'I was attacked on CCTV - but the charge was dropped in a plea deal'

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Domestic Abuse Survivor Advocates for Victim Notification in Plea Deals After Case Outcome"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Liz Shanks, a firefighter from Blantyre in South Lanarkshire, installed CCTV cameras around her home to safeguard her classic car collection, but instead, the recordings revealed the alarming domestic abuse inflicted by her former partner, Chris Forrest. The footage documented repeated violent assaults, including instances where Forrest strangled Liz and threatened her life, with one chilling moment captured on video where he shouted, "you are going to die in my hands you wee cow" as she struggled to breathe. These recordings were crucial in a 2022 court case, leading to Forrest being sentenced to 27 months in prison after pleading guilty to four charges of assault. However, as part of a plea deal negotiated with prosecutors, seven other charges were dropped, leaving Liz feeling devastated and frustrated when she learned about the plea agreement without any prior notification or input. She expressed her disappointment, particularly regarding a specific charge that had supporting CCTV evidence yet was dismissed, leaving her feeling as though her struggle for justice had been undermined.

Liz is now part of a campaign advocating for changes in the legal system, specifically calling for victims of domestic abuse to be informed about plea negotiations in their cases. She, along with other survivors, argues that being kept in the dark during these negotiations makes victims feel like mere spectators in the judicial process. The Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay has expressed support for this reform, proposing amendments to the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill to ensure victims are notified of plea deals. However, Justice Secretary Angela Constance has voiced her opposition to such changes, citing potential complications in the system. Advocates, including Dr. Marsha Scott from Scottish Women's Aid, stress the importance of transparency and communication with survivors, emphasizing that improving the plea negotiation process is essential to empower victims. Despite the challenges, Liz remains committed to her advocacy work and hopes to foster positive changes that will benefit others who have experienced similar situations, demonstrating that there can be hope and healing after trauma.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights a deeply troubling case of domestic abuse captured on CCTV, where the victim, Liz Shanks, expressed her distress over the legal proceedings that followed. The narrative not only sheds light on the brutality of domestic violence but also raises significant questions about the justice system and the rights of victims in plea negotiations.

Victim's Perspective and Legal System Flaws

Liz's experience illustrates the emotional turmoil faced by victims when they feel excluded from the judicial process. Her shock at discovering that multiple charges against her abuser were dropped reveals a potential gap in victim advocacy within the legal framework. This situation emphasizes the need for reforms that ensure victims are kept informed and involved in plea negotiations, as their voices are crucial in the pursuit of justice.

Public Sentiment and Advocacy for Change

The article aligns with a broader societal movement advocating for changes in how domestic abuse cases are handled, particularly regarding the rights of victims. Liz's call for legislative changes resonates with many abuse survivors and has attracted political support, indicating a growing awareness and urgency around this issue. The fact that the leader of the Scottish Conservatives has backed her cause highlights a potential shift in political focus towards victim rights, although opposition from figures like Justice Secretary Angela Constance suggests ongoing contention.

Implications for Society and Future Actions

The public reaction to this case may lead to increased pressure on lawmakers to reconsider the legal processes surrounding plea deals in domestic abuse cases. As more survivors share their stories, there could be a push for comprehensive reforms that prioritize victim advocacy and transparency in the judicial process. This can potentially affect public trust in the justice system and lead to broader discussions on the treatment of domestic violence victims.

Community Support and Engagement

The article is likely to resonate with various communities, particularly those advocating for women's rights and domestic abuse survivors. It seeks to engage individuals who are concerned about social justice and legal reforms, fostering a collective response to advocate for systemic changes. By highlighting Liz's story, the article aims to amplify the voices of those affected by similar experiences.

Economic and Political Repercussions

While this specific case may not have immediate implications for financial markets, it could influence public policy discussions that affect social services and legal frameworks, potentially reallocating resources towards victim support initiatives. The political ramifications may also extend to upcoming elections, shaping public discourse around law enforcement and judicial reforms.

Potential for Manipulation

The article does not overtly manipulate information, but it does focus heavily on the emotional aspects of Liz's story, which could evoke strong reactions from readers. The choice of language and the framing of the legal system's shortcomings serve to underscore the urgency of the issue, potentially influencing public sentiment towards a call for action.

In conclusion, the reliability of the article is bolstered by its focus on a real case, personal testimonies, and the involvement of public figures in advocating for change. However, as with any media coverage of sensitive issues, it is essential to approach the narrative critically, considering the broader context and motivations behind the reporting.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Warning: This article contains details readers may find upsetting Liz Shanks installed cameras around her home to protect her prized collection of classic cars – but instead, they captured the escalating and violent domestic abuse carried out by her former partner. The harrowing recordings show repeated attacks in which Chris Forrest strangles Liz, pins her to the ground, and throttles her against a wall in the driveway. In one, he screams "you are going to die in my hands you wee cow" as she gasps for breath. The videos proved pivotal in a 2022 court case when Forrest was jailed for 27 months for attacks on Liz spanning three years. Faced with the CCTV evidence, Forrest pleaded guilty to four charges. But as part of a plea negotiation, commonly known as a plea deal, prosecutors agreed to drop the other seven charges against him. Liz, a 36-year-old firefighter from Blantyre in South Lanarkshire, says she was "devastated" when she discovered that those charges had been dropped. She is part of a group of abuse survivors who are calling for the law to be changed to ensure that victims are notified about plea negotiations agreed in their cases. The leader of the Scottish Conservatives has backed the move, but Justice Secretary Angela Constance has indicated that she is not in favour. Liz says that the first she knew about the plea deal was when she got a phone call to say that the court case was over. "I said: 'Where was my say in this plea deal? Why wasn't I told or given a say?' "I was devastated. I was left frustrated. Disbelief. And I struggled to get the information as to what particular attacks he'd pled guilty to. "Much to my disappointment there was one in particular that had supporting CCTV which he got off with." In that video, Forrest can be seen standing in the driveway waiting for Liz while cracking his knuckles. When the car pulls up he launches into an attack, screaming at her and pulling the door open, before lunging into the driver's side. Liz says Forrest strangled her inside the car for almost 10 seconds. The footage then shows him slamming the door on her foot and kicking the car window before dragging her terrified pet dog away by its lead. Forrest was initially charged with assault to the danger of life for the attack. A not guilty plea was accepted. "I just felt like part of my world had fallen apart," said Liz. "I'd been fighting so long and so hard to see the end result for this." She said that if he had been convicted on that charge, it would have given her "validation" - something that was really important for most victims. Liz said that notifying victims of a plea deal would prevent them feeling like "a spectator" in the whole process. She is part of a group of seven campaigners, featured ina BBC Disclosure documentaryon domestic abuse last year, who are calling for more rights for victims going through the justice process. Most of them say they were not informed of the outcomes of plea deals in their cases. In these negotiations, a procurator fiscal can accept some not guilty pleas if the accused admits other charges. Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay is attempting to get changes to the way plea deals are handled included in the new Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill. He said: "We're not against the use of plea deals but we think it's a basic requirement that there should be transparency around their use, and that victims should be given a full explanation as to when they're used, why they're used and the terms that are reached. "Quite often what happens is charges are either watered down or indeed dropped altogether even where there's an abundance of evidence to support specific charges, so inevitably when people don't even get told about this, or perhaps find out by accident, it causes them additional distress." Mr Findlay proposed two amendments to the bill, which would enshrine in law the requirement for a victim to be notified when a plea deal is reached in their case. He failed to win support last time the bill was discussed at Holyrood, but intends to press the case again when it reaches its final stage of the parliamentary process. Liz and other campaigners are writing to the justice secretary asking her to support those amendments. Ms Constance outlined her opposition to this move at a recent justice committee hearing, saying it could "add complexity to the system that victims need to navigate". And she added: "Removing individual choice could be traumatic when the victim has made an informed decision not to engage." A Scottish government spokesperson said the justice secretary was willing to continue to consider what more could be done to ensure victims receive the information they are seeking. The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service says plea deals avoid the need for a trial and the stress of witnesses having to give evidence. A spokesperson said it was "committed to listening to victims whilst working with partners across the criminal justice system in the continual improvement of the communication process". Dr Marsha Scott, the chief executive of Scottish Women's Aid, said it should be possible to engage with survivors in "a respectful and informed way". "This not about forcing engagement with survivors, this is about opening the process to them so that it's transparent, so they understand what's happening and so that they can control as much as possible their engagement with the system. "The plea negotiations or plea bargains are a significant area that needs improvement." Simon Brown is president of the Scottish Solicitors Bar Association, which represents criminal defence solicitors. He said complainers – the alleged victims in a case – should be notified of plea negotiations, but warned against further concessions. "I think this issue becomes problematic when you have to ask for their consent," he said. "Complainers don't have the necessary legal knowledge to know what is and isn't admissible in evidence. "Obviously by the nature of being a complainer, they're going to be biased against anything resolving short of guilty." Liz Shanks says she will continue campaigning for changes that will benefit abuse survivors, and has been working with the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service to develop policy and training around the issue. She is expecting her first baby with a new partner, and says this shows that there can be light at the end of the tunnel. "I know from what I went through that you're so low, you don't believe that something as good as that could happen to you," she adds. "But life is so much better. And if I can take something negative and make it into something positive and help other people, it makes me feel better about what's happened to me." If you've been affected by the issues in this story you can findinformation and support hereon BBC Action Line.

Back to Home
Source: Bbc News