Scottish farmers worried over imported trade deal meat

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Concerns Rise Among Scottish Farmers Over Impact of Trade Deal Imports"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Scotland's meat industry is increasingly apprehensive about the influx of imported meat resulting from various trade agreements signed by the UK. Quality Meat Scotland (QMS) has raised concerns about the potential destabilization of the Scottish food sector due to imports from countries like New Zealand, Australia, and Brazil. While farming unions at the Royal Highland Show acknowledge that trade deals can open new markets for Scottish farmers, QMS emphasizes the necessity of considering the cumulative effects of these agreements. They argue that the current low livestock numbers in the US, caused by recent droughts, present a beef shortage opportunity that Scottish exports could capitalize on. However, to fully benefit from this situation, it is crucial to reverse the decline in Scottish cattle numbers, which would require significant efforts to boost local production.

The landscape of trade agreements has evolved significantly since Australia became the first nation to establish a post-Brexit trade deal with the UK in 2021, which took effect in May 2023. Farmers have expressed concerns that the UK government may have compromised too much in these negotiations. With approximately 70 countries now having trade agreements in principle with the UK, the farming sector is keenly analyzing the implications for both imports and exports. QMS forecasts that Scotland would need an additional 79,000 cows by 2030 to replace imported beef with locally sourced products, highlighting the challenges ahead. While there is optimism regarding new markets, such as the recent agreement with India that could significantly boost exports of Scotch whisky, farmers are also wary of ensuring that imported products adhere to the same high production and welfare standards as domestic offerings. The future of Scottish agriculture relies on navigating these complex trade dynamics while safeguarding local interests and market stability.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Scotland's meat industry says it is becoming concerned about the "creepage" of imports from countries which have signed trade deals with the UK. Quality Meat Scotland (QMS) says imports from countries like New Zealand, Australia and Brazil risk destabilising the Scottish food sector. On the opening day of the Royal Highland Show at Ingliston, Edinburgh, farming unions insist trade deals are opening up new markets for many in the sector. But QMS is urging politicians to consider the cumulative impact of multiple deals rather than treating each one in isolation. It says low livestock numbers in the US, following successive droughts, mean there is a beef shortage from which Scottish exports could benefit. However, a decline in Scottish cattle numbers would need to be reversed in order to meet demand from across the Atlantic. Australia was the first country since Brexit to strikea trade agreement with the UKin 2021. It came into effect in May 2023 and farmers accused the then Conservative UK government of "giving away our markets too cheaply". Since then, trade agreements in principle have been struck with about 70 countries and last month the UK and EU reached a renewed deal. The farming and food sectors have been considering what it means for imports and exports. QMS modelling predicts an extra 79,000 cows would be needed by 2030 to replace imports with home grown beef. That equates to an extra two animals per herd each year although even more would be needed if exports were to grow. Chief executive Sarah Millar told BBC Scotland News: "We're not afraid of trade, we want to position our markets out there on that premium global marketplace as well, so we welcome two-way trade. "But it's got to be done in a fair and equitable basis. "All of these trade deals, when they come together, could have a destabilising effect." Other market places have been opening up as trade deals have been agreed. The United Arab Emirates has been receiving imports of Scotch lamb since 2023. But Ms Millar says the EU is still the most important export market and any agreements which can smooth access to European trade would be welcomed. Last month's trade deal with Indiais being looked upon as having growth potential for Scotland's arable farmers. The agreement has halved excise duty for whisky imports which has been welcomed by the Scotch Whisky Association. It says the deal has the potential to increase exports to India by £1bn over the next five years and create 1,200 jobs in the UK. Barley growers are hoping it will result in an increase in demand for the crop from Scottish maltings. Neil White, an arable farmer near Duns in the Scottish borders, says he could almost double the amount of barley he grows. He explained: "We're at the very beginning of that supply chain. "I have only 25-30% of the farm growing spring barley so potentially this farm could grow a lot more if the premium was there. "It's a relatively cheap crop to grow. It's also a local market and a prestige market." There is growing optimism that the EU-UK trade and co-operation agreement will benefit farmers, and small food businesses in particular, by reducing red tape at the border and reopening trade routes. The seed potato industry says the lost market opportunity into the EU has cost £75m over the last five years. NFU Scotland welcomes the reset of relations but has concerns about the UK being aligned with the EU's rules without having a say on their formation. Jonnie Hall, director of policy, says recovering lost markets is important but believes other trade opportunities are also available. He said supplying premium beef products to the US would be good for farmers here. But anything being sold into the UK must meet the same production and welfare standards as home produced food. That means politicians sticking to the ban on controversialhormone-treated US beef. He added: "We're all doing a bit of crystal ball gazing at the moment. "We need to see the real detail to understand the implications."

Back to Home
Source: Bbc News