Sir David Attenborough has told Prince William he is "appalled" by the damage certain fishing methods are wreaking on the world's oceans. The Prince of Wales interviewed the TV naturalist ahead of a key UN Oceans conference which kicks off on Monday. The world's countries are gathering for the first time in three years to discuss how to better protect the oceans, which are facing growing threats from plastic pollution, climate change and over-exploitation. The UN's key aim is to get the High Seas Treaty - an agreement signed two years ago to put 30% of the ocean into protected areas - ratified by 60 countries to bring it into force. "What we have done to the deep ocean floor is just unspeakably awful," said Sir David. "If you did anything remotely like it on land, everybody would be up in arms," he said in the interview released on Saturday. It was conducted at the premiere of his new documentary, Ocean, last month. The documentary draws attention to the potential damage from some fishing practices, like bottom trawling, for marine life and the ability of the ocean to lock up planet-warming carbon. Governments, charities and scientists will come together at the UN Oceans Conference (UNOC) in Nice to try and agree how to accelerate action on the issues most affecting the world's seas. Sir David said he hopes the leaders gathering for the UN conference will "realise how much the oceans matter to all of us, the citizens of the world". The ocean is crucial for the survival of all organisms on the planet - it is the largest ecosystem, is estimated tocontribute $2.5 trillion to world economiesand provides up to80% of the oxygen we breath. The key aim for the UN is to galvanise enough support to bring the High Seas Treaty into force - including commitment from the UK. Three years ago countries agreed to protect 30% of the world's oceans by 2030, across national and international waters. International waters - or high seas - are a common resource with no ruling country so nations signed the High Seas Treaty in 2023 agreeing to work together to put a third of them into Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). Since then only 32 countries have ratified the treaty - 60 are needed to bring it into force. But many scientists and NGOs are worried MPAs will not be effective whilst practices like bottom trawling are still allowed within them. "Our ocean is 99% of our living space on the globe, we have huge dependency on the ocean in every possible way, but bottom trawling does a lot of damage," Dr Amanda Vincent, Professor in Marine Conservation at The University of British Columbia toldBBC's Inside Science. Bottom trawling or dredging is currently allowed in 90% of the UK's MPAs, according to environmental campaigners Oceana, and the Environment Audit Committee (EAC) has called for a ban on it within them. But some fishing communities have pushed back on the assertion that certain fishing practices need to be banned in these areas. "Bottom trawling is only a destructive process if it's taking place in the wrong place, otherwise, it is an efficient way to produce food from our seas," Elspeth Macdonald, CEO of Scottish Fisherman's Association told the BBC. Scientists point to evidencethat restricting the practice in some areas allows fish stocks to recover and be better in the long term for the industry. The conference had been called after concern by the UN that oceans were facing irreparable damage, particularly from climate change. The oceans are a crucial buffer against the worst impacts of a warming planet, absorbing excess heat and greenhouse gases, said Callum Roberts, Professor of Marine Conservation at the University of Exeter. "If the sea had not absorbed more than 90% of the excess heat that has been added to the planet as a result of greenhouse gas emissions, then the world wouldn't just be one and a half degrees warmer it would be about 36 degrees warmer. "Those of us who were left would be struggling with Death Valley temperatures everywhere," he said. This excess heat is having significant impacts on marine life, warn scientists. "Coral reefs, for the past 20 years, have been subject to mass bleaching and mass mortality and that is due to extreme temperatures," said Dr Jean-Pierre Gattuso, senior research scientist at Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche and co-chair of the One Ocean Science Congress (OOSC). "This really is the first marine ecosystem and perhaps the first ecosystem which is potentially subject to disappearance." The OOSC is a gathering of 2,000 of the world's scientists, prior to the UN conference, where the latest data on ocean health is assessed and recommendations put forward to governments. Alongside efforts on climate change the scientists recommended an end to deep sea activities. The most controversial issue to be discussed is perhaps deep sea mining. For more than a decade countries have been trying to agree how deep sea mining in international waters could work - how resources could be shared and environmental damage could be minimised. But in April President Trump bypassed those discussions and signed an executive order saying he would permit mining within international waters. China and France called it a breach of international law, although no formal legal proceedings have yet been started. Scientists have warnedthat too little is understood about the ecosystems in the deep sea and therefore no commercial activities should go forward without more research. "Deep sea biology is the most threatened of global biology, and of what we know the least. We must act with precaution where we don't have the science," said Prof Peter Haugan, Co-chair of the International Science Council Expert Group on the Ocean. Sign up for our Future Earth newsletterto keep up with the latest climate and environment stories with the BBC's Justin Rowlatt. Outside the UK?Sign up to our international newsletter here.
Ocean damage unspeakably awful, Attenborough tells prince
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Attenborough Raises Alarm Over Ocean Damage Ahead of UN Conference"
TruthLens AI Summary
Sir David Attenborough expressed his deep concern to Prince William regarding the severe damage inflicted on the world's oceans by certain fishing methods, particularly ahead of the upcoming UN Oceans Conference set to commence on Monday. During an interview conducted at the premiere of his documentary 'Ocean,' Attenborough emphasized the alarming impact of practices such as bottom trawling on marine ecosystems and the ocean's ability to sequester carbon. He stated, "What we have done to the deep ocean floor is just unspeakably awful," highlighting the lack of public outcry compared to similar destructive activities on land. The UN conference aims to address critical issues threatening marine health, including plastic pollution, climate change, and over-exploitation, with a primary goal of achieving ratification from 60 countries for the High Seas Treaty, which seeks to designate 30% of the ocean as protected areas by 2030.
The conference will gather governments, scientists, and NGOs to discuss strategies for enhancing ocean protection in light of increasing concerns over climate change and its effects on marine biodiversity. Experts warn that the oceans, which absorb a significant amount of excess heat and greenhouse gases, are facing irreparable harm. Notably, coral reefs are experiencing mass bleaching and mortality due to rising temperatures, which threatens their existence. Furthermore, the issue of deep sea mining remains contentious, with calls for a moratorium until more research can be conducted to understand the potential ecological impacts. Attenborough and other advocates stress the importance of recognizing the oceans' vital role in sustaining life on Earth and the dire need for immediate and effective action to safeguard this critical resource for future generations.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article highlights a critical discussion on the alarming state of the world's oceans, particularly focusing on the impact of certain fishing methods. Sir David Attenborough's remarks to Prince William underscore the urgency of addressing ocean conservation as countries prepare for a significant UN Oceans conference. This dialogue aims to raise awareness about environmental issues and mobilize action towards protecting marine ecosystems.
Purpose of the Article
The intent behind this news piece appears to be twofold: to inform the public about the imminent UN Oceans conference and to rally support for the High Seas Treaty aimed at protecting oceanic ecosystems. By featuring a respected figure like Sir David Attenborough, the article seeks to amplify the message about the dire consequences of human activities on oceans and encourage collective action among nations.
Public Perception
The article is likely designed to evoke concern and urgency in the public regarding ocean conservation. By sharing Attenborough's strong emotions about the damage inflicted on the oceans, the narrative aims to inspire readers to care about these environmental issues and possibly support initiatives that promote ocean protection.
Potential Omissions
While the article focuses on the pressing need for ocean conservation, it may downplay the complexities of implementing such treaties, including potential pushback from industries reliant on fishing practices that harm marine life. This could create an impression that the solution is straightforward when, in reality, there are various stakeholders involved with differing interests.
Manipulative Aspects
The language used in the article is emotionally charged, which can be seen as manipulative. By describing the damage to the ocean as "unspeakably awful," it aims to provoke a strong emotional response from readers. This technique can be effective in rallying public support but may also oversimplify the underlying issues.
Truthfulness of the Content
The article presents factual information regarding the UN Oceans conference and the High Seas Treaty. However, the portrayal of the situation may lack nuance, as it emphasizes the urgent need for action without fully exploring the challenges of international cooperation in marine conservation.
Societal Implications
The conference and discussions highlighted could lead to increased environmental policies and regulations, affecting industries such as fishing, tourism, and shipping. If successful, the treaty could significantly shift how nations approach ocean conservation, impacting global economic activities.
Target Audiences
The article seems to appeal more to environmentally conscious communities, including activists, scientists, and policymakers. By featuring a prominent environmental figure like Attenborough, it targets individuals who are already invested in conservation efforts and likely to support progressive policies.
Economic Impact
The news about ocean conservation can influence industries tied to marine ecosystems, including fisheries and tourism. Companies that rely heavily on ocean resources may face increased scrutiny and regulation, potentially affecting their stock prices and operations.
Geopolitical Relevance
The article touches on global governance issues related to marine conservation, aligning with broader discussions about climate change and environmental stewardship. These topics are increasingly relevant in today’s geopolitical climate as nations navigate their responsibilities towards global commons.
Use of AI in Writing
There is no clear indication that AI was used in writing this article. However, if AI were involved, it might have guided the framing of the narrative to ensure it resonates emotionally with the audience, potentially emphasizing the urgency of the issue while maintaining factual accuracy.
In conclusion, this news piece serves to raise awareness and advocate for ocean conservation while attempting to mobilize public and governmental support for the High Seas Treaty. The emotional language and high-profile figures involved aim to create a sense of urgency and importance around the topic.