How do you measure misery? For journalists the usual way is to see it, to feel it, to smell it. Beleaguered Palestinian colleagues in Gaza are doing that, still doing invaluable reporting at great risk to themselves. More than 200 have been killed doing their jobs. Israel does not allow international journalists into Gaza. Denied the chance of eyewitness reporting – one of the best tools of the job – we can study, from a distance, the assessments of aid organisations operating in Gaza. Pascal Hundt, deputy director of operations at the International Committee of the Red Cross said last week that civilians in Gaza faced "an overwhelming daily struggle to survive the dangers of hostilities, cope with relentless displacement, and endure the consequences of being deprived of urgent humanitarian assistance." He added: "This situation must not—and cannot—be allowed to escalate further." But it might, if Israel continues the plunge deeper into war that resumed on 18 March when it broke a two-month ceasefire with a massive series of air strikes. Israel had already sealed the gates of Gaza. Since the beginning of March, it has blocked all shipments of humanitarian aid, including food and medical supplies. The return to war ended any chance of moving on to the ceasefire's proposed second phase, which Israel and Hamas had agreed would end with the release of all the remaining hostages in exchange for a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. That was unacceptable to the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the ultra-nationalist religious extremists who keep him in power. They want Gaza's Palestinians to be replaced by Jewish settlers. They threatened to topple Netanyahu's government if he did not go back to war, and the end of Netanyahu's political career would bring the day of reckoning for his part in Israel's failure to prevent the deadly Hamas attacks on 7 October 2023. It might also force a conclusion in his long trial on corruption charges. Prime Minister Netanyahu is now promising a new "intense" offensive into Gaza in the days after President Donald Trump finishes his swing through the wealthy Arab oil monarchies in the Gulf later this week. The offensive includes a plan to displace massive numbers of Palestinian civilians on top of waves of artillery, air strikes and death. "To displace" is a cold verb. It means families having only handfuls of minutes to flee for their lives, from an area that might be hit immediately to one that might be hit later. Hundreds of thousands have done so repeatedly since the war began. Gaza was one of the most overcrowded places on earth before the war. Israel's plan is to force as many Gazans as possible into a tiny area in the south, near the ruins of the town of Rafah, which has been almost entirely destroyed. Before that happens, the UN humanitarian office estimates that 70% of Gaza is already effectively off limits to Palestinians. Israel's plan is toleave them in an even smaller area. The UN and leading aid groups reject Israeli claims that Hamas steals and controls food that comes into Gaza. They have refused to cooperate with a scheme dreamt up by Israel and the US that would use private security firms, protected by Israeli troops, to distribute basic rations. Far from Gaza, in London, I talked to Philippe Lazzarini, the commissioner-general of Unrwa, the UN agency that supports Palestinian refugees. He told me that he was running out of words "to describe the misery and the tragedy affecting the people in Gaza. They have been now more than two months without any aid". "Starvation is spreading, people are exhausted, people are hungry... we can expect that in the coming weeks if no aid is coming in, that people will not die because of the bombardment, but they will die because of the lack of food. This is the weaponisation of humanitarian aid." If words are not enough, look at the most authoritative data-driven assessment of famine and food emergencies in the regular reports issued by Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, or IPC. It is a joint venture by UN agencies, aid groups and governments that measures whether a famine is happening. The latest IPC update says Gaza is close to famine. But it says that the entire population, more than two million people, almost half of whom are children, is experiencing acute food insecurity. In plain English, that means they are being starved by Israel's blockade. The IPC says that 470,000 Gazans, 22% of the population, are in a classification it calls "Phase 5 – catastrophe." The IPC defines it as a condition in which "at least one in five households experience an extreme lack of food and face starvation resulting in destitution, extremely critical levels of acute malnutrition and death." In practical terms, the phase five classification, the most acute used by the IPC, estimates that "71,000 children and more than 17,000 mothers will need urgent treatment for acute malnutrition". Thousands of tons of the food, medical aid and humanitarian supplies that they need are sitting only a few miles away, on the other side of the border in Egypt. In London I asked Mr Lazzarini whether he agreed with those who have accused Israel of denying food and humanitarian aid to civilians as a weapon of war. "I have absolutely no doubt," he said, "that this is what we have witnessed during this last 19 months, especially during this last two months. That's a war crime. The quantification will come from the ICJ [International Court of Justice] not from me, but what I can say, what we see, what we observe, food and humanitarian assistance is indeed being used to meet the political or military objective in the context of Gaza." I asked Mr Lazzarini whether the blockade, on top of a year and half of war and destruction, might amount to genocide. That is the accusation against Israel levelled by South Africa and other states at the ICJ in The Hague. "Listen, by any account, the destruction is massive. The number of people who have been killed is huge and certainly underestimated. We have seen the systematic destruction also of a school, of a health centre. People have been constant pinballs within Gaza, moving all the time. So there is absolutely no doubt that we are talking about massive atrocities. Genocide? It could end up to genocide. There are many elements which could go in this direction." Israel's defence minister Israel Katz has made no secret of Israel's tactics. Last month Katz said that the blockade was a "main pressure lever" to secure victory over Hamas and to get the all the hostages out. The National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir agreed. He wrote that: "The cessation of humanitarian aid is one of the main levers of pressure on Hamas. The return of aid to Gaza before Hamas gets on its knees and releases all of our hostages would be a historic mistake." Netanyahu's plans for another offensive, and the remarks made by Katz, Ben-Gvir and others, horrified Israeli families with hostages still inside Gaza. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum which represents many of them, said minister Katz was pushing an "illusion... Israel is choosing to seize territory before the hostages." Dissident Israeli military reservists also protested, saying that they were being forced to fight again not for Israeli security but for the political survival of the Israeli government. In the air force reserve, 1,200 pilots signed an open letter saying that prolonging the war served mainly "political and personal interests and not security ones". Netanyahu blamed a small group of "bad apples" for the open letter. For many months Netanyahu and his government have also accused Mr Lazzarini of lying. One official report posted online in January of this year was headed "Dismantling Unrwa Chief Lazzarini's Falsehoods". It claimed that he had "consistently made false statements which have profoundly misinformed the public debate on this issue". Unrwa, Israel says, has been infiltrated and exploited by Hamas to an unprecedented degree. It says some Unrwa employees took part in the attacks of 7 October. Mr Lazzarini denies the personal accusations directed at him by Israel and the broader ones aimed at Unrwa. He says Unrwa investigated 19 staff named by Israel and concluded nine of them may have a case to answer. All 19 were suspended. Mr Lazzarini said that since then Unrwa had received "hundreds of allegations from the State of Israel. Each time, as a rule-based organisation, we keep asking for substantiated information". He said they had never received it. All wars are political, and none more than the ones between Israel and the Palestinians. The war engages and enrages the outside world as well the belligerents. Israel argues that self-defence justifies its actions since 7 October 2023 when Hamas, Islamic Jihad and others attacked Israel, killed around 1,200 people, mostly Israeli civilians, and took 251 others hostage. Any other government, it says, would have done the same. Palestinians and an increasingly concerned and outraged chorus of states, including some of Israel's key European allies, say that does not justify the continuation of the most devastating assault on Palestinians since the war of 1948, when Israel gained its independence, which Palestinians call "the catastrophe". Even President Trump shows signs of distancing himself from Benjamin Netanyahu, saying that the people of Gaza must be fed. The allegation that the total denial of food to Gazan civilians is more evidence of an Israeli genocide against Palestinians has outraged Benjamin Netanyahu, his government and many Israeli citizens. It produced rare political unity in Israel. The leader of the opposition Yair Lapid, normally a stern critic of Netanyahu, condemned "a moral collapse and a moral disaster" at the ICJ. Genocide is defined as the destruction, in whole or in part, of a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. The International Criminal Court (ICC), a separate body, has issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former defence minister on war crimes charges, which they reject. The three Hamas leaders who were also the subject of ICC warrants have all been killed by Israel. It is not too soon to think about the longer-term impact of this devastating war, even though its end is not in sight. Mr Lazzarini told me that "in the coming years we will realise how wrong we have been… on the wrong side of the history. We have under our watch let a massive atrocity unfold." It started, he said, with the Hamas attacks on Israel on the 7 October: "The largest killing of Israeli and Jewish in the region since World War II" had been followed by a "massive" military response by Israel. It was, he said, "disproportionate, basically almost leading to the annihilation of an entire population in their homeland... I think there is a collective responsibility from the international community, the level, the passivity, the indifference being shown until now, the lack of political, diplomatic, economic action. I mean, it's absolutely monstrous, especially in our countries where we have said 'never again'." Ahead may be an attempt to realise Donald Trump's dangerous fantasy of Gaza as the Dubai of the Mediterranean, rebuilt and owned by America and without Palestinians. It has given shape to cherished dreams of Israeli extremists who threaten of the removal of Palestinians from the land between the river Jordan and the Mediterranean. Whatever lies ahead, it will not be peace.
Israel denying food to Gaza is 'weapon of war', UN refugee agency head tells BBC
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"UN Official Criticizes Israel's Humanitarian Blockade in Gaza as a Weapon of War"
TruthLens AI Summary
The humanitarian crisis in Gaza has reached alarming levels, with the UN refugee agency head, Philippe Lazzarini, describing the situation as a weaponization of humanitarian aid. Since the resumption of hostilities on March 18, Israel has imposed a blockade that denies essential supplies, including food and medical aid, to the already beleaguered population of over two million people. Lazzarini expressed deep concern over the lack of assistance, noting that starvation is spreading and that people are facing extreme food insecurity. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) reports that a significant portion of the population is experiencing acute food shortages, with many nearing famine conditions. The blockade, coupled with Israel's military strategies, aims to displace civilians further into smaller areas of Gaza, exacerbating their suffering and limiting their access to basic necessities.
As the Israeli government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, gears up for a renewed offensive, the international community is increasingly alarmed by the implications of these actions. Israeli officials have openly stated that the blockade is a strategic tactic to pressure Hamas, while critics argue that it constitutes a war crime. The ongoing violence has led to widespread condemnation, with accusations of genocide against Palestinians gaining traction among various states and organizations. Amidst this turmoil, there is a growing call for accountability and urgent humanitarian intervention. Lazzarini's assertion that the international community has a collective responsibility to address the unfolding atrocity underscores the dire need for political and diplomatic action to alleviate the suffering in Gaza and prevent further escalation of the conflict.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article sheds light on the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza amidst ongoing conflict, focusing on the Israeli blockade of food and medical supplies. It outlines the struggles faced by civilians and critiques the Israeli government's actions that exacerbate suffering. The reporting emphasizes the implications of these actions on both the humanitarian crisis and the broader political landscape.
Perception Management
The article aims to evoke empathy and concern for the Palestinian people by highlighting their suffering and the denial of basic necessities. By portraying the situation as a "weapon of war," it seeks to frame Israel's actions in a negative light, potentially influencing public opinion against the Israeli government. The mention of the high number of journalists killed in Gaza also serves to underscore the challenges of getting accurate information, suggesting a need for international attention and intervention.
Information Omission
While the article focuses on the humanitarian aspects of the crisis, it may downplay or omit perspectives that could provide a more balanced view, such as the reasons behind Israel's military actions or the context of the conflict with Hamas. This selective reporting could lead to a one-sided narrative that aligns with specific political agendas.
Manipulative Elements
There is a notable level of manipulation in the language used, particularly in framing statements like "weapon of war" and emphasizing the struggles of civilians without equally addressing the complexities of the conflict. Such language can provoke emotional responses and may lead readers to form opinions based on incomplete information.
Truthfulness of Reporting
The information presented appears to be rooted in verifiable accounts from humanitarian organizations, lending some credibility to the article. However, the framing and selective emphasis may skew the overall truthfulness, as the narrative follows a specific agenda.
Societal Impact
The portrayal of the humanitarian crisis could mobilize public opinion and prompt calls for action from governments and international organizations. This might lead to increased pressure on Israel to alter its policies, potentially affecting international relations and humanitarian aid dynamics in the region.
Communal Support
The article likely resonates more with communities advocating for Palestinian rights, humanitarian aid supporters, and those critical of Israeli policies. It aims to engage audiences who are already sympathetic to the plight of the Palestinians or those seeking justice in international conflicts.
Market Implications
In terms of economic impact, the news could influence investor sentiment regarding companies involved in the region. Defense stocks might see fluctuations based on public perception of the conflict, while humanitarian aid organizations may gain increased funding as public awareness grows.
Geopolitical Relevance
The situation in Gaza is pivotal in the context of Middle Eastern geopolitics, affecting relationships between various nations and international bodies. The article connects with broader themes of conflict resolution and humanitarian intervention, making it highly relevant to current global discussions.
AI Influence in Journalism
It's possible that AI tools were used in drafting or editing the news article to ensure clarity and engagement. AI language models could contribute to stylistic choices, emphasizing emotional language or structuring arguments in a way that resonates with readers. This could subtly guide the narrative direction, aligning it with the intended emotional impact.
In conclusion, while the article presents important humanitarian concerns, its framing and selective emphasis suggest a degree of manipulativeness. The overall reliability of the reporting is mixed, as it draws on credible sources but may lack balance in its portrayal of the complex situation.