Atletico Madrid's Julian Alvarez scored a penalty during a shootout against Real Madrid, but it was disallowed for a double touch Accidental 'double-touch' penalties will be allowed to be retaken - but only if the kick was successful. European football's governing body Uefa asked for the laws concerning these rare instances to be reviewed following controversy in Atletico Madrid's Champions League last-16 second-leg tie against Real Madrid in March. Atletico's Argentina forwardJulian Alvarez slipped as he converted during a penalty shootoutand his standing leg made slight contact with the ball. The spot-kick was disallowed and Real went on to win the shootout to progress to the quarter-finals. The International Football Association Board (Ifab), which sets the sport's laws, has now made a clarification to Law 14 regarding this issue. The law does not directly cover what to do in the event of an accidental double touch, and Ifab said referees had "understandably" been penalising players up to this point. However, the board said Law 14's primary purpose was to deal with deliberate double touches and a clarification has now been issued to all national associations and confederations. Ifab acknowledged it would be unfair not to penalise a double touch at all and allow such kicks to stand as a goal, because goalkeepers can be disadvantaged by the altered trajectory of the ball. However, it has now clarified that where an accidental 'double-touch' kick is scored, it should be retaken rather than ruled out. Where such kicks are unsuccessful, an indirect free-kick will be given to the defending team if they occur in a match or be recorded as a miss if during a shootout. The clarified law will be effective from 1 July, but Ifab said it "may be used by competitions starting before that date". The Fifa Club World Cup takes place in the United States from 14 June-13 July.
Law change on 'double-touch' penalties after Alvarez dispute
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"IFAB Clarifies Rules on Accidental Double-Touch Penalties Following Alvarez Incident"
Bbc News
8.7
TruthLens AI Summary
In a significant update to the rules governing penalty shootouts, the International Football Association Board (IFAB) has clarified the regulations regarding accidental 'double-touch' penalties. This decision follows a controversial incident during the Champions League match between Atletico Madrid and Real Madrid, where Atletico's Julian Alvarez scored a penalty that was disallowed due to a double touch. Alvarez, while executing the penalty, slipped, causing his standing leg to make contact with the ball, which led to the ruling that the penalty was invalid. Consequently, Real Madrid advanced in the tournament, raising questions about the fairness of the existing laws governing such scenarios. The new clarification allows for a retake of the penalty if the double touch is accidental and the attempt was successful, addressing concerns about the unintentional nature of such infractions and the impact on goalkeepers, who may be at a disadvantage due to changes in the ball's trajectory.
The IFAB's revision of Law 14 comes as a response to the need for clearer guidelines in instances of accidental double touches. Previously, referees had been penalizing players in these situations based on the interpretation of the law, which primarily focused on deliberate actions. The updated rules stipulate that if a player scores from an accidental double touch, the penalty will be retaken, while unsuccessful attempts will result in an indirect free-kick awarded to the defending team during regular matches or be recorded as a miss in shootouts. This change will take effect from July 1, but competitions occurring before this date, such as the FIFA Club World Cup scheduled in the United States from June 14 to July 13, may implement these rules sooner. The IFAB's decision aims to create a fairer playing environment, ensuring that players are not unfairly penalized for unintentional mishaps in high-stakes situations like penalty shootouts.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article provides an overview of a recent change to football penalty regulations following a controversial incident involving Atletico Madrid's Julian Alvarez during a shootout against Real Madrid. This update is significant as it addresses a specific scenario that has garnered attention and debate among fans and players alike.
Regulatory Changes Explained
The key change allows for accidental 'double-touch' penalties to be retaken if the initial kick is successful. This decision stems from a review prompted by UEFA after Alvarez's penalty was disallowed due to contact from his standing leg. The International Football Association Board (IFAB) clarified that while double touches typically warrant penalties, the context of accidental touches in successful kicks needed to be addressed to ensure fairness.
Implications for Fair Play
This ruling reflects an effort to maintain fairness in the game, acknowledging that goalkeepers may be at a disadvantage due to unexpected changes in the ball's trajectory. By permitting successful accidental kicks to be retaken rather than disallowed, the IFAB aims to balance the interests of both attackers and defenders in penalty situations. The new regulation will take effect on July 1, but it may be applied in competitions that start earlier.
Public Perception and Community Impact
This change is likely to influence how players approach penalty kicks, potentially reducing anxiety around double-touch scenarios and encouraging a more confident execution of penalties. It also serves to enhance the credibility of referees, who may have previously been criticized for inconsistent interpretations of the rules. The article appears to be aimed at football fans and stakeholders who follow the sport closely, ensuring they are informed about changes that could affect game outcomes.
Potential Economic and Social Repercussions
On a broader scale, revising penalty rules could impact match results, ultimately influencing team revenues from ticket sales, merchandise, and sponsorships. Teams that benefit from these changes may see an increase in support and engagement from fans, while those adversely affected might face backlash. This could lead to discussions around governance and fairness in sports, potentially fuelling debates in related economic and social spheres.
Connections to Other News
While this article focuses on a specific incident, it may connect to broader narratives within sports governance and regulation. Changes in rules often reflect ongoing discussions about fairness and competitive balance in sports, mirroring trends seen in other leagues and competitions. Thus, it can be seen as part of a larger dialogue about the integrity of sports.
Manipulative Aspects and Trustworthiness
While the article does not overtly manipulate information, it does frame the change in a way that emphasizes fairness, which can evoke a positive perception of the governing bodies involved. However, the language used could be interpreted as subtly steering public sentiment towards acceptance of the new rules. The overall reliability of the article appears strong given its basis in official regulatory changes by established football authorities.
In summary, the article serves to inform the football community about significant regulatory updates while fostering a narrative of fairness and transparency in the sport. Its implications may extend beyond the pitch, influencing economic and social dynamics within the football world.