Iran still has an off-ramp for diplomacy, says Lammy

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Lammy Urges Iran to Pursue Diplomatic Solutions Amid Rising Tensions"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Foreign Secretary David Lammy has called on Iran to seize the opportunity for diplomacy amidst escalating tensions following recent U.S. strikes aimed at disrupting Iran's nuclear program. Lammy emphasized the potential consequences of retaliation from Iran, warning against attacks on U.S. bases or blockading the vital Strait of Hormuz. During a conversation with the Iranian foreign minister, Lammy urged Iran to take the available diplomatic 'off-ramp' seriously. He stated that the U.K., along with G7 partners and other international allies, is encouraging Iran to engage constructively in discussions regarding its nuclear activities. The stakes are high, as Lammy noted that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to a dangerous proliferation of nuclear weapons across the Middle East, exacerbating global security threats.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer reaffirmed that the U.K. was not involved in the U.S. military operation that targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, while expressing concerns about potential escalation in the region. He highlighted the importance of stabilizing the situation to avoid further economic repercussions for the U.K., particularly concerning energy prices. Although Lammy acknowledged the legitimacy of the U.S. strikes, he maintained that diplomatic solutions remain the best path forward. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has also called for unrestricted access to Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpiles, underlining the urgency of the situation. As the U.K. government grapples with its position regarding the conflict, opposition leaders have criticized ministers for avoiding questions about the implications of U.S. military actions and the risk of being drawn into another conflict in the Middle East. Lammy is expected to provide further insights in the House of Commons soon.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Foreign Secretary David Lammy has urged Iran to take "the off-ramp" and return to the negotiating table. Iran has vowed there will be "everlasting consequences" following US strikes at the weekend, intended to take out the country's nuclear programme. Lammy said he had told Iran that it would be a "catastrophic mistake" for them to retaliate by firing at US bases, or by blockading thekey shipping lane of the Strait of Hormuz. Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Lammy said he had told the Iranian foreign minister to take a message to the Iranian leadership to "get serious about their nuclear programme". He added: "They have to get serious about the off-ramp that is being made available to them. "There is still an off-ramp and I was discussing that with the Iranian foreign minister again on the phone yesterday. "We, alongside all of our partners in the G7, across Europe and across the Arab world and the Levant, are urging the Iranians to get serious both with the E3 - us, Germany and France - but also with the United States." On Sunday, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer stressed the UK was not involved in the US strikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran - Natanz, Isfahan and Fordo - on Saturday night. He also warned of the risk of escalation, and said he wanted to reassure people that "we're doing everything we can to stabilise the situation". Sir Keir reiterated his call for de-escalation on Monday, adding that he wanted to protect people in the UK from further energy price rises. "Let me reassure everybody watching: we are absolutely focused on de-escalation in the Middle East," he said, adding: "That's because of the concern about escalation for the region and beyond but also the impact on our economy." While Washington acted alone in ordering and executing the strikes, the prime minister did not need to make a decision about UK involvement. But, depending on if, how and when Iran chooses to retaliate, some of the trade-offs involved could soon return for the government. Ministers have made clear they don't want a nuclear armed Iran; but neither is it saying it supports Washington's means of trying to remove that outcome, by bombing Tehran's nuclear facilities. Pressed on whether the US strikes were legal, Lammy responded: "I don't say it's not legitimate" and said there was "no moral equivalence" with the UK's clear stance that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was illegal. However, he also acknowledged that diplomatic efforts had not stopped the Iranians enriching uranium, so "clearly it was not working". The foreign secretary said the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) had "confirmed the 60% enrichment" and the Iranians were still "obfuscating and engaged in deception". Lammy said that, if Iran obtained nuclear weapons, there was likely to be "nuclear proliferation across the Middle East, the world would be seriously more dangerous, and that's why it must be stopped". He said: "Yes they can have a civil nuclear capability that's properly monitored, that involves outsiders, but they cannot continue to enrich to 60%... Why do they need 60% enrichment if not for a nuclear weapon?" But the foreign secretary said that "ultimately" the only solution to dealing with the Iranian nuclear programme was through diplomacy, "because the expertise still exists in the country, it's likely that some of the material still exists in the country". The IAEA, the UN's nuclear watchdog,held an emergency meeting on Monday, with director Rafael Grossi demanding Iran allow agency inspectors access to its highly enriched uranium stockpiles, including the "400 kilograms enriched to 60%". James Cartlidge, shadow defence secretary, said the Conservatives backed the US military operation. "The key message is to show support for Israel and the United States," he told BBC Breakfast. "We feel above all else that we can't have a situation where Iran has nuclear weapons." Asked if the UK would get involved in the conflict, he said it was "too early to speculate" but welcomed UK defence secretary John Healey's earlier decision to move planes and military assets to the Middle East, putting them in a position to "respond if needed". Liberal Democrats leader Sir Ed Davey accused ministers of "dodging questions". He said: "Trump's strikes on Iran were a seismic moment which will have a profound effect on global security for many years to come. "But UK ministers are dodging questions on whether they support these strikes, and failing to guarantee that we won't be dragged into another illegal American war in the Middle East." Lammy is expected to make a statement in the House of Commons later. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletterto read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Back to Home
Source: Bbc News