Thirty-five seconds. That's all the time you get to change the set at Eurovision. Thirty-five seconds to get one set of performers off the stage and put the next ones in the right place. Thirty-five seconds to make sure everyone has the right microphones and earpieces. Thirty-five seconds to make sure the props are in place and tightly secured. While you're at home watching the introductory videos known as postcards, dozens of people swarm the stage, setting the scene for whatever comes next. "We call it the Formula 1 tyre change," says Richard van Rouwendaal, the affable Dutch stage manager who makes it all work. "Each person in the crew can only do one thing. You run on stage with one light bulb or one prop. You always walk on the same line. If you go off course, you will hit somebody. "It's a bit like ice skating." The stage crew start rehearsing their "F1 tyre change" weeks before the contestants even arrive. Every country sends detailed plans of their staging, and Eurovision hires stand-ins to play the acts (in Liverpool 2023, it was pupils from the local performing arts school), while stagehands start shaving precious seconds off the changeovers. "We have about two weeks," says Van Rouwendaal, who's normally based in Utrecht but is in Basel for this year's contest. "My company is around 13 Dutchies and 30 local guys and girls, who rock it in Switzerland. "In those two weeks, I have to figure out who's right for each job. Someone's good at running, someone's good at lifting, someone's good at organising the backstage area. It is a bit like being good at Tetris because you have to line everything up in a small space, in the perfect way." As soon as a song finishes, the team are ready to roll. As well as the stagehands, there are people responsible for positioning lights and setting pyrotechnics; and 10 cleaners who sweep the stage with mops and vacuum cleaners between every performance. "My cleaners are just as important as the stage crew. You need a clean stage for the dancers - but also, if there's an overhead shot of somebody lying down, you don't want to see shoeprints on the floor." The attention to detail is clinical. Backstage, every performer has their own microphone stand, set to the correct height and angle, to make sure every performance is camera perfect. "Sometimes the delegation will say the artist wants to wear a different shoe for the grand final," says Van Rouwendaal. "But if that happens, the mic stand is at the wrong height, so we've got a problem!" Spontaneously changing footwear isn't the worst problem he's faced, though. At the 2022 contest in Turin, the stage was 10m (33ft) higher than the backstage area. As a result, they were pushing heavy stage props – including a mechanical bull – up a steep ramp between every act. "We were exhausted every night," he recalls. "This year is better. We've even got an extra backstage tent where we prepare the props." Props are a huge part of Eurovision. The tradition started at the second ever contest in 1957, when Germany's Margot Hielscher sang part of her songTelefon, Telefoninto (you guessed it) a telephone. Over the intervening decades, the staging has become ever more elaborate. In 2014, Ukraine's Mariya Yaremchuk trapped one of her dancers in a giant hamster wheel, while Romania brought a literal cannon to their performance in 2017. This year, we've got disco balls, space hoppers, a magical food blender, a Swedish sauna and, for the UK, a fallen chandelier. "It's a big logistics effort, actually, to get all the props organised," says Damaris Reist, deputy head of production for this year's contest. "It's all organised in a kind of a circle. The [props] come onto the stage from the left, and then get taken off to the right. "Backstage, the props that have been used are pushed back to the back of the queue, and so on. It's all in the planning." During the show, there are several secret passageways and "smuggling routes" to get props in and out of vision, especially when a performance requires new elements half-way through. Cast your mind back, if you will, to Sam Ryder's performance for the UK at the 2022 contest in Italy. There he was, alone on the stage, belting out falsetto notes in his spangly jumpsuit, when suddenly, an electric guitar appeared out of thin air and landed in his hands. And guess who put it there? Richard van Rouwendaal. "I'm a magician," he laughs. "No, no, no… That was a collaboration between the camera director, the British delegation and the stage crew." In other words, Richard ducked onto the stage, guitar in hand, while the director cut to a wide shot, concealing his presence from viewers at home. "It's choreographed to the nearest millimetre," he says. "We're not invisible, but we have to be invisible." What if it all goes wrong? There are certain tricks the audience will never notice, Van Rouwendaal reveals. If he announces "stage not clear" into his headset, the director can buy time by showing an extended shot of the audience. In the event of a bigger incident – "a camera can break, a prop can fall" – they cut to a presenter in the green room, who can fill for a couple of minutes. Up in the control room, a tape of the dress rehearsal plays in sync with the live show, allowing directors to switch to pre-recorded footage in the event of something like a stage invasion or a malfunctioning microphone. A visual glitch isn't enough to trigger the back-up tape, however - as Switzerland's Zoë Më discovered at Tuesday's first semi-final. Her performance was briefly interrupted when the feed from an on-stage camera froze, but producers simply cut to a wide shot until it was fixed. (If it had happened in the final, she'd have been offered the chance to perform again.) "There's actually lots of measures that are being taken to make sure that every act can be shown in the best way," says Reist. "There are people who know the regulations by heart, who have been playing through what could happen and what we would do in various different situations. "I'll be sitting next to our head of production, and if there's [a situation] where somebody has to run, maybe that's going to be me!" It's no surprise to learn that staging a live three-hour broadcast with thousands of moving parts is incredibly stressful. This year, organisers have introduced measures to protect the welfare of contestants and crew, including closed-door rehearsals, longer breaks between shows, and the creation of a "disconnected zone" where cameras are banned. Even so, Reist says she has worked every weekend for the past two months, while Van Rouwendaal and his team are regularly pulling 20-hour days. The shifts are so long that, back in 2008, Eurovision production legend Ola Melzig built a bunker under the stage, complete with a sofa, a "sadly underused" PS3 and two (yes, two) espresso machines. "I don't have hidden luxuries like Ola. I'm not at that level yet!" laughs Van Rouwendaal "But backstage, I've got a spot with my crew. We've got stroopwafels there and, last week, it was King's Day in Holland, so I baked pancakes for everyone. "I try to make it fun. Sometimes we go out and have a drink and cheer because we had a great day. "Yes, we have to be on top, and we have to be sharp as a knife, but having fun together is also very important." And if all goes to plan, you won't see them at all this weekend.
Meet the 'invisible crew' who have 35 seconds to prevent a Eurovision blunder
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Eurovision Stage Crew Executes Complex Set Changes Under Strict Time Constraints"
TruthLens AI Summary
At the Eurovision Song Contest, the pressure is palpable as the stage crew operates under a strict 35-second time limit to facilitate seamless set changes between performances. Richard van Rouwendaal, the stage manager, likens the process to a Formula 1 pit stop, emphasizing the precision required from each crew member, who is assigned a specific task such as moving a prop or adjusting lighting. This meticulous preparation begins weeks in advance, with the crew rehearsing their roles using stand-ins to simulate the actual performances. The planning involves careful coordination of the team, which includes local crew members in Switzerland and Dutch stagehands, to ensure that everything is executed flawlessly. Each performer is provided with a personalized microphone stand, and even minor changes, such as a performer’s footwear, can complicate the logistics of the setup. The crew's attention to detail is paramount; a clean stage is essential for both aesthetic and practical reasons, as any visible imperfections can detract from the televised performance.
The logistics of managing props at Eurovision have evolved significantly since the event's inception, with elaborate staging becoming a hallmark of the contest. This year, the production features a range of imaginative props, from disco balls to a Swedish sauna, all of which require careful handling and organization. Damaris Reist, deputy head of production, highlights the complexity of prop management, which involves strategic planning for their movement on and off the stage. The crew must also be prepared for unforeseen circumstances, such as technical malfunctions or miscommunications, with contingency plans in place to maintain the show's flow. Despite the high-stress environment and long hours, the crew finds ways to foster camaraderie and maintain morale, recognizing that their behind-the-scenes efforts, though often invisible to the audience, are critical to the success of the live broadcast. As the contest approaches, the crew's commitment to excellence remains unwavering, ensuring that viewers enjoy a polished and entertaining experience without realizing the monumental effort that goes into each performance.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article provides an intriguing look into the behind-the-scenes operations of the Eurovision Song Contest, particularly focusing on the crew responsible for the rapid stage changes between performances. This emphasis on the meticulous preparation and coordination required highlights the complexity and professionalism involved in producing such a high-profile event.
Purpose of the Article
This piece aims to shed light on the often-overlooked aspects of large-scale productions like Eurovision. By detailing the rigorous preparation and teamwork of the stage crew, the article seeks to enhance appreciation for the logistical challenges faced by the organizers. It underscores the notion that every successful performance is the result of significant behind-the-scenes effort, which may not be visible to the casual viewer.
Public Perception
The narrative encourages readers to recognize the importance of teamwork and precision in live events. It crafts an image of a well-oiled machine operating under pressure, likely aiming to foster a sense of admiration and respect for the crew members. This portrayal can enhance the audience's overall experience of the event, promoting a deeper engagement with the performances.
Potential Concealment
While the article primarily celebrates the crew's efforts, it may inadvertently downplay other potential issues or challenges associated with Eurovision, such as controversies surrounding the contest or logistical failures in past events. There is no explicit indication of manipulation; however, the focus on the crew could serve to distract from other criticisms of the event.
Manipulative Nature
In terms of manipulative potential, the article leans towards being informative rather than deceptive. It effectively uses language that conveys urgency and excitement, which could evoke a sense of admiration for the crew's work. The use of metaphors like "Formula 1 tyre change" creates a vivid image, helping readers appreciate the speed and efficiency required during performances.
Comparative Context
When comparing this article to others covering Eurovision, it stands out by focusing on the technical and operational aspects rather than the performances themselves. This unique angle can create a more holistic view of the event and highlight the collaborative nature of such productions, setting it apart from more performance-centric narratives that dominate coverage.
Impact on Society and Economy
The insights provided could potentially influence public interest and engagement with Eurovision, possibly affecting ticket sales, viewership, and sponsorships. A greater appreciation for behind-the-scenes efforts may enhance the overall reputation of the event, leading to increased participation from both audiences and advertisers.
Target Audience
This article likely appeals to individuals interested in the performing arts, production, and event management. It may resonate particularly with those who work in related fields, as well as fans of Eurovision who are curious about the complexities of the event.
Market and Political Implications
In terms of market impact, the article may not have a direct influence on stock markets or specific shares. However, it could indirectly affect companies involved in entertainment production and event management by highlighting the importance of operational excellence in live events.
Global Power Dynamics
The piece does not directly address global power dynamics but emphasizes the collaborative efforts of local and international teams. It reflects a growing recognition of the importance of teamwork in a globalized context, which is relevant to today's interconnected world.
Use of Artificial Intelligence
There is no clear indication that AI was used in the writing of this article. However, if AI had been involved, it could have influenced the tone and style, ensuring the piece was engaging and accessible to a broad audience. AI models focused on natural language processing might have been utilized to refine the language.
Conclusion on Reliability
The article appears reliable as it provides specific details about the processes involved in stage management at Eurovision and includes quotes from relevant personnel, contributing to its credibility. The focus on the crew's hard work adds a layer of authenticity, making it a trustworthy account of the event's operational challenges.