You’ve probably heard the stories: For every man who has cut carbs from his diet and dropped 10 pounds, there’s a woman who’s done exactly the same thing and lost 2. Research backs up this frustrating fact. Diet and exercise tend to benefit men much more than women when it comes to losing weight. That’s why the results of recent clinical trials were surprising — and welcome — for some: In study after study, injected GLP-1 weight loss medications appear to work better on average for women than they do for men. What’s not clear is why. And researchers say it’s important to understand so doctors can optimize the use of these powerful drugs for everyone. The latest study to see this effect was presented Sunday at the annual meeting of the European Congress on Obesity and published in the New England Journal of Medicine. It was the first head-to-head comparison of the injectable GLP-1 medications semaglutide and tirzepatide, which are sold under the brand names Wegovy and Zepbound for weight loss. Roughly 750 people with obesity were randomly split into two groups. Half were assigned to get the maximum dose of Wegovy they could tolerate; the other half used the maximum dose of Zepbound. Zepbound is newer medication than Wegovy. It stimulates two different gut hormones that affect appetite and blood sugar, while Wegovy primarily affects the action of one. Many doctors have observed that Zepbound seems to be a more powerful medication than Wegovy, so it was not surprising when this trial – which was sponsored by Eli Lilly, the manufacturer of Zepbound – arrived at the same conclusion. People in the study who were using Zepbound lost about 50% more weight those who got Wegovy, making it the superior drug in terms of weight loss. One curious thing about the study was that all the participants lost a little bit less weight, on average, than has been measured with the same medications in other trials. Researchers say that result was driven by men, who lost about 6% less weight than women. About 35% of participants in this study were men, while 20% to 25% of participants in previous trials have been male. “Why this works better in women, I can’t honestly tell you, but it’s great,” said Dr. Louis Aronne, who directs the Comprehensive Weight Control Center at Weill Cornell Medicine and who led the study. “It has been seen again and again.” For example, in long-term follow up of a trial that compared semaglutide to a placebo, women using semaglutide for two years lost an average of 11% of their starting weight, while men using the drug lost an average of 8%. Across trials of tirzepatide that compared it to a placebo, women on the drug lost up to 28% of their starting weight, while men lost up to 19% of their weight. Untangling sex-specific effects There could be a host of reasons for this, spanning numerous aspects of biology and culture, said Dr. Melanie Jay, an obesity expert and professor of medicine at New York University’s Grossman School of Medicine. The first has to do with drug dosing. Women tend to weigh a little bit less than men but are prescribed the same doses, so it may be that they’re getting more for their size. “So maybe they’re getting a higher dose,” Jay said. It might also have something to do with where women store fat. Jay said women tend to have more cutaneous fat, or fat under their skin, than visceral fat, or fat that’s packed around the internal organs like the liver. Perhaps the drugs are more effective on one type of fat than the other. Women also face more societal pressure to be thin, Jay said, and this could lead to greater motivation to stay on the medications, which aren’t always easy to take. Jay said she’s seen this in her own practice. Women seem to be more willing to tolerate and work through the significant side effects of the drugs, which can include regular nausea, vomiting and constipation. “I have had a few more men be like, ‘I can’t take the constipation or the nausea,’ whereas the women usually figure out how to get through it,” Jay said. She said the side effects tend to get better over time, as people learn how to eat differently and start to exercise more. Role of estrogen in weight loss One of the most intriguing clues to explain why women benefit more from the GLP-1 medications has to do with the hormone estrogen, which women have in higher amounts than men. Dr. Karolina Skibicka is a professor of molecular medicine at the University of Gothenberg in Sweden and has a lab in the nutrition department at Penn State University. “Overall, I’m a neuroscientist interested in gut-brain communication,” which is how she began studying GLP-1, a gut hormone that also works in the brain. Skibicka says scientists have known that estrogen plays a role in metabolism for about 30 years, but they didn’t really understand how. Her research in rats has shown that estrogen directly interacts with GLP-1 and other gut hormones, making them more potent in the brain. Several studies have shown that if you inject rats with GLP-1 and estrogen together, “you will see a very enhanced effect sort of across the board, on feeding behavior, motivated behavior, various other aspects of GLP-1 actions,” she said. You can test this interaction in a another way, she said. If you block the action of estrogen with a chemical inhibitor, it turns down the effect of GLP-1, too. “If we take it away, the effect is reduced, so the animals will eat a little bit more now, or GLP-1 is just not as effective as suppressing feeding or suppressing food reward behavior, maybe more specifically, when we take away estrogen,” she said. Estrogen appears to amplify the effects of GLP-1 by increasing the number of receptors — think of them as boat docks — on the surface of cells where this gut hormone can attach. In many tissues, she says, cells have receptors for both estrogen and GLP-1. “So then you sort of have an amplified effect inside the cell as well.” Although all of these theories are interesting, they are just educated guesses at this point. A push for more research “We’re really dealing with paucity of data compared to just sort of the baseline data that you have about what GLP-1 does,” Skibicka said. “Clinical studies don’t really ask and don’t really confirm why they see a difference.” Both Jay and Skibicka said sex differences typically go unexplored when it comes to drugs, and the GLP-1 medications are no exception. In studies that do report data by sex, women may lose 50% to 90% more weight than men, but they also seem to report more GI side effects, Skibicka said. Men seem to get more cardiovascular benefits from the medications than women. Although most studies don’t find that GLP-1 medications negatively affect mood, some have shown that this may differ by sex, with women being more likely to experience depression on the medications than men. Understanding the impacts of these sex differences could be important for all patients. If estrogen affects how strongly the medications work, that may have implications for the treatment of women before or after menopause, since estrogen levels fall in women as they age. It may also impact how well GLP-1 medications work for women on hormone-blocking therapies after breast cancer, for example. It may lead to strategies that help nonresponders, the people who don’t seem to lose weight on the drugs, and people who stop losing weight before they reach their weight loss goals. Jay said that understanding the mechanisms behind the sex differences could help with adherence to the medications, too. “I think those things are really important to know, because maybe there’s something else that we could give men alongside it that could enhance it … or we could change the dosing,” Jay said. “Men and women have different biologies, and we can’t treat them always the same.”
Popular injected weight loss medications work better for one sex. Researchers want to know why
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Research Reveals Gender Differences in Effectiveness of GLP-1 Weight Loss Medications"
TruthLens AI Summary
Recent studies have revealed a significant discrepancy in the effectiveness of injected GLP-1 weight loss medications between genders, with women showing notably better results than men. This finding contradicts the common narrative that men typically lose weight more easily through diet and exercise. The latest research, presented at the European Congress on Obesity and published in the New England Journal of Medicine, involved a direct comparison of two medications: semaglutide (Wegovy) and tirzepatide (Zepbound). The study randomly assigned approximately 750 participants with obesity to receive either medication at their maximum tolerated doses. Results indicated that participants using Zepbound lost about 50% more weight than those on Wegovy, underscoring Zepbound's superior efficacy. However, it was noted that overall weight loss in this study was less than in previous trials, particularly among men who lost about 6% less than women, raising questions about the underlying reasons for these disparities.
Experts have proposed several theories to explain why women may respond more favorably to these medications. One hypothesis involves dosing, as women generally weigh less than men but receive the same medication doses, potentially leading to higher effective doses relative to their body weight. Additionally, differences in fat distribution, with women having more subcutaneous fat compared to visceral fat, might influence the drugs' effectiveness. Social factors also play a role; women often face greater societal pressure regarding body image and may display more resilience in managing the side effects of these medications. Furthermore, research suggests that estrogen may enhance the effects of GLP-1, potentially amplifying weight loss outcomes in women. Despite these insights, experts emphasize the need for further research to understand the biological and cultural factors contributing to these gender differences in treatment responses, as this knowledge could inform more effective, personalized weight loss strategies for both men and women.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article highlights a significant finding in the realm of weight loss medications, particularly focusing on the efficacy of injected GLP-1 drugs like semaglutide and tirzepatide. It reveals that, contrary to traditional trends where men often see better results from diet and exercise, these medications appear to work more effectively for women. This finding raises questions about the underlying causes and implications for treatment strategies.
Research Implications and Goals
The primary objective of this research is to understand why these medications yield different results based on sex. By identifying the reasons behind this discrepancy, healthcare providers can tailor treatment plans to enhance the effectiveness of these drugs for all patients. This is crucial as the demand for effective weight loss solutions continues to grow.
Community Perception
The article aims to inform the public about the advantages of GLP-1 medications, particularly for women, thereby fostering a sense of hope and excitement. It positions these medications as potentially transformative tools in the fight against obesity, especially for women who have historically struggled more with weight loss.
Potential Concealments
There may be an underlying intent to downplay the overall effectiveness of weight loss strategies, such as diet and exercise, which have shown to favor men. By emphasizing the superior results of these medications for women, the article could be steering attention away from traditional methods that still hold value.
Manipulative Elements
While the article presents factual information, it could be seen as manipulative to some extent. The language used suggests a significant breakthrough in women's health, which may lead readers to overlook the complexities involved in weight loss. The focus on gender differences in drug efficacy could also unintentionally reinforce stereotypes about weight loss capabilities.
Comparative Context
When compared to other health-related articles, this piece aligns with a growing trend of emphasizing personalized medicine. It suggests that understanding individual differences is crucial in treatment effectiveness. However, it also reflects a broader societal focus on gender disparities in health outcomes.
Broader Societal Impact
This research could have significant implications for public health policy, especially as obesity rates rise globally. If the efficacy of these medications is confirmed, it may lead to increased investment in GLP-1 drugs and a shift in treatment protocols. This shift could also influence healthcare costs and insurance coverage policies, impacting the economy.
Target Audience
The article likely resonates more with women seeking weight loss solutions and healthcare professionals interested in innovative treatments. It appeals to those who may feel marginalized by traditional weight loss narratives that often favor male experiences.
Market Influence
This news could impact the stock market, specifically for companies like Eli Lilly, which manufactures Zepbound. Positive findings about their drug could lead to increased stock prices and investor interest, potentially affecting the pharmaceutical sector's dynamics.
Global Context
While this article does not directly address geopolitical issues, it reflects broader conversations on health disparities and the importance of inclusive research in addressing global health challenges. The findings could align with current discussions about gender equity in healthcare.
Artificial Intelligence Involvement
There is no direct indication that AI was utilized in the writing of this article. However, if AI were involved, it could have assisted in data analysis or the synthesis of complex information. The straightforward presentation of research findings suggests an aim to communicate effectively rather than manipulate readers.
Ultimately, the article serves as a significant contribution to ongoing discussions about gender differences in healthcare and the potential of new treatments in addressing obesity. The reliability of the information presented is bolstered by its foundation in recent clinical trials, although it remains essential to approach the findings with a critical eye regarding broader implications and societal narratives.