World leaders may be gathering on Saturday to pay their respects to a fellow statesman whose church has more members than their states have citizens. But they may also use the Pope's funeral as a rare and unexpected opportunity to conduct a little impromptu diplomacy. For it will be one of the largest gatherings of global heads of state and government since the funeral of the late Queen in 2022. Diplomats said there were few plans for formal meetings between government leaders because that would not be in the spirit of what is a solemn occasion. "We do not want to be disrespectful to our hosts," one European diplomat said. "But will there be opportunities for brush-byes? Absolutely." That was a reference to the serendipitous conversations that can take place on the margins of a summit or a ceremony as leaders "brush by" one another while they find their seats. Another official said: "It's a funeral. We are treading carefully." All eyes will, of course, be on whether Presidents Trump and Zelensky use the opportunity of being in the same place to discuss the prospects of a ceasefire in Ukraine. They will be seated in an area of St Peter's Square allocated to world leaders in alphabetical order by country. You might imagine that means the leaders of the United States and Ukraine would sit near one another. But French was historically the language of diplomacy so the President of les États-Unis may well be some distance from his Ukrainian counterpart. Given the tensions between the two leaders, some diplomats said this might be no bad thing and could avoid the risk of a confrontation like that in the Oval Office in February. It is possible both men could meet privately elsewhere in Rome, as some European countries were hoping, but it was not clear if that was likely. "If it happens, it will be impromptu," one diplomat said. On Tuesday, Zelensky said he was ready in principle to see Trump in Rome. "We are always ready to meet with our partners from the United State of America," he said. The following day, Trump said he had "a lot of meetings set up" but did not say with whom. On Friday, Zelensky cast doubt on whether he would manage to attend after all, following the latest Russian strikes on Kyiv disrupting his travel plans. The diplomatic focus will be on the part of St Peter's Square where presidents and prime ministers, princes and monarchs will sit waiting for the obsequies to begin. That will be the main opportunity for them to mingle and discuss the issues of the day, to make contacts and establish relationships. The journey to Rome could also provide an opportunity for diplomatic encounters. The Vatican said 170 delegations were coming including about 50 heads of state, 15 heads of government and 12 reigning monarchs. The chances of them meeting at one of Rome's two airports on arrival or departure is high. But while funerals can present diplomatic opportunities, they can also pose threats. There is the possibility of leaders coming into contact with an adversary. That is because politicians who are subject to European travel sanctions can visit Vatican City because it is considered neutral territory. Crucially, neither President Vladimir Putin of Russia, nor President Xi Jinping of China are due to attend. The most unpredictable moment could come in the service itself. Francis Campbell, the British ambassador to the Holy See from 2005 to 2011, said the funeral Mass involves a moment when celebrants give each other a sign of peace and leaders could find themselves shaking hands with people they would rather not. "You cannot avoid it," he said. "You are attending a religious ceremony and it's incumbent on you to participate as much as possible." At the funeral of Pope John Paul II in 2005, the then Prince of Wales found himself unexpectedly shaking hands with President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe. The future King's spokesman said he had been "caught by surprise". There are also risks for leaders appearing before many thousands of mourners. At the same funeral in 2005, George Bush was booed by the crowd when his face was displayed on a monitor, an apparent judgement on the US president's war in Iraq. The former Prime Minister Harold Wilson is credited with coining the phrase "a good working funeral" in relation to the service marking the death of Winston Churchill in 1965. Geoff Berridge, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at Leicester University, said working funerals were of considerable value. "They provide heads of state and government with a good excuse to break existing schedules for urgent discussions on current problems without arousing public expectations," he wrote in his book, Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. In recent years, there have been several such funerals following the deaths of the late Queen, the former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, and Ebrahim Raisi, the Iranian president. But "working funerals" have also been the subject of satire. Jim Hacker, the eponymous PM in the Yes, Prime Minister comedy on the BBC, said working funerals were a "heaven sent" opportunity. "Dignified grief goes down very well with the voters, especially when it is shared by the world's statesmen," he told his aides. Working funerals were "much better than a summit because there are no expectations. People don't expect their leaders to come back from a funeral with test ban agreements or farm quote reductions. So we can actually have some meaningful discussions. A summit is just a public relations circus."
Pope Francis's funeral presents chance for 'brush-by' diplomacy
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"World Leaders to Attend Pope Francis's Funeral, Offering Diplomatic Opportunities"
TruthLens AI Summary
World leaders are expected to converge in Rome on Saturday for the funeral of Pope Francis, marking one of the largest gatherings of heads of state since the late Queen's funeral in 2022. While the event is primarily a solemn occasion to pay respects, it also presents a unique opportunity for informal diplomacy among leaders. Diplomats have indicated that while formal meetings are unlikely due to the nature of the event, there will be opportunities for casual interactions, or 'brush-byes,' as leaders find themselves seated near one another. Notably, the seating arrangement will place Presidents Trump and Zelensky close together, raising the possibility of a discussion regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. However, the diplomatic climate surrounding their potential interaction remains delicate, and some officials believe that a physical distance might help avoid a confrontation reminiscent of their previous meeting in the Oval Office. Zelensky has expressed a willingness to meet Trump, while the latter has indicated numerous meetings lined up during the visit. Nonetheless, Zelensky's attendance remains uncertain due to recent Russian strikes affecting his travel plans.
The funeral will host around 170 delegations, including 50 heads of state and numerous monarchs, providing ample opportunity for leaders to network and engage in discussions about pressing global issues. The Vatican's neutral status allows leaders who might be subject to sanctions in other contexts to attend, although notable figures like Presidents Putin and Xi are absent from the guest list. The service itself may present unpredictable moments, as the ritual of exchanging peace may lead leaders into unwanted interactions. Historical precedents show that such gatherings can evoke mixed reactions from attendees; for instance, George Bush was booed at the 2005 funeral of Pope John Paul II. Despite the risks of awkward encounters, many see the potential for significant diplomatic dialogue during these 'working funerals,' which allow leaders to address urgent matters without the typical expectations associated with formal summits.
TruthLens AI Analysis
World leaders gathering for Pope Francis's funeral highlights the intersection of solemnity and diplomacy. The article suggests that while the primary purpose is to pay respects, there are underlying diplomatic implications, particularly regarding the interactions among heads of state.
Diplomatic Opportunities Amidst Ceremony
The report indicates that attendees may seize the opportunity for informal discussions, or "brush-by" diplomacy, which occurs naturally as leaders interact in such settings. While formal meetings are deemed inappropriate for a funeral, the potential for spontaneous dialogue remains. This duality of purpose presents an intriguing dynamic at the event.
Focus on Key Leaders
Attention is particularly drawn to the possible interaction between Presidents Trump and Zelensky, given the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The seating arrangement could either facilitate or hinder their ability to converse based on their alphabetical placement. The tension between these leaders is highlighted, and the article speculates on the possibility of a private meeting, emphasizing the delicate nature of their relationship.
Public Perception and Intent
There is an implicit understanding that the broader public may perceive this event as a significant moment for international relations. By emphasizing the potential for dialogue amidst a solemn occasion, the article aims to foster a sense of hope for diplomatic resolutions, particularly regarding the Ukrainian conflict. This could be a strategic move to frame the narrative surrounding global leadership as one that seeks peace and cooperation even in challenging times.
Possible Omissions
While the article focuses on the interactions among world leaders, it may overlook the broader implications of the Pope's passing and the potential shifts in Catholic leadership, which could have far-reaching effects on global issues, including social justice and climate change. This omission may indicate a desire to keep the focus narrowly on diplomatic maneuvers rather than broader systemic changes.
Manipulation and Reliability
The article's framing of the event could be seen as slightly manipulative, as it emphasizes the importance of the leaders' interactions while downplaying the solemnity of the occasion. The language used is respectful but carries an underlying tension regarding the geopolitical stakes involved. Overall, the news appears reliable but is shaped to highlight specific diplomatic narratives that align with current global tensions.
In conclusion, the article presents a nuanced view of a significant event, balancing respect for the occasion with the realities of international diplomacy. It subtly encourages readers to consider the implications of these interactions on global politics while maintaining a focus on the personal relationships between leaders.