Man who injected himself with venom hundreds of times could revolutionize snakebite treatment

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Research on Snake Venom Immunity Promises New Antivenom Treatment"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Immunologist Jacob Glanville was intrigued by reports of Tim Friede, a self-taught snake expert who had injected himself with venom from various deadly snakes for nearly 18 years. This unusual practice enabled Friede to develop immunity to several neurotoxins. Recognizing the potential in Friede's unique experience, Glanville reached out to him for a blood sample to study the antibodies that had formed as a result of this exposure. Their collaboration led to a significant advancement in snakebite treatment, culminating in the development of a novel antivenom capable of protecting against bites from 19 species of venomous snakes, at least in mice. In their study, published in the journal Cell, Glanville and his team isolated specific antibodies from Friede's blood that effectively neutralized the venom from various snake species, showcasing an innovative approach to antivenom production that could potentially save lives.

The traditional method of creating antivenom has remained largely unchanged since the Victorian era, relying on animal models and often resulting in serious side effects for patients. Glanville's research aims to revolutionize this process by utilizing human-derived antibodies, which could lead to fewer adverse reactions. The cocktail developed by the researchers includes two of Friede's antibodies and a small-molecule drug called varespladib, which inhibits an enzyme found in the majority of snake venoms. While the antivenom has not yet been tested in humans, experts believe that its human origin may offer a safer alternative to conventional treatments. Future research aims to explore its effectiveness against other snake families, particularly viperids, and to conduct field studies, potentially extending its use to veterinary applications as well. This groundbreaking work holds the promise of addressing the significant global health issue posed by snakebites, which currently claim thousands of lives each year, particularly in developing countries.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a unique story about Tim Friede, a man who has injected himself with snake venom numerous times and has now contributed to groundbreaking research in snakebite treatment. The narrative blends elements of human curiosity, scientific exploration, and the potential for medical advancements, which can evoke mixed feelings among readers.

Purpose Behind the Publication

This piece aims to highlight the innovative research stemming from an unconventional source, emphasizing the potential benefits for snakebite treatment. It serves to draw attention to the scientific study that could lead to advancements in antivenom development. By presenting Friede's story, the article also invites public intrigue surrounding the extremes of human experimentation in the name of science.

Public Perception and Reactions

The article may foster a sense of fascination and disbelief among readers, leading to discussions about the limits of self-experimentation and the ethical implications involved. It positions Friede as a maverick, which could inspire admiration or caution, depending on individual perspectives regarding risk and innovation.

Transparency and Hidden Aspects

While the article focuses on the positive outcomes of Friede's experiences, it advises against replicating his actions, hinting at the dangers involved in snake venom exposure. However, it does not delve deeply into the potential negative consequences of such self-experimentation or the broader implications for safety in scientific research, which could be a crucial aspect to consider.

Manipulation Assessment

The manipulation rate in this article appears moderate, as it portrays Friede's experience in a sensational light while simultaneously promoting the research’s potential benefits. The language used is compelling yet careful, aiming to strike a balance between intrigue and caution.

Credibility of the Information

The information presented is grounded in scientific research published in a reputable journal, which lends credibility. However, the narrative's focus on the sensational aspects of Friede's journey might overshadow more critical evaluations of the research process and its implications.

Underlying Narratives and Connections

When compared to other stories in the realm of medical innovation, this piece connects with ongoing discussions about unconventional methods in science. It may resonate with communities interested in alternative medicine or those advocating for innovative approaches to public health issues.

Impact on Society and Economy

The potential advancements in snakebite treatment could have significant implications for public health in regions where snakebites are prevalent. This could lead to decreased healthcare costs associated with snakebite treatments and improve outcomes in affected populations.

Target Audiences

The article appeals primarily to individuals interested in science, medicine, and unconventional approaches to health. It may particularly resonate with communities focused on biotechnological innovations and those advocating for personal autonomy in scientific exploration.

Market Influence

In the context of biotechnology, this news could positively influence stocks related to pharmaceutical companies working on antivenoms or snakebite treatments. Investors may find the research promising, leading to increased interest in related stocks.

Geopolitical Relevance

While the article does not directly address global power dynamics, advancements in medical research can have international implications, particularly in regions affected by snakebites. The ongoing discourse on public health innovations is relevant to current global health challenges.

Potential Use of AI in Article Creation

There is a possibility that AI-assisted tools were used for drafting or editing the article, especially in terms of structuring the narrative and enhancing clarity. However, the personal anecdotes and the human element suggest a significant input from human writers, focusing on storytelling.

In conclusion, the article presents a compelling narrative that intertwines scientific exploration with the extraordinary actions of an individual. The balance between intrigue and caution is handled with care, although the sensational aspects may overshadow critical discussions regarding safety and ethics in self-experimentation. Overall, the news is credible, yet readers are encouraged to approach it with a critical mindset.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Immunologist Jacob Glanville came across media reports in 2017 of a man who had injected himself hundreds of times with the venom of some of the world’s deadliest snakes, including cobras, mambas and rattlesnakes — and allowed himself to be bitten. “The news articles were kind of flashy. ‘Crazy guy gets bit by snakes,’” Glanville said. “But I looked, and I was like there’s a diamond in the rough here.” Glanville’s diamond was Tim Friede, a self-taught snake expert based in California who exposed himself to the venom of snakes over the course of nearly 18 years, effectively gaining immunity to several neurotoxins. “We had this conversation. And I said, I know it’s awkward, but I’m really interested in looking at some of your blood,” Glanville recalled. “And he said, ‘Finally, I’ve been waiting for this call.’” The pair agreed to work together, and Friede donated a 40-milliliter blood sample to Glanville and his colleagues. Eight years later, Glanville and Peter Kwong, Richard J. Stock Professor of medical sciences at Columbia University’s Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, have published details of an antivenom that can protect against bites from 19 species of poisonous snake — at least in mice — based on antibodies in Friede’s blood and a venom-blocking drug. “Tim, to my knowledge, he has an unparalleled history. It was different, very diverse species from every continent that has snakes, and … he kept rotating between (the snake venoms) over a 17-year, nine-month history, and he took meticulous records the entire time,” Glanville said. “However, we strongly discourage anyone from trying to do what Tim did,” Glanville added. “Snake venom is dangerous.” Friede gave up immunizing himself with snake venom in 2018 after some close calls, and he is now employed by Glanville’s biotechnology company Centivax, Glanville said. Glanville is CEO and chairman of Centivax. The research was published Friday in the scientific journal Cell. CNN contacted Friede, but he did not respond to an interview request. The snakebite problem If you’re unlucky enough to have a poisonous snake sink its fangs into you, your best hope is an antivenom, which for the most part has been made in the same way since Victorian times. Traditionally, the process involves milking snake venom by hand and injecting it into horses or other animals in small doses to evoke an immune response. The animal’s blood is drawn and purified to obtain antibodies that act against the venom. Producing antivenom in this way can get messy, not to mention dangerous. The process is prone to errors and laborious, and the finished serum can result in serious side effects. Experts have long called for better ways to treat snakebites, which kill some 200 people a day, mainly in the developing world, and leave 400,000 people a year with disabilities. The World Health Organization added snakebite to its list of neglected tropical diseases in 2017. Glanville, who grew up in rural Guatemala, said he had long been aware of the health problems posed by snakebites and immediately recognized that Friede’s experience presented a unique opportunity. Exposing himself to the venom of snakes for nearly two decades, by injecting venom and allowing himself to be bitten, Friede had generated antibodies that were effective against several snake neurotoxins at once. ‘Revolutionary’ potential The researchers isolated antibodies from Friede’s blood that reacted with neurotoxins found within the 19 snake species tested in the study, which included coral snakes, mambas, cobras, taipans, kraits and others. These antibodies were then tested one by one in mice poisoned by venom from each of the 19 species, allowing scientists to understand systematically the minimum number of components that would neutralize all the venoms. The drug cocktail the team created ultimately included three things: two antibodies isolated from Friede and the small-molecule drug varespladib, which inhibits an enzyme that is present in 95% of all snakebites. The drug is currently in human clinical trials as a standalone treatment. The first antibody, known as LNX-D09, protected mice from a lethal dose of whole venom from six of the snake species. The addition of varespladib granted protection against an additional three species. Finally, researchers added a second antibody isolated from Friede’s blood, called SNX-B03, which extended protection across 19 species. The antivenom offered the mice 100% protection against the venom for 13 species and partial protection (20% to 40%) for the remaining six, the researchers noted in the study. Steven Hall, a snakebite pharmacologist at Lancaster University in the United Kingdom, called it a “very clever and creative way” to develop an antivenom. Hall wasn’t involved in the research. And while the cocktail has not been tested in humans, should it be approved for clinical use, Hall said the human origin of the antibodies would likely mean fewer side effects than antivenoms made the traditional way using horses or other animals, which can often result in allergic reactions. “It’s impressive for the fact that this is done with one or two antibodies, plus a small-molecule drug, and that increases the number of species, versus a regular antidote. And I think it does a good job of highlighting the potential utility of combining a small-molecule drug with an antibody,” Hall added. “If it makes it into clinic, makes it into people in the long run, it would be revolutionary. It actually would completely change the field in terms of snakebite (treatment),” he said. Columbia’s Kwong said that the published research focused on a class of snakes known as elapids. It did not include viperids, the other major group of venomous snakes that includes rattlesnakes, saw-scaled vipers and additional species. However, the team is investigating whether additional antibodies identified in Friede’s blood or other agents might offer protection against this viperid family of snakes. “The final contemplated product would be a single, pan-antivenom cocktail or we potentially would make two: one that is for the elapids and another that is for the viperids because some areas of the world only have one or the other,” Kwong said. The team also wants to start field research in Australia, where there are only elapid snakes, allowing vets to use the antivenom on dogs bitten by snakes.

Back to Home
Source: CNN