosters inequality, creating a two-tier system where only the wealthy can afford adequate protection against crime, while others remain vulnerable.
As the private security industry expands, questions arise about the implications for public safety and accountability. Private guards operate under limited powers, primarily acting as deterrents rather than direct law enforcement agents. While they can assist in community safety, their lack of authority compared to police officers raises concerns about the potential for confusion and misinterpretation of their role. Critics, including former police officials, warn that relying on private security could undermine the foundational principles of policing established in the 19th century, particularly the notion of equal protection under the law. The debate continues, with some advocating for collaboration between private firms and local police to enhance community safety, while others caution against the risks of a privatized approach to law enforcement. Ultimately, the future of private policing in the UK hinges on the ability of traditional police forces to regain public trust and effectively address rising crime rates.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article sheds light on a growing trend in rural England where families hire private security firms, such as Blueline Security, to patrol their neighborhoods due to perceived inadequacies in public policing. This situation raises several important questions about crime prevention, community trust in law enforcement, and societal divisions based on wealth and safety.
Purpose Behind the Article
The piece appears to aim at highlighting the emergence of private policing as a response to public dissatisfaction with traditional law enforcement. By detailing the experiences of those who employ private security, the article underscores a perceived gap in police reliability. This narrative could be intended to provoke thought about the changing landscape of safety and security in communities, particularly in affluent areas that feel abandoned by public services.
Community Perception
The article is likely to create a dual perception: one of reassurance for those who can afford private security, seeing it as a necessary measure for safety, and a sense of division for those who may view this trend as indicative of a failing public safety system. This might foster a community discourse around privilege and the accessibility of safety measures, potentially leading to further stratification between wealthier neighborhoods and those less affluent.
Information Omission
While the article provides a detailed account of private policing, it may downplay the broader implications of relying on private firms for public safety. The potential negative impact on community relations, the over-policing of certain demographics, or the ethical considerations of privatizing safety may not be adequately addressed. This omission could lead to a skewed understanding of the issue, suggesting a narrative that favors private security solutions while neglecting systemic issues within public law enforcement.
Manipulative Nature of the Article
The manipulation factor in this article seems moderate. It portrays private security as a necessary alternative without significantly exploring the implications of this trend, which could lead to a misleading understanding of the overall safety landscape. The language used tends to evoke a sense of urgency and need for personal safety, which could be construed as fear-based persuasion.
Truthfulness of the Report
The information presented appears factual based on the interviews and observations described. However, the selective focus on affluent families and their experiences can create an incomplete picture of crime and safety across different socioeconomic groups. The reliability of the article hinges on how well it balances these perspectives.
Societal Implications
The rise of private policing could lead to increased social division, as wealthier individuals isolate themselves further from public services, potentially eroding community cohesion. Economically, this trend may benefit private security firms but could also raise questions about resource allocation for public policing. Politically, it might spark discussions on funding and accountability in law enforcement.
Support Base for the Article
This article likely resonates with affluent communities who feel their safety is compromised. It may also appeal to individuals frustrated with traditional policing methods, thus drawing support from those who prioritize personal security over community-based policing solutions.
Market Impact
The news surrounding private security may influence investor sentiment towards security companies, potentially benefiting their stock prices. Conversely, if public trust in police continues to erode, it could affect public sector funding and policies related to law enforcement.
Global Context
While the article discusses a local phenomenon, it mirrors broader global trends regarding privatization of public services and the growing distrust in governmental institutions. This theme resonates today, where safety and security are increasingly commodified, reflecting ongoing debates about governance and public trust.
AI Influence in Article Creation
There is no clear evidence that AI was used in the writing of this article. However, if AI tools were employed, they might have influenced the stylistic choices or the framing of the narrative to align with common media tropes about security and policing, emphasizing urgency and personal safety.
In summary, the article presents a complex issue of private policing in response to community safety concerns while potentially omitting broader implications and fostering a narrative that could divide society based on socio-economic status.