Since the start of 2022, Russian influencer Egor Melo has been traveling around Europe. Last year, he went to Zurich to see Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour, celebrated New Year’s Eve in Paris, and enjoyed the historical sights of Nuremberg, Germany. After Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, direct flights between Russia and the EU were suspended. In September of the same year, the EU suspended its visa facilitation agreement with Russia, making Russian citizens face a lengthier, more expensive visa approval process to enter the EU. Processing fees for Schengen visas — which allow non-EU citizens to travel within the 29-country European Schengen area — have increased due to the suspension of visa-free agreements, some EU countries, many of which border Russia are offering fewer consular appointments for Russians, and the EU has advised member states to scrutinize Russian applications thoroughly. The new rules don’t prevent Russian tourists from traveling to Europe — nor is there anything illegal about their trips. It’s just making the process more difficult and expensive. Latvia, Norway, Poland, Finland, Estonia, Lithuania, and the Czech Republic have gone even further — issuing full bans on almost all tourist visas for Russian citizens. But on his Instagram, dedicated “to showing that travel in Europe is accessible to everyone,” Melos claims he’s “been in two of these countries in the past year with a tourist visa and had no problems.” His advice? Obtain a visa from another Schengen country. “For example, fly to Italy and from there travel to these countries.” Melos declined a CNN request to talk about his claims. The Baltic states’ ban only applies to Russian citizens who cross the external Schengen border — not entry from other Schengen countries. “Once you are in the Schengen zone, you can travel within the Schengen zone anywhere, because there is, in principle, no internal control (…) This is not unlawful. This is the Schengen system,” Sarah Ganty, co-author of a 2022 Yale Journal of International Law paper that opposed the visa bans, told CNN. Getting a permit ‘isn’t that difficult’ Melo isn’t alone in continuing to travel. The interior minister for Latvia reportedly condemned data presented at an EU meeting, which stated that 565,069 Schengen visas were issued to Russians in 2024: 90% for tourism. It’s a massive drop from the four million issued pre-pandemic in 2019, but an increase of 25% from 2023. The visa refusal rate for Russians diverges strongly among member states — from 1% to 65% in the first half of 2024, according to an EU report. “The stabilization of Schengen visa issuance” has contributed to the growth in demand for travel to Europe, the vice president of the Russian Union of Travel Industry (ATOR), claimed in an interview with Russian publication Vedomosti. One well-known travel blogger from Russia, who asked to not have their name included for fear of future visa applications being denied, agreed with ATOR. They’ve recently visited Norway — a country that stopped issuing visas to Russian tourists in May 2024. “Right now, obtaining a visa requires many additional documents that weren’t needed before, such as purchased flight tickets, hotel bookings, or even tax certificates,” they said. “Jokes about needing a doctor’s note (to travel) soon are becoming more common.” But they still see travel as accessible. “Let’s be honest — getting an EU residence permit, like a Spanish digital nomad visa, isn’t that difficult right now. Some people are opting for a three-year EU residence permit instead of a visa, which has also become a common practice,” the blogger said. “For example, if you have children living in the Baltics, the easiest way to get there is through Italy, France or Spain. The scheme is simple: you fly to Rome, spend some time there, and then travel through the Estonia-Russia border after first flying to your relatives.” No direct flights means that “Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Serbia” had become the main transit countries for those living in Russia’s West, while “if you live in the Russian Far East, for example, in Vladivostok, it might be easier to fly through China,” according to them. But there are ways to avoid the extra costs when returning to Russia. ‘No questions were asked’ Even without an EU residence permit, it is possible to enter Russia through Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, the travel blogger said. “That’s why, in the summer, there are long queues at the Narva-Ivangorod border, as flying to Tallinn is cheap, and many people with tourist visas prefer to return via the Estonian-Russian border rather than through, say, Istanbul or Antalya.” Russian travel companies are still offering tours to countries that have supposedly blocked visas for Russian tourists. For example, one company, YouTravel, is currently offering a 15-day road trip through Finland, Sweden, Norway and Latvia in June. All these countries, apart from Sweden, have banned Russian tourists. The agency says it will assist in obtaining a visa free of charge. So how easy is it really to obtain a visa? Asked about the process to obtain a visa to Latvia, which has a complete ban on issuing tourist visas to Russians, a sales assistant at St Petersburg-based agency Visateka said they could help obtain entry “through a third country.” They advised that the easiest document-wise for a June travel date would be France. For the equivalent of $300, the sales assistant said Visateka could reserve flights and a hotel, and prepare documents to take to the French embassy for a visa appointment. Visateka claims that for France, Italy and Spain, the chances of having a visa approved were around 93%. Their website claims that in the first two weeks of April, they’ve obtained 20 visas for Russian citizens to enter Latvia, 93 to Lithuania and 20 to Poland. “Last year, we visited Riga to see the Christmas markets,” Daria from St. Petersburg told CNN. She requested her last name be omitted in fear of her next Schengen visa application being denied. With a Spanish visa, she flew to Istanbul, then to Madrid, before boarding a flight to the Latvian capital on the same day. “No questions were asked at the airport,” she said about the use of her Spanish visa to visit Riga. “It’s common practice.” “I’m not part of this war, I don’t support Putin. I don’t understand why I should be discriminated against and treated as if I’m a threat.” Growing frustration The Vinsky online travel forum is populated with similar stories. One holder of a French visa shared their experience of flying via Vienna, then taking a plane to Riga in the evening: “I was worried about what to say, but in the end (at Vienna airport) they asked exactly zero questions.” Another, who had been granted an Italian tourist visa, said they flew to Rome and then on to Riga. One traveler from Moscow asked, “If you enter Italy with an Italian visa and fly from Milan to Amsterdam a few days later, what are the risks?” Another responded, “Once you get a visa, you’ll be able to travel along the route you’ve planned without any stress.” Regarding the increase in visas issued in 2024, the EU Commission told CNN that it “closely monitors the implementation of the guidelines through the Blueprint Network.” The Blueprint Network is the EU’s framework for monitoring migration. “The Commission is working with Member States to promote consistent implementation of the guidelines.” Last year, Hungary extended visa exemptions to Russians and Belarusians, and according to the European Travel Commission’s statistics, Russian arrivals to Hungary increased by a third. In April 2024, Romania restarted issuing short-stay visas to Russian tourists on a discretionary basis after experiencing a drop in tourist revenue, another ETC report states. In early December, Italian visa centers in Moscow reduced processing times for visas. As the war grinds into its fourth third year, frustration is growing. Rihards Kozlovskis, Latvia’s minister of internal affairs, has called on EU countries to join Latvia in banning Schengen tourist visas for Russian citizens. Speaking at a meeting of the EU Justice and Home Affairs Council in Brussels, he said it is member states’ “moral duty to deny such a service.” “We are facing both illegal border crossings and acts of sabotage, such as the burning of the Museum of the Occupation, drones crossing the border, propaganda attempts to influence public opinion, etc.,” Kozlovskis said. “Therefore I urge all member states to take this threat seriously.” The Russian travel blogger CNN spoke to said he would be “disappointed” if such sanctions were introduced. “Russia has its own restrictions on travel to so-called ‘unfriendly’ countries. Police officers, judges and government employees are already prohibited from traveling, so those connected to the state are not going anywhere anyway,” he said. “I don’t think ordinary Russian travelers pose any kind of threat to the Latvian minister with their presence.” Bans ‘unlawful’ A European Commission spokesperson said that the organization had “adopted clear sets of guidance to support Member States to deprioritize visas for Russians and focus on security and border control. Heightened scrutiny should be performed in a way that preserves the right to seek asylum and prevents risks of non-refoulement.” Ganty, the law academic, argued that such bans were never lawful. She described the de facto national-level ban against Russian citizens — introduced by Poland, Finland and the Baltic States — as a breach of EU law. “These Russians who are applying for Schengen visas have mainly been depicted as tourists having fun in Europe, but there are lots of people who have family members across the border, there are people who are dissenters, there are health reasons why someone might need a short-stay visa,” she said. “I think we really need to continue the dialogue with Russian citizens, especially those who are trying to flee the regime and oppose the regime. I think it’s really important to be welcoming towards them.” When Mark Temynsky, a Ukrainian-American and fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Center, visited Montenegro in 2023 with his cousins, he was surprised at the number of Russians who were also there — and the reaction they got from the Russians while posing with a Ukrainian flag by St John’s Fortress, a historic landmark overlooking the town of Kotor. “We got some looks and stares from Russian speakers who were making comments (…) we’re just taking photos with the flag,” he said. “In Greece, as well as in Cyprus, when I was there in August of 2023, it was still very heavily visited by ethnic Russians and Russian speakers who were on holiday there and just again — from a moral perspective — it just did not sit with me that these people are supporting the country’s war and then go on vacation. “I have many family and friends in Ukraine who haven’t been on vacation in several years because they don’t know where to go, and many of them are not permitted to leave the country and fear for their safety. It’s very strange.” He said he wants the EU to go further with bans on tourist visas. “I would argue that European countries aren’t doing this to punish the Russians, just for the sake of punishing the Russians. It’s to explore other avenues to put additional pressures on Russia. And I think at this point, you gotta get creative, and if this is another way to do that, then I think there’s no harm in trying to see what happens.”
Russians are still traveling around Europe despite sanctions. Not everyone’s happy about it
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Russian Citizens Continue to Travel in Europe Despite Visa Restrictions and Sanctions"
TruthLens AI Summary
Since the onset of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022, the travel landscape for Russian citizens seeking to visit Europe has significantly changed. Influencer Egor Melo exemplifies the ongoing Russian tourism experience, as he has successfully navigated various European destinations despite the challenges posed by new sanctions and visa restrictions. Following the invasion, the EU suspended its visa facilitation agreement with Russia, resulting in increased processing fees and a more stringent visa approval process for Russian travelers. Countries like Latvia, Poland, and Finland have implemented outright bans on tourist visas for Russian citizens, further complicating travel plans. However, Melo and others have reported that it is still possible to visit these countries by obtaining visas from other Schengen nations, such as Italy. Once within the Schengen zone, travel between member countries remains largely unrestricted, highlighting a loophole that many Russian tourists are exploiting to bypass the bans imposed by certain states.
Despite the hurdles, demand for travel to Europe among Russians persists, as evidenced by the issuance of 565,069 Schengen visas in 2024, a significant increase from the previous year but still a fraction of pre-pandemic figures. The visa refusal rates vary widely among EU member states, creating a patchwork of accessibility for Russian tourists. Some travel bloggers and influencers have noted the added documentation requirements, but many still view travel as achievable. The discourse surrounding Russian tourism in Europe is complex, with some EU officials advocating for stricter bans, citing national security concerns, while others argue that such measures are unlawful and detrimental to genuine travelers. As tensions remain high, the narrative continues to evolve, with calls for dialogue and understanding becoming increasingly important amidst the backdrop of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article examines the ongoing travel of Russian citizens in Europe despite various sanctions imposed by the EU following the invasion of Ukraine. While the sanctions have created obstacles for Russian tourists, some individuals have found ways to navigate these challenges. This dynamic raises questions about the perceptions and realities of Russian tourism in Europe amid geopolitical tensions.
Intended Purpose of the Article
The article seems to aim at shedding light on the complexities surrounding Russian tourism in Europe post-sanctions. By showcasing an individual who continues to travel despite the restrictions, it may seek to challenge the narrative that sanctions are entirely effective in isolating Russian citizens. It also highlights the adaptability of individuals like Egor Melo, who can circumvent some of the barriers through strategic planning.
Public Sentiment and Perception
There appears to be a divide in public sentiment regarding Russian tourists in Europe. While some may view their continued travel as problematic given the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, others might see it as a reflection of personal freedom and the ineffectiveness of sanctions. The article might be aiming to evoke empathy towards individual Russian travelers while simultaneously acknowledging the geopolitical context that complicates their presence in Europe.
Potential Concealments
While the article does provide insight into the experiences of Russian tourists, it may downplay the broader implications of their travel during a time of conflict. The article focuses on individual stories rather than the collective impact of Russian tourism on European sentiments about the war, which could lead to a simplistic understanding of a complex issue.
Manipulative Elements
The article does exhibit some manipulative characteristics, particularly in its portrayal of individual experiences against the backdrop of collective sanctions. By emphasizing the success stories of travelers like Melo, it risks minimizing the seriousness of the sanctions and the broader implications for European security and solidarity against Russia's actions.
Truthfulness and Reliability
The reliability of the article can be considered moderate. While it presents factual information about the sanctions and the complexities of the visa process, it also relies on the subjective experiences of a single individual, which may not reflect the experiences of all Russian travelers. Thus, while the article contains truthful elements, it could be seen as selectively highlighting certain narratives.
Comparison with Other News
This article connects with a wider discourse around the impact of sanctions on individuals versus states. It reflects a nuanced debate present in various media outlets about the effectiveness of sanctions and their humanitarian implications. Other articles may focus more on the backlash against Russian presence in certain countries, creating a broader dialogue on the ethics of collective punishment.
Societal, Economic, and Political Implications
The continued travel of Russians in Europe could provoke varied responses, from increased scrutiny and hostility towards Russian citizens to discussions about the effectiveness of sanctions. Economically, it may have implications for tourism-dependent sectors in Europe, particularly in countries that are more lenient in their visa policies. Politically, it could lead to debates about the balance between individual freedoms and collective security concerns.
Target Audience and Community Support
The article seems to appeal more to audiences who are sympathetic towards individual freedoms, possibly including travel enthusiasts and advocates for personal rights. It may resonate less with those who prioritize national security and geopolitical considerations.
Market and Economic Impact
The implications of this article on stock markets or global economics appear minimal. However, sectors such as tourism and hospitality in Europe may be indirectly affected by the perceptions of Russian tourists, especially in countries that are more open to them.
Geopolitical Context
This article holds significance in the broader context of global power dynamics, especially as tensions between Russia and the West continue to evolve. It highlights a nuanced aspect of the conflict that may not always be at the forefront of political discussions.
Potential Use of AI in Article Creation
There is a possibility that AI tools were utilized in crafting this article, particularly in organizing the narrative and ensuring a coherent flow of information. AI models could have influenced the tone, making it more approachable and engaging for readers. However, without explicit indicators of AI involvement, this remains speculative.
In conclusion, the article provides a complex view of Russian tourism in Europe, intertwining individual narratives with broader geopolitical themes. Its reliability is mixed, and while it offers an interesting perspective, it may also obscure some of the more significant implications of the ongoing conflict.