Archaeologists working in an ancient Mayan city have unearthed a mysterious 1,700-year-old altar whose bright decorations and grim contents may hold the key to unraveling the complex geopolitics of the time. Despite finding the altar in Tikal, a ruined Mayan city situated in modern Guatemala, archaeologists believe it wasn’t decorated by Mayas. Instead, they say it was the work of artists trained 630 miles away in Teotihuacan – a powerful city close to modern-day Mexico City that exerted a strong influence over the region. Before this discovery, which was published on Tuesday in the journal Antiquity, archaeologists already knew that the two cultures interacted, though the nature of the relationship was disputed. But the ornately decorated altar, with two bodies buried beneath, confirms that “wealthy leaders from Teotihuacan came to Tikal and created replicas of ritual facilities that would have existed in their home city,” said co-author Stephen Houston, a professor at Brown University who specializes in Mayan culture. “This is a story of empire – how important kingdoms reached out to control others,” he said. “This new find lends strong weight to the view that this was not light contact, or mere trade. It involved belligerent forces building an enclave close to the local royal palace.” Houston and his co-authors from the US and Guatemala began excavating the site in 2019, after scans of the area revealed structures under what they previously thought was a natural hill. “Only a bit of this palace is visible on the surface. The rest and especially the deeper layers are only accessible through tunnels excavated by archaeologists,” Houston told CNN via email. “Typically, we find a floor and walls, and follow along them, thus exposing buried buildings.” As the researchers investigated, they discovered this altar, which still bears the faint outlines of a person wearing a feathered headdress on each panel and traces of bright red, black and yellow paints. Such a design resembles other representations of a deity known as the “Storm God,” more common in Teotihuacan than Mayan art. Two bodies were buried underneath the altar – one probably an adult male and the other a small child aged between 2 and 4 years old, who was buried in a seated position much more commonly seen in Teotihuacan than in Tikal. The bodies of three other infants were discovered around the altar, buried in a similar way to other infant graves in Teotihuacan. The authors didn’t specify what caused their deaths. “The altar confirms that Teotihuacan rituals were used in the very center of Tikal, involving people who used utterly foreign, Teotihuacan painting styles, to depict foreign gods,” Houston told CNN via email. Some of the remains may have belonged to Maya individuals, Houston said, “but the tomb finds suggest close contact with, and perhaps an origin in, Teotihuacan. The sacrifices of infants fit with Mexican practices.” These cultural practices point toward the increasing Teotihuacan influence in Tikal, the researchers said in their paper. And the fact that these buildings were subsequently buried and never built on again “probably speaks to the complicated feelings (the Maya) had about Teotihuacan,” said co-author Andrew Scherer, a professor of anthropology and archaeology at Brown. “The Maya regularly buried buildings and rebuilt on top of them,” he said in a statement. “But here, they buried the altar and surrounding buildings and just left them, even though this would have been prime real estate centuries later. They treated it almost like a memorial or a radioactive zone.” This latest discovery uncovers another layer of the complicated relationship between the two cultures that recent research has revealed. In the 1960s, researchers found a stone bearing an inscription that described a conflict between the Maya and Teotihuacan, and learnt that “around AD 378, Teotihuacan was essentially decapitating a kingdom,” Houston said. “They removed the king and replaced him with a quisling, a puppet king who proved a useful local instrument to Teotihuacan.” This altar was probably built at a similar time to the coup, Scherer said, which eventually propelled the Mayan kingdom to its most powerful point, before it declined around 900 AD. The findings of this excavation show “a tale as old as time,” Houston added, referring to empires sparring and competing for cultural influence. “Everyone knows what happened to the Aztec civilization after the Spanish arrived … These powers of central Mexico reached into the Maya world because they saw it as a place of extraordinary wealth, of special feathers from tropical birds, jade and chocolate,” he said. “As far as Teotihuacan was concerned, it was the land of milk and honey.”
Mysterious altar found in ancient Mayan city contains bodies – and wasn’t made by the Maya
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Ancient Altar in Tikal Reveals Teotihuacan Influence on Maya Culture"
CNN
7.7
TruthLens AI Summary
Archaeologists have recently uncovered a remarkable 1,700-year-old altar in the ancient Mayan city of Tikal, located in present-day Guatemala. This altar, adorned with vivid decorations and containing human remains, is believed to have been crafted by artists from Teotihuacan, a powerful city situated approximately 630 miles away from Tikal, near modern-day Mexico City. This discovery, detailed in the journal Antiquity, challenges previous assumptions about the interactions between the Maya and Teotihuacan cultures. Co-author Stephen Houston, a Brown University professor specializing in Mayan culture, noted that the altar and its contents reveal a complex relationship marked by more than mere trade; it suggests a significant political and cultural influence from Teotihuacan over Tikal, indicating a scenario where Teotihuacan leaders established an enclave in Tikal to exert control over the region. The altar features intricate designs, including depictions of a deity known as the 'Storm God,' which are more characteristic of Teotihuacan art than of Mayan tradition.
Beneath the altar, archaeologists discovered the remains of two individuals, presumed to be an adult male and a small child, alongside the remains of three infants, all buried in a manner typical of Teotihuacan practices. The findings suggest a profound cultural exchange, with elements of Teotihuacan rituals being adopted in Tikal. Interestingly, the Maya's decision to bury the altar and the surrounding structures rather than build over them indicates a complex emotional response to their Teotihuacan counterparts. This burial practice is atypical for the Maya, who usually constructed new buildings atop older ones, suggesting a possible reverence or caution regarding the Teotihuacan influence. Previous research has established a historical conflict between the two cultures, with Teotihuacan purportedly exerting dominance over Maya kingdoms in the 4th century AD. This latest excavation reinforces the narrative of imperial rivalry and cultural exchange, highlighting how powerful empires historically sought to expand their influence over neighboring regions, similar to the dynamics observed in later colonial encounters.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article reveals a significant archaeological discovery in Tikal, an ancient Mayan city, where a 1,700-year-old altar has been uncovered, along with the puzzling conclusion that it was not created by the Maya. Instead, the altar's decoration is attributed to artists from Teotihuacan, a powerful city located far away. This finding sheds light on the historical interactions between the Maya and Teotihuacan, suggesting a more complex and possibly aggressive relationship than previously understood.
Purpose of the Article
The intent behind publishing this news could be to highlight the intricate and dynamic relationships that existed among ancient civilizations, particularly in Mesoamerica. By emphasizing the influence of Teotihuacan over Tikal, it may aim to reshape the narrative surrounding the power dynamics of ancient cultures. The article serves to intrigue readers about historical complexities and generate interest in archaeological studies, thereby engaging a wider audience.
Public Perception
This discovery may cultivate a sense of wonder and curiosity within the community about ancient history and archaeology. It positions the Maya not merely as isolated historical actors but as part of a broader geopolitical landscape involving powerful city-states, which can enhance appreciation for the cultural heritage of the region.
Potential Omissions
While the article presents a fascinating discovery, it might downplay the ongoing scholarly debates regarding the nature of interactions between these ancient civilizations. By focusing on the belligerent aspects of the relationship, it could obscure the potential for peaceful exchanges and collaborations that may have also occurred.
Trustworthiness of the News
The article appears credible, as it is backed by academic research published in a reputable journal, Antiquity. However, the interpretation of the findings and the emphasis on conflict may introduce a subjective lens that warrants scrutiny.
Societal Impact
This discovery could impact cultural tourism in Guatemala, potentially leading to increased interest in archaeological sites. Additionally, it may influence local government policies regarding heritage conservation and tourism development, as well as provoke discussions about identity and historical narrative among the descendants of these ancient cultures.
Target Audience
The article likely appeals to history enthusiasts, archaeologists, and those interested in ancient civilizations. It may also resonate with educational institutions and cultural organizations aiming to promote awareness of Mesoamerican history.
Economic Implications
While the immediate economic impact on the stock market may be minimal, this discovery could enhance tourism-related stocks in Guatemala, such as those in hospitality and local attractions. It fosters a narrative that can increase visitation and investment in archaeological sites.
Geopolitical Relevance
The findings could spark discussions around cultural imperialism and the legacies of ancient empires in contemporary geopolitics. This story, while historical, echoes modern themes of influence and power dynamics, making it relevant in today's discussions about cultural heritage and identity.
Artificial Intelligence Involvement
There is no direct evidence suggesting that AI was utilized in the writing of this article. However, certain aspects such as the structured presentation of facts and the clarity of language could be indicative of AI-assisted drafting tools. If AI were involved, it might have been used to streamline the narrative to ensure it is engaging and accessible.
Manipulation Analysis
The article does not overtly manipulate the reader but presents a strong narrative that could lead to sensational interpretations. The focus on violent interactions may evoke emotional responses, potentially framing ancient societies in a more conflict-oriented light, which could influence public perception of historical interactions.
In summary, while the article provides a credible account of an archaeological discovery, it also shapes a narrative that emphasizes conflict, possibly at the expense of a more nuanced understanding of ancient Mesoamerican relationships.