Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has defended Chancellor Rachel Reeves' original decision to cut winter fuel payments and the subsequent partial U-turn. He told the BBC the chancellor would not apologise for withdrawing the payment from more than 10 million pensioners last year, arguing that she had to take measures to stabilise the economy. He said the decisions she had taken last year had created "room for manoeuvre" enabling her to extend the payment to more pensioners this coming winter. Miliband said the move would cost "a relatively small amount of money" and would be accounted for in the Budget but the Conservatives said ministers did not know how it would be funded. Last July, the government announced it would be withdrawing the payment, worth up to £300 per year, from more than 10 million pensioners. It meant that last winter only those receiving pension credit or another means-tested benefit would be eligible - an estimated 1.5 million individuals. However, following pressure from charities, unions and its own backbenchers,the Labour government announcedit would partially reverse that decision, expanding eligibility to more than three-quarters of pensioners. Under the revised policy, nine million pensioners in England and Wales with an annual income of £35,000 or less will receive the payment this winter. Asked if the government would apologise, Miliband said Reeves had not wanted to make the original cut, but had to act to stop the economy "going off a cliff". He argued that since last summer, the nation's finances had stabilised and the government had "heard the strength of feeling" from voters. He said the government was "sticking by the principle" that the wealthiest pensioners should not get the payment, but it was right to expand the numbers who would receive it. Pressed on how the government would pay for the change, which is expected to cost around £1.25bn, Miliband said the details would be set out in the autumn Budget. The government has argued that the change would "not lead to permanent additional borrowing" due to an improving economy. However, although economic growthwas better than expectedin the first quarter of 2025, analysts expect it to slow in the coming months. The Conservative shadow chancellor Mel Stride said there was "no justification for leaving pensioners in the cold last winter". He said Labour had already spent savings from the original cut on "inflation-busting pay deals for the unions" and that the chancellor did not know how she would pay for the U-turn. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said: "Countless pensioners were forced to choose between heating and eating all whilst the government buried its head in the sand for months on end, ignoring those who were really suffering." However, Paul Johnson, head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank, said extending the winter fuel payment "wouldn't be in the top 100 things" he would do if he had £1.25bn to reduce poverty. "Almost none of the people impacted by this will be in poverty - most of them will be at least as well off as the average in the population," he told BBC Radio 4 PM programme. "We know that poverty is much worse among families with children than it is with pensioners, and of course the poorest pensioners are already getting this." The Resolution Foundation said the U-turn would create "new complexity" in the tax system and that any savings from the policy would be eaten up by the administrative cost of means-testing the payment. The government said no one would need to register with HMRC or take any further action to receive payments, and pensioners who want to opt out will be able to do so through a system set to be developed.
Miliband defends winter fuel payment U-turn
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Miliband Supports Chancellor's Decision to Revise Winter Fuel Payments for Pensioners"
Bbc News
7.5
TruthLens AI Summary
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has publicly defended Chancellor Rachel Reeves' controversial decision to cut winter fuel payments to pensioners and the subsequent partial reversal of that decision. In an interview with the BBC, Miliband explained that the chancellor would not apologize for withdrawing the payment from over 10 million pensioners last year. He argued that the measures taken were necessary for stabilizing the economy at that time. Miliband emphasized that the original decisions had created 'room for manoeuvre,' allowing the chancellor to extend winter fuel payments to a broader group of pensioners for the upcoming winter. He stated that the cost of this extension would be manageable within the Budget. However, the Conservative party criticized the government, claiming that ministers lacked clarity on how the funding for this initiative would be secured. The original cut had limited eligibility to only those receiving pension credit or other means-tested benefits, which affected about 1.5 million individuals last winter. In response to pressure from various groups, including charities and unions, the Labour government has announced a revision that will now enable around nine million pensioners in England and Wales with an annual income of £35,000 or less to receive the payment this winter.
Miliband acknowledged that the government had heard the public's concerns and that the financial situation had improved since the original cut was made. He reiterated the government’s position that the wealthiest pensioners should not receive the payment while still advocating for an expansion of eligibility. When questioned about how the U-turn would be funded, which is anticipated to cost approximately £1.25 billion, he stated that details would be provided in the upcoming autumn Budget. While the government believes that this change will not result in permanent additional borrowing due to anticipated economic improvements, analysts predict a slowdown in economic growth in the coming months. The Conservative shadow chancellor and the Liberal Democrat leader expressed their discontent with the situation, highlighting the struggles faced by pensioners during the past winter. Meanwhile, experts from the Institute for Fiscal Studies and the Resolution Foundation raised concerns about the effectiveness and complexity of the new policy, suggesting that the funds might be better allocated to address poverty among families with children rather than pensioners.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article provides an overview of Ed Miliband's defense regarding the government's decision to cut and then partially reverse cuts to winter fuel payments for pensioners. It reveals the political dynamics and public pressures that influenced these decisions, as well as the economic reasoning behind them.
Political Justification and Public Pressure
Miliband's defense of the Chancellor's decision reflects an attempt to balance political accountability with economic necessity. By stating that the government had to act to prevent economic deterioration, he positions the initial cut as a regrettable but necessary measure. The acknowledgment of public pressure from charities and unions indicates a responsiveness to voter sentiment, which is crucial for maintaining political support.
Funding Concerns
The article raises concerns about how the government plans to fund the extended winter fuel payments, which is expected to cost approximately £1.25 billion. This financial uncertainty may lead to skepticism among the public and opposition parties regarding the government's fiscal management. The lack of clarity on funding could be perceived as a weakness in the government's position, potentially undermining public trust.
Impact on Pensioners
The expansion of eligibility for winter fuel payments to include more pensioners suggests a targeted approach to alleviate financial strain among vulnerable populations. This change may foster goodwill among the electorate, particularly among older voters who are directly affected by these financial decisions. It implies a shift towards a more inclusive social policy, which might enhance the Labour party's appeal.
General Public Sentiment
The article hints at a broader narrative about the government's commitment to social welfare, contrasting with the Conservatives' criticisms. By framing the decision as a response to public pressure, the Labour government aims to cultivate an image of being attuned to the needs of its constituents, particularly in a challenging economic climate.
Manipulative Elements
While the article does not overtly manipulate facts, it selectively emphasizes the government's responsiveness to public demands, potentially downplaying the negative implications of the initial cut. The language used by Miliband, focusing on economic stabilization and public sentiment, serves to mask the more contentious aspects of the policy reversal.
Connection to Broader Issues
This news piece connects to ongoing discussions about government spending, social safety nets, and economic recovery strategies. The implications of these decisions could resonate beyond pensioners, influencing broader debates about welfare reform and fiscal policy.
Potential Economic Implications
The announcement of extended winter fuel payments may have a limited but positive effect on consumer spending among pensioners, which could provide a slight boost to the economy. However, concerns about funding could lead to volatility in financial markets, especially if investors perceive the government's fiscal strategy as unsustainable.
Target Audience
The article seems to target older demographics, social welfare advocates, and the broader electorate concerned about economic policies and their impacts. By addressing pensioners directly, it seeks to garner support from a critical voter base.
In conclusion, the article highlights a significant policy shift within the government, framed in a way that emphasizes accountability and responsiveness to public demand. However, underlying concerns about funding and the initial cuts remain, which may affect the overall credibility of the government in the eyes of the public.