Supreme Court declines to hear copyright appeal that alleged Ed Sheeran copied Marvin Gaye song

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Supreme Court Declines to Review Ed Sheeran's Copyright Case Involving Marvin Gaye's Song"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Supreme Court recently opted not to hear an appeal regarding a copyright lawsuit against Ed Sheeran, who has been accused of copying Marvin Gaye's iconic song "Let's Get It On" in his hit single "Thinking Out Loud." This decision upholds a previous ruling by the New York-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals, which had sided with Sheeran after a jury found in 2023 that his song did not infringe upon Gaye's copyright. The lawsuit was initiated by Structured Asset Sales, a company that holds a fractional interest in the royalties from Gaye's classic track. The primary issue at stake was whether the appeals court had placed too much emphasis on the interpretations provided by the US Copyright Office regarding the Copyright Act of 1909, especially in light of the Supreme Court's recent rulings that limit deference to federal agency interpretations of ambiguous laws.

Structured Asset Sales argued that Sheeran's song borrowed significant elements from "Let's Get It On," particularly in terms of its drum patterns and overall tempo. The company contended that the rights of numerous legacy artists and their works were implicated in this case. However, Sheeran's legal team countered by asserting that the original sheet music submitted to the Copyright Office did not specify a tempo, thus undermining the infringement claims. They maintained that the language of copyright law is sufficiently clear, negating the need for judicial deference to the Copyright Office's interpretation. The Supreme Court's refusal to take on the case effectively closes the chapter on this particular legal battle for Sheeran, allowing him to continue his career without the looming threat of copyright infringement regarding this song.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a copyright suit against pop star Ed Sheeran filed by a company that alleged his smash single “Thinking Out Loud” copied the classic Marvin Gaye song “Let’s Get It On.”

Sheeran has been fighting – and successfully defending against – different iterations of the lawsuit for years. In a related case, a jury in 2023 concluded that Sheeran’s number, which won a Grammy in 2016, did not infringe on the copyright that was originally registered in 1973.

By declining to hear the appeal, the Supreme Court left in place a decision from the New York-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appealssiding with Sheeran. The suit before the high court was filed by a company called Structured Asset Sales, which owned a one-ninth interest in the royalties from “Let’s Get It On,” Gaye’s iconic Motown song.

The question put to the justices was whether the appeals court gave too much deference to the US Copyright Office interpretation of the Copyright Act of 1909. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority recently limited the circumstances under which courts are supposed to defer to interpretations of vague laws by federal agencies, overturning a 1984 precedentChevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council.

The Copyright Office concluded that the protections for the song were limited to the handwritten sheet music Gaye’s co-writer, Ed Townsend, had submitted in the 1970s. Structured Asset Sales claimed that Sheeran’s song copied elements of “Let’s Get It On,” like the drums and tempo. The company argued that the rights to many other songs were at stake in case.

“The rights of thousands of legacy musical composers and artists, of many of the most beloved and enduring pieces of popular music, are at the center of the controversy,” its attorneys told the Supreme Court.

But Sheeran’s lawyers countered, among other things, that the sheet music submitted did not indicate a tempo. They also argued that the text of the copyright law is clear and didn’t require courts to defer to the Copyright Office’s interpretation.

Back to Home
Source: CNN