John Swinney will set out his programme for government on Tuesday, making clear what he expects to get done over the final year of the Holyrood term. A year of delivery is key to his aim of being re-elected as Scotland's first minister next May. And this programme should give us the full picture of what his party has done - and has not done - since the last election. So this is a good moment to check in on the SNP's 2021 manifesto - what has been delivered, what has been dropped, and what has been delayed? It is fair at the outset to reflect that the SNP is onto its third leader and first minister since that election, so some changes to the agenda were inevitable. The world has changed enormously too, from the tail end of the pandemic to the war in Ukraine, to the cost-of-living crisis and major changes of government in Westminster and Washington. Some of those things have clearly contributed to the success or failure of the programme. But what is a manifesto of a victorious party for, if not a yardstick of a government's progress? A two-page spread at the start of the SNP's manifesto in 2021 outlined the party's "next steps" - a list which contained 20 pledges for the parliamentary term. Right at the top was a promise toincrease NHS frontline spendingby at least 20%. That target has already been smashed, thanks to the huge increases in health spending post-pandemic - from 2020 to 2025 the NHS budget went up from about £12bn to over £16bn, which is closer to 30%. A promise toincrease NHS staff payby an average of 4% has also been more than fulfilled, with double-digit inflation driving public sector pay deals higher. But the next promise, ofcreating a National Care Servicecollapsed in slow motion across the parliamentary term. Ministers may seek to blame the opposition for that one, but the range of groups which ended up turning against the government's vision for the service was huge, and it had clearly become undeliverable. The government also said it wouldfreeze income tax rates and bandsfor the duration of the parliament. Higher rate taxpayers in particular may have noticed that big changes were made to the system in the end - the higher and top rates were increased in 2023, and then a new "advanced rate" was added in 2024. This is not unrelated to the swelling of NHS budgets and public sector pay deals, of course. All reflect the changing realities on the ground, but also the political choices made by the SNP. Their instinct was to raise taxes rather than cut spending elsewhere - although as we will soon see, there has been belt-tightening too. Another victim of circumstance was the goal todecarbonise the heating of one million homes by 2030. The crisis in energy prices and the cost of living led ministers toconclude last yearthat it was "no longer considered achievable". Of course there is political context too - the Greens were kicked out of government by Humza Yousaf, and the heat in buildings bill drawn up by former minister Patrick Harvie was torn up on Mr Swinney's watch. There were a lot of policies in the manifesto aimed at young people, families and education. Nicola Sturgeon famously made closing the attainment gap her top priority. That has not yet happened - but the manifesto pledge toinvest £1bn in the attainment fundhas been maintained through the administrations of both of her successors. The government has also more than met the promise todouble the Scottish Child Paymentto £20 a week - indeed it now stands at £27.15. Local pilots are being run ofthe wraparound childcare service, although as it stands there is no indication of when or whether it will be rolled out nationwide. But the pledge to providefree school breakfasts and lunchesto every pupil has not been met, withuniversal rollout pausedin favour of focusing on poorer families. And a promise torecruit 3,500 additional teachers and classroom assistantshas turned into one to restore the falling figures tothe level they were atin 2023. Likewise, the idea ofproviding every child in Scotland with a device to get onlinewas the victim of budget cuts, with councils given the green light to spend the funding for iton pay deals. There was also the idea offree bikesfor all children of school age who cannot afford them. The government ran an in-house pilot scheme, but it was subsequently moved to a "third sector partnership approach" run by Cycling Scotland. In 2023 Patrick Harvie told MSPs that "a single national delivery model would not be the best way to meet the needs or intentions of the policy", but that the government still puts money towards the scheme and that thousands of young people have benefitted. Some pledges are harder to judge, at least from where we stand today. There is much scrutiny on an ongoing basis as to whether the target ofdelivering a further 100,000 affordable homesby 2032 will be met. The target was stretched to 110,000, but an internal memo from December 2023 suggested it was "at risk" due to sluggish approvals of new housing, and the housing budget was at one point cutbefore being reinstated. But the government insists it is still working towards this goal, and the target date remains far enough away that it's hard to forecast whether it will hit it. See also the pledge toinvest £500m to support new jobs and reskill people. The Just Transition Fund has indeed been doling out this cash, but overa 10-year timescalerather than in the five-year Holyrood term. The SNP also saidit would invest £33bn in a national infrastructure mission. Once again inflation has played havoc with the intention, and a report in 2023 concluded that it is "likely to take longer than expected" to achieve this target. In October 2024a progress reportsaid ministers "cannot responsibly commit to additional major infrastructure projects or public-private partnerships in the near term", and that the government was "focussing capital resources on the maintenance of existing assets to safeguard service delivery". On transport, the government hit its target of bringingScotrail into public ownership- something which had actually been announced by ministers prior to the election. But a pledge todecarbonise rail services by 2035has beenpushed back by a decade"due to constrained budgets and logistical requirements impacting adversely on the delivery programme". And the idea ofremoving the majority of fossil fuel buses from public transport by 2023also proved far too lofty a target to meet. Despite the government funding 800 zero-emission buses and coaches, Transform Scotlandestimated last yearthat about 70% of the fleet still runs on diesel. One topic that John Swinney has talked about relatively rarely since he became first minister, but which will surely have to feature in his next manifesto somewhere, is Scotland's constitutional future. The 2021 paper promised tohold an independence referendumafter the Covid crisis was over. Nicola Sturgeon's attempt to force the issue via the Supreme Court fell flat, and talk of a "de facto referendum" ended with her resignation - not to mention the SNP's massive losses in last year's general election. It's hard to say whether her successors have managed tomaintain relations with EU partnerswith a view to rejoining. A diplomatic office was added in Copenhagen, but plans for another in Warsaw have not yet borne fruit and the idea of rejoining the European club remains as distant as independence. Five of the 20 headline pledges have inarguably been delivered upon, and things like funding the NHS and the Scottish Child Payment are no small matter. But at least as many have been dropped, while others have been delayed or kicked into the long grass. The same story continues through the rest of the manifesto: free bus travel for under-22s and a ban on single-use plastics were delivered; alcohol advertising restrictions and annual citizens assemblies were scrapped. Almost always there is a deeper story too - consider the pledge to simplify the gender recognition process. There are plenty of reasons why this is the case, given the big changes in government here and circumstances more broadly. But you can see why Swinney is so keen to set himself up for a year of delivery before he has to put his next manifesto to the public for a vote.
Programme for government: Has SNP delivered on promises?
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"SNP's Programme for Government: Evaluating Progress on 2021 Manifesto Commitments"
TruthLens AI Summary
John Swinney is poised to present his programme for government, outlining his expectations for the upcoming year as Scotland's first minister, with a particular focus on delivering key initiatives ahead of the next election in May 2024. This moment serves as an essential checkpoint to evaluate the Scottish National Party's (SNP) performance against its 2021 manifesto, which included a set of 20 pledges ranging from healthcare to education. Notably, the SNP has seen significant changes in leadership since the last election, which, coupled with external factors such as the pandemic, the war in Ukraine, and the cost-of-living crisis, has influenced the party's agenda and its ability to fulfill promises. The SNP has successfully increased NHS funding, surpassing its commitment of a 20% increase, with health spending rising from around £12 billion to over £16 billion. However, the ambitious goal of creating a National Care Service has faltered, facing opposition from various stakeholders and ultimately being deemed undeliverable. Additionally, the party's pledge to freeze income tax rates was altered, with higher tax rates introduced, reflecting the fiscal pressures stemming from the increased healthcare budget and public sector pay demands.
Several other manifesto commitments have met with mixed results. The SNP has made strides in addressing educational disparities by maintaining investment in the attainment fund, although the goal of closing the attainment gap remains unachieved. The Scottish Child Payment has exceeded expectations, increasing to £27.15, yet promises for universal free school meals and the recruitment of additional teachers have not been realized. Moreover, the ambitious target of decarbonizing heating for one million homes by 2030 has been abandoned due to rising energy costs. While some targets, such as the delivery of affordable homes and job creation through the Just Transition Fund, are still in progress, concerns persist about their feasibility amid budget constraints. As Swinney prepares to outline his agenda, it is evident that the SNP's track record reveals a complex narrative of achievements and setbacks, underscoring the challenges of governance amid shifting political and economic landscapes.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article provides an analysis of the Scottish National Party's (SNP) performance in delivering on its promises since the last election, especially in light of the upcoming program for government presentation by John Swinney. The focus is on evaluating the successes and failures of the SNP in fulfilling its 2021 manifesto commitments, which is critical as Swinney seeks re-election as Scotland's first minister.
Evaluation of Achievements and Failures
The article highlights that some key promises have been successfully met, particularly in increasing NHS funding and staff pay. The significant rise in health spending post-pandemic is emphasized, showcasing a positive aspect of the SNP's governance. However, it also points out the collapse of the promise to create a National Care Service, indicating that not all pledges have been fulfilled. This juxtaposition of accomplishments and setbacks serves to provide a nuanced view of the SNP's governance.
Contextual Influences
The changing leadership within the SNP since the last election and external factors such as the pandemic and geopolitical events are noted as significant influences on the party's ability to deliver on its promises. This context suggests that while the SNP has made strides in some areas, various challenges have impeded progress in others.
Public Perception and Political Strategy
By revisiting the manifesto commitments, the article aims to shape public perception regarding the SNP's effectiveness. This is particularly relevant as the party prepares for the upcoming elections, where demonstrating accountability for past promises will be crucial for voter support. The article implicitly suggests that the SNP must navigate these challenges to regain or maintain public trust.
Potential Consequences
The evaluation of the SNP's track record may impact the political landscape in Scotland, influencing voter sentiment and party dynamics leading up to the elections. If the government is perceived as failing to deliver on key promises, it could result in a loss of support, potentially benefiting opposition parties.
Target Audience
The article is likely aimed at politically engaged citizens, particularly those interested in Scottish politics and the SNP's governance. It may resonate more with constituents who prioritize healthcare and social services, given the focus on NHS spending and care services.
Economic and Market Impact
While the article primarily focuses on political implications, the performance of the SNP could indirectly affect the economy and public sector investments. A shift in public confidence may influence market perceptions, particularly in sectors related to healthcare and public services.
Geopolitical Relevance
The article does not directly address international relations but hints at broader societal issues that may resonate with global audiences, especially those concerned with governance and public welfare in the context of crises like the pandemic and economic challenges.
Use of AI in Writing
It is plausible that AI could have been utilized in generating parts of this article, particularly in structuring the analysis or summarizing key points. While the writing style appears human, AI could assist in organizing data and presenting it coherently.
The article presents a balanced view of the SNP's performance, emphasizing both successes and failures. However, it also serves as a strategic tool that could influence public perception in the lead-up to elections, highlighting the importance of accountability in governance. Overall, the reliability of the article can be deemed moderate, as it provides factual information while also aiming to shape voter sentiment.