Ana María Careaga was just 16 when she was kidnapped, stolen by the regime then running Argentina. To her mother, Esther Ballestrino de Careaga, it was as if she had vanished. It was an event that would change not just the lives of both the women and the daughter Ana María was carrying, but the future of Argentina. And it was something a priest named Jorge Bergoglio would never forget. It was 1977 and Argentina was under the grip of a military dictatorship following a coup the year before. Those who opposed the regime were abducted, tortured, and killed – victims of what would become known as the “Dirty War.” There was no notification or public record of the detentions, and families had no idea what had happened to their loved ones. By the time Ana María was seized, her brother-in-law had already disappeared. Soldiers took her to the clandestine detention center known as El Atlético, where she was tortured – even after she told her captors she was three months pregnant. Although the extrajudicial kidnappings were becoming increasingly common, families did not speak of them — until mothers took a stand. On April 30, 1977, a dozen or so women, each the mother of a missing child, gathered in Plaza de Mayo, the grand square in front of the Casa Rosada presidential palace in Buenos Aires. They were ordered to disperse, but instead linked arms and continued to walk slowly around the square. Each Sunday, more women would come to join in, soon to include Esther who became one of the leaders of Las Madres de Playa de Mayo (the Mothers of Playa de Mayo.) Esther knew Bergoglio long before he had even joined the priesthood. She had been his boss while he was a high schooler working a technical internship at a laboratory. “He says she taught him the culture of work,” Ana María told CNN on Thursday, standing in Buenos Aires’ ornate Santa Cruz Catholic Church. “He says she sent him to get some tests done and he brought back the results very quickly.” She questioned him on his speedy work, and he revealed that the tests were coming out the same, so he merely copied them out. “She told him, ‘You have to do it right,’ and sent him to do it again,” Ana María said. It’s an account Bergoglio confirmed after he became Pope Francis, and the two stayed in touch as he joined the priesthood and rose to become a leader of Argentina’s Jesuit community. ‘The disappeared are my children’ While Ana María was detained — always chained and blindfolded, she said — her mother and other members of the movement met in a back room at the Santa Cruz Church in downtown Buenos Aires. Ana María turned 17 while still in captivity, and she was released on September 30, 1977, by then seven months pregnant. Within days of a medical check arranged by her mother, she left for Sweden, where she was granted asylum. “That was the last time we saw each other,” Ana María said. “We wrote letters to each other, and in one letter she tells me that when I was kidnapped, she was like an automaton, thinking about (me) the whole time. She left in the morning and came back at night, out all day with the mothers searching, searching, searching.” Even when her daughter was safe, Esther kept campaigning for those who had become known as the “disappeared.” “When she returned to the plaza after I was released, the mothers asked her, ‘What are you doing here if you’ve already recovered your daughter?’” Ana María told CNN. “And she said, ‘I’m going to continue until they all appear, because all the disappeared are my children.’” To Ana María, and perhaps to the priest who’d befriended her mother, it was a reflection that “the struggle wasn’t just individual, but a collective one.” Months after her daughter’s release, in December 1977, Esther and others met as usual at Santa Cruz when they were betrayed. Stepping out of the church, she and others were abducted. “They had been taken to … a clandestine center for torture and extermination, and then they were thrown alive from the ‘death flights,’ which was the final solution they (the regime) boasted of having found to get rid of the bodies,” Ana María said. The “death flights” where prisoners were killed by being tossed from a plane over land or sea is now a documented horror of the Dirty War. Many bodies were never recovered, but days after she disappeared, the remains of Esther washed up on land. “What the Mothers say is that the sea did not want to be an accomplice and returned the bodies,” Ana María said. Esther’s remains were unidentified though and buried in a mass grave. Ana María did not know of her mother’s disappearance until she called to tell her of the birth of her granddaughter, the baby carried while she was detained. “She was born on December 11, and we called on December 11, 1977, to say that she had been born, and that’s when we found out that my mom had been kidnapped three days earlier,” she said. “My mom didn’t know that she had been born safely.” ‘I did what I could’ As Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Bergoglio testified about Esther during a 2010 trial related to Dirty War atrocities. In an excerpt posted on YouTube by journalist Uki Goñi, he said he had known her for more than 20 years. “It caused me great pain,” Bergoglio said of learning of her abduction. “I tried to get in touch with relatives, I wasn’t able to. They were mostly … in hiding.” He said he had tried to speak to people who could help but had not approached the authorities. His actions or lack thereof during the Dirty War hung around him as unanswered questions, even as the Vatican dismissed allegations against him. “I did what I could,” he told the trial. “I remember her as a great woman.” Decades later, long after the fall of the military regime in 1983, the remains from the oceanside mass grave were identified, and found to include Esther. Families petitioned Bergoglio to allow them to be buried not in a cemetery, but outside the Church of Santa Cruz — the last place they had walked free. “He said it was an honor,” Ana María told us. “He remembered his friend Esther and said it was an honor and authorized it so we could, as the faithful of this church say, sow them in the last free land that their feet trod.” To commemorate her mother and all the others who challenged the regime, April 30 is now recognized as the founding of the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo. The Vatican publicized a message then Pope Francis sent to Ana Marìa in 2018 to play on a radio show she hosts. “I very much remember your mother,” he said then. “She worked hard, she was a fighter and together with her many women who fought for justice, both because they had lost their children or simply because mothers who, seeing the drama of so many missing children, came together to fight for this as well.” Standing just off the main altar inside Santa Cruz Church, Ana María calmly pulled out her replacement phone — her original had been recently stolen. Fortunately, her WhatsApp messages had been backed up, preserving the Pope’s words, and her memories. She still has that recording on her phone. In it, the Pope tells her: “I’m glad you follow these footsteps of your mother and that you broadcast it to others in your radio show. So today, in a special way, I pray for mothers, I pray for you, I pray for your mother Esther, and I pray for all the men and women of good will who wish to carry forward a project of justice and fraternity among all. May God bless you all.” Esther Ballestrino de Careaga never met her granddaughter. But Pope Francis did, spending about an hour with her last year when she visited Rome, her mother said, proudly showing a video of the two together. “He knew the whole story because my mom told him everything they had done to me, the torture, everything,” Ana María said. As another April 30 anniversary approaches, Ana María has only memories now of her mother and the Pope. Of her mother, she said: “I have a very vivid memory of a very loving, hard-working, and committed person. I feel she left me with many values, and she’s present in our history because disappearance generates that — disappearance is the permanent presence of an absence.” She carries a directive from the Pope as well. “When my daughter went to see him last year, he told her that we had to continue bearing witness,” she said. “We, right now in Argentina, are going through a very difficult time, and I say … we need to remember again.” “Everything that happened, the 30,000 disappeared, and how the Mothers created a civilizing pact in this country, a social contract of ‘never again.’ And that’s why it’s so important to preserve memory, which was also what the Pope said: that memory had to be preserved.”
Pope Francis used WhatsApp to stay connected to torture survivor of Argentina’s ‘Dirty War’
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Pope Francis Maintains Connection with Argentine Torture Survivor and Activist's Family"
TruthLens AI Summary
Ana María Careaga's harrowing story begins in 1977, when, at just 16 years old, she was kidnapped by the military dictatorship in Argentina, a regime notorious for its brutal tactics during what is now referred to as the 'Dirty War.' Ana María, who was pregnant at the time, was taken to a clandestine detention center called El Atlético, where she endured severe torture. Her mother, Esther Ballestrino de Careaga, who had previously worked with Jorge Bergoglio, now Pope Francis, became a leader in the movement known as Las Madres de Plaza de Mayo. This group was formed by mothers of the disappeared, who began to take a stand against the regime by gathering in public to demand justice for their missing children. Esther's relentless pursuit for truth and justice, even after Ana María's release, underscores the collective struggle of the families affected by the regime's atrocities. Tragically, Esther was later abducted and killed, but her legacy lives on through the movement she helped inspire and the continued efforts of her daughter to honor those who suffered during this dark period in Argentina's history.
Decades later, Pope Francis has acknowledged the deep impact of these events on his life and faith. He remembered Esther as a significant figure who fought for justice and was deeply affected by her abduction. In a poignant moment, he expressed his sorrow during a trial concerning the Dirty War and has maintained contact with Ana María over the years. Their relationship has been strengthened through WhatsApp, where the Pope has sent messages of support and remembrance. Ana María, who now hosts a radio show, continues to share her mother's story and the importance of preserving memory and justice in Argentina. As the anniversary of the founding of the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo approaches, Ana María reflects on her mother's values and the enduring impact of their fight against state-sponsored violence, emphasizing the need for collective memory and the ongoing pursuit of justice for the 30,000 disappeared during the Dirty War.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article highlights the deep connections between Pope Francis and the historical trauma experienced during Argentina's "Dirty War," particularly through the lens of Ana María Careaga, a torture survivor. It illustrates a poignant narrative of suffering, resilience, and the enduring impacts of state violence on individuals and families. The choice to focus on Pope Francis's relationship with a survivor serves to humanize both the pontiff and the broader historical context of Argentina's past.
Purpose of the Article
The intention behind this article seems to be to shed light on the personal connections that Pope Francis maintains with victims of historical atrocities, emphasizing his compassion and empathy. By using WhatsApp to stay in touch with Careaga, the article aims to portray the Pope as a figure of moral authority who remembers and honors the past. This narrative serves to enhance his image, especially in the context of social justice and human rights.
Public Perception
By framing the story in this way, the article likely seeks to foster a positive perception of Pope Francis within both religious and secular communities. It connects him to a painful chapter in Argentina’s history, thus reinforcing his commitment to social issues. This narrative can resonate with individuals who value leaders who acknowledge and address past injustices.
Possible Omissions
While the article focuses on a significant historical figure, it may downplay other critical aspects of the Church's role during the dictatorship or the complexities surrounding Pope Francis’s earlier actions or inactions regarding human rights issues. This selective storytelling may aim to present a more favorable image of the Pope.
Manipulative Elements
There are manipulative aspects in the narrative, as it seeks to evoke emotional responses and may gloss over more controversial elements of the Church's history during the Dirty War. By focusing on personal connections, the article diverts attention from systemic issues and historical accountability.
Trustworthiness of the Content
The article appears to be based on factual historical events and personal testimonies, which lends it credibility. However, the selective focus on positive aspects of Pope Francis's actions may create a skewed representation of the broader historical context. Thus, while the foundational facts are likely true, the interpretation may lack balance.
Social and Political Impact
The article could influence public sentiment towards the Church and Pope Francis, potentially galvanizing support for social justice initiatives. This may also affect the political landscape in Argentina as it relates to human rights policies and the Church's role in advocating for victims' rights.
Target Audience
The piece is likely aimed at readers interested in social justice, human rights, and the role of religion in addressing historical wrongs. It may attract those who appreciate narratives of personal resilience and reconciliation.
Economic and Market Implications
While the article itself may not have direct implications for stock markets, it could influence public sentiment towards organizations and entities associated with human rights. Companies or NGOs focusing on social justice might see increased support or funding as a result of heightened awareness.
Global Context
This narrative connects to broader discussions about human rights and state violence, which resonate globally, especially in contexts where similar histories exist. It serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggles for justice in various parts of the world.
Utilization of Artificial Intelligence
There is no direct indication that AI was used in crafting this article. However, it is possible that AI tools could assist in analyzing historical data or generating related content. If AI were involved, it might have subtly influenced the framing of the narrative to emphasize emotional elements.
In conclusion, while the article provides an important narrative about Pope Francis and Ana María Careaga, it is essential to approach it with a critical lens, considering the broader historical context and potential biases in the portrayal of events.