The office of the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has offered its condolences for Pope Francis, four days after his death. An earlier offer of condolences posted on social media by the official state account of Israel had previously been deleted, causing considerable controversy within the country. Israel is also sending a relatively low-level delegation to the late pontiff's funeral on Saturday, with only the country's Vatican ambassador in attendance. All of this has been seen in Israel and elsewhere as a sign of the Israeli government's displeasure with Pope Francis's impassioned remarks on the war in Gaza. Belatedly and somewhat impersonally, the Israeli prime minister's office issued a two sentence offer of condolences on Thursday night. It read: "The State of Israel expresses its deepest condolences to the Catholic Church and the Catholic community worldwide at the passing of Pope Francis. May he rest in peace." The tone of the original message tweeted by the verified @Israel account on X on the day of the Pope's death was noticeably warmer. It featured a photo of Pope Francis at the Western Wall in Jerusalem and concluded: "May his memory be a blessing." But it was swiftly withdrawn, without explanation. Several Israeli media outlets reported on it being deleted, with the Jerusalem Post quoting officials at the foreign ministry saying that it had been posted in "error". The Jerusalem Post also quoted Israel's former ambassador to the Vatican, Raphael Schutz, describing the decision to delete the published statement as a mistake. In the face of such criticism, Israeli officials did point out that the country's current ambassador to the Vatican had offered his condolences in person. And it is the ambassador, Yaron Sideman, who will represent Israel at the funeral of Pope Francis. This is in marked contrast to the heads of state or government who will be attending from most major nations, including US President Donald Trump. It is also very different from the funeral of the last pope to die while still in office - that of John Paul II in 2005. Israel sent the then-president, Moshe Katsav, and the then-foreign minister, Silvan Shalom, to attend the ceremony. The current Israeli President, Isaac Herzog, did publish an eloquent and heartfelt tribute to Pope Francis in the hours after his death, describing him as a man of deep faith and boundless compassion. But there appear to be no plans for him to attend the funeral. No reason has been given, although it may have something to do with the funeral taking place on Shabbat, the Jewish Sabbath. But it seems clear that the Israeli government's resentment of Pope Francis's expressions of solidarity with the Palestinians, especially during the war in Gaza, has soured its response to his death. Last November, Pope Francis suggested that the international community should examine whether Israel's military offensive in Gaza should be classed as genocide – an allegation Israel has vehemently denied. Earlier this year, he called the humanitarian situation in Gaza "shameful". In his very last public address on Easter Sunday - the day before his death - there was mention of Gaza once again. His address spoke of the suffering of both the Palestinians and the Israelis. Since his death, more details have emerged of how Pope Francis would be in contact almost daily with the small Christian community sheltering in a church in Gaza City during the war. Palestinians have spoken warmly of how much his expressions of empathy had given them hope. As a sign of how highly they respected the Pope, the Palestinian Authority is sending Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa to the funeral. All this has meant that some in Israel, especially among the coalition of religious and nationalist parties that buoy up Netanyahu's coalition, believe that Pope Francis had taken the side of the Palestinians, despite his expressions of sympathy for Israelis and his efforts at bolstering multi-faith dialogue. That sense of a rift between the current Israeli government and the Vatican may well be visible at the Pope's funeral in Rome, where Israel's leaders will be noticeable by their absence.
Israel's muted response to Pope Francis's death signals tensions over Gaza
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Israeli Government's Condolences to Pope Francis Reflect Tensions Over Gaza Conflict"
Bbc News
7.5
TruthLens AI Summary
The Israeli government's response to the death of Pope Francis has been marked by a notable lack of warmth, reflecting underlying tensions over the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office issued a brief and impersonal statement of condolences four days after the pope's passing, which contrasted sharply with an earlier, more heartfelt message that was quickly deleted. The initial tweet from the verified @Israel account had featured a photo of Pope Francis and concluded with a sentiment wishing for his memory to be a blessing, but the deletion raised eyebrows and was described by some officials as a mistake. This muted response is further underscored by the low-level delegation attending the pope's funeral, which consists solely of Israel's ambassador to the Vatican, Yaron Sideman, in stark contrast to the attendance of heads of state from other nations, such as U.S. President Donald Trump. The absence of higher-ranking officials at the funeral, including Israeli President Isaac Herzog, who praised the pope's compassion in a tribute but is not expected to attend, adds to the perception of a rift between Israel and the Vatican.
The tensions between the Israeli government and Pope Francis can be traced back to the pontiff's comments regarding the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, which he referred to as "shameful." His previous remarks have suggested that Israel's military actions might warrant classification as genocide, a claim that Israel has strongly denied. The pope's expressions of solidarity with the Palestinians, particularly during the recent conflict, have fueled resentment among Israeli officials, especially within Netanyahu's coalition of religious and nationalist parties. While Pope Francis had extended sympathies to both sides, his frequent references to the plight of the Palestinians have led some in Israel to accuse him of bias. In contrast, the Palestinian Authority has expressed deep respect for the pope, with their Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa attending the funeral in recognition of his empathy towards the Palestinian community. The differences in the responses from both sides may be highlighted at the funeral, where Israel's leaders are expected to be conspicuously absent, signaling a significant diplomatic divide.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article explores the implications of Israel's response to the death of Pope Francis, emphasizing the tensions surrounding the ongoing conflict in Gaza. It highlights the belated condolences offered by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the controversy surrounding the deletion of an earlier, warmer message. This situation reflects broader geopolitical dynamics and the relationship between Israel and the Vatican, particularly in the context of the Pope's remarks on the Gaza war.
Political Context and Diplomatic Relations
The muted response from Israel can be interpreted as a diplomatic maneuver reflecting dissatisfaction with the Pope's previous comments on the Gaza conflict. Such actions may indicate a growing rift between Israeli leadership and the Vatican, particularly as the Pope has been vocal about humanitarian issues. The choice of a low-level delegation to the funeral reinforces this notion, contrasting with the attendance of higher-profile leaders from other nations.
Public Perception and Media Influence
The article suggests that the media portrayal of Israel's actions may shape public perception both domestically and internationally. The deletion of the initial condolence tweet appears to have caused significant backlash, hinting at internal discord within the Israeli government regarding how to engage with global leaders and religious figures. This situation could lead to increased scrutiny of Israel's diplomatic strategies and public relations efforts.
Potential Distractions from Other Issues
The focus on the Pope’s death and Israel’s response may serve to divert attention from other pressing issues, such as ongoing military actions in Gaza. By managing the narrative around the Pope, the Israeli government could be attempting to mitigate criticism of its policies and actions in the region. This tactic aligns with broader strategies often observed in political communications.
Implications for Society and Economy
The article hints at potential societal repercussions stemming from the government’s diplomatic stance. A strained relationship with the Vatican could impact various sectors, including tourism and international relations. The response to the Pope's death could influence how other nations perceive Israel, which may have long-term economic ramifications.
Support from Specific Communities
This news piece may resonate more with specific communities that share similar views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or have strong ties to the Catholic Church. It could also draw attention from religious communities concerned with humanitarian issues, thus shaping discourse within those groups.
Impact on Global Markets
While the article does not directly address market implications, the diplomatic tensions highlighted could affect investor sentiment, particularly in sectors sensitive to geopolitical stability. Investors often respond to news involving international relations, and any perceived instability in Israel might lead to fluctuations in the market.
Geopolitical Significance
The relationship between Israel and the Vatican is multifaceted, and the Pope's remarks on Gaza could influence diplomatic relations not just between these entities, but also with other countries. The article subtly underscores how such dynamics might play into larger discussions about global peace and security, particularly in the context of religious leadership.
The article's reliability is affected by its focus on specific diplomatic interactions, potentially omitting broader contexts. While the core facts presented are credible, the interpretation of those facts suggests a narrative that may be influenced by the outlet's perspective. The framing of the story in relation to ongoing tensions provides a lens through which readers might view the complexities of international relations.