A new-build house inspector, known as a snagger, is urging owners to check their property thoroughly after picking up the keys, as he has found some strange things in people's homes. "Finding things like sandwiches, food waste and bottles is, unfortunately, fairly common," says professional snagger Chris Greenwood, who identifies issues with the quality of the home after the building work has been completed. He says he has even found bottles of urine, which "tend to be under baths or under shower trays". "It makes you wonder what else has been missed," he adds. Snagging aims to identify defects or problems or something that is broken, damaged, not fitted properly or looks unfinished. Owners typically have a two-year period to identify them and flag to the house builder to correct. An industry body insists confusion over snagging issues has given builders a bad reputation. The National Federation of Builders (NFB) said traders do care about building to a high standard and that some snagging is inevitable. Chris says his snagging inspection service costs between £300 and £600, depending on the size of the property. He provides an independent report to the homeowner, who can use it to raise any issues with the developer. Chris says his finds can range from the mundane, such as bumpy plasterwork, to the bizarre, which includes socket plates with no wiring behind them. However, he also adds that not all houses he inspects have issues and some have been built to a "very high quality". The BBC joined him on his latest inspection at a new-build house in Lincolnshire, where he immediately found a mouldy sandwich in the loft. "It's embarrassing because [it shows] no one has been up and looked at those items prior to completion," he says. "It's a really, really quick check. It took me the time to get my ladder out and popping my head into the loft to identify those issues. "It doesn't give the customer the confidence that other things have been checked if that's the first thing I am putting on my report." Chris also discovered the patio doors were not sufficiently sealed, letting in cold air, and identified a number of issues he put down to poor workmanship or materials. Fellow inspector Kelly Skidmore says the snagging industry faces "significant resistance" from developers who are "often reluctant to have independent third-party professionals scrutinising their workmanship". He says his inspections typically uncover between 60 and 80 problems per property. Many are minor cosmetic issues, but he says he has also uncovered serious failings such as errors in "fire-stopping" - special measures to stop the spread of fire between different parts of a building. The New Homes Quality Board was set up to help customers through the process of buying new homes. CEO Emma Toms believes owners have a right to expect their home to be of a high standard and should not need to use snaggers. However, she says there has to be an element of understanding about the conditions homes are built in. "They are not built in sterile air-conditioned factories, they're built outside, usually in a muddy field, in all weathers by up to 200 people," she says. With that in mind, should new-build owners be less picky and more understanding about the potential problems they could uncover? "I am not being picky," Chris adds. "It's a brand new house. It should be of a high standard at handover. "If you were to buy a brand new car and it was full of dents, you would question why. So, no. The developer needs to pick these items up, identify them and rectify them in a timely manner." According to theHomeowners Alliance, this is what new-build owners should look for when moving in. The large number of people working on one property can be part of the problem, according to Rico Wojtulewic, head of policy at the NFB. He believes sub-contracting can lead to confusion among workers, who he says can lose track of who is checking what. Rico says there is "potential for human error" with any house build but confusion between smaller snags and larger structural problems, which he says are generally less common, has played a part in giving house builders a bad reputation. He adds: "They really do care about the builds they're doing and recognise that people are making the biggest purchase of their life." Kate Hatton, from Warwickshire, has used the same professional snagger twice and believes it is important to seek professional advice. "You've got the backing of someone in the trade who can say 'no that isn't right'." Her snagger found issues ranging from small cosmetic problems to missing panels and a vent on the wall that was not installed properly, running the risk of causing water to come into the house if not rectified. "I think you always expect something but I was surprised by some of them," Kate says. Both Chris and Kelly believe a lot of the snags they find are as a result of skills gaps in traders, a feeling echoed by the building trade. Rob Sanderson, senior contracts manager at Lincolnshire construction company Gelder Group, says he has seen a change in workers. He feels more experienced tradespeople "focused on attention to detail" are retiring and not enough new people are coming into the construction industry. However, he agreed with the NFB, saying good builders do care and "in the first instance, buyers should give the developer the chance to rectify any snags," rather than seeking external help. Listen to highlights fromLincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch thelatest episode of Look Northor tell us about a story you think we should be coveringhere.
New-home snagger: 'I've found mouldy sandwiches and bottles of wee'
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"New Home Inspector Highlights Common Issues Found in Newly Built Properties"
TruthLens AI Summary
Chris Greenwood, a professional home inspector known as a 'snagger', emphasizes the importance of thorough checks for new homeowners after discovering odd and often unsanitary items in newly built houses. His inspections, which can cost between £300 and £600, aim to identify defects in construction quality, including bizarre finds like mouldy sandwiches and bottles of urine left under baths. Greenwood notes that such discoveries raise concerns about the overall quality of the construction process and the thoroughness of pre-completion checks. He reported finding an array of issues, from minor cosmetic flaws to more serious concerns like insufficient sealing of patio doors that could lead to cold air infiltration. The National Federation of Builders (NFB) acknowledges that while some snagging issues are inevitable, they emphasize the builders' commitment to high standards. However, they highlight that confusion in the snagging process can contribute to builders' poor reputations, as many new homeowners feel compelled to hire independent inspectors to ensure their new homes meet expected quality standards.
The New Homes Quality Board, represented by CEO Emma Toms, advocates for a balance between homeowner expectations and the realities of construction environments. She acknowledges the challenges of building in varied weather conditions and the complexities of managing large teams on-site. Despite this, both Greenwood and fellow inspector Kelly Skidmore argue that homeowners should not have to settle for subpar conditions in new builds, comparing it to expecting a brand new car to be free of dents. Homeowners like Kate Hatton, who have engaged snagging professionals, emphasize the value of having an expert to identify issues that may not be immediately obvious, reinforcing the notion that many snags stem from skill gaps in the current workforce. Experts agree that while builders care about their work, the industry faces challenges such as a lack of experienced tradespeople, which can impact the quality of new home constructions. Ultimately, both builders and homeowners are encouraged to cooperate to ensure that issues are resolved promptly, maintaining a standard of quality in new housing developments.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article sheds light on the unusual findings of a new-build house inspector, Chris Greenwood, who highlights the importance of thorough inspections after homeowners receive their keys. His experiences, including discovering mouldy sandwiches and bottles of urine, raise concerns about the quality control in the construction industry and encourage new homeowners to be vigilant.
Public Sentiment and Industry Reputation
The article aims to evoke a sense of caution among new homeowners regarding potential defects in their properties. It underscores the idea that issues like those found by Greenwood are not isolated incidents but rather indicative of a broader problem in the building sector. This could lead to a negative perception of builders and the quality of new constructions, as well as increased skepticism among prospective homebuyers about the construction process.
Potential Concealment of Issues
While the article does not directly suggest any hidden agendas, the focus on the negative aspects of snagging could be interpreted as an attempt to shift responsibility away from builders. By emphasizing the bizarre and unsanitary findings, it raises questions about the thoroughness of construction oversight, possibly diverting attention from systemic issues within the industry.
Reliability and Manipulative Elements
The reliability of this article stems from the firsthand accounts of an experienced professional in the field. However, the sensational nature of the findings may introduce an element of manipulation, as the focus on extreme examples could lead to an exaggerated perception of widespread negligence in the industry. The language used is emotive and designed to provoke a strong reaction, which can be seen as a form of manipulation.
Comparative Context
In comparison to other reports about construction quality and housing market trends, this article fits within a narrative that often highlights the shortcomings of builders. There may be an implicit connection with other news stories focusing on housing crises and consumer rights, particularly in a climate where housing affordability and quality are pressing issues.
Impact on Society and Economy
The revelations in this article could have broader implications for public trust in the construction industry. If homeowners begin to question the integrity of new builds, it could lead to a slowdown in home sales, affecting the real estate market negatively. Additionally, there could be calls for stricter regulations and oversight in construction practices.
Target Audience
The article likely appeals to first-time homebuyers and individuals interested in the real estate market. It addresses concerns that potential buyers may have about the quality of new homes and serves as a cautionary tale for those entering the housing market.
Market Influence
While the article might not have a direct impact on stock markets, it could influence the perception of companies within the construction and real estate sectors. Companies known for poor quality could see their stock values affected if consumer confidence dwindles as a result of such reports.
Global Context
In the broader conversation about housing quality and consumer rights, this article contributes to ongoing discussions about building standards and regulations. It reflects a growing awareness of the importance of transparency in real estate transactions, which resonates with current global concerns about consumer protection.
Use of AI in Report Composition
There is no direct evidence suggesting that artificial intelligence was used in the drafting of this article. However, AI models could be involved in analyzing trends in housing complaints or generating reports based on data collected from various inspections, which may subtly influence the angle taken by the journalist.
This analysis demonstrates that the article, while based on genuine observations, could be seen as having a manipulative edge due to its sensationalist approach. It serves as a reminder of the importance of thorough inspections but could also inadvertently contribute to a climate of distrust within the housing market.