RFK Jr's vaccine panel to review long-approved jabs for children

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"New Vaccine Panel to Review Established Child Immunization Schedules Under Kennedy's Leadership"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The newly appointed members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), established by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., convened for their first meeting amidst significant scrutiny and controversy. This panel, which plays a pivotal role in advising the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on vaccination schedules for children and adolescents, has seen a complete overhaul since Kennedy removed all previous members in June. The new members include several who have previously expressed skepticism towards vaccines, raising concerns among public health experts and lawmakers regarding their qualifications. During the meeting, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, the new chair of the panel, revealed his own dismissal from Harvard University due to his refusal to receive a Covid-19 vaccine. He announced that the panel would be examining the immunization schedules for various vaccines, including the hepatitis B vaccine for newborns and the measles vaccine, both of which have established safety records over many years.

Critics have expressed alarm over the implications of reviewing vaccines that have been approved for seven or more years, suggesting that such a review could undermine confidence in established vaccination protocols. Prominent epidemiologists, including Bill Hanage from Harvard, have voiced their concerns about the rationale behind questioning the integrity of long-approved vaccines. The panel's initial agenda included a vote on recommendations for vaccines against RSV, a respiratory virus affecting infants, which has been postponed. The upcoming discussions also include the controversial topic of thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative that has not been used in most vaccines for decades. The selection of panel members has been criticized for lacking diversity in expertise, particularly in relevant fields such as microbiology, epidemiology, and immunology. Republican Senator Bill Cassidy underscored these concerns, emphasizing the need for a broader range of expertise and cautioning against proceeding without a confirmed CDC director to oversee the recommendations of the panel.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The new members of US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr's panel of vaccine advisers will review long-approved immunisation schedules for children and teens. The seven members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (Acip) met for the first time on Wednesday, weeks after Kennedy ousted all 17 of their predecessors. The Acip recommends who should be vaccinated and when to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ahead of the meeting, public health experts and politicians raised concerns about the qualifications of the new members - several of whom are vaccine critics. The health secretary sparked uproar when heremoved all 17 members of the Acip on 9 June, and then hand-picked eight new members to serve on the panel - including one who dropped out hours before the first meeting. Wednesday's meeting began with the new chair Dr Martin Kulldorff telling the panel that he was fired from his job as a professor at Harvard University because he refused to get a Covid-19 vaccine. Dr Kulldorff also announced the panel would launch new working groups to examine child vaccination schedules and vaccines that were approved seven or more years ago. He said it would be reviewed whether it was "wise" to give the hepatitis B vaccines to newborns, a shot proven safe and effective at preventing the infection that causes liver cancer. Vaccine schedules for measles would also be reviewed, he said. Examining vaccines licensed seven or more years ago raises concerns, because it suggests the process to approve them was flawed, said Bill Hanage, a professor of epidemiology at Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health. "I cannot think of any rational reason you would look at that and think it to be the case," he said. The panel was initially meant to vote on recommendations for shots against RSV, a respiratory virus that can be dangerous for infants, but that has been postponed. On Thursday, the group is scheduled to hear a presentation on the use of thimerosal in vaccines given by Lyn Redwood, a former leader of Children's Health Defense, an anti-vaccine group Kennedy used to run. Ms Redwood has been hired by the CDC to work in its vaccine safety office, according to the BBC's US partner CBS News. The decision for the panel to discuss thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative that has not been used in most vaccines for decades, is perplexing, Dr Hanage said. In the past, he said, Acip's members had a wide range of vaccine expertise and would scrutinise vaccine recommendations for months. This time, Kennedy chose for the panel "people that are like him - people in the past who have shown an anti-vaccine bias", said Dr Paul Offit, a former Acip member and director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. One of the new Acip members was Dr Michael Ross, however he withdrew this week ahead of a review of members' financial holdings, the Department of Health and Human Services said. Kennedy's panel choices have also sparked criticism from Republican Senator Bill Cassidy, a physician who was sceptical of voting to confirm Kennedy as health secretary because of his stances on vaccines. In a post on X, Cassidy said the panel should not proceed with their meeting because of the group's small size and the lack of a CDC director in place to approve their recommendations. "Although the appointees to ACIP have scientific credentials, many do not have significant experience studying microbiology, epidemiology or immunology," he wrote. "In particular, some lack experience studying new technologies such as mRNA vaccines, and may even have a preconceived bias against them."

Back to Home
Source: Bbc News