Ever since the government-changing administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt, a president’s first 100 days in office have been viewed as a sprint to see how much they can get done in the honeymoon period after Inauguration Day. At the start of his second term, President Donald Trump has embraced an effort to dismantle the administrative state that Roosevelt helped create more than 90 years ago. Working with Elon Musk to shrink government as significantly and as quickly as possible, Trump has moved to cut international and scientific research funding and fired federal workers. His rat-a-tat executive orders and his flood-the-zone approach to major policy proposals have overwhelmed Americans’ attention spans. His mass deportations are affecting American neighborhoods; his tariffs could remake world trade. He’s exercising executive power in a way unimagined by the framers of the Constitution and directly challenging portions of the Constitution itself. He has found time for multiple trips to his private Florida club in Mar-a-Lago, but he’s also found his approval ratings slipping. Here’s a look at Trump’s first 100 days by some of the biggest numbers: No president other than Roosevelt signed more executive orders than Trump in a single year. These orders, along with executive actions, include consequential changes like rescinding equal opportunity requirements in federal government hiring that date back 50 years; directing the US military to help more at the US border; unwinding Biden administration efforts to combat climate change; and directing Musk and his ad hoc “Department of Government Efficiency” to shrink the federal government. Others, such as declaring English the national language and trying to ban trans girls from girls’ sports teams, seem to speak directly to his supporters and their politics. His endorsement of high-flow showers may simply be popular, if ultimately wasteful. With some variation, the number of federal workers directly employed by the government has remained relatively steady at around 2 million for decades. Trump and Musk wasted no time trying to trim things down. Probationary workers who had not been on the job very long have been fired at many agencies. Others have been targeted by “reductions in force” and early retirement efforts. It’s not clear how many workers Trump ultimately wants to remove. An effort during the Clinton administration in the 1990s shrank the federal workforce by more than 400,000 positions over the course of seven years, but at the same time, the number of contractors has grown. CNN has tracked how many federal workers have been let go or targeted for firings during Trump’s second term so far. There’s no doubt border encounters are down since Trump took office, although they were also dropping at the end of the Biden administration. Trump spent hundreds of millions of dollars to deploy elements of the US military to the border, and his deportation efforts have likely caused many potential migrants to rethink their plans. Trump also effectively shut the border to asylum seekers. Trump bucked 400 years of history in trying to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America. When the Associated Press still referred to the Gulf by both names, Trump’s White House sought to bar the wire agency from many events. A lawsuit is ongoing. Presidents are under a lot of pressure, so far be it from anyone to begrudge Trump’s numerous trips to his private club in Florida, where he frequently plays golf on the weekends. There is some dissonance between his insistence that federal workers must do all of their work from a federal office building and his frequent work from Mar-a-Lago. That said, a president’s work is never done, and infrastructure is in place to allow Trump to work from all his homes. Trump has built an entire strategy around challenging the US Constitution in court. He wants to reinterpret the 14th Amendment, end birthright citizenship and refuse to spend money appropriated by Congress. How and when those larger issues make it to the Supreme Court on the merits is anyone’s guess. But already the court has weighed in on whether several of Trump’s actions can take effect in the short term. Justices partially sided with Trump in one case dealing with his plan to use an 18th-century law to deport migrants as if they were part of an invading force, but broke with him temporarily when that issue returned a second time. They also handed him defeats on his effort to freeze billions in USAID funding and on the firing of a government watchdog. But Trump has won, so far, on his ability to fire probationary workers and cancel education grants while those underlying cases continue. It’s hard to say who won in the court’s decision that Trump must facilitate the return of a mistakenly deported Maryland man, but not necessarily “effectuate” that return. Trump has had great success confirming Cabinet secretaries. Only one position, US ambassador to the United Nations, remains unfilled. That position is sometimes not even included in the Cabinet. Trump pulled the nomination of Rep. Elise Stefanik, one of his most loyal followers on Capitol Hill, because Republicans have only a thin majority in the House of Representatives, and they were nervous about replacing her with a special election. While Trump’s Cabinet is mostly full, thousands of lower positions remain unfilled. Plus, Trump hopes to reclassify much of the bureaucracy that is not currently appointed by each president to make them easier to fire and replace with people who support him. While there was a “Trump bump” after the election, stock markets and major indexes fell dramatically after Trump’s herky-jerky rollout of his tariff plan. Tariffs were imposed on imports from close US partners like Canada and Mexico. A 10% across-the-board tariff was imposed on almost all imports. But punitive reciprocal tariffs — which Trump threatened due to his contention that the US, despite the size of its economy, has been cheated by other countries — have been delayed. Investors don’t like tariffs and they don’t like uncertainty. Trillions of dollars in market capitalization have been lost. For now, the US maintains a 10% universal tariff on virtually every good imported to America, with higher rates for some things. Additional tariffs are coming, according to the White House. Trump says the pain tariffs cause for consumers will be worth it to create new manufacturing jobs in the US and to combat a market flooded with Chinese goods. Economists, however, doubt supply chains built on worldwide trade will be able to adapt to a more nationalist approach. Trump has promised to negotiate scores of individual trade deals. Another complication of tariffs is that while Trump promised to lower the price of goods after inflation hurt Biden’s presidency, tariffs — which he also promised during the campaign — will do the opposite, and will likely raise prices. Musk’s involvement in Trump’s administration and his leadership of the government-shrinking Department of Government Efficiency have hurt Tesla’s business. The electric vehicle company was founded to respond to the threat of climate change. Now, Musk has morphed into the top election benefactor for Trump, who has said climate change is a hoax and who wants to prioritize carbon-emitting fossil fuel production. As Tesla’s share price shrank, Trump stepped in to endorse the cars and promised to buy one in a show at the White House in March. Trump’s most notable foreign policy episode was his confrontation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, broadcast live on TV when the two leaders met in the Oval Office. Zelensky has since worked to maintain US support for Ukraine, although Trump has long admired Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has not visited the White House. Most world leaders adopt a strategy of flattery in the White House, so Zelensky’s heated pushback during an Oval Office visit with Trump and Vice President JD Vance came as a surprise. Every president gets the opportunity to redecorate the Oval Office, but Trump, long a fan of all things golden, has brought something new for his second term. There are now multiple gold-framed portraits lining the walls, gold filigree on the fireplace, gold vases on the mantle. It’s a lot of gold. CNN’s David Goldman, Samantha Waldenberg, Riane Lumer and John Fritze contributed to this report. Photo credits: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images, Win McNamee/Getty Images, Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images, Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images, Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images, Kevin Lamarque/Reuters, Tesla, Inc.
Lawsuits, executive actions, confirmations and golf trips: Key moments in Trump’s first 100 days
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Trump's First 100 Days: Executive Actions, Policy Changes, and Economic Challenges"
TruthLens AI Summary
In the wake of his second inauguration, President Donald Trump has embarked on a rapid and aggressive agenda aimed at dismantling the administrative framework established during Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency. Collaborating with Elon Musk, Trump has focused on reducing government size and efficiency, which includes significant cuts to international and scientific research funding, as well as the termination of several federal employees. His administration has been characterized by an unprecedented number of executive orders, second only to Roosevelt, which have included controversial measures such as rescinding long-standing equal opportunity hiring practices, mobilizing military resources at the US border, and rolling back climate change initiatives. Some of his actions, like the push to declare English as the national language and attempts to ban transgender girls from competing in sports, appear to resonate with his political base, while others, like endorsing high-flow showers, have drawn mixed reactions. Despite the administration's efforts to reshape the federal workforce, the number of federal employees has shown little change, with Trump and Musk's initiatives primarily targeting new hires and probationary workers at various agencies.
Additionally, Trump's first 100 days have not been without challenges, as his approval ratings have seen a decline alongside a tumultuous economic landscape marked by fluctuating stock markets and the imposition of tariffs on imports. His foreign policy has also been a point of contention, particularly highlighted by a public confrontation with Ukrainian President Zelensky that showcased a stark deviation from typical diplomatic decorum. As Trump continues to pursue an agenda that includes reinterpreting constitutional provisions and addressing immigration policies, he faces legal battles that could significantly impact his administration's direction. The Supreme Court has weighed in on several of his initiatives, granting some victories while simultaneously issuing setbacks on others, particularly regarding funding and deportation strategies. Furthermore, his Cabinet appointments have progressed, with only one key position remaining unfilled, although a significant number of lower-level positions still await confirmation. Trump's ambitious plans for trade and tariffs aim to reshape American manufacturing, but they also pose risks of increased consumer prices amidst ongoing economic uncertainties. As the administration forges ahead, the implications of Trump's policies and actions will continue to unfold, shaping the political landscape for the years to come.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article provides an overview of the significant events and actions taken by President Donald Trump during the first 100 days of his second term. It emphasizes his aggressive approach to dismantling governmental structures established since Franklin D. Roosevelt's era. By highlighting Trump's executive orders and actions, the article aims to illustrate both the scale and implications of his governance style.
Intent Behind the Article
The piece appears to seek a critical examination of Trump's administration, particularly focusing on his use of executive power and controversial policies. By profiling his actions, including mass deportations and cuts to scientific funding, the article intends to provoke concern about the potential long-term consequences of his administration's strategies.
Public Perception
The narrative constructed around Trump’s actions may foster a sense of unease among readers regarding his governance. By listing various contentious policies, such as the attempt to ban trans girls from sports and the declaration of English as the national language, it positions Trump as a divisive figure, appealing to certain voter bases while alienating others.
Potential Omissions
The article does not delve into the positive support or achievements of Trump's policies, which could be perceived as an attempt to present a biased view. This selective focus may obscure a more nuanced understanding of public sentiment and the complexities of his administration's impact.
Manipulative Elements
The language used is somewhat charged, potentially steering readers toward a negative interpretation of Trump's presidency. By portraying his actions in a predominantly critical light, the article may influence opinions rather than present a balanced account of his governance.
Credibility Assessment
The reliability of the article hinges on the factual accuracy of the claims regarding Trump's actions and their consequences. While it references established events, the tone and selective focus raise questions about potential bias. The article leans towards a critical perspective, which could diminish its acceptance among Trump supporters.
Comparative Analysis
When situated among other reports on Trump's presidency, this article aligns with a broader trend of critical media coverage. There may be connections to other narratives focusing on the implications of his policies on American society and governance.
Societal and Economic Impact
The article’s emphasis on Trump's governance style could influence public discourse and perceptions of his administration's legitimacy. This, in turn, might affect voter behavior in future elections and could have implications for policy directions at both national and local levels.
Target Audience
The content seems tailored for audiences who are critical of Trump’s administration, appealing to those concerned about civil liberties and government overreach. It is likely to resonate more with left-leaning audiences who prioritize social justice and environmental issues.
Market Implications
The article may indirectly affect investor sentiment, particularly in sectors influenced by Trump’s policies, such as international trade and scientific funding. Stocks related to these areas might experience volatility based on public perception and political developments.
Global Context
Trump's actions can be viewed in relation to global political dynamics, particularly regarding U.S. relations with other nations. The themes discussed in the article are pertinent to ongoing debates about nationalism and governance on an international scale.
Use of AI in Writing
While the article does not explicitly indicate the use of artificial intelligence, it is conceivable that AI tools could have assisted in generating content or structuring arguments. If AI was employed, it might have influenced the tone or emphasis of certain points, creating a specific narrative direction.
Manipulative Potential
The article could be seen as manipulative due to its selective focus and emotionally charged language. By highlighting divisive issues without providing a balanced perspective, it risks fostering polarization among readers.
The article ultimately presents a critical view of Trump's first 100 days, emphasizing executive actions that challenge established norms and provoke societal concerns. Its reliability is somewhat undermined by its tone and focus, which may not fully encompass the complexity of public opinion and policy impact.