Former New Zealand head coach Steve Hansen said he felt "hollow" after the series draw against the British and Irish Lions in 2017 The British and Irish Lions board is considering a proposal for sudden-death extra time if a deciding third Test this summer against Australia finishes in a draw. Rugby Australia chief Phil Waughrevealed he suggested at meetings in London that 'golden point' extra time - which means the first team to score wins - should be played in such circumstances. In 2017, the Lions and New Zealand shared the series after the deciding third Test finished 15-15, with captain Sam Warburton saying it was"a bit of an anticlimax for the players". Former New Zealand head coach Steve Hansen said the draw was "a bit like kissing your sister and no-one wants that". "We've had some really constructive conversations. That's got to go to the Lions board around whether it's a drawn series, or you decide it through golden point or extra time," Waugh told theSydney Morning Herald.,external "Our preference, if we put the fans at the centre of everything we're doing, I think that the familiarity that everyone has with 'golden point' and the interest for that in our market is a good guide. "Obviously, we will be making sure both parties agree. But I think that if you're thinking about some fan engagement, that's certainly very appealing." For regular season games this year, Super Rugby Pacific brought in'golden point',,externalwhere if the teams are level at full-time then an 10 minutes of extra time is played, with a draw then declared if there is no winning score. In April, Australian side Western Force and New Zealand's Hurricanes played out a thrilling 17-17 draw, with no score in extra time. For Super Rugby Pacific knockout games, two 10-minute periods of standard extra time are played. If the teams are still level, up to 10 minutes of golden point extra time are played, followed by a kicking competition if necessary. Sonny Bill Williams was red-carded for a first-half shoulder charge on Anthony Watson during the Lions' second Test win over New Zealand in 2017 Waugh confirmed both sides had agreed that the 20-minute red card will be used during the series. The rule means the offending team can replace the red-carded player 20 minutes after being reduced to 14 players. This year's Six Nations used 20-minute red cards for the first time after a trial at the Autumn Nations Cup in November. Ireland centre Garry Ringrose, who will tour Australia this summer with the Lions, was given a first-half 20-minute red card against Wales. Once the 20 minutes passed, Bundee Aki replaced Ringrose and played a key role in seeing the game home for Ireland. "We've been very vocal in our support for the 20-minute red card," Waugh added. The Lions will play a warm-up match against Argentina in Dublin on 20 June before leaving for Australia, with the three-match Test series against the Wallabies starting in Brisbane on 19 July.
Lions consider golden point extra time proposal
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"British and Irish Lions Consider 'Golden Point' Extra Time Proposal for Upcoming Series"
Bbc News
6.0
TruthLens AI Summary
The British and Irish Lions board is currently deliberating a proposal for implementing sudden-death extra time, termed 'golden point', in the event that the deciding third Test against Australia ends in a draw this summer. Phil Waugh, the chief of Rugby Australia, disclosed that he had proposed this idea during recent meetings in London. The concept of golden point means that the first team to score in extra time would win the match, a rule that could enhance the excitement and engagement for fans. This consideration arises from past experiences, notably the 2017 series between the Lions and New Zealand, which concluded in a 15-15 draw, leaving players feeling unsatisfied. Former New Zealand head coach Steve Hansen articulated his disappointment over that outcome, comparing it to an anticlimactic experience. Waugh emphasized the need for fan engagement in rugby, suggesting that implementing golden point could serve as a familiar and appealing format for spectators, especially in light of its usage in other competitions like Super Rugby Pacific.
In addition to the golden point proposal, Waugh confirmed that both teams have agreed to utilize the 20-minute red card rule during the series. This innovative rule allows the team of a player who has received a red card to substitute a replacement after a 20-minute period, preserving competitive balance in the match. The 20-minute red card rule was trialed in the recent Six Nations and has garnered positive feedback. The Lions are set to kick off their tour with a warm-up match against Argentina in Dublin on June 20, leading up to the highly anticipated three-match Test series against the Wallabies, which begins on July 19 in Brisbane. The discussions surrounding both the golden point extra time and the red card rule reflect a broader movement within rugby to enhance the game's competitiveness and appeal to its fan base, ensuring that matches conclude with a decisive outcome rather than a draw.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article examines the proposal from the British and Irish Lions board regarding the introduction of a golden point extra time format for potential drawn matches against Australia. This suggestion stems from the disappointment over the 2017 series draw with New Zealand. The article highlights key opinions from involved parties, including Rugby Australia chief Phil Waugh and former New Zealand coach Steve Hansen, underlining the emotional and competitive implications of match outcomes in rugby.
Intent Behind the News
This article aims to promote discussion about enhancing the excitement and competitiveness of rugby matches. By focusing on fan engagement and the emotional impact of drawn games, it seeks to garner support for the proposed golden point rule. The mention of past frustrations from players and coaches serves to illustrate the potential benefits of this new rule, suggesting that it could lead to more thrilling conclusions in high-stakes games.
Public Perception Goals
The article is likely aiming to foster a perception that rugby is evolving and adapting to fan desires. By emphasizing the potential for excitement in matches that currently end in draws, the proposal is framed as a necessary improvement in the sport. The use of quotes from notable figures adds credibility and a sense of urgency to the narrative, potentially swaying public opinion in favor of the change.
Information Omission Concerns
While the article presents a clear case for the golden point extra time, it does not explore potential drawbacks or criticisms of the proposal. This omission may indicate a desire to focus on the positive aspects of the proposal, possibly downplaying dissenting opinions within the sport’s community. The absence of counterarguments could lead to a one-sided understanding of the issue.
Manipulative Elements
In terms of manipulation, the language used in the article, such as "anticlimax" and "kissing your sister," suggests a strong emotional appeal aimed at stirring frustration and desire for change among readers. By framing draws as undesirable outcomes, the article positions the proposed rule as a necessary evolution, potentially steering readers toward a specific viewpoint.
Trustworthiness of the Article
The information presented seems credible, as it is based on quotes from recognized figures in rugby and discusses a tangible proposal. However, the lack of a balanced view raises questions about its overall objectivity. The emphasis on positive aspects without addressing potential criticisms may impact the perceived reliability of the content.
Comparison to Other News
When compared to other sports news, this article aligns with trends of increasing fan engagement through rule changes. Similar discussions have occurred in various sports leagues around the world, indicating a broader movement toward making matches more exciting. However, the article does not explore how this proposal fits into the larger context of rugby's governance or its implications for other competitions.
Community Response
This news is likely to resonate more with rugby fans who prioritize thrilling gameplay and competitive integrity. It aims to engage a community that values the excitement of matches, especially in high-profile events like the Lions tour. The proposal may also appeal to a younger demographic, familiar with sudden-death formats in other sports.
Economic and Market Impact
From a market perspective, such changes could influence merchandise sales and viewership ratings, particularly if they lead to more exciting games. While the immediate effect on stock markets is minimal, rugby-related businesses could see fluctuations based on viewer engagement and sponsorship opportunities arising from increased game interest.
Global Power Dynamics
The article does not directly address global power dynamics, but it does reflect the ongoing evolution of sports governance and fan engagement strategies worldwide. As rugby seeks to modernize its appeal, it may influence its standing compared to other sports, potentially impacting its global reach and popularity.
AI Involvement
It is plausible that AI tools were used in the article's composition, particularly in structuring the narrative and generating quotes or opinion summaries. The language and flow suggest a polished presentation, potentially influenced by AI models designed for news writing. If AI contributed, it may have aimed to emphasize emotional engagement and clarity in presenting the proposal's benefits.
Conclusion
This article appears to advocate for a change in rugby that aligns with fan desires, but it lacks a comprehensive exploration of opposing views. Its emotional appeal and selective presentation raise questions about its objectivity. Overall, while the article is informative, its potential biases should be considered when evaluating its trustworthiness.