After federal health officials made abrupt changes to US Covid-19 vaccine recommendations for pregnant women last month, there’s new confusion and uncertainty about who can get the shots — and some reports that patients were turned away when they tried to get vaccinated. Now, 30 health and medical organizations are pushing for continued access and insurance coverage for the vaccines. “We are deeply concerned about the recently adopted HHS policy to no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy,” wrote the organizations – including major professional groups for obstetricians, primary care providers, pediatricians, pharmacists and nurses – in an open letter. “It is vital that we ensure that pregnant women continue to have access to this prevention tool so that they can protect themselves and their young infants, a vulnerable group who is not yet eligible for vaccination.” The letter calls on “payers and insurers to continue making the COVID-19 vaccine available to pregnant people without undue utilization management or cost-sharing requirements,” even though the shots have been removed from the list of vaccines recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pregnant women who have Covid-19 are more likely to require care in the ICU or on a ventilator, or to die, the letter said, and they’re at higher risk of complications such as cesarean birth, preeclampsia or eclampsia, and blood clots. Infants born after a Covid-19 infection also face increased risks. The letter comes two weeks after US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. abruptly announced that the Covid-19 vaccine, which has shown to be safe and effective during pregnancy, would no longer be recommended for pregnant people. Leaders from the US Food and Drug Administration also recently outlined a new framework for the approval process for Covid-19 vaccines that could limit shots to older Americans and people at higher risk of serious Covid-19 infection. Experts immediately warned that these changes could create new barriers to vaccines for those who want them, including confusion around who is eligible and higher costs for patients if insurance no longer covers them. The American Pharmacists Association, which signed on to the open letter, said it has already received reports of patients being denied Covid-19 vaccines. Leigh Haldeman, 33, a nurse at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle who is pregnant, told CNN that she tried twice to get vaccinated last week and was turned away. “Because of some complications I had during my first pregnancy, getting the vaccine now and getting that extra boost of immunity would be definitely important for me,” said Haldeman, who got her last shot in the fall of 2024. At two different pharmacies, she was told it is not recommended for pregnant women to receive the Covid-19 vaccine, based on new guidelines. She still hasn’t been able to get the shot. Many doctors still strongly recommend Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy. “Despite the change in recommendations from HHS, the science has not changed,” the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said in a statement. “It is very clear that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy can be catastrophic and lead to major disability, and it can cause devastating consequences for families. The COVID-19 vaccine is safe during pregnancy, and vaccination can protect our patients and their infants after birth.” ‘We cannot give this to you’ After an appointment last week, Haldeman agreed with her obstetrician’s advice to get an additional Covid-19 shot during her pregnancy. Her first try was a Walgreens store where she had an appointment to get the vaccine. “I went through the whole check-in process, and then as soon as the pharmacist saw that I was pregnant, they were like, ‘We cannot give this to you,’ ” she recounted. “ ‘We’re only giving it to immunocompromised people right now.’ ” She said she asked whether she was considered immunocompromised because she’s pregnant. Haldeman said the pharmacist responded that guidelines have changed, that it’s not recommended and they wouldn’t give it to her. She then called her primary care provider and obstetrician, but neither had the vaccine in stock. In past years, pharmacies have administered the majority of Covid-19 shots. A Walgreens spokesperson told CNN, “We continue to closely monitor and review all federal and state guidance related to vaccines. As regulations and recommendations evolve, we remain committed to ensuring our pharmacy teams have the latest information to support patient care.” Haldeman said her obstetrician suggested trying another pharmacy. She called a Safeway and asked, “I’m 25 weeks pregnant. My provider is recommending that I get this Covid booster. Are you able to give that to me?” The immediate answer was no. “I’m under the impression from my provider that I need to get this,” she recalled saying. “Pharmacies are the only people that appear to have it right now. What do I need to do to get this vaccine?” She said the pharmacist told her, “The guidelines have changed as of last Friday. We can’t give it to you.” The pharmacist suggested that Haldeman try getting a prescription for the vaccine from her provider so the pharmacy might be able to administer it. Her obstetrician wrote a vaccination prescription and sent it to the Safeway pharmacy, but when Haldeman visited the location at 7 p.m. the same day, she was told the pharmacy hadn’t received the prescription. In a statement from a company spokesperson, Safeway parent company Albertsons told CNN, “In accordance with recently updated CDC guidance, we adjusted our COVID-19 vaccination policies. Pregnant individuals with specific medical conditions that increase their risk of severe illness remain eligible for vaccination. We encourage all customers to consult with their healthcare providers for personalized advice.” The lack of clarity left Haldeman frustrated and uncertain about what to do next. “I spent half my day on this. … Most people are probably not going to go to those lengths to get the vaccine. The more hoops that you make people jump through, less and less people are just going to get vaccinated,” Haldeman said. “And we know that having Covid during pregnancy does terrible things to your placenta, and certainly reducing that risk is worth it. So it’s very frustrating.” The American Pharmacists Association said in a news release that the updates to the Covid-19 recommendations “do not appear to be based on the scientific evidence provided over the past few years. … COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy has been proven safe and effective.” However, pharmacists “may face consequences if they do not follow the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices or CDC recommendations,” said Allison Hill, the association’s director of professional affairs. “HHS’s and CDC’s recent changes to the Covid-19 recommendations create barriers and confusion,” Hill said. HHS’s unusual updates to the Covid-19 vaccine schedules were followed this week by a sweeping change to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the independent experts who typically guide the agency on its vaccine recommendations. Kennedy bypassed ACIP in making the Covid-19 changes and then said this week that he had dismissed the entire 17-member panel. On Wednesday, Kennedy announced eight new members to ACIP. The removal of the vaccine advisers sparked a swift backlash from health care providers and professional organizations. Dr. Tina Tan, president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, another organization that signed the open letter, said that undermining the integrity of ACIP is “completely unfounded” and has “a significant negative impact on Americans of all ages.” The pharmacists association said Tuesday, “It is highly concerning that removing 17 scientists overnight eliminates the historical knowledge, scientific training, and clinical expertise required to equip pharmacists and the public to make appropriate choices for health based upon the risk.” Risks from Covid-19 Since Kennedy announced changes to the Covid-19 vaccine schedule, doctors said they’re worried about their patients and the future of vaccinations. “We are worried about our patients in the future, who may be less likely to choose vaccination during pregnancy despite the clear and definitive evidence demonstrating its benefit,” Dr. Steven J. Fleischman, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said in a statement. “We are concerned about access implications and what this recommendation will mean for insurance coverage of the COVID-19 vaccine for those who do choose to get vaccinated during pregnancy. And as ob-gyns, we are very concerned about the potential deterioration of vaccine confidence in the future.” Studies have shown that infants who are born after a Covid-19 infection during pregnancy are at increased risk of stillbirth, respiratory distress and low birth weight. “With maternal health being compromised, you have the risk for preterm delivery, babies that are born very small or potentially even fetal loss early on,” Dr. Flor Munoz-Rivas, an associate professor of pediatrics and infectious disease at Baylor College of Medicine, said last week. Dr. John Lynch, an associate medical director at the Harborview Medical Center and a colleague of Haldeman’s, said Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy also has benefits for the newborn. “Vaccinating a mom leads to the protection of the baby when they don’t have their own immune response,” Lynch said. Since the Covid vaccine is not available to babies younger than 6 months, vaccinating the mother may be the safest way for young children to gain some immunity. “That first year of life remains the highest period of risk, and this is a vaccine-preventable disease,” Muñoz said. “We can modify the outcomes for these babies through maternal vaccination and through infant vaccination.”
New federal Covid-19 vaccine policies are already keeping some people from getting shots
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Confusion Surrounds Covid-19 Vaccine Access for Pregnant Women Following Policy Changes"
TruthLens AI Summary
Recent changes to federal Covid-19 vaccine recommendations have generated significant confusion and concern, particularly regarding vaccination for pregnant women. Last month, health officials announced that the Covid-19 vaccine would no longer be recommended during pregnancy, leading to reports of patients being denied vaccinations at pharmacies. In response, 30 health and medical organizations, including major groups of obstetricians and pediatricians, issued an open letter expressing their alarm over the new policy. They emphasized the critical need for continued access and insurance coverage for the vaccine, highlighting the heightened risks pregnant women face from Covid-19, including severe complications that can arise from the virus. The organizations argue that the vaccine remains a vital tool for protecting both mothers and their infants, who are not yet eligible for vaccination themselves. They urged insurers to maintain coverage for the vaccine without imposing additional costs or barriers to access, despite the changes in official recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
The abrupt policy shift has led to immediate repercussions for individuals seeking vaccinations. Reports have surfaced of pregnant women being turned away from pharmacies, such as in the case of Leigh Haldeman, a nurse who was denied the vaccine despite her doctor's recommendation. As healthcare providers and organizations raise alarms about the implications of these changes, they stress that the science supporting the safety and effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy has not changed. Experts warn that this confusion may deter pregnant women from getting vaccinated, potentially endangering both maternal and infant health. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists reiterated that Covid-19 infection during pregnancy poses serious risks, and vaccination is crucial in mitigating these dangers. As the situation evolves, healthcare professionals continue to advocate for clear communication and access to vaccines to ensure the safety of pregnant women and their babies in the face of ongoing public health challenges.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article addresses the recent changes in federal Covid-19 vaccine policies, particularly regarding pregnant women, and highlights the ensuing confusion and concerns from healthcare organizations. This shift has led to reports of patients being denied vaccinations, prompting a response from 30 health and medical organizations advocating for continued access and insurance coverage for these vaccines.
Concerns Raised by Medical Organizations
A significant aspect of the article is the open letter from various health organizations expressing deep concern over the new recommendations that discourage Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy. They emphasize the importance of providing pregnant women with access to vaccinations to safeguard their health and that of their infants, who remain vulnerable. The letter underscores the increased risks pregnant women face if infected with Covid-19, including severe complications and higher mortality rates.
Impact of Policy Changes
The abrupt announcement by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to no longer recommend vaccinations for pregnant individuals raises questions about the rationale behind this decision. The article suggests that this policy shift could lead to a decrease in vaccine uptake among pregnant women, potentially resulting in adverse health outcomes for both mothers and infants.
Public Perception and Trust
The article may seek to foster a sense of urgency and concern among the public regarding the safety and availability of Covid-19 vaccines for pregnant women. By highlighting the voices of medical professionals and the risks associated with Covid-19 during pregnancy, it aims to reinforce the idea that vaccination is a critical preventive measure. However, it may also create confusion and mistrust towards federal health authorities due to the sudden policy changes.
Potential Hidden Agendas
While the article predominantly focuses on the implications of the policy changes, it could be speculated that there are broader agendas at play, possibly regarding vaccine distribution strategies or public health priorities. The framing of the issue may divert attention from other crucial discussions related to healthcare access and the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns.
Manipulative Elements
The language used in the article is emotionally charged, focusing on the vulnerability of pregnant women and the potential consequences of policy changes. This could be seen as a manipulation tactic to emphasize the importance of vaccination while casting doubt on the decisions made by health officials.
Overall, the article appears to be rooted in factual reporting about the changes in vaccine policy and the reactions from medical organizations. However, the emotional appeal and emphasis on the potential risks associated with policy changes may contribute to a perception of manipulation. The article serves to raise awareness and concern about vaccination accessibility for pregnant women, which is crucial for public health discussions.
The reliability of the information presented is contingent upon the accuracy of the reported statements from health organizations and the context of the policy changes. The article seems credible but may reflect a particular narrative aligned with advocacy for vaccine accessibility.