People who have committed murder, manslaughter or stalking offences should be forced to live in restricted areas after being released from prison on licence, campaigners have said. Rhianon Bragg said she felt "trapped" after her stalker was released from prison subject to an exclusion zone, which meant he could not enter the surrounding four counties of her home. The Ministry of Justice said exclusion zones prevented offenders from approaching their victims. But Ms Bragg is part of a group of victims who say this approach should be "flipped on its head", with "high risk" former prisoners only able to live, work and travel in specific areas of the UK for the rest of their lives. Some experts have raised concerns that such an approach could amount to a breach of perpetrators' human rights. Ms Bragg, from Gwynedd,was stalked and held at gunpoint for eight hoursby her ex-partner Gareth Wyn Jones in 2019. Jones wasjailed for four-and-a half-years in 2020and later released on licence in February 2024. Being on licence means that a person is still serving a prison sentence but can live in the community under strict conditions. As part of Jones' licence conditions he was not allowed to enter the surrounding four counties of Ms Bragg's home for a period of five years, but Ms Bragg said she began to feel "trapped". "We hadn't got freedom anymore, not truly," she said. "It may sound like a large area, but the clock was ticking. "Just simply travelling and worrying about stopping at a service station that he might be there," she added. "Being outside the safety zone did feel like a real a risk, and it shouldn't be like that." Ms Bragg recently found out that Jones had died. "The morning after I'd been told that news, I couldn't work out what I was feeling, I couldn't put a name on it, it felt different, it wasn't familiar, and then it suddenly came to me - it was freedom," she said. "Victims have been through enough already, we should all be able to feel freedom." Emma King said she had to "fight" for a five-mile exclusion zone around her home from the man who killed her sister. Julie Butcherwas murdered in 2005 by her ex-husbandRichard Butcher at their home in Chiseldon, Wiltshire. Butcher was jailed for 13 years but Ms King said he moved back to the same area after being released. "We are actually imprisoned ourselves now in a small area and will be forever looking over our shoulders," said Ms King. She said 50-mile (80km) exclusion zones should be the minimum imposed on perpetrators, and that they should be imposed at sentencing to avoid further trauma for the families of victims. Ms King has joined forces with Carole Gould, whose17-year-old daughter Ellie was stabbed to deathat her home in Calne, Wiltshire, in 2019, by Thomas Griffiths after she ended their relationship. After hearing about Ms King's experiences, Ms Gould said she said she was "horrified". "Naively I just thought Griffiths won't be allowed back to the south west of England [after being released] but hearing what Emma has to say, that means Griffiths could move back and live with his parents who have chosen not to move out of the area," Ms Gould said. "They don't take into account the anxiety we're living with right now, let alone the grief, for what we should do for our long term plans. "Should we move away or sit it out and see what happens?" Diana Parkes, whose daughter Joanna Simpson was killed at her home in Berkshire in 2010, has also endorsed the calls for restricted zones. Ms Parkes, who set up theJoanna Simpson Trustin her daughter's name to support children affected by domestic abuse and homicide, said victims were "absolutely terrified" when perpetrators came out of prison. "Every single victim I have spoken to endorses this feeling that the offender should be in a restricted zone and the victim should be able to carry on their life, because they've done nothing wrong," said Ms Parkes. "Why should they only be made to feel safe in an exclusion zone? "I'm fighting like mad until my dying breath to make sure people understand. Particularly the law makers, if they had lost a family member like us, they would really truly think differently." Latest Ministry of Justice data showed 62,821 people were on licence or subject to post release supervision as of September 2024. Craig Court, a solicitor at Harding Evans, in south Wales, who has represented both prisoners and victims of abuse, said introducing restricted zones in which offenders could live and work would pose a "real risk" of breaching the Human Rights Act 1998. He said the act had played a significant role in shaping how licence conditions were applied to offenders. "Victims' campaigns have rightly highlighted the need for more restrictive conditions to ensure their safety and psychological wellbeing," said Mr Court. "While I agree that such restrictive measures are crucial, especially where there is a continuing risk of harm, the act requires that any restriction - such as preventing an offender from entering certain areas - must comply with Article 5 [right to liberty] and Article 8 [right to private and family life] of the European Convention of Human Rights." Mr Court said these provisions did not prohibit restrictive conditions but did require them to be proportionate, necessary, and grounded in a clear assessment of ongoing risk. He said the aim was to protect the needs of victims whilst not undermining the fundamental rights of offenders. "As the law currently stands, confining an offender to a particular area or restricting an offender from leaving a defined area runs the real risk of breaching both Articles 5 and or 8," he added. Ms Gould said she felt the emphasis should be "flipped on its head". "It's all about the perpetrators' human rights and not ours, and that's so wrong," she said. "The radius should be put on them. So we know where they are and we have the freedom of the UK." A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: "Victims must feel safe, which is why any offenders released on licence who break the rules face going back to prison. "They have to follow strict conditions, such as curfews and exclusion zones that prevent them approaching their victims, as well as restrictions on phone and internet use." If you are affected by any of the issues in this article you can find details of organisations that can help via theBBC Action Line.
Killers and stalkers should live in restricted zones, say victims
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Victims Call for Restricted Living Zones for Released Offenders"
Bbc News
7.7
TruthLens AI Summary
Campaigners are advocating for a shift in policy regarding the living conditions of individuals convicted of serious crimes such as murder, manslaughter, and stalking. They propose that upon release from prison, these offenders should be required to reside in designated restricted areas rather than relying on exclusion zones that limit their proximity to victims. Victims like Rhianon Bragg, who endured stalking and violence at the hands of her ex-partner, express feelings of entrapment due to current measures that allow offenders to move freely within certain regions. Bragg, who felt a lack of true freedom even with an exclusion zone in place, emphasizes the emotional toll this situation takes on victims. She described a sense of liberation upon learning of her stalker's death, highlighting the psychological burden that survivors carry and their desire for safety and freedom in their lives. Emma King, who fought for a five-mile exclusion zone after her sister’s murderer was released, echoes these sentiments, asserting that victims continue to live in fear and should not be subjected to the same trauma repeatedly.
Experts have raised concerns about the potential human rights implications of enforcing such restrictions on offenders. Craig Court, a solicitor, points out that while victims' safety is paramount, any restrictions placed on offenders must comply with the Human Rights Act, ensuring that their rights are not unduly infringed upon. He argues that any measures should be proportionate and based on a clear assessment of ongoing risk. The Ministry of Justice maintains that existing rules aim to protect victims by imposing conditions on released offenders, such as exclusion zones and curfews. However, campaigners like Carole Gould and Diana Parkes argue that the focus should be shifted to prioritize the safety and peace of mind of victims, suggesting that the current system disproportionately favors the rights of offenders. As discussions around this topic continue, the voices of victims remain central, advocating for a more protective framework that allows them to reclaim their sense of security and freedom.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article highlights a growing concern among victims of violent crimes regarding the living conditions of offenders upon their release from prison. The emphasis on the need for restricted zones for former criminals reflects a significant shift in the narrative around victim safety and offender rights. As victims like Rhianon Bragg advocate for more stringent measures, this news piece aims to shed light on the complexities and emotional ramifications faced by those who have suffered from such crimes.
Victim Advocacy and Public Sentiment
The push from victims to create restricted living zones for offenders aims to resonate with public sentiment around safety and justice. By sharing personal experiences, such as Ms. Bragg's, the article seeks to evoke empathy and support for the proposed changes in legislation. The narrative positions victims as deserving of a sense of freedom and security, which can garner public backing for stricter regulations.
Human Rights Concerns
While the article supports the victims’ perspectives, it also acknowledges the potential human rights implications of restricting where former offenders can live. This creates a tension between the rights of victims and those of offenders, which might lead to a divided public opinion. The mention of experts raising concerns about human rights violations may serve to add depth to the discussion, suggesting that the debate is complex and multifaceted.
Impact on Society and Justice System
This news could influence the justice system's policies regarding the management of released offenders. If public support grows for the idea of restricted zones, it may lead to legislative changes that could alter how offenders are monitored post-release. This shift could affect the broader societal view of rehabilitation, punishment, and victim rights.
Community Support and Target Audience
The article is likely to resonate more with communities that have experienced violence or stalking, as well as advocacy groups fighting for victim rights. It appeals to individuals who prioritize safety and security over the potential rehabilitation of offenders, thereby aligning with a specific segment of the population.
Economic and Political Implications
While the article may not directly impact the stock market, it could influence sectors related to criminal justice, such as private security firms or counseling services for victims. Legislative changes inspired by such discussions might also affect local economies, particularly in regions with higher crime rates.
Global Context
In a global context, the issues raised in this article reflect ongoing debates about crime, punishment, and human rights. The discourse surrounding victim rights is relevant in many countries, especially in discussions about reforming criminal justice systems to better serve victims while maintaining fairness for offenders.
AI Involvement in Content Creation
It is plausible that AI tools were utilized in crafting this article, particularly in structuring the narrative and ensuring clarity in conveying the emotional weight of the victims' experiences. The use of AI in journalism can enhance the delivery of complex topics by providing a structured approach to storytelling.
The article effectively champions the cause of victims while acknowledging the potential repercussions for offenders, creating a rich ground for further discussion on public safety, human rights, and the justice system. The overall reliability of the article appears solid, as it presents facts and opinions from both victims and experts, offering a balanced view of a sensitive issue.