Moira Ross is still haunted, more than three decades later, by the moment she asked her schoolboy son if he had murdered a waiter. Six months earlier, on 2 June 1994, Shamsuddin Mahmood, 26, was killed by a single shot to the head as he served customers in an Indian restaurant in Orkney. Speaking for the first time, she relived the moment she confronted Michael in his bedroom after he was questioned by detectives. Prosecutors initially ruled there was not enough evidence to charge the army cadet with a crime committed when he was just 15 years old. Michael left the island the following summer and would go on to get married, have a family and become a decorated Black Watch sniper before he was finally brought to justice thanks to an anonymous letter. But in a new documentary,The Orkney Assassin: Murder in the Isles,his parents maintain he is the victim of a miscarriage of justice. Recalling the day Michael, then 16, returned home hungry from the police station his mother said he was "just his normal self". She later went upstairs to his room and described what happened next. "I said: 'Did you shoot that man?' and he said 'no' and I just can't..." Ms Ross broke down then continued: "I just can't get over the look on his face when I asked him that." As well as the cloud of suspicion over her son, the investigation ended the police career of her husband, Eddy. He was jailed in 1997 after lying about the fact he owned bullets identical to the one used in the murder. The documentary includes moving testimony from a witness who was 13 at the time of the shooting. Journalists and a local photographer also reflect on the first homicide on the idyllic group of islands for 25 years and agree it continues to divide the community to this day. Ex-Daily Record reporter Bob Dow said: "To be honest this was more than just a murder. "This was a cold blooded public execution carried out on one of the most crime-free parts of the UK. "This was like Pulp Fiction meetsWhisky Galore." Emma, who was 13 at the time, was in the Mumutaz restaurant in Kirkwall with her parents. But at 19:15 she witnessed something that left her traumatised. She recalled: "I was sitting in one of the window seats next to the door and the door opened." Emma thought it was someone coming to collect a takeaway. She added: "They were quite well built and they sort of had a purposeful march on them. "I could not see who it was because they had their face covered." Emma admitted her memory of what happened next was "fragmented". She said: "I remember it was a hand gun and there was a pop. "It did not make sense at the time what was happening. "Then this person turned round and just walked out." In an instant the restaurant had been transformed into a chaotic crime scene. Emma said: "I remember being so relieved to see the police but safe, happy Orkney was gone." Photographer Ken Amer said there was "absolute panic" when he arrived on the scene. His black and white images captured stunned staff leaving the restaurant and unfinished meals on the tables, including the one Emma was sitting at with her parents. Mr Amer later realised he had previously photographed the victim while covering a big cheque presentation for The Orcadian newspaper. Looking at the picture of Mr Mahmood, Emma said: "I remember he had a big smile in real life and he was really friendly and kind. "I have never been able to make sense of what happened that night." Angus Chisholm was a detective inspector for the then Northern Constabulary in Inverness when he was sent from the Highland capital to Orkney. The following morning he tasked local constable, ex-Black Watch soldier Eddy Ross, with the ballistic side of the investigation. Its focus became the 9mm bullet casing of the single shot which passed through Mr Mahmood's head and became embedded in the wall. Ross quickly identified the round as one previously used by the British Army. As the inquiry continued a reconstruction of the murder featured on the BBC's Crimewatch UK. But, unlike most TV appeals, detectives had no description of the gunman, who entered and left the restaurant without uttering a word. Mr Mahmood's brother, A.K.M Shafiuddin, remembered him as a "kind hearted person" and told the programme he planned to marry his girlfriend, who was a medical student. Locals wrestled with various theories but inquiries on the island and in the waiter's native Bangladesh drew a blank. Mr Chisholm said: "Nobody had a bad word to say about Shamsuddin." Two months after the murder police finally got a breakthrough. As he finished a night shift Ross informed Mr Chisholm that he had discovered a box of the same 9mm bullets used in the murder - in his own home. The father-of-three said he had been given the box - which was still sealed - by ex-marine Jim Spence. But when Mr Spence was questioned he said he handed over two boxes to PC Ross - one sealed and one half full. In a separate development, a mother and daughter reported they had seen a masked male acting suspiciously in Papdale Woods, a fortnight before the murder. They alerted officers when they spotted the same individual going into a baker's in Kirkwall. It was Michael Ross - the teenage son of PC Ross. Eddy told the documentary: "Basically from that point in time the finger was pointing towards us." When Michael was interviewed he initially said he did not know anything about the woods and was with two friends on the night of the murder. But when officers checked out his alibi it didn't stand up. Michael's mother Moira said: "I was very nervous when they thought Michael was a suspect. "He has never been in trouble with the police. "He's never been in the Indian restaurant. Ever." In a separate twist, Mr Spence told police he had not mentioned the missing box of bullets as PC Ross had visited him three times and asked him not to. Asked if he had told his friend to lie about the bullets, Ross said: "No. We had conversations on the street and has he mistaken what I said? "I had no reason to ask him that." Officers obtained a search warrant for the family home and discovered a notebook in Michael's room with swastikas scribbled on it. On 6 December 1994 the 16-year-old was taken from school and interviewed under caution without a lawyer. Ms Ross, who was at work at the time, said: "We were just in shock, I suppose, because I was sure he would never do anything like that." Mr Chisholm said the teenager was unfazed by the gravity of the allegations. He added: "He was cool, calm and collected." The senior officer filed a report to the Crown Office but prosecutors decided there was not enough evidence to charge the teenager. Michael left school in 1995 and joined the Army before being assigned to his father's old regiment, the Black Watch. Meanwhile, PC Ross was suspended from Northern Constabulary after being charged with perverting the course of justice for asking Mr Spence to lie for him. On 20 May 1997, after a trial in Inverness, he was jailed for three years and his 23-year police career was in ruins. Eddy, who served two years in prison then became an undertaker, said: "With hindsight I should have dumped the box of ammunition and it is much my regret that I did not. "But for me ditching it would not have been right, from my way of thinking, so which way do you turn?" Meanwhile, his corporal son wasmentioned in dispatches for showing braveryfollowing two improvised explosive attacks in North Babi, Iraq. But in 2006, 12 years after the murder, the cold case took a fresh twist when an anonymous letter was handed in to Kirkwall police station. Its author, later identified as local man William Grant, claimed to have seen the killer coming out of a public toilet cubicle on the night of the murder. The new evidence was enough to finally arrest Ross and he went on trial at the High Court in Glasgow in May 2008. But Brian McConnachie KC, who led the prosecution, said he did not anticipate Mr Grant would be "such an unreliable witness". Under cross examination he admitted that he made up some of the things he originally told police. Leah Seator, editor of The Orcadian, said many people on the island thought Ross would walk free. But on 20 June the jury returned a guilty verdict - only for the moment to be overshadowed by an audacious escape attempt. As he was about to be led away Ross knocked over a security guard, and jumped out of the dock. He pulled open a side door but was eventually stopped in a court corridor. Mr McConnachie said: "I have been doing this for 40 years and I have never seen such a dramatic end to a trial." Back in Orkney, Mrs Ross took a devastating call from her husband. She said: "I did not believe that he would be sent to prison." When Ross returned to court four months later, amid heightened security, he was sentenced to 25 years plus a further five for his brazen bid to flee. Lord Hardietold the killerhe had carried out a "premeditated assassination" motivated by "extreme racist prejudice". Since Ross' conviction his family have urged anyone with new evidence to come forward and in 2018 theyappointed campaigning lawyer Aamer Anwar. Four years later the former corporal was convicted of histhird prison escape attemptafter he tried to climb a fence at HMP Shotts in Lanarkshire. Eddy said: "It has not been easy but we have got to try and see if we can get him released a bit earlier." Mr McConnachie said the sad thing about the case was that it became more about the killer than Mr Mahmood, whose life was ended without warning. After the verdict, A.K.M Shafiuddin said: "Everybody loved him. "We won't get our brother back but at least we have a feeling that justice has been done." The Orkney Assassin: Murder in the Isles will be available on Prime Video in the UK & Ireland on 8 June.
Mother haunted by day she asked killer son: 'Did you shoot that man?'
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Documentary Explores 1994 Murder Case in Orkney and Its Lasting Impact on Community"
TruthLens AI Summary
Moira Ross is grappling with the haunting memory of the day she confronted her son, Michael, about the murder of a waiter, Shamsuddin Mahmood, which occurred in Orkney on June 2, 1994. Mahmood, just 26 years old, was shot in the head while working at an Indian restaurant, a shocking event that marked the first homicide in the islands in 25 years. Moira vividly recalls the moment she asked Michael, then only 16, if he had committed the crime. He responded with a firm 'no,' a moment that has lingered in her mind ever since. Initially, the police did not have sufficient evidence to charge him, and he went on to live a seemingly normal life, joining the army and becoming a decorated sniper. However, the investigation took a turn when an anonymous letter led to his arrest years later, prompting his family to insist that he was the victim of a miscarriage of justice. This case has left a profound impact on the community, with many still divided over the circumstances surrounding the murder and the subsequent trial of Michael Ross.
The documentary "The Orkney Assassin: Murder in the Isles" delves into the complexities of this case, featuring firsthand accounts from witnesses and the community. The chaos that ensued after the murder, including the emotional testimonies from those present in the restaurant that night, highlights the lasting trauma inflicted on the community. Local photographer Ken Amer captured the immediate aftermath, reflecting on the panic and confusion that engulfed the area. As the investigation unfolded, it revealed troubling connections between the victim and the police, particularly Moira's husband, Eddy, who was later imprisoned for perverting the course of justice related to the case. The documentary presents a nuanced exploration of the events leading to Michael's trial, the subsequent revelations, and the lingering questions of justice and accountability that continue to affect the families involved. Ultimately, the film aims to shed light on the life lost and the unresolved grief of those left behind, emphasizing the need for closure and understanding in a community still reeling from tragedy.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article recounts a tragic event that occurred over three decades ago, focusing on the emotional aftermath experienced by Moira Ross, the mother of a boy implicated in a murder. The narrative delves into the complexities of familial relationships, the impact of crime on community dynamics, and the lingering questions of justice. The story is particularly compelling as it intertwines elements of personal tragedy with broader social implications.
Purpose of the Article
The primary aim appears to be to evoke empathy and provoke thought regarding the nature of justice and the impact of crime on families. By sharing Moira Ross's emotional turmoil and her son Michael's journey, the article seeks to highlight the complexities surrounding accusations and the devastating effects of crime on personal lives. Furthermore, by presenting the documentary, it promotes awareness of the ongoing debate about Michael's guilt and the concept of a potential miscarriage of justice.
Community Perception
This article is likely intended to stir a mixture of sympathy and outrage within the community. By bringing to light the personal struggles of the Ross family and the ramifications of the murder, it may foster a more nuanced understanding of the situation while potentially dividing public opinion based on beliefs about Michael’s innocence or guilt.
Concealed Information
There is a possibility that the article does not fully disclose all perspectives regarding the case. The focus on the Ross family's narrative might overshadow other viewpoints, especially those from the victim's side or law enforcement. This selective storytelling could aim to shape public sentiment in favor of the accused while leaving critical questions unanswered.
Manipulative Nature
The article has a moderate level of manipulative framing, primarily through emotional appeal. By emphasizing Moira's distress and the familial consequences of the murder, it engages readers emotionally. However, the language used is largely neutral, focusing on personal testimonials rather than explicit accusations or sensationalism, which may mitigate overt manipulation.
Truthfulness of the Content
In terms of factual accuracy, the article appears to recount events based on personal accounts and a documentary narrative. However, it remains crucial to recognize that personal testimonies can be subjective and might not encompass the entire truth of the situation.
Public Sentiment
The narrative likely resonates more with individuals who empathize with familial struggles, particularly those familiar with the challenges of criminal allegations. It may appeal to communities that prioritize justice reform, as well as to those who have experienced similar familial tragedies.
Potential Societal Impact
This article could influence community discussions about criminal justice, particularly regarding young offenders and the implications of wrongful accusations. It might also impact local perceptions of law enforcement and their handling of such sensitive cases.
Stock Market Relevance
While the article primarily focuses on a local crime story without direct implications for the financial markets, it could indirectly affect businesses in the Orkney area if public sentiment shifts towards a more critical view of safety and policing.
Global Context
From a global perspective, the themes of justice, familial tragedy, and community division resonate with broader societal issues concerning crime and punishment. It reflects ongoing dialogues about the justice system and its failures, which are relevant in many parts of the world today.
Artificial Intelligence Involvement
There is no clear indication that AI played a role in the article's creation; however, aspects of the narrative structure might suggest the influence of automated content generation tools. If AI were involved, it may have helped in organizing the narrative or optimizing for clarity, but the emotional depth seems rooted in human experience and storytelling.
Conclusion on Reliability
The article presents a compelling personal story within the context of a serious crime. While it provides valuable insights into the emotional fallout of such events, its reliability may be limited by the subjective nature of personal testimonies and the potential omission of broader perspectives.